top of page
Search

Saturday - Where does TIME Go?

Updated: Apr 20

Saturday 4-20-24

 

Verses for today:


Rejoice evermore.

1 Thessalonians 5:16 KJV

 

I have shewed you all things, how that so labouring ye ought to support the weak, and to remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive.

Acts 20:35 KJV

 

Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

1 John 4:4 KJV

 

 

This is “Absurd”!

The Ontario Court of Justice is now requiring all participants to state their “preferred pronouns” before the start of each case. We must lobby our politicians to condemn this absurdity or face the likelihood of gender ideology taking hold in almost all aspects of public life... PRONOUN MADNESS!

 

On April 11, Sharon Nicklas, Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice, announced that all lawyers, clients, and witnesses in the court room must give their “preferred pronouns” at the beginning of each court case. It is now expected that individuals should be referred to using pronouns that do not necessarily correspond to their biological sex, which is a flagrant violation of truth. Demand that the basic truths of gender be respected in Canada - send an urgent message to your politicians today.


This radical gender ideology means that a man will have to be referred to as “she” and “her” if requested, thus allowing men being tried for crimes against women to call themselves women. Indeed, a recent study from the Correctional Service of Canada found that 44% of men placed in female prisons (because they claimed to be women) are being punished for sexual crimes. We must reach out to our legislators and ask them to condemn the court's harmful decision and to work for its reversal.


Canadian leaders' deference to gender ideology will only end when enough people speak up, so please make sure to sign and share our message to Premier Doug Ford and Ontario's MPPs.

The LifeSite Advocacy Team

Larry McGill


A-I as it currently exists will ‘Blow-your-mind’!

Tectonic changes are here and developing beyond anything we can contemplate.

View the VIDEO... and gain an appreciation of what is at the ‘Threshold’ of our FUTURE!

The Future with A-I is hard to contemplate... Get ready for the RIDE-of-your-Life!

Thank you – Don Hill


 

There is a “fundamental flaw” with the COVID-19 mRNA shots.

The mRNA COVID-19 shots “should be completely banned! If they’re going to be used for anything, it has to be what they are, gene therapies,” says renowned oncologist and professor Angus Dalgleish, known for his research in cancer and HIV/AIDS.

 

In an interview with Dr. John Campbell, Dalgleish declared there is a “fundamental flaw” with COVID-19 shots, and the flaw is that “it carries on for an indeterminate period of time.”

What that means is the modified mRNA containing N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) allows the mRNA in the COVID shots to last in the body for an indefinite period of time, leading to an uncontrolled amount of spike protein production.

The bottom line: There is a great likelihood that the shots are causing cancer.

  • ·        Spike protein inhibits the activity of tumor suppressor genes.

  • ·        Spike protein interferes with BRCA, which keeps ovarian and breast cancer in check.

  • ·        The N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) in itself leads to immune suppression. Without the immune system working in full force, it creates conditions conducive to rapid cancer growth—or what some people refer to as “turbo cancer.”

 

As such, Prof. Dalgleish says:

“You should never use them [mRNA shots] in the general population as vaccines because they’re not.”

“They [COVID shots] should be completely banned!”

Angus Dalgleish

The Vigilant Fox

 

This post is going viral.

The Vigilant FOX

Dr. Syafiq Nordin, a restorative medicine doctor from Malaysia, issued a heartfelt apology to his 10K followers for his role in administering C19 shots.

In a viral Facebook post, he wrote (translated to English):

PLEASE FORGIVE ME

1. In light of the recent news about Pfizer, a weakness in the industry, which I am part of, has been revealed.

2. I feel saddened because, before meeting Dr. Razin Jaafar, there were many mistakes in the medical advice I provided, especially concerning COVID.

3. However, I am very grateful to him because I am now more open-eyed and more enlightened about health sciences, which honestly are more natural and fitting to my soul as a medical practitioner and as a Muslim.

4. During the past COVID times, it cannot be denied that it was difficult for health care workers who strived to provide the best health services, and even more difficult for the rest of the citizens facing the lockdown.

5. The administration of the vaccine at that time was seen as the best way, and the mass vaccination program was launched very quickly.

6. I was also involved, in my capacity, in giving medical advice and obtaining 'consent' so that the vaccine could be administered.

7. I, as a medical practitioner, also received 3 Pfizer vaccines.

8. Everything happened in a 'touch & go' manner, it was impossible for me to identify whom I had given medical advice related to this issue.

9. With this, I would like to apologize a thousand times for the mistakes I had made in the previous years, especially to those who came to me during the mass COVID-vaccination season.

10. Honestly, I am incapable of assisting financially should complications occur.

11. However, I will try my best to provide more holistic medical advice, in line with the Restorative sciences brought by Dr. Razin.

 

I apologize, Malaysian Citizens!

Dr. Syafiq Nordin Restorative Medicine

 

Dr. Nordin joins Dr. Drew, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. John Campbell, Prof. Angus Dalgleish, and more who had a change of heart about the shots and could no longer deny the truth.

When I worked in Pharma, we always gauged the sentiments towards our drugs by measuring the positions of KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders). Let’s just say that the more KOLs start making U-Turns, the more likely the "Safe and Effective" narrative will collapse. Secondly, I challenge anyone to create a list of anyone making a U-Turn in the opposite direction...

Get more DETAIL at the above LINK... è

Comments & Remarks:

1.      Mohamad Shafiq: "The best doc.. I salute the doctor for his bravery to admit it. not an easy thing. May more medical practitioners come forward and raise awareness to the people."

2.      Top fan Raja Intan Ris: "Sad but thanks for the open apology Dr Syafiq Nordin. Hopefully more doctors who already know about the badness of V will appear to correct the condition"

3.      Biskut Jagung: "Thank you Doctor for the recognition And the doctor's honesty. I was able to take mom to get her post v treatment with Doctor Razin because the vax has changed my mom's life 360 degrees. From an active, healthy person, able to do various activities to... (See more)"

4.      Wan Hazwani Liyana: "Alhamdulillah the best doctor.... my friend's mother died due to covid despite being vaccinated 2x ... which gap is the goodness of this V that is said to be able to prevent death ... that's why I'm weird... But at that time I was silent because one Malaysian is trusting the goodness of vaccines.... so I choose to just be a stranger ... shut up and look watching around....."

5.      Anwar Sadat: "First time seeing Doc confessing guilty in giving advice thanks to badseen covid. Repent while still alive and apologize to the heirs and patients affected by this poisonous filth.. May Allah Taala accept your repentance..."

6.      Nadia Rozaila: "I'm one of the victims of Pfizer who almost died.. Alhamdulillah Allah still lengthens my life.. I only want to order one thing, Al Kahfi practices it.."

7.      Mohamed Shazni: "Congratulations doctor because doctor is man enough to admit his mistakes and apologize. Hopefully the others will also get rid of their ego and make a massive apology. Including all "religious people" yeah."

8.      Abu Naim: "Thank you for your sincerity, honesty and open thinking Dr. right now. May you be in the forgiveness and blessing of Allah and have a long life for the sake of the health of the nation."

Source - Aussie17:

The Vigilant Fox


  

UN Report Calls for Legalizing Sex Between Adults and Children

A disturbing new report from the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) adds to growing concerns about global leaders pushing to normalize pedophilia.

 

The report “The 8 March Principles for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Criminal Law Proscribing Conduct Associated with Sex, Reproduction, Drug Use, HIV, Homelessness and Poverty” on the UNAIDS website offers legal guidance on issues related to sex, including involving children under age 18.

Without any discussion about what the age of consent should be, the report suggests minors can consent to having sex with an adult.

“Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law,” the report states.

 

It also advises lawyers, judges and law enforcement to consider “the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them” when considering enforcement of laws about sex with minors.

 

The report continues: “Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees.”

 

Please follow LifeNews on Rumble for the latest pro-life videos.

In other words, Live Action News writer Cassy Fiano-Chesser pointed out “the report calls for sex between adults and minors to be decriminalized, so long as the minors ‘consent’ … Minors, of course, cannot truly consent to sex with an adult — something these so-called experts should know.”

However, the report portrays the matter as an issue of rights and acceptance.

 

The forward to the report was written by a “proudly gay” lawyer, Edwin Cameron of South Africa, who argued that laws about sex can make people feel ostracized because of their sexual behavior.

“Criminal law may thus impel hostility, exclusion, inequality, discrimination and marginalization of individuals and groups, sometimes to the point of violence. As a result, human rights, democratic values and social inclusiveness all suffer,” Cameron wrote.

 

He argued that laws criminalizing sexual behavior “codify discrimination” against people of different sexual orientations. Cameron did not mention it, but some now argue that an adult who is sexually attracted to children is a sexual orientation, not a pedophile.

Another disturbing aspect of the report was its insistence that killing unborn babies in elective abortions is a human “right.”

 

The report calls for completely decriminalizing abortions – a move that would protect dangerous untrained abortionists and quacks from prosecution.

“Abortion must be taken entirely out of the purview of the criminal law, including for having, aiding, assisting with or providing an abortion …” the report states.

 

It also argues that pregnant mothers should not be punished for using drugs or alcohol during pregnancy even if the unborn baby is harmed.

The groups involved in creating the report include the International Commission of Jurists, UNAIDS and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, according to Fox News.

LifeNews


 

Is ANOTHER Glenn Beck prediction about to come true?

Nearly two years ago, Glenn Beck issued a warning to his audience: “The federal government [will] use climate change as the national emergency,” which will “give the president the kinds of powers that a president only gets when we are attacked on the homeland and are at war.”

 

Today, Glenn’s prescience was confirmed.

According to a Daily Caller article published Thursday, “White House officials are weighing whether to declare a national climate emergency several months out from the 2024 election.”

However, this isn’t the first time the Biden administration has threatened to flex its climate change muscles.

“The president’s administration previously considered a similar measure back in 2022 once negotiations over clean energy failed ... Biden also said that he declared a climate emergency in 2023 when he implemented ‘conservative policies,”’ the article reported.

 

So, when Glenn said that “all of the agencies that are supposed to protect and defend the Constitution” would be “used to protect and defend the agenda against climate change,” it looks like he may be about to be proved right.

While the decision to officially declare a national climate emergency has not yet been made, the pressure to make such a drastic move is higher than ever considering the upcoming election.

 

The article noted that “such a move could help Biden win over some of the youth vote,” which he desperately needs to beat Trump, whom he’s been trailing in the polls.

According to Aru Shiney-Ajay, the executive director for the Sunshine Movement — an organization that advocates for political action in matters related to climate change — “If Biden wants to win the youth vote, he needs to take forceful action on climate change.”

 

Only time will tell if Biden decides to finally pull the trigger and declare a national climate emergency. However, considering Glenn tends to be quite clairvoyant on these matters, we won’t be shocked if the official announcement comes.


 

 

Seizing Russian assets:

A feel good Bill that will Absolutely Boomerang.

This is NOT Responsible Statecraft:

The Washington foreign policy establishment is on the precipice of making yet another strategic blunder.

The Senate is poised to ram through the Rebuilding Economic Prosperity and Opportunity (REPO) for Ukrainians Act. This legislation will provide the president the authority to confiscate Russia’s frozen sovereign assets in the United States and transfer them to Ukraine for its reconstruction.

 

Confiscating Russia’s sovereign assets is an act of economic war. Seizing and transferring these assets to Ukraine may make Washington feel virtuous, but it will not bring peace. Passage of this bill will only reinforce the view of hardliners in Moscow that Russia’s war lies not just with Ukraine, but really with the United States and the West. Any hope that the United States and Russia could work toward stabilizing or improving relations will subsequently be destroyed.


There is no justification for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but enacting this bill will make peace less likely. Ukrainians have courageously defended their country for nearly two years, but even Ukraine’s former top military commander General Valery Zaluzhny admits the war is now a stalemate.

 

Russia’s frozen assets could be used as a bargaining chip during negotiations, but once Congress provides the president the authority to seize Russian assets, there will be immense political pressure on him to carry out the policy to avoid looking weak. President Biden was recently pilloried by the media and members of my party for returning frozen Iranian assets in exchange for five American hostages. He is unlikely to make that decision again.


Confiscation will only convince Moscow that there is no negotiated settlement to be had with Ukraine. The result will be a destroyed Ukraine. More Ukrainian soldiers and civilians will die, and more cities and towns will be turned to rubble.

 

History is replete with examples of economic warfare turning into violent hostilities. Many historians believe the U.S. embargo of 1807, which was intended to punish France and England for their aggressions at sea, led to the War of 1812. Likewise, FDR’s decision to freeze Japan’s sovereign assets and implement an embargo on oil and gasoline exports led to Tokyo’s decision to attack Pearl Harbor.

 

The past teaches us the folly of embracing every proposed act of revenge. U.S. senators are duty-bound to ask whether our actions will ensure American security and prosperity. In regard to the REPO Act, the Russians already answered that question for us. Moscow says they will retaliate in kind against the United States and our allies, with some estimates claiming upward of $288 billion in Western assets that Moscow could confiscate.

 

Nicholas Mulder, an assistant professor of history at Cornell University, highlights the danger of the “destabilizing precedent that western countries would set by seizing assets to end a war they are not openly involved in.” Professor Mulder states that such an action “would broaden the coercive actions that states could take for disputes to which they are not a direct party.”

 

Confiscating Russia’s assets will also certainly convince other countries, including China, that the United States can no longer be trusted as the guarantor of the global economy. They will seek to move away from the dollar and hold their reserves in other currencies. This process of de-dollarization will be an unmitigated disaster as it will degrade America’s financial strength and ensure the prosperity Americans have come to expect is no longer attainable.

 

In addition, this bill will hand the Russians another tool to fuel resentment against the United States. American leaders speak of a “rules-based international order” but the theory that the United States can confiscate the assets of another country we are not at war with is legally dubious.

 

Professor Mulder argues that “economic reprisals are the prerogative of injured states, not of third parties.” Rather than compel respect for international law, our actions will demonstrate to our adversaries that we are flouting it. This bill will be used by the Kremlin to show the world that while Washington demands that others follow the rules, we are happy to break them whenever we see fit.

 

In a multipolar world, Washington can no longer expect to act with impunity, particularly when dealing with a nuclear power. We understood the serious dangers our country faced during the Cold War. But three decades of repeated foreign policy disasters proves that Washington’s foreign policy establishment is badly broken.

A good way to start on the road to fixing that broken foreign policy is rejecting this disastrous bill.

DIPLOMACY WATCH

Donna Warren


WARNING – WARNING - Warning - Warning

Facebook Executive Jeff Zients Reportedly More Powerful Than Kamala Harris in The White House:

An explosive undercover investigation has brought to light the concealed influencers steering White House directives and strategies.


Tyler Robinson, Special Advisor to Isabel Guzman, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, was filmed covertly by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas discussing significant figures influencing the White House, including former President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.


Undercover footage has captured Tyler Robinson, a Special Advisor to Isabel Guzman, Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA), revealing the internal power dynamics at the White House. The video, which has circulated widely across media outlets, shows Robinson speaking candidly about the influence wielded by Jeff Zeints, former Facebook board member and the current Chief of Staff to the President.

 

According to Robinson, Zeints is described as "the second most powerful person in Washington," suggesting his decisions are deeply aligned with those of the President himself. This assertion raises questions about the actual distribution of power within the current administration.

 

Behind-the-Scenes Influence

Further elaborating on the influence, Robinson disclosed that former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continue to be involved behind the scenes. Their ongoing engagement with the White House activities suggests a continuing influence from past high-profile Democratic figures in shaping current policies and strategies.

 

This information points to a layered influence structure, where decisions and directives may stem from individuals not currently in public office.

Robinson's comments also shed light on how the White House allegedly manipulates official activities for partisan gains. He specifically mentioned that Isabel Guzman, under directives from the White House, travels extensively under the pretext of engaging with small business owners. However, according to Robinson, these trips are often aligned with supporting Democratic candidates in crucial swing states.

 

He described scenarios where Guzman was instructed to selectively invite Democratic politicians to events, excluding their Republican counterparts. This selective engagement raises concerns about potential violations of the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in certain forms of political activity.

 

Questionable Activities Under Scrutiny

Robinson’s revelations extend to specific directives from the White House regarding whom Guzman should support. He recounted directives to "invite Senator Tester" but to exclude Republican politicians from similar events. Such practices, as described, could heavily skew the perceived neutrality expected from federal officials.

 

Additionally, Robinson highlighted efforts to assist Democratic congress members in their re-election campaigns, explicitly stating that visits were planned with this objective in mind. This further implicates the administration in activities that may not only raise ethical questions but also legal ones regarding the Hatch Act.

 

The influence of Jeff Zeints over Vice President Kamala Harris was another critical point made by Robinson, who explicitly agreed that Zeints held more sway than Harris within the White House. This comment has sparked debates about the roles and influence of elected versus appointed officials in governing the country.

 

The ongoing involvement of figures like Obama and Clinton, as revealed by Robinson, also paints a complex picture of loyalty and power within the Democratic party, suggesting that past leaders have a continuing impact on current administration strategies.

 

Implications for Political Transparency

The implications of such revelations are significant, highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability in how government operations are conducted. The public's trust in their elected officials could be at stake if the administration's actions are perceived as being unduly influenced by a few individuals behind the scenes.

This story not only questions the ethical boundaries of current White House operations but also challenges the administration to clarify the roles and influence of both visible and hidden figures within its ranks.

 

Conclusion: Reassessing Government Integrity

In conclusion, the uncovered interactions involving Tyler Robinson reveal a web of influence and political strategy that may contravene legal and ethical standards. The roles of Jeff Zeints, as well as the continued involvement of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, suggest a complex interplay of power behind the current administration. Such revelations necessitate a closer examination and possibly, a reassessment of how political operations are managed and executed in the highest offices of government.

The American Digest


 Follow up instructions for Bill C367 and Bill C63:

God told us "I want you to rewrite history because we have just one more shot. If we miss, there will be a Bill 367 coming against us. You HAVE TO REWRITE IT" 

Both of the following alarming bills have had first reading in parliament. FYI: There are still several more steps before a bill becomes law but it's important to jump on this now before second reading when debates over these bills will happen.


Bill C-367—is a real threat to religious freedom

-under the Canadian Criminal Code we currently have something called “a religious exemption” that allows you to express your opinion based on religious texts (eg. found in the Bible). This Bill proposes to AMEND THE CRIMINAL CODE TO TAKE AWAY THIS ‘RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION’ so it strips our protection to publicly express our faith which then opens up the real possibility that our biblical views would be classified as ‘hate speech’

 

Bill C-63 -- Wants to amend Bill 63 (Online Harms Act) “ criminalizes speech.” 

Bill C-63 seeks to include an amendment to define “hate” which currently doesn’t have a definition. The problem with the proposed definition is that the terms are too broad. This creates the opportunity of calling just about anything hate speech.

Bill C63 also seeks to broaden the “Hate Crime” offences to capture any offence under any act of parliament that is motivated by hatred.

The problem with these proposed amendments is the threat that prosecutors could manipulate defendants to agree to unnecessary plea bargains to avoid adding “Hate Crime” to a simple criminal charge like spray-painting graffiti that some would find offensive.

No Canadian should face an anonymous human rights complaint for what they have said.

No Canadian should be hauled before a court or punished merely because somebody “fears” they will say something hateful.

No Canadian should face life imprisonment for their expression.

 

What can you do?

1.       You can sign a petition for Bill C-63 on the website: Justice Centre For Constitutional Freedoms:  https://theccf.ca/fix-c-63/

 “Stop the Online Harms Act”

  AND 

2.       Currently there is NO petition for Bill C-367 so instead please call, ask for a face-to-face meeting with your MP (Member of Parliament) or write a letter.

 

 

Please see the following... [Suggested Format] for a sample letter that you can copy and paste, use as is, or modify to express your personal views.

The Citizen Action Group

Following is a suggested Contact Memorandum... [Translate into your own WORDS] and send to your Member-of-Parliament!


Your name 

Your address

Date

MP Name

MP Address/Riding

Dear MP name,

I am writing to you to express my concern about Bill C-367.

On the surface Bill C-367 seems honorable in wanting to prevent hatred against certain people

groups:

" This enactment amends the Criminal Code to eliminate as a defense against willful promotion

of hatred or antisemitism the fact that a person, in good faith, expressed or attempted to

establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a

religious text"

 

I put to you that the wording of Bill C-367 goes beyond the scope of just eliminating the defense

against willful promotion of hatred or antisemitism, (which is not clearly defined), but it infringes

on all Canadians’ freedoms and protections when expressing a religious view. 

The Canadian Criminal Code already contains sections that address the willful promotion of

hatred and antisemitism. So, what is the purpose of this bill?

 

Bill C-367 seems to be an overreach of power that will eliminate Canadian citizens from freely

expressing their opinion or belief based on religious text on any topic.

Has anyone considered how the passing of this Bill will impact the amendments proposed in Bill

C-63? Every Canadian will be at a substantial risk of being criminally charged and/or have

restricted freedoms for simply expressing a religious view that is different from someone else

(especially if that person chooses to be offended)! These two bills working, in conjunction with

one another, will present frightening restrictions of freedom of speech and freedom of religion in

our country!

 

As my Member of Parliament, I am asking you to advocate on my behalf to eliminate this bill. It

is imperative to uphold our Canadian Charter to protect our rights and freedoms to express an

opinion on any religious subject based on religious text. 

I am imploring you, as my elected Member of Parliament, to speak on my behalf and express

my objections to Bill C-367.

Sincerely,

 

Your Name

Your Title (Constituent Riding)

The Citizen Action Group

 



Concerns Mount Over Potential Political Retribution Against Jan. 6 Committee Members

By Victor Winston

updated on April 19, 2024

The specter of retribution looms large over members of the disbanded U.S. House Jan. 6 select committee.


Former President Donald Trump's remarks hinting at the arrest of his political detractors have ignited a wave of apprehension among those who investigated or testified about his actions surrounding the Capitol riot.

CBS News reported that members of Congress who played significant roles in the investigation of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot expressed fear over their safety. This worry stems from Trump's public threats and the possibility of his return to office.

 

Representative Adam Schiff, a key figure in the committee, shared personal concerns regarding him and his family's safety. "My wife and I have had conversations about what life would look like if the worst happened," articulated Rep. Schiff, highlighting the gravity of the threats they perceive.


Representative Pete Aguilar, another member who faced Trump's wrath, recounted conversations with his family about their resilience and support no matter the circumstances. They assured him of their unwavering presence, even if it meant visiting him "no matter where I am."

 

Testimonies Highlight the Fear of Justice Being Weaponized

Former police officer Michael Fanone, who testified about his harrowing experiences during the riot, vehemently believes Trump would misuse his powers. Before his quote, Michael Fanone cautioned about the potential misuse of justice: "He's going to weaponize the Department of Justice...and use it to go after people like myself."


Ex-Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, another pivotal figure during the committee's hearings and now a candidate for a U.S. House seat in Maryland, echoed similar sentiments about Trump's threats as concrete threats rather than mere political bluster.

 

Statements from the Trump campaign have done little to alleviate these fears, branding the Jan. 6 committee's investigation as deceitful and allegedly covering up facts.


This narrative, intensifying the divide, was detailed in a campaign release that condemned top Democrats and Liz Cheney alike, painting them as the true threats to democracy.

 

An Ongoing Concern for the Democratic Process

Political analyst Erica Frantz commented on the troubling nature of Trump's posts, stressing the negative impact such rhetoric could have on democratic norms:

This sort of post is not what you want to see out of your political leaders in a healthy democracy... It's intended to invoke fear among them and deter them from speaking out against Trump.

 

The committee, which was forced to disband after Republicans regained control of the House in late 2022, had made strides in uncovering Trump's role in the events leading up to and during the January 6 attack.


Throughout their tenure, committee members faced increasing hostility and threats from sections of the public aligned with Trump. These incidents underscore the polarized reaction to the committee's findings and the heated atmosphere surrounding its members.

 

In conclusion, disbanding the Jan. 6 committee has not marked the end of its saga. The fears of its former members concerning potential political retribution from Trump illustrate continuing tensions and the fragility of democratic institutions in the face of political vindictiveness. The statements and actions of key figures involved reveal a troubling landscape where political conflicts are feared to potentially spill over into personal peril.

Capitalism Institute

'THEY' have reason to be afraid... 'Their' SINS have found them out!



Rumors – Rumors - Rumors – Rumors – Rumors

 

RUMOURS Circulating out there...:

You need to MAKE-UP Your own MIND!


SUMMARY:

Note: 

 

The EVENT – It is Biblical: …The 17th Letter (JFK Jr, VP USA Republic) on Telegram Fri. 19 April 2024

  • ·        There is going to be a BIG Biblical Scenario where they make out it’s World War Three, but really they are activating Militaries then bombing all of these Satanic Luceriferian landmarks, enacting GESARA funds and We The People rebuild.

  • ·        WW3 Scare Event. Nuke Sirens. Water Event. Stock Market Crash. Global Martial Law

  • ·        34 Satanic Buildings and Dams will Fall Worldwide with the Rods of God/DEW attacks: Q showed us the very big Satanic Illuminati landmarks: Vatican, Buckingham Palace, White House x 2 (USA, Germany), Three Gorges Dam in China. Cern on the Swiss/ French Border possible.

  • ·        Planes & Trains grounded; Lights/Power switched off while changing over to Tesla Free energy

  • ·        Bitcoin Servers/Data Center hit and turned off for good. 99.5% of Crypto gone China Coins. Enter ISO20022 Coins backed by Precious Metals. Quantum Systems. Project Odin Switched on. Nesara/Gesara/RV

  • ·        Election Flipping via Military Courts – FISA

  • ·        Military Tribunals/confessions/10 day movie – 3 × 8 hr sessions.

  • ·        10 countries will be running EBS to cover the whole World.

  • ·        Project Odin is part of Quantum Starlink. Our new Quantum Systems are to be protected by Secret Space Programs out of the Cabal’s reach.

 

Note:

END



27 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page