SUNDAY / MONDAY
New BLOG – Great ARTICLES
SUNDAY/MONDAY 9 -[27/28]-26
SPIRITUAL:
Verse-for-TODAY [Sunday]
New International Version
But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.
Read all of Matthew 6 ►
Verse-for-TODAY [Monday]
New International Version
The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.
Read all of 1 Corinthians 2 ►
After eight remarkable years, the groundbreaking faith-based series, "The Chosen," has officially concluded filming, marking the end of a transformative journey from humble beginnings to a global phenomenon.
Dallas Jenkins arrived on the set of The Chosen Thursday a little more relaxed than normal, a little less stressed and definitely less hurried.
Thursday marked the final day Jenkins and his cast and crew would gather near Dallas, Texas, to film the popular series, which began in 2018 with a skeleton crew and a big dream: to make the first multi-season television series about Jesus – and, in the process, show His extraordinary impact on the people He encountered.
After 528 days on set – spanning eight years, seven seasons and plenty of sweat and tears – Jenkins wrapped filming, sent everyone home and took a deep breath.
The Chosen was finished.
Of course, the public has yet to experience the final two seasons of the series, with Season 6 set to launch in November and Season 7, the final season, on schedule for a 2028 release.
But for Jenkins, Thursday represented the end of a marathon.
“This morning, when I was praying, I just said to God, ‘What a thing You did, what a thing You’ve done,’” Jenkins said in a video for fans, “and I’m grateful to be a part of it and I’m grateful that you’re part of it.”
Jenkins has long joked that once The Chosen was behind him, he would take a nap for a year before figuring out what comes next.
Thursday’s milestone doesn’t mean that The Chosen is in the can – post-production is still underway for the final two seasons – but it did mark a major milestone in a journey that once seemed improbable.
The Chosen began as a crowdfunded project struggling for attention and funding, but during the COVID-19 pandemic grew into a worldwide phenomenon. Eventually, its biggest stars, including Jonathan Roumie, who portrays Jesus, landed on the covers of magazines and on the sets of late-night television shows.
Jenkins spoke Thursday like a man with a burden finally lifted from his shoulders.
Typically, on the way to set, Jenkins said, he’s focused only on the day ahead. But not on Thursday.
“I am usually [seeing] a little stress hanging over [me] – I’m usually prepping the scenes that day, and I’m just super focused,” he said as he drove to set Thursday. “I am in a great mood today. I woke up earlier than I wanted to, but then I couldn’t go back to sleep because I was just too excited. I’m very grateful for you for helping me get here and helping us get here.”
Jenkins even saw a little symbolism in the 528-day total. The company that produces The Chosen is named 5&2 Studios – a reference to the five loaves and two fish Jesus used to feed the 5,000 – while eight is often associated in biblical symbolism with new beginnings and resurrection.
“It’s kind of cool,” he said.
Season 6 will center on the crucifixion of Jesus and the events leading up to it, while Season 7 will bring the series to its long-planned conclusion with the resurrection and its aftermath.
CANADIAN:
People are vandalizing national parks, healthcare is a mess, and no one’s being held accountable — and Sonduren Fanarredha says Canadians have been too willing to accept it for too long.
Summary [ChatGPT]
The episode of Sonduren Uncensored ties several issues together under one theme: government accountability and whether Canadians should expect better performance from their institutions.
Banff National Park: It opens with alleged vandalism/desecration in Banff, arguing that damaging nationally significant places should bring stronger consequences.
B.C. snap election: Premier David Eby has indeed called an early October 24, 2026 election, saying U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and threats have substantially changed B.C.'s circumstances. Critics, including the episode, argue domestic problems deserve more attention. ABC News
Immigration and infrastructure: The program questions whether housing, healthcare and infrastructure expanded quickly enough alongside international students and temporary workers. Importantly, Ottawa has now sharply reduced new arrivals: the federal government says new student arrivals were 80% lower from January–July 2026 than in the same period in 2024, while new temporary-worker arrivals were 59% lower. Canada
Jobs and young Canadians: The Costco job-fair example is used to illustrate competition for entry-level employment. There is a real broader concern here: youth unemployment was 14.3% in April 2026, well above the pre-pandemic average of 10.8%. Statistics Canada The federal government says temporary residents were a contributing factor, but not the sole cause; economic slowing, tariff uncertainty and other changes also matter. Canada
Healthcare: The cancer patient's decision to seek U.S. treatment becomes the episode's symbol for frustration with access and waiting times in Canada's healthcare system.
The program's central message is captured by its question, “Why have we accepted this mediocrity?” That's the host's judgment rather than a neutral factual finding. The underlying argument is that problems involving employment, affordability, healthcare, addiction, homelessness and public safety should be judged by measurable outcomes—and governments held accountable for those outcomes.
For the illustration, I centered it on “CANADA — WE CAN DO BETTER,” with Banff, the B.C. election, tariffs, immigration/job competition, healthcare, homelessness and opioids surrounding it.
Juno News
[ChatGPT]
TRUMP:
A reported tariff agreement and coal pledge emerge from the Chinese president's visit.
The United States and China have agreed to lower tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods in each direction following a three-day summit in Washington between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to the White House, the two countries “reached consensus on recommendations for more favorable tariff treatment for $30 billion of non-sensitive goods in each direction.” The summit concluded Friday, and Xi departed for Beijing on Saturday.
Under the agreement, China will lower tariffs on American agricultural products, fish and seafood, logs and wood products, cosmetics and medical devices. The United States will reduce tariffs on Chinese-made small appliances, toys, holiday decorations and children’s car seats. China also agreed to import 10 million metric tons of American coal in 2027 and another 10 million metric tons in 2028. The two sides also extended their existing trade truce, which had been set to expire November 10, by two months.
The deal was negotiated through the new U.S.-China Board of Trade, first proposed during Trump’s visit to China in May and formally established during Xi’s visit this week. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said “a lot more details” about the agreement will be released Monday. Neither government has yet released final tariff rates or complete product lists. The leaders also agreed to a military communication memorandum meant to prevent crises and to launch a dialogue on artificial intelligence, with talks set for November.
The agreement marks a sharp de-escalation from the trade fight that began in February 2025, when Trump imposed a 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, citing Beijing’s role in the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration. Tariffs climbed as high as 145% by April 2025, with China answering with levies of up to 125%. A 90-day truce in May 2025 brought rates down, and a tentative agreement that October included Chinese commitments on fentanyl precursors and soybean purchases. The White House said the two nations “continue to work on U.S. concerns regarding supply chain shortages related to rare earths and other critical minerals, with the goal of ensuring shipment levels return to appropriate levels.”
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the truce extension would give both sides “more time to see what we can do on the economic front.” Farm-state Republicans made clear they are still waiting on Beijing. Rep. Mike Flood (R-Neb.) said on Friday that he hoped Xi “makes good on his promise to buy soybeans,” adding, “This was a promise made in March of this year. I know that, two weeks ago, they bought 1 million cubic tons of soybeans. He’s got a ways to go.” Flood said that would “go a long way with American agriculture and Nebraska soybean farmers.”
Others raised national security concerns. Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said Friday, “China is enabling Iran. They’re supplying what [are] dual-use materials, and, in this most recent instance, something that could target our men and women in the military.” Meanwhile, Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.) said Trump’s decision to show Xi historic documents at the National Archives, including 19th-century U.S.-China treaties, likely reflected “America’s commitment to remaining a world leader,” though he said he did not know the president’s exact intentions.
For American families, the most immediate impact could show up on store shelves. Toys, holiday decorations, small appliances and children’s car seats are among the Chinese imports set for lower tariffs, which could ease costs heading into the holiday season. For farmers, fishermen, loggers and coal miners, the deal opens the door to more sales in one of the world’s largest markets, but only if Beijing follows through on commitments it has made before and not always kept.
The summit also shows the administration’s strategy of using tariffs as leverage to force Beijing to the negotiating table. Key issues, including rare earth supplies, technology restrictions, Taiwan and China’s support for Iran, remain unresolved. With more details expected Monday and further meetings scheduled this fall, the coming weeks will reveal whether this deal delivers real results for American workers or becomes another promise China fails to keep.
America First News
The former president says federal bribery and political patronage have declined significantly.
Barack Obama just said something so out of touch with how ordinary Americans feel about Washington that even sympathetic commentators are having trouble spinning it.
The former president used the launch of his brand new podcast to make a claim that will strike most Americans as detached from reality. Obama said that people are always surprised when he tells them the federal government is so much less corrupt than it probably has ever been, in terms of pure bribes, patronage, or favors.
Think about that for a second. At a time when trust in government institutions has cratered and Americans have watched a revolving door between Washington offices and corporate boardrooms spin faster than ever, the man who occupied the Oval Office for eight years wants Americans to believe corruption is basically a thing of the past.
The comments came in the first episode of Obama’s new six-part series. The show, called A Great Book with Barack Obama, premiered on Amazon’s Audible platform and features Obama discussing books that shaped his worldview with various public figures.
The specific episode paired Obama with a sympathetic media voice, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Jill Lepore, discussing Robert Penn Warren’s 1946 novel All the King’s Men, a book about a corrupt Southern political machine.
Obama’s argument was that old-fashioned bribery and patronage have declined so much that Washington actually functions worse as a result. He claimed reforms cutting down on old-school corruption also stripped away what he called lubrication that once helped bridge ideological divides in Congress and get people to vote for things they were not comfortable with.
Read that carefully. The former president is nostalgic for a system where lawmakers were bought off with favors in exchange for votes, because at least it got things done.
Obama pointed to a specific era of American politics to make his case, referencing Lyndon B. Johnson’s style of legislating and describing how cornering lawmakers and hustling them for votes worked not through physical intimidation but by asking what they needed.
The timing of these comments could not be more politically inconvenient for his own party. Obama’s remarks came just as Democrats have been trying to turn government corruption into a defining midterm election issue, particularly around President Trump’s business dealings.
It is hard to imagine a worse unforced error for Democratic strategists. Right as the party tries to hammer home a message that Washington corruption has spiraled out of control, their most prominent living former president went on tape insisting the federal government is cleaner than it has arguably ever been.
The numbers make Obama’s claim look even more disconnected from how Americans actually feel. A record 89 percent of American adults believe government corruption is widespread, according to Gallup polling.
Break those numbers down further and the picture gets even worse for Obama’s argument. Gallup found that 91 percent of Democrats, 90 percent of independents, and 83 percent of Republicans all described government corruption as widespread.
This is not a partisan perception gap that Obama can wave away as Republicans simply distrust a Democrat-controlled government. Nine out of ten members of his own party think corruption is rampant in Washington, and Obama just went on a podcast to tell them they are wrong.
To be fair, some outlets pointed out Obama was making a narrower point than the headlines suggest, focused specifically on bribery, patronage, and favors rather than the broader forms of corruption most Americans have in mind.
That distinction may satisfy media fact checkers eager to give Obama the benefit of the doubt, but it will do little to change how the comments land with ordinary voters. Most Americans do not parse the difference between old-fashioned patronage and the modern forms of corruption they see every single day, from insider stock trading among lawmakers to federal contracts flowing toward politically connected firms.
Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.
AMERICA First News
Lame-duck Democrat files 26 impeachment articles against Trump as midterm fight heats up
By Craig Barlow
See more of the truth in your search results. Click below, then SELECT the checkbox.Add Capitalism Institute on GoogleDemocrat Steve Cohen filed 26 impeachment articles against President Trump, a dead-on-arrival measure he calls a roadmap if Democrats seize the House in 2026.Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee introduced a sprawling resolution laying out 26 articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, a move that stands virtually no chance of advancing in the Republican-controlled House.
Cohen cast the filing as more than a protest. He presented it as a blueprint for the next Congress if voters hand Democrats the speaker’s gavel in the 2026 midterms, and he will not be there to pursue it himself.Breitbart reported the Tennessee Democrat’s announcement came nine days after the House already shelved related motions from another Democrat. The battle for House control is intensifying ahead of those midterms.
Cohen calls Trump “the most impeachable President”Cohen serves on the House Judiciary Committee. In a statement issued Thursday, he left little doubt about his view of the president or of his own party’s Republican colleagues.Cohen said:
“Trump is clearly the most impeachable President our country has ever endured. His continued presence in office is a danger to our democracy. That the sycophantic Republican majority in Congress is derelict in its duty does not mean that I must abandon my responsibilities.”
He tied the filing directly to his oath of office.Cohen said:“I took an independent oath to support and defend the Constitution. That commitment compels me to introduce this resolution today. When historians write about this period, and our constituents ask who stood up to President Trump’s lawlessness, this resolution is the answer.”
He added that he “sincerely believe[s] that the 120th Congress will better live up to its duties as co-equal branch of government and a check on the executive,” and that he hopes the resolution “paves the way to accountability.”“We cannot tolerate this kind [of] lawlessness and corruption,” Cohen said.
House already rejected a similar push from Al GreenCohen’s filing did not arrive in a vacuum. On September 15, the House voted 232-147 to shelve motions from Rep. Al Green, the Houston Democrat. That rejection came nine days before Cohen unveiled his own 26-article package.Under current GOP leadership, Cohen’s resolution is expected to be tabled. The measure has virtually no path in a Republican majority. Cohen framed it anyway as preparation for a possible Democratic majority after November voting.
He will not serve in that next Congress as a representative. In May, Breitbart News reported that Cohen ended his bid for re-election after redistricting efforts made a win in his Memphis-area seat unlikely. Come January, on day one of the 120th Congress, he will be gone.
Twenty-six articles target Trump’s second-term agendaCohen’s resolution runs the length of the administration’s second-term priorities and beyond. The articles, as labeled in the filing, cover elections, foreign operations, immigration enforcement, spending, personnel, media, and more.
The list includes:
1. Article I: Undermining Democracy, Sowing Doubt in Elections
2. Article II: Waging War on Iran Without Congressional Approval
3. Article III: Extrajudicial Killings in International Waters of Venezuela
4. Article IV: Deploying Military Forces Against United States Cities
5. Article V: Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
6. Article VI: Canceling Federal Grants to Punish States for Their Votes
7. Article VII: Imposing Loyalty Tests on the Federal Workforce
8. Article VIII: Disregard of Courts involving the Alien Enemies Act and Kilmar Abrego Garcia
9. Article IX: Cruel and Unusual Punishment at CECOT detention facilities
10. Article X: Unlawful Withholding of Appropriated Funds and Dismantling Congressionally Established Programs
11. Article XI: Obstructing the Lawful Appointment of United States Attorneys
12. Article XII: Defying Court Orders in Immigration Enforcement
13. Article XIII: Abolishing a Congressionally Mandated Agency (The Department of Education)
14. Article XIV: Mass Termination of Inspectors General Without Statutory Notice
15. Article XV: Unilaterally Taxing U.S. Citizens Through Emergency Powers Tariffs
16. Article XVI: Political Prosecutions of James Comey, Letitia James, and Adam Schiff
17. Article XVII: IRS Settlement and Corruption of the Judgment Fund
18. Article XVIII: Corrupt Use of the Pardon Power
19. Article XIX: Banishing Reporters from the White House over Disfavored Coverage
20. Article XX: Coercing CBS and ABC to Change Editorial Content
21. Article XXI: Retaliatory Executive Orders Against Law Firms
22. Article XXII: Coercing Universities Through Withheld Federal Funds
23. Article XXIII: Demolishing the White House East Wing Without Congressional Approval
24. Article XXIV: Illegal Impoundment of Appropriated Funds
25. Article XXV: Self-Aggrandizement through Renaming Public Institutions, Seizure of Civic Property, and Personal Appropriation of National Currency
26. Article XXVI: Emoluments Violations, Profiting Personally and Directly from the Presidency
Several titles take direct aim at core second-term policies: the birthright citizenship executive order, mass deportation and immigration enforcement, use of the Alien Enemies Act, federal deployments to U.S. cities, tariffs under emergency powers, and moves involving the Department of Education. Others allege interference with prosecutors, the press, law firms, universities, inspectors general, and appropriated funds.
Article XVI names James Comey, Letitia James, and Adam Schiff under a “political prosecutions” heading. Article VIII pairs court disputes with Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Article IX cites conditions at CECOT detention facilities. The package also reaches the White House East Wing, the pardon power, and emoluments claims.
Cohen’s office posted the comprehensive articles of impeachment. Newsweek also covered the introduction. The underlying factual claims inside each article rest on Cohen’s characterizations and the titles themselves; the resolution packages them as grounds for removal.
A roadmap written by a member on the way out
Cohen did not hide the political timing. He said he wants the 120th Congress, if Democrats win the House, to treat the document as a working plan for oversight and accountability against the executive branch. The fight for that majority is already underway.Republicans hold the chamber now. They just voted down Green’s motions by a wide margin. Cohen’s 26-article resolution faces the same leadership and the same math. He introduced it anyway, then reminded readers he is leaving.
The sequence is plain. A Houston Democrat’s push fails on the floor. Nine days later a Tennessee Democrat on the Judiciary Committee drops a far longer indictment. That Democrat has already quit the race for his redrawn seat. He hands the next Democratic majority a pre-written case and walks out the door in January.Voters still decide in 2026 whether any of it becomes more than a press release and a committee-member farewell.
Impeachment theater from a lame-duck member who already lost his district is not constitutional duty, it is a campaign memo dressed up as high crime, and the House already showed what it thinks of the script.
By Craig Barlow
GLOBAL:
Judicial Watch Weekend Playback
FITTON: New Emails Show Utah Valley University Staff Hated Charlie Kirk!
FITTON FURIOUS: FBI Hiding Butler Records and CIA Called Out by Fed Court on Jan 6 Cover-Up!
FITTON: FBI Outrageously Claims it Will Take 158 Years to Release "Hidden Room" Records!
Judicial Watch: Judge Orders Hearing in Lawsuit Against the CIA for January 6 Records
Taxpayer-Funded Health Care Programs Hit With $17.5 Billion in Fraud in One Year
The JUDICIAL WATCH
Daniel Brooks INPUTS:
Daniel Brooks INPUTS:
èDANIEL
Dan’s Daily Briefing — September 28, 2026
1. American import bans on Canadian goods begin tomorrow
Facts: On September 29, the United States will begin prohibiting imports of most Canadian alcoholic beverages, certain dairy products and motorcycles.
The measures escalate the dispute beyond tariffs and follow Canada’s retaliatory duties on approximately C$20 billion in American goods. Washington says Canada discriminates against American producers; Prime Minister Mark Carney has so far resisted another immediate round of retaliation. Reuters background | Global News update, published September 27
Why it matters to Dan: The affected categories are smaller than steel or automobiles, but outright bans establish a dangerous precedent. Ontario producers lose access regardless of whether they could absorb or offset a tariff.
Canada should diversify trade while eliminating its own internal barriers. It is difficult to condemn economic walls at the border while maintaining a tasteful collection of smaller ones between provinces.
2. Oil rebounds as Iran talks stall—but Gulf exports keep recovering
Facts: Brent crude rebounded by more than 3% on September 28 after Trump rejected Iran’s proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the conflict.
However, preliminary Kpler data indicate that exports from major Middle Eastern producers reached 12.8 million barrels daily in September, their highest level since the war began in February. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates led the recovery. Reuters market report, published September 28
Why it matters to Dan: This is the important update: diplomacy has deteriorated, but physical supply is adapting. Alternate terminals, restored infrastructure and limited Hormuz movements are preventing political failure from becoming complete energy paralysis.
For Ontario preparedness, continue watching diesel and freight rather than crude alone. Maintain practical reserves, but the improving export figures argue against panic buying.
Prediction: Oil will remain unusually sensitive to diplomatic headlines, while diesel may stay comparatively expensive because refinery capacity and inventories remain constrained.
3. Swiss voters reject rigid neutrality by more than two to one
Facts: Swiss voters firmly rejected a constitutional proposal on September 27 that would have prohibited most economic sanctions against countries at war and ended peacetime cooperation with NATO.
More than two-thirds opposed the measure. Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis said the result did not abandon neutrality but preserved the government’s flexibility in applying it. Reuters results report
Why it matters to Dan: Yesterday’s unresolved vote now has a decisive result. Swiss voters chose adaptable neutrality over a constitutional rule that critics warned could favour aggressors by making sanctions nearly impossible.
Canada’s geography and alliances make Swiss-style neutrality unrealistic, but the underlying question remains valuable: which commitments genuinely protect the country, and which merely expose it to conflicts without sufficient military capacity?
4. Pope Leo promises abuse survivors continued action
Facts: Pope Leo met privately in Lourdes with seven French survivors of clerical abuse and said he remained committed to ensuring that abuse is confronted and prevented.
The participants were selected after consultation with approximately 40 survivor groups and individuals. During the same visit, Leo told health-care workers that medicine must serve human dignity rather than become an instrument of “programmed death.” Vatican News on the survivor meeting, published September 28 | Vatican News on health care
Why it matters to Dan: The Church cannot speak credibly about protecting vulnerable people at the end of life while failing those harmed under its own authority. Both issues require treating each person as possessing inherent worth rather than institutional usefulness.
Promises now need measurable follow-through: independent reporting, consistent compensation, disclosure of offenders and accountability extending beyond local diocesan discretion.
5. Indian startup prepares an AI-processing satellite
Facts: Indian startup TakeMe2Space plans to launch its MOI-1A satellite aboard a SpaceX rocket on October 1.
The company says customers will be able to upload containerized AI models that analyze imagery aboard the satellite and transmit conclusions rather than the complete underlying dataset. Proposed applications include agriculture, mining, insurance and supply-chain monitoring. Reuters, published September 28
Unconfirmed: The company’s performance, commercial demand and reliability claims have not yet been demonstrated in orbit. The launch has not occurred.
Why it matters to Dan: Processing data in space could reduce transmission delays and bandwidth costs while allowing organizations to receive targeted information faster. It also introduces questions about model security, ownership and whether customers can independently audit the analysis.
For media and asset workflows, the broader trend is familiar: computing is moving closer to where information is created. Apparently even the cloud has decided that Earth-based real estate is becoming inconvenient.
Patrick Bestall’s INPUT:
#1.
Alto train contract invalid?
And I wonder who sold their land to the government at inflated prices?
.PB
#2.
3 from National Post
Last week, Prime Minister Mark Carney predicted his government would balance its operating budget a year earlier than expected. This week, the Parliamentary Budget Office describes Carney's prediction as, and we're paraphrasing here, not bloody likely.
Sentencing can be a highly subjective task for a judge, and in the case of a Winnipeg voyeur, there were multiple factors the judge took into consideration. Chris Lambie explains how an Iranian-born chemist ended up with a conditional discharge.
"The single most damaging habit is that politeness sometimes does not allow us to maintain consistency in how we assert our position, our privilege, and the leverage that we have in the world. For many years, that has over indexed toward a reliance on the U.S., but we have a lot more value to add." — Author Kumaran Nadesan, in explaining to Tracy Moran why Canada’s greatest weakness is its inclination to be too polite.
.PB
#3.
Toronto rally welcomes Shah of Iran, the returning Crown Prince
.PB
#4.
WiFi & Cell Phone Mystery Disruptions
.PB
#5.
CBDC fear in Canada
Public opinion data specifically evaluating "fear" or opposition toward a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in Canada depends heavily on the type of survey conducted. Results vary significantly between broad public polls and targeted consultations:
· Widespread Skepticism and Concern (Public Surveys): In a scientifically sampled national survey by WealthRocket, 56% of Canadians expressed explicit concern about the potential for fraud, 53% were worried about cyberattacks, and 44% feared the potential misuse of their personal spending data. In that same poll, 25% of Canadians stated they would completely refuse to use a digital dollar. [2, 3]
· Overwhelming Opposition (Self-Selected Consultations): When the Bank of Canada conducted a massive public consultation involving over 89,000 respondents, 82% to 86% of participants strongly opposed the idea of the central bank even researching or building a digital currency. Fears cited by this group primarily focused on government surveillance, the erosion of financial privacy, and the forced elimination of cash. However, the central bank noted that this pool was largely self-selected and reflected a highly motivated, distrustful segment of the population rather than the average Canadian. [4, 5, 6, 7]
· Trust Deficits: Highlighting these anxieties, a separate academic analysis found that 74% of respondents completely distrust the federal government's capacity to protect personal payment data, and 58% harbor the same distrust toward the central bank. [1, 8]
Due to this combination of high public anxiety and limited consumer incentive, the Bank of Canada officially scaled down its work on a retail digital dollar, pivoting its focus back to general payment system research. [7]
Are you interested in the specific privacy protections the Bank of Canada originally proposed, or would you like to see how Canadian attitudes toward CBDCs compare to other countries like the United States?
[6] https://tnc.news
.PB
#6.
Wisdom for Perilous Times
"For every word you spend, buy two more." (Anon.)
When someone's talking to you, is it wrong to not pay attention because you're already planning what you're gonna say next?
Should you work with someone who thinks they know it all? (very important when planning or dealing with crisis!)
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND WISDOM:
"It's not how much you know, it's how much you're willing to learn"
A PERSIAN PROVERB:
He who knows not and KNOWS NOT he knows not; he is a fool - shun him.
He who knows not and knows he knows not; he is simple - teach him.
He who knows and knows not that he knows; he is asleep - awake him.
He who knows and knows he knows; he is wise - follow him.
Key Bible Verses
James 1:19: Advises everyone to be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry, prioritizing reception over immediate reaction.
Proverbs 18:13: States that answering before listening is folly and shame, bringing disgrace through poor judgment.
Ecclesiastes 5:2: Warns against hasty speech, encouraging restraint and letting words be few.
Proverbs 18:2: Notes that fools prefer airing their own opinions over gaining understanding.
Proverbs 29:20: Suggests that speaking in haste leaves little hope, even compared to a fool.
Proverbs 3:5: Lean not on your own understanding.
Ecclesiastes 5:1: Declares that drawing near to listen is better than the sacrifice of fools. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
· 100 Bible Verses about Quick To Listen And Slow To Speak
Guard your steps when you go to the house of God. To draw near to listen is better than to offer the sacrifice of fools, for they ...
· Scott Kedersha
What does the Bible say about listening? — Scott Kedersha
According to the Bible, God wants us to be better listeners. Here are some Bible passages about listening: *Proverbs 26:11** "A...
· City Bible Forum
The wisdom of the listening leader | City Bible Forum
According to Proverbs, listening is a hallmark of a wise person. The fool, on the other hand, never stops talking. Some proverbs a...
.PB
#7.
A civilian who breached the perimeter at MacDill Air Force Base and Violently Engaged Security was detained Saturday
Analysis — 5 significant points [ChatGPT]
1. There was an unauthorized perimeter breach. On Saturday, September 26, at roughly 1 p.m., a civilian without authorization breached the perimeter at MacDill Air Force Base near the Dale Mabry Gate. Independent local reporting attributes this information directly to the 6th Air Refueling Wing. WTSP
2. The encounter became violent. Base officials said the person then “violently engaged” security personnel. The civilian was detained, while one security officer and the civilian suffered non-life-threatening injuries and received medical treatment. No additional injuries were reported. Patch
3. The gate was shut down. MacDill closed the Dale Mabry Gate to inbound and outbound traffic that afternoon and instructed people to avoid the area. That indicates officials treated the incident as an active security situation while they secured and investigated the scene. WTSP
4. MacDill's strategic importance makes the incident noteworthy. MacDill supports both U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM). Air Force material identifies the 6th Air Refueling Wing as the host unit responsible for base security and support to those commands and other partners. MacDill Air Force Base
5. The biggest questions remain unanswered. As of the latest reporting I've found, authorities have not publicly identified the civilian, disclosed a motive, explained precisely how the perimeter was breached, or announced charges. The investigation remains ongoing. That means it's too early to conclude whether this was terrorism, espionage, a deliberate attempt to reach a sensitive facility, or an unrelated individual incident. WTSP
Bottom line
The article's central factual claim is supported: an unauthorized civilian breached MacDill's perimeter, violently confronted security, injured an officer, and was detained. The significance is heightened because of MacDill's national-security role.
But there's an important distinction: saying this incident raises legitimate questions about how the perimeter was breached is supported by the facts; saying it demonstrates a systemic security breakdown would require information investigators haven't released yet.
The AMERICAN Almanac
ChatGPT
Fox News
Civilian detained at Florida Air Force base after security attack | Fox News
The AMERICAN Almanac
.PB
#8.
Legal guns gaining popularity in Canada!
With home invasions surging in Canada, firearms are becoming more popular
National Firearms Association executive vice-president Blair Hagen said that a common theme he heard from those attending a gun show were concerns over how common armed home invasions are becoming in Canada.
.PB
#9.
Justice in UK is insane!!
.PB
#10.
EU's war with Russia?
A self-fulfilling prophecy?
.PB
#11.
The return of Serfdom, Homesteading, Herbalism, and Perma-culture farming
Half the farms in America are rented! That's what they did in the Middle Ages. It's called Serfdom. Look it up. Better still, read the little book we published ten years ago predicting a return to the past, "Church - Coming of Age". I can send you an email copy.
To learn about the best Permaculture farming for Canada, contact Don Brooks and ask for his Power Point Presentation. A box full of compressed Prairie Permaculture can feed as many animals as a bale of hay! No fertilizer. Tractor fuel is a by-product. Wait 'til the guys in the video above find out about this!
.PB
#12.
A Christian Land Acknowledgement
for Sept. 30, National Day for Truth and Reconciliation
The Principles behind a Christian “Acknowledgment of the Land”
Before revising, we must define the anchors that prevent ideological drift:
1. God is the sole owner of all land — Leviticus 25:23: “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine.”
2. Every people group is a temporary steward, not an absolute possessor.
3. Injustices committed against any people — Indigenous or otherwise — are violations of God’s command to justice and charity.
4. True reconciliation occurs only through Christ, not through state mediation or territorial sentimentality.
5. Land and humanity share one Creator; the ecological and moral order stand or fall together.
With those truths in view, notice how an authentic Christian Land Acknowledgment sounds radically different from the standard political template.
Refined Theologically Orthodox Land Acknowledgment
**“We acknowledge that the land upon which we gather belongs to God alone, who created heaven and earth and entrusted them to humanity for wise and loving stewardship. Throughout history many peoples have lived here; we give thanks for those who took care of creation and lament the injustices that defiled it. We confess that whenever any of us have used the land for greed rather than gratitude, we have sinned against the Creator.
Today, we renew our commission as stewards of God’s creation, seeking reconciliation not through words alone but through justice, humility, and faith in Jesus Christ, who restores harmony between heaven and earth.”**
.PB
#13.
Says midterms are a REFERENDUM on far left DSA
Summary [ChatGPT]
1. Mamdani says his politics can go national. In his CNN Amanpour interview, he explicitly argued that New York’s affordability problems—housing, childcare and transit—reflect challenges facing working-class Americans nationwide. CNN Transcripts+1
2. He frames this as a revival of the New Deal tradition. Mamdani invokes FDR and argues Democrats can reconnect with working-class voters through ambitious government programs. That is his political argument, rather than evidence that the national electorate agrees.
3. There is measurable growth of democratic-socialist identification among Democrats. A July 2026 CNN/SSRS poll found roughly one-third of Democratic and Democratic-leaning adults identified as democratic socialists; the group was particularly supportive of moving the party left. AABC17NEWS+1
4. The movement has had primary-election successes. Democratic-socialist candidates have won several prominent Democratic primaries, although success in Democratic primaries does not by itself establish support among the broader electorate. AABC17NEWS
5. Mamdani has also built an extensive digital communications ecosystem. Columbia Journalism Review documented a network of more than 200 influencers receiving city-related information, including talking points and clips through a Signal group. CJR also identified city-funded programs involving influencers, while distinguishing those from simply paying creators to praise Mamdani. CColumbia Journalism Review
6. The central political question remains unresolved: whether enthusiasm for democratic socialism among a substantial segment of Democratic voters can translate into broader national support. The article presents that as a wager; Mamdani argues yes, while critics such as Bill Maher argue the movement represents a much more radical ideological shift.
Overview
MAMDANI'S NATIONAL ARGUMENT
The strongest factual takeaway is that Mamdani himself is now explicitly presenting his political model as national, while polling documents genuine growth of democratic-socialist identification inside the Democratic coalition—but whether that translates beyond that coalition remains an open electoral question.
.PB
RUMOUR:
RUMOURS Circulating out there...:
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website, and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
I may not agree with everything from the content-producers that I share.
Apply critical thinking and use discernment to
Come to your own conclusions regarding the content!
You need to MAKE UP Your own MIND!
What we think that we now know...
REPORT Today
The world keeps spinning, and now you’re caught up.
GP Q: President Trump Reposted JFK’s Most Terrifying Speech
A vintage microphone, handwritten papers, and fountain pen create an atmosphere of old-world radio storytelling.
GP Q@argosaki
PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST REPOSTED JFK’S MOST TERRIFYING SPEECH — AND THE DEEP STATE IS PANICKING
JFK saw it coming. In 1961. And now, Trump has just made sure 300 million Americans see it, too.
The speech everyone’s talking about: Kennedy’s address to the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961. The CIA had just botched the Bay of Pigs. Kennedy was livid. He’d been lied to by his own intelligence apparatus. And he walked onto that stage and said something no president has dared say since.
“We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice.”
Read that again. Monolithic. Ruthless. Conspiracy.
This wasn’t some fringe radio host. This was the sitting President of the United States, on live television, telling the American people that a shadow network of power — operating through intelligence agencies, media complicity, and institutional capture — was working against the republic itself.
And then he said the quiet part out loud:
“Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
Sound familiar?
Sixty-five years later, Trump drops this video on Truth Social. No commentary needed. The speech does all the work. And within hours, the same media outlets that spent four years calling Trump a conspiracy theorist are suddenly very quiet.
Here’s what they don’t want you to connect:
• Kennedy was assassinated 2.5 years after this speech
• The Warren Commission was a joke — even the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979 concluded Kennedy was “probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy”
• The files are STILL classified
• Trump has been pushing to release them, but the permanent national security state refuses, instead slow-walking the order
The timing isn’t random. This isn’t just history. JFK described a permanent national security state that has only grown more entrenched — one that operates beyond elections, beyond accountability, beyond the reach of voters.
Kennedy called it “a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations.”
That machine didn’t disappear when he died. It got even stronger.
Trump reposting this isn’t nostalgia. It’s a signal. The same forces JFK warned about are the same forces that tried to destroy Trump — Russiagate, two impeachments, lawfare, media blackout, assassination attempts. The playbook hasn’t changed. Only the names.
And now the sitting president just reminded the country who the real enemy has always been.
The speech that scared them then is the speech they’re terrified you’ll watch now.
Sharing this because they’re counting on you not to watch it. Don’t let them win.
Source(s):• https://x.com/argosaki/status/2103803531052679233Contact AuthorIf you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
======
Return Power to We the People
Rob Cunningham | KUWL.show
Return power to the people
→ reform the rules governing money
→ make room for financial innovation
→ establish lawful digital dollars
→ clarify digital asset markets
→ open modern payment infrastructure.
• President Trump’s January 20, 2017 inaugural promise set the purpose: government and its institutions should serve the American people.
• His February 3 EO 13772 identified 7 governing principles a new US financial system should embrace and ordered Treasury to identify rules that respected those principles.
• Treasury’s July 2018 report then detailed how the regulatory system could accommodate nonbank finance and new financial technology.
• In his second term, President Trump’s direction became even more concrete.
• Trump’s January 2025 digital finance order made responsible digital asset and blockchain growth administration policy.
• Congress passed the GENIUS Act, which he signed in July 2025, creating a federal framework for payment stablecoins.
• The SEC launched Project Crypto that month; in January 2026, it became a joint SEC–CFTC effort to coordinate crypto market oversight.
• Trump’s May 2026 order then addressed integrating financial technology with established payment systems, including a review of access to Federal Reserve payment services.
The through line is Authority over Money.• Who may build a payment system?• What backs a digital dollar?• What rules govern its exchange?• Who gets access to settlement infrastructure?
President Trump’s leadership actions moved those questions from inherited NGO Federal Reserve arrangements into explicit U.S. law, new regulatory policy, and public debate.
This is the straight line connection between “Giving power back to We the People” and President Trump’s monetary reforms transforming our world.
These documented facts are 100% indisputable.The chance of these facts being “coincidental” is exactly 0%.
Promises Made. Promises Kept.
Welcome to our New World of Distributed Access to Real World Abundance for all humanity.
Source(s):• https://x.com/KuwlShow/status/2103975795014177201Contact AuthorIf you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
=======
China Makes Deal With US, The Economy Is Taking Off, [CB] Panics, Timing Is Everything
Streamed on: Sep 27, 1:30 pm EDT
Trump used a pocket rescission to limit government, more is coming. Trump made a tariff deal with Xi, everything is about to change. The economy is growing like crazy, the [CB]/fake news cannot stand this. Soon they will no longer control the narrative. In the end the [CB] will cease to exists the way we know it today.
Do You See The [DS] Midterm Psyop? Trump Just Shut-Off The [DS] Money, Success Is Retribution
Streamed on: Sep 27, 2:00 pm EDT
The [DS] is panicking, they are pushing the midterm psyop on the people and it is not working. They are preparing events because they are losing leverage over their system that they created. Trump just shut-off the money and now they cannot funnel into the criminal syndicate. As the people taking back control the country is going to become very successful, that is the retribution. Accountability comes later.
èTRUMP-P
=======
The Charlie Ward Show — The New Quantum World, AI, and the Future of Money
In a recent episode of The Charlie Ward Show, longtime friends and collaborators Charlie Ward, Scott McKay, and Jim Qranker sit down for a candid conversation that spans years of investigative work, personal experience, and a shared vision for a more transparent society. The dialogue is framed around three core ideas: the depth of systemic corruption that touches government, finance, and everyday institutions; the urgent need for collective awareness and truth‑seeking; and the emergence of a practical tool—Claude AI—that empowers ordinary people to challenge wrongdoing without the prohibitive cost of traditional legal representation. While the discussion is wide‑ranging, its central message is clear: empowering citizens with knowledge and technology is the most effective way to restore accountability at the local level.
The trio opens by reflecting on what they describe as a “multi‑year journey exposing systemic corruption.” Their observations point to familiar yet often overlooked patterns: property‑tax assessments that balloon without clear justification, municipalities that impose fees while offering limited services, and public agencies—such as police departments and courts—that increasingly operate in ways that blur the line between public duty and corporate interest. By tracing these threads, Ward, McKay, and Qranker illustrate how a web of interconnected incentives can erode public trust, making the ordinary citizen feel powerless in the face of entrenched bureaucracy.
A recurring theme throughout the conversation is the concept of “hard truths.” The speakers argue that acknowledging uncomfortable realities is a prerequisite for any meaningful reform. They stress that the proliferation of misinformation and the deliberate simplification of complex issues have contributed to a collective disengagement from civic responsibilities. According to them, the loss of community bonds and the rise of divisive narratives—whether religious, historical, or cultural—have become tools for keeping the populace fragmented. This fragmentation, in turn, enables those in positions of power to maintain control with minimal resistance.
What sets this discussion apart from many other commentary pieces is the practical solution they present. The guests introduce an advanced artificial‑intelligence platform known as Claude AI, a technology originally designed for high‑level data analysis and content generation. In the hands of a motivated citizen, Claude AI becomes a “legal weapon” that can draft well‑researched legal documents, compile evidence, and formulate arguments that meet professional standards—all without the need for expensive attorney fees. By automating the most time‑consuming parts of legal preparation, the platform seeks to level the playing field, allowing individuals and community groups to file complaints, request audits, or pursue corrective action against local officials who may be acting outside the scope of the law.
The conversation dives deeper into how Claude AI can be integrated into everyday activism. For example, a homeowner who suspects an unjust property‑tax increase can upload relevant data, and the AI will generate a customized legal brief, citing appropriate statutes and case law. Similarly, a neighborhood association concerned about irregular permits can use the platform to request transparency and demand corrective oversight. The speakers emphasize that the technology does not replace professional counsel when a case escalates to a complex litigation stage, but it does provide a crucial first step: a well‑crafted, fact‑based request that obliges agencies to respond in writing. This approach, they argue, not only saves money but also creates a documented paper trail that can be valuable in future proceedings.
Beyond the technical aspects, the trio explores the broader sociopolitical implications of a citizen‑led legal renaissance. They contend that a well‑informed populace equipped with effective tools can rekindle the sense of community that has been diluted by years of top‑down manipulation. The discussion touches on the concept of a “spiritual awakening,” not in a religious sense, but as a collective shift toward personal responsibility, ethical conduct, and an appreciation for the interdependence of society. By encouraging individuals to see themselves as custodians of the public good rather than passive observers, the speakers hope to spark a cultural movement that resists the historical “matrix of control” they describe.
The conversation culminates with an introduction to “Operation Marksman,” an emerging grassroots initiative that aims to coordinate the use of Claude AI across multiple jurisdictions. Operation Marksman envisions a network of volunteers who share best practices, provide peer review of AI‑generated documents, and support one another through the often‑daunting process of filing official complaints. The goal is not merely to lodge isolated grievances, but to generate a sufficient volume of well‑structured legal actions that compel municipal bodies to address systemic issues in a timely manner. According to the hosts, the momentum built by Operation Marksman could lay the groundwork for wider political and societal reform within the next few years.
While the ideas presented are ambitious, the speakers are careful to stress that change will come through steady, lawful, and collaborative effort. They underscore the importance of civic engagement—attending city council meetings, participating in public comment periods, and leveraging technology responsibly. By aligning the right tools with a clear understanding of legal processes, they believe citizens can reclaim the sovereignty that is often taken for granted. The conversation serves as both a call to awareness and an invitation to act, suggesting that the path forward lies in collective, data‑driven activism rather than isolated protest.
For anyone interested in exploring these concepts further, the full video on The Charlie Ward Show—available on YouTube—offers a detailed walk‑through of the issues discussed, real‑world examples of AI‑assisted legal actions, and a deeper look at how Operation Marksman plans to scale its impact. Watching the episode provides not only a richer context but also practical guidance for individuals who wish to take the first step toward using technology for community empowerment.
In summary, the dialogue between Charlie Ward, Scott McKay, and Jim Qranker highlights three interconnected pillars: a critical examination of systemic corruption, the transformative potential of AI‑driven legal tools, and the necessity of grassroots coordination through initiatives like Operation Marksman. By embracing these ideas, citizens can move beyond passive observation and become active participants in reshaping the institutions that affect their daily lives. The conversation reminds us that truth, technology, and collective resolve are the keystones of a more accountable and transparent future.
Contact Author
If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
The END
Comments