top of page

SATURDAY 19-7-23

Saturday 10-7-23

Verse(s) for today:

O taste and see that the LORD is good: Blessed is the man that trusteth in him.

Psalm 34:8 KJV

Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

Philippians 2:5 KJV

And he said unto them, go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Mark 16:15 KJV


I am taking a break this LONG WEEKEND... Not likely Reporting Sunday & Monday


"Israel is at War" on this Jewish Holiday of Simchat Torah:

ISRAEL IS AT WAR! This is a last minute update on the massive, unprovoked, surprise attack that hit Israel early this morning - 50 years since the Yom Kippur war when Arabs launched a surprise attack! After coming home very late from a night of feasting and rejoicing with family in their Sukkah on the last night of the festival, we were awoken just a few short hours later on shabbat morning by the wailing of air-raid sirens and the exposion of bombs here in Southern Israel.

Hamas fires a large number of rockets towards Israel in the city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, October 7, 2023.(photo credit: ABED RAHIM KHATIB/FLASH90)

As we ran down the stairs to a place of semi-shelter, my heart broke to see my neighbor and his children all huddled together under their staircase. How we long for the day when Yeshua will bring peace and our children will no longer have to hide in fear from our enemies.

At least 5 IDF soldiers have been kidnapped and other soldiers and civilians taken hostage. Israelis flock to donate blood as hundreds of victims have been wounded by the missile blasts and many others have died.

As we ran down the stairs to a place of semi-shelter, my heart broke to see my neighbor and his children all huddled together under their staircase. How we long for the day when Yeshua will bring peace and our children will no longer have to hide in fear from our enemies.

In an unprescedented attack, fully armed terrorist commandoes inflitrated Israel by overtaking IDF soldiers at the Gaza border & breaking down the fence, as well as coming in by boat and paragliders. What was to be a day of great rejoicing has turned into a day of horror as the Jihad Islamic terrorists have been breaking into houses, slaughtering the inhabitans (including women and children) and shooting people in the streets in Southern Israeli communities. At least 5 IDF soldiers have been kidnapped and other soldiers and civilians taken hostage. Israelis flock to donate blood as hundreds of victims have been wounded by the missile blasts and many others have died.

THE CONCLUDING DAYS OF SUKKOT - THE GREAT SALVATION! As we approach the end of Sukkot (the Feast of Tabernacles), we celebrate with three concluding festive days. The seventh day is called Hoshana Rabah (Great Salvation) { הוֹשַׁעְנָא רַבָּא } when the Jewish people cry out “Hoshana Adonai” - “Save us Lord!” As Yeshua rode into Jerusalem just before Passover, the people of Israel waved palm branches and cried out, Hosha - Na!” (Save us!). “Baruch Haba B’shem Adonai” (Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord)! Melech Yisrael (King of Israel)!” (John 12:12-13) The cries of God’s people are not in vain, for God promises that all who call upon His name will be saved. And everyone who calls on the name of Yehovah יהוה will be saved; for on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there will be deliverance, as Adonai has said, among the survivors whom Adonai calls.” (Joel 2:32)

Seven Hoshanot

While during Sukkot, the Jewish people walk in a daily circuit around the synagogue holding the four species of branches and fruit, on the last day (Hoshana Rabah) seven circuits - called hoshanot - are observed. This custom originates from the days of the Holy Temple. What do these circuits represent? They are to demonstrate our joy and thanksgiving for a blessed and fruitful year. Why seven circuits on the last day? Seven is a number in the Bible that symbolizes perfection, wholeness or completion (as in the 7th day Sabbath when all of creation was complete and perfect).

It is believed that encircling something or someone seven times breaks down the walls of separation, just as when the Israelites encircled the walls of Jericho seven times, “the wall fell down flat.” (Joshua 6:20) For this reason a Jewish bride will traditionally encircle her bridegroom seven times before approaching the altar. This is believed to tear down any walls of separation between them and give her entrance into the depths of her beloved’s heart. It is a beautiful Jewish custom.

SHMINI ATZERET (שְׁמִינִי עֲצֶרֶת ) – "Eighth [day of] Assembly" For seven days present food offerings to the Lord, and on the eighth day hold a sacred assembly and present a food offering to the Lord. It is the closing special assembly; do no regular work.” (Leviticus 23:36; see also Numbers 29:35) If the number seven is so meaningful – representing ‘wholeness, completion and perfection’ – why do we need an ‘eighth day’? The eighth day of Sukkot is also special. The Hebrew word for ‘eighth’ is ‘shmini’ שְׁמִינִי.

Eight - Above & Beyond! What does this mean to us and how does this relate to Shmini Atzeret? Although seven is the number of completion and perfection, God gives us an additional day to celebrate that goes even beyond seven! This tells us of the amazing wonders that God will reveal to those who love Him. But, as the Word says, “No eye has seen, no ear has heard and no one’s heart has imagined all the things that God has prepared for those who love him.” (1 Corinthians 2:9)

Eight - New Beginnings! Eight is the number of new beginnings. The full week of seven has been completed and we begin again. It is a number of the great hope we have through covenant with the Almighty God. To be a ‘Hebrew’ is called an ‘Ivri’ עברי. It comes from the root word that means ‘to cross over’. All of us who are in the Messiah, whether Jewish by birth or not, have ‘crossed over’ from the Kingdom of darkness into the Kingdom of Light (of His Son); therefore we are all in essence ‘Ivrim’ עברים (Hebrews). There is another related meaning that comes from this root word. m’ever’ מעברmeans ‘beyond’. These blessings that we receive through the New Covenant are far above and beyond even anything we could ask, or think, or even imagine! Wow! “Now to the One being able to do exceedingly above and beyond all things that we ask or think, according to the power working in us.” (Ephesians 3:20)

Showers of Blessings Rabbinic Tradition teaches that on the eight day of assembly, Shemini Atzeret, God judges the world for water, deciding on the amount of rainfall for the coming year, therefore the Jewish people recite special prayers for rain on this day. God’s covenant with Israel also promises ‘rain in its season’ as long as the people of Israel walk in obedience. I will bless them and the places surrounding my hill. I will send down showers in season; there will be showers of blessing.” (Ezekiel 34:26)

Hope of the Messiah Water is a recurring theme throughout the festival of Sukkot; but why is there such an emphasis on water? Besides the obvious need for rain to water the earth, the rains also symbolize showers of blessing and specifically, the hope of the coming Messiah.

The Lord Will Pour Out His Spirit Like Rain! How wonderful to feel the first raindrops this week on Sukkot here in Israel where it doesn't rain at all during the long, hot summer! Water is such a precious resource and rain is desperately needed. The “early and latter rain” is a biblical symbol for the final outpouring of the Holy Spirit, which God has promised:

Be glad, O children of Zion, and rejoice in the Lord your God, for he has given the early rain for your vindication; He has poured down for you abundant rain the early and the latter rain, as before.... And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh;" (Joel 2:23-28)

However, it was after He poured out His soul even unto death on a cross, that God poured out the ‘rain of the Holy Spirit’ upon the earth.

Simchat Beit Hashoeva - Last Day Ceremony On this final day of the Feast, a special ceremony is performed called Simchat Beit Hashoeva (Rejoicing of the House of Drawing of Water), originating from a Second Temple period custom in which the Cohen (priest) would draw water from the Pool of Siloam and pour it out upon the altar.

Yeshua, the word used in this verse is also the Hebrew name for Jesus the Messiah. It meansGod is salvation’ or God saves.

[Voice For Israel]


Voice For Israel



Trozzi Report: 2023-10-06 Dr Byram Bridle Justifiably Angry Doctors Sucharit Bhakdi, Byram Bridle, Peter McCullough, Jessica Rose, Mark Trozzi, Janci Lindsey, Brigitte König, with Kevin McKernan MSc and Christof Plothe DO 1.Our understanding of natural immunity verses the covid-19 “vaccine “failure, renders us justifiably angry, like Dr Bridle, at physicians and bureaucrats, who for lack of knowledge, wisdom, or courage, sentenced Sheilla Annette Lewis to death. Here is the three-minute clip where Dr Bridle delivered this important explanation and astute accusation. This is the first clip published from the September 20th 2023 Bright Light News event with both Dr Malones and myself also speaking at the Grand Eglinton Theater in Toronto. 2. We have all waited for a civilized conversation and constructive public debate between widely different perspectives and opinions regarding covid-19 and the genetic jabs. Here it is! Tonight! On line from anywhere , or in person in Kitchener, Ontario. Viral Immunologist Dr Byram Bridle and Medical Officer of Health Dr Matt Straus.

[Dr Mark Trozzi]

P.s. If you are unable to access today´s post by clicking the link above, please copy and paste the full URL into your internet browser for access to today´s material.



22 Years Ago, October 7, 2001, US-NATO Invaded Afghanistan:

It Was Presented as “Act of Self Defense:

The legal argument used by Washington and NATO to invade Afghanistan was that the September 11 attacks constituted an undeclared “armed attack” “from abroad” by an unnamed foreign power, and that consequently “the laws of war” apply, allowing the nation under attack, to strike back in the name of “self-defense.”

Both the media and the US government, in chorus, continue to point to the 9/11 attacks and the role of Al Qaeda, allegedly supported by Afghanistan, when in fact (amply documented) Al Qaeda was an intelligence asset created by the CIA.

Thanks for reading Michel Chossudovsky! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.


Lest we forget, Osama bin Laden had been recruited by National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski during the so-called Soviet-Afghan war.

The bombing and invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001 was described as a “campaign” against “Islamic terrorists”, rather than a war.

To this date, however, there is no proof that Al Qaeda was behind the 9/11 attacks.

Even if one accepts the official 9/11 narrative, there is no evidence that Afghanistan as a Nation State was behind or in any way complicit in the 9/11 attacks.

The Afghan government in the weeks following 9/11, offered on two occasions through diplomatic channels to deliver Osama bin Laden to US Justice, if there were preliminary evidence of his involvement in the 9/11 attacks. These offers were casually refused by Washington.

Where Was Osama on September 11, 2001?

To this date, Osama bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda, is identified in military documents and official statements of both the Bush and Obama administrations as the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks.

The Afghan government (the “Taliban regime” in official documents) is identified as supporting Al Qaeda and providing refuge to its leader Osama bin Laden inside Afghan territory in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

On September 10, 2001, according to a CBS news report, Osama bin Laden was in Pakistan. He had been admitted to a Pakistani military hospital in Rawalpindi. (CBS Evening News with Dan Rather; CBS, 28 January 2002, See also Michel Chossudovsky, Where was Osama on September 11, 2001?, Global Research, 11 September 2008):

“DAN RATHER, CBS ANCHOR: As the United states and its allies in the war on terrorism press the hunt for Osama bin Laden, CBS News has exclusive information tonight about where bin Laden was and what he was doing in the last hours before his followers struck the United States September 11.

This is the result of hard-nosed investigative reporting by a team of CBS news journalists, and by one of the best foreign correspondents in the business, CBS`s Barry Petersen. Here is his report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) BARRY PETERSEN, CBS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Everyone remembers what happened on September 11. Here`s the story of what may have happened the night before. It is a tale as twisted as the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

CBS News has been told that the night before the September 11 terrorist attack, Osama bin Laden was in Pakistan. He was getting medical treatment with the support of the very military that days later pledged its backing for the U.S. war on terror in Afghanistan (CBS, op cit, emphasis added)

Recovering from his hospital treatment in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, how could Osama have coordinated the 9/11 attacks?

How could Afghanistan be made responsible for these attacks by Al Qaeda?

Bin Laden is a national of Saudi Arabia who, according to CBS News, was not in Afghanistan, but in Pakistan at the time of the attacks.

The Invasion of Afghanistan: NATO’s Doctrine of Collective Security

The legal argument used by Washington and NATO to invade Afghanistan was that the September 11 attacks constituted an undeclared “armed attack” “from abroad” by an unnamed foreign power, and that consequently “the laws of war” apply, allowing the nation under attack, to strike back in the name of “self-defense”.

The “Global War on Terrorism” was officially launched by the Bush administration on September 11, 2001. On the following morning (September 12, 2001), NATO’s North Atlantic Council meeting in Brussels, adopted the following resolution:

“if it is determined that the [September 11, 2001] attack against the United States was directed from abroad [Afghanistan] against The North Atlantic area“, it shall be regarded as an action covered by Article 5 of the Washington Treaty”. (emphasis added)

In this regard, Article 5 of the Washington Treaty stipulates that if:

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.” (NATO, What is Article 5, NATO Topics – NATO and the Scourge of Terrorism, accessed 24 November 2009, emphasis added)

“Use of Armed Force” Only “If It Is Determined…”

There was an “if” in the September 12 resolution. Article 5 would apply only if it is determined that Afghanistan as a Nation State was complicit or behind the 9/11 attacks.

In practice, the “if” had already been waived prior to 9/11. The entire NATO arsenal was already on a war footing. In military terms, NATO and the US were already in an advanced state of readiness. Known to military analysts, but never revealed in the Western media, the implementation of a large scale theater war takes up to one year (or more) of advanced operational planning, prior to the launching of an invasion.

Moreover, there was evidence that the war on Afghanistan had been planned prior to 9/11.

The North Atlantic Council in Brussels responded almost immediately in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, in the morning of September 12, 2001.

The use of article 5 of the Washington Treaty had in all likelihood been contemplated by military planners, as a pretext for waging war, prior to 9/11.

There was, however, no official declaration of war on September 12th. The Alliance waited until 3 days before the invasion to declare war on Afghanistan, an impoverished country which by no stretch of the imagination could have launched an attack against a member state of “The North Atlantic area”.

The September 12 resolution of the Atlantic Council required “determination” and corroborating evidence, that:

1) Al Qaeda led by Osama bin Laden with the support of a foreign power had ordered the “attack from abroad” on the United States of America;

2) The terrorist attacks of 9/11 constituted a bona fide military operation (under the provisions of Article 5) by an alleged foreign country (Afghanistan) against a NATO member state, and consequently against all NATO member states under the doctrine of collective security:

“Article 5 and the case of the terrorist attacks against the United States: The United States has been the object of brutal terrorist attacks. It immediately consulted with the other members of the Alliance. The Alliance determined that the US had been the object of an armed attack. The Alliance therefore agreed that if it was determined that this attack was directed from abroad, it would be regarded as covered by Article 5. NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson, subsequently informed the Secretary-General of the United Nations of the Alliance’s decision.

Article 5 has thus been invoked, but no determination has yet been made whether the attack against the United States was directed from abroad. If such a determination is made, each Ally will then consider what assistance it should provide. In practice, there will be consultations among the Allies. Any collective action by NATO will be decided by the North Atlantic Council. The United States can also carry out independent actions, consistent with its rights and obligations under the UN Charter.

Allies can provide any form of assistance they deem necessary to respond to the situation. This assistance is not necessarily military and depends on the material resources of each country. Each individual member determines how it will contribute and will consult with the other members, bearing in mind that the ultimate aim is to “to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area”.

By invoking Article 5, NATO members have shown their solidarity toward the United States and condemned, in the strongest possible way, the terrorist attacks against the United States on 11 September.

If the conditions are met for the application of Article 5, NATO Allies will decide how to assist the United States. (Many Allies have clearly offered emergency assistance). Each Ally is obliged to assist the United States by taking forward, individually and in concert with other Allies, such action as it deems necessary. This is an individual obligation on each Ally and each Ally is responsible for determining what it deems necessary in these particular circumstances.

No collective action will be taken by NATO until further consultations are held and further decisions are made by the the North Atlantic Council. (NATO, NATO Topics – NATO and the Scourge of Terrorism, accessed 24 November 2009, emphasis added)

The Mysterious Frank Taylor Report

The final decision to invoke Article 5 in relation to the 9/11 attacks came three weeks later upon the submission to the NATO Council of a mysterious classified report by a US State Department official named Frank Taylor. The report was submitted to NATO on October 2nd, 5 days before the commencement of the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan.

Frank Taylor was working in the US State Department. He had been entrusted with the writing of a brief to establish whether the US “had been attacked from abroad,” pursuant to the North Atlantic Council’s resolution of September 12 2001.

US Ambassador at Large and Co-ordinator for Counter-terrorism Frank Taylor briefed the North Atlantic Council on October 2nd, five days before the commencement of the bombings.

On October 2nd he handed his brief to NATO “on the results of investigations into the 11 September attacks…. (NATO – Topic: Terrorism, NATO and the fight against Terrorism, accessed 24 November 2009).

The classified report was not released to the media. And to this date, to our knowledge, it has remained classified.

NATO’s Secretary General Lord Robertson casually summarised the substance of the Frank Taylor report in a press release:

“This morning, the United States briefed the North Atlantic Council on the results of the investigation into who was responsible for the horrific terrorist attacks which took place on September 11.

The briefing was given by Ambassador Frank Taylor, the United States Department of State Coordinator for Counter-terrorism.

This morning’s briefing follows those offered by United States Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and United States Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and illustrates the commitment of the United States to maintain close cooperation with Allies.

Today’s was classified briefing and so I cannot give you all the details.

Briefings are also being given directly by the United States to the Allies in their capitals.

The briefing addressed the events of September 11 themselves, the results of the investigation so far, what is known about Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaida organisation and their involvement in the attacks and in previous terrorist activity, and the links between al-Qaida and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

The facts are clear and compelling. The information presented points conclusively to an al-Qaida role in the September 11 attacks.

We know that the individuals who carried out these attacks were part of the world-wide terrorist network of al-Qaida, headed by Osama bin Laden and his key lieutenants and protected by the Taliban.

On the basis of this briefing, it has now been determined that the attack against the United States on September 11 was directed from abroad and shall therefore be regarded as an action covered by Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, which states that an armed attack on one or more of the Allies in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all.

I want to reiterate that the United States of America can rely on the full support of its 18 NATO Allies in the campaign against terrorism.”

(Lord Robertson, NATO Secretary General, statement to the NATO Council, State Department, Appendix H, Multinational Response to September 11 NATO Press, accessed 24 November 2009, emphasis added)

In other words, on October 5, 2001, two days before the actual commencement of the bombing campaign on October 7, the North Atlantic Council decided, based on the information provided by Frank Taylor to the Council “that the attacks were directed from abroad” by Al Qaeda, headed by Osama bin Laden, thereby requiring an action on the part of NATO under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty (NATO – Topic: Terrorism, NATO and the fight against Terrorism, accessed 24 November 2009).

NATO action under article 5, was outlined in an October 4 decision, 3 days before the commencement of the bombings. This NATO decision implied eight measures in support the United States, which were tantamount to a declaration of war on Afghanistan:

to enhance intelligence sharing and co-operation, both bilaterally and in appropriate NATO bodies, relating to the threats posed by terrorism and the actions to be taken against it;

to provide, individually or collectively, as appropriate and according to their capabilities, [military] assistance to Allies and other states which are or may be subject to increased terrorist threats as a result of their support for the campaign against terrorism;

to take necessary measures to provide increased security for facilities of the United States and other Allies on their territory;

  • · to backfill selected Allied assets in NATO’s area of responsibility that are required to directly support operations against terrorism;

  • · to provide blanket overflight clearances for the United States and other Allies’ aircraft, in accordance with the necessary air traffic arrangements and national procedures, for military flights related to operations against terrorism;

  • · to provide access for the United States and other Allies to ports and airfields on the territory of NATO nations for operations against terrorism, including for refuelling, in accordance with national procedures;

  • · that the Alliance is ready to deploy elements of its Standing Naval Forces to the Eastern Mediterranean in order to provide a NATO presence and demonstrate resolve; and

  • · that the Alliance is similarly ready to deploy elements of its NATO Airborne Early Warning Force to support operations against terrorism. NATO – Topic: Terrorism, NATO and the fight against Terrorism, accessed 24 November 2009 emphasis added)

Press reports of Frank Taylor’s brief to the NATO Council were scanty. The invocation of Article 5, five days before the bombings commenced, was barely mentioned. The media consensus was: “all roads lead to Bin Laden” as if bin Laden was a Nation State which had attacked America.

What stands out are outright lies and fabrications. Moreover, prior to October 2nd, NATO had no pretext under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty to intervene militarily in Afghanistan.

The justification was provided by Frank Taylor’s classified report, which was not made public.

The two UN Security Council resolutions adopted in the course of September 2001, did not, under any circumstances, provide a justification for the invasion and illegal occupation of a UN member country. (See: Security Council resolution 1368 (2001) Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts, Security Council resolution 1373 (2001) Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts).

UNSC Resolution 1373 (2001) called for prevention and suppression of terrorist acts, as well suppression of the financing of terrorism:

“(e) Ensure that any person who participates in the financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice and ensure that, in addition to any other measures against them, such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts;

“3. Calls upon all States to:

“(a) Find ways of intensifying and accelerating the exchange of operational information, especially regarding actions or movements of terrorist persons or networks; forged or falsified travel documents; traffic in arms, explosives or sensitive materials; use of communications technologies by terrorist groups; and the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction by terrorist groups;

“(b) Exchange information in accordance with international and domestic law and cooperate on administrative and judicial matters to prevent the commission of terrorist acts;

“(c) Cooperate, particularly through bilateral and multilateral arrangements and agreements, to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and take action against perpetrators of such acts;

“4. Notes with concern the close connection between international terrorism and transnational organized crime, illicit drugs, money-laundering, illegal arms-trafficking, and illegal movement of nuclear, chemical, biological and other potentially deadly materials, and in this regard emphasizes the need to enhance coordination of efforts on national, subregional, regional and international levels in order to strengthen a global response to this serious challenge and threat to international security;

“5. Declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations (excerpts of UNSC Resolution 1373 (2001, See also UN Press Release SC 7178 SECURITY COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTS WIDE-RANGING ANTI-TERRORISM RESOLUTION; CALLS FOR SUPPRESSING FINANCING, IMPROVING INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, Security Council, 4385th Meeting, September 2001)

Nowhere in this resolution is there any mention of military action against a UN member State.

The War on Afghanistan Had Been Planned Prior to 9/11

Known and documented, the war on Afghanistan had been planned prior to 9/11. According to Jane Defense, India had been approached in March 2001 by US to participate in a US military operation against Afghanistan:

Insider accounts published in the British, French and Indian media have revealed that US officials threatened war against Afghanistan during the summer of 2001. These reports include the prediction, made in July, that “if the military action went ahead, it would take place before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest.”

The Bush administration began its bombing strikes on the hapless, poverty-stricken country October 7, and ground attacks by US Special Forces began October 19. (See Patrick Martin, US planned war in Afghanistan long before September 11,, November 20, 2001)

According to statements of former foreign Secretary of Pakistan Niaz Naik, the US had already decided to wage war on Afghanistan prior to 9/11 ( BBC report published one week after the attacks, September 18, 2001) ”

Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.

Russian troops were on standby. …

The underlying objective according to Mr Naik, was to “topple the Taleban regime” and install a government “possibly under the leadership of the former Afghan King Zahir Shah.”

He said that he was in no doubt that after the World Trade Center bombings this pre-existing US plan had been built upon and would be implemented within two or three weeks.

Concluding Remarks: Twenty-two Years Later

Afghanistan did not attack America on September 11, 2001.

The war on Afghanistan was already on the Pentagon’s drawing board prior to 9/11.

The US led war on Afghanistan, using 9/11 as a pretext and a justification, is illegal and criminal.

The US and NATO heads of state and heads of government from 2001 to the present are complicit in the launching of a criminal and illegal war.

Invoking article 5 of the Washington Treaty is an illegal and criminal procedure. The (former) US and NATO heads of state and heads of government should be prosecuted for war crimes.

[This article was first published by Global Research on October 4, 2012 with minor edits on October 6, 2023.]

Thanks for reading Michel Chossudovsky!


HYp0CR!T? (1 Min)

T3RR@!N: Th3 R3@L PurP0$3 0f V!Ru$3$ (5 Min)

$T3W: P0P3 CL3@R4 W@Y +o BL3$$ $0D0MY (11 Min)

U C@N G3T a M@$T3R$ D3Gr33 !n D3V!L W0r$H!P (17 Min)

!ND!@ M00N L@nD!NG: "C@N S0M#0n3 T3LL M3 !f Th!$ !s R3@L?" (13 Min)

BLU3 L!gHT & H3@LTH (3 Min)

K!W!: PM H!PK!N$ Pu$H!Ng M@G!C P0T!0N & 3LV!$ (1 Min)

M@N!T0Ba Pr3M!3R W@B K!N3W: $@YS "J@B !s $aCr3D" (1 Min)

Th3 $@TaN!C H!P H0P !nDu$rY Xp0$3D "Wh@T'$ Th3 B!G $3Cr3T?" (25 Min)

3LV!$: H0W Gr3@T Th0U ArT (3 Min)

R0B3RT J0HN$0N: $3LL!nG H!$ $0UL (22 Min)

$@TaN'$ PL@N F0R Th3 F@K3 Tr!BuL@T!0N (27 Min)

N!G3R!@N$: BURN Th3 B@NK$**CBDC !s CXLed (3 Min)

N3!L: 14 A!RL!N3$ G0 B@nKRuPT**Th3Y PL@N +o $T0P U FLY!nG (20 Min)

Dr. Peter McCullough On 'The Holy Grail Of COVID-19 Vaccine Detoxification':

[Rebel News Media]

Dr. Peter McCullough has been a voice of reason in a broken healthcare system, crazed with COVID hysteria.

As a global leader in his field, Dr. McCullough — internist and cardiologist — has worked tirelessly to educate us all on the science behind COVID and the vaccines, all while being censored for speaking scientific truth.

And, unfortunately, his warnings about vaccines have come to pass.

In a recent article, Dr. McCullough said:

“Far and away the most common question I get from those who took one of the COVID-19 vaccines is: ‘how do I get this out of my body?’ The mRNA and adenoviral DNA products were rolled out with no idea of how or when the body would ever break down the genetic code. The synthetic mRNA carried on lipid nanoparticles appears to be resistant to breakdown by human ribonucleases by design so the product would be long-lasting and produce the protein product of interest for a considerable time period... it is a big problem when the protein is the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 Spike.

This leaves the dissolution of Spike protein as a therapeutic goal for the vaccine injured. With a respiratory infection, Spike is processed and activated by cellular proteases including transmembrane serine protein 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin, and furin.

With vaccination, these systems may be avoided by systemic administration and production of Spike protein within cells.

As a result, the pathogenesis of vaccine injury syndromes is believed to be driven by the accumulation of Spike protein in cells, tissues, and organs.

Nattokinase is an enzyme produced by fermenting soybeans with the bacteria Bacillus subtilis var. natto and has been available as an oral supplement. It degrades fibrinogen, factor VII, cytokines, and factor VIII and has been studied for its cardiovascular benefits.

Out of all the available therapies I have used in my practice and among all the proposed detoxification agents, I believe nattokinase and related peptides hold the greatest promise for patients at this time.”

If you or someone you love needs nattokinase, The Wellness Company’s Spike Support Formula contains nattokinase plus other extracts known to help the body recover from spike protein exposure — both from the vaccine and from COVID-19.


In The Wellness Company’s Spike Support Formula, you will find:

  • · Nattokinase (dissolves spike protein)

  • · Selenium (aids in helping the body repair itself and recover)

  • · Dandelion root (acts as a detoxifying agent supporting better liver function)

  • · Black sativa extract (may facilitate cellular repair)

  • · Green tea extract (provides added defenses at the cellular level through scavenging for free radicals)

  • · Irish sea moss (could help rebuild damaged tissue and muscle)

Click here: [ to order the Spike Support Formula today!]

The Wellness Company strives to build a new health care system that earns people’s trust, governed and operated with transparency, and offering the highest quality practitioners who align at their core with our fundamental belief — to put the patient first.

[Rebel News Media]

Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors:

This is just ‘Informational’ and YOU

must make up YOUR OWN MIND


General Summary

Restored Republics:

  • · The Wed. 4 Oct. EBS Wasn’t The EBS: Thurs. 5 Oct. WHITE HATS DESTROY FEMA’S EBS ( United States Army Rangers on Wednesday upset FEMA’s scheduled emergency broadcast and destroyed the central transmitter, but only after the wicked agency activated an alert that could have exposed patriots to federal harassment, a source in General Eric M. Smith’s office told Real Raw News.

  • · “Hang Him!” Adm. Stephens Says of Corrupt Army Major David Dunbar….But Without Tribunal! | Real Raw News

  • · A new 5,000+ army of Star Link Satellites was already in place to take over Mainstream Media Satellites. The EAS will broadcast over this Star Link System, the Global Alliance’s takedown of the Cabal, showing arrests and Tribunals of Global Elites charged with Crimes Against Humanity. The documentaries have been made in 55 languages and 600 dialects and will be shown on all channels on the Planet.

  • · The Senegalese president announced the dissolution of the country’s government and reported that a new Government led by the prime minister will be announced soon.

  • · Niger: The US State Department is preparing to officially designate the military takeover in Niger as a coup d’etat as soon as next week, three US officials told CNN.

The Real News for Fri. 6 Oct. 2023:

  • · There is Evidence the FBI Planned the January 6 Operation and Planted Documents Days Earlier That Were Later Used Against Innocent Americans. It was discovered that the Government itself was the author of the mysterious “1776 Returns” document. The 1776 Returns document is the title of a 9-page paper that outlined strategic plans for the takeover of US government buildings on January 6, 2021. It was confirmed in court that the FBI was behind the document and the FBI operative was the author of the document.

  • · Fri. 6 Oct. Med Beds and Gesara: The White Hats and the Green Button, Healthcare Revolution & President Trump – Trust the Plan! – American Media Group (

  • · FBI Monitoring MAGNA Supporters:

  • · “Cloud Seeding Science” is just another term for Geo-engineering, and weather modification. First, they “Seed’ the clouds with heavy metal particles, and then they use HAARP to induct the rain via the electro-magnetic frequencies. They have basically confirmed everything that we have already knew years ago that weather modification is real, however it’s just conspiracy theory when we call them out on it.

  • · 46 OF 50 States have recounted the 2020 Election Vote and confirmed that Biden lost, Trump won by 80%. Mainstream Media has yet to report. Why? And why have the other four states refused to recount, or report their recount?

  • · The Biden administration says there is an “immediate need” to wave regulations and build a border wall as the migrant crisis spirals out of control. Remarkable. 4 years ago, this was “racist.” Now they’re advocating for it. There is presently an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads in the vicinity of the border of the United States in order to prevent unlawful entries into the United States in the project areas pursuant to sections 102(a) and 102(b) of [the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996],” Mayorkas said in an announcement. Gee, maybe they shouldn’t have sold all the border wall parts.

  • · Biden’s Fake Inauguration: Go back and watch the FAKE 2020 inauguration. It was 100% filmed on two different days. Shoes changed. People appeared and disappeared. US Marshalls were seen directing traffic on people with names as big as Nancy Pelosi.

  • · Thurs. 21 Jan. 2021: Communist Troops Surround a US Under Martial Law, Inauguration Not Live on TV | Politics | Before It’s News (

31 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page