top of page
Search

FRIDAY

 New BLOG – Great ARTICLES

FRIDAY 9 -[4]-26



SPIRITUAL:

David Jeremiah – Turning Point

 Then [the sailors] said to [Jonah], “Please tell us! For whose cause is this trouble upon us? What is your occupation? And where do you come from? What is your country? And of what people are you?”Jonah 1:8

 Recommended Reading: Matthew 16:11-12; Galatians 5:9



 

EVANGELISM:

Jesus has called every one of His followers to make disciples. In Matthew 28:19–20, He commands us to “go” and make disciples of all nations. Acts 1:8 gives us a pattern for gospel mission—to be His witnesses beginning in Jerusalem, then extending outward.

 

The Great Commission includes both proclaiming the gospel and making disciples. We proclaim the good news of God’s Kingdom, calling people to turn from their sin and trust in Jesus Christ for forgiveness. But Jesus also commands us to teach those who follow Him to obey everything He has commanded.

 

This is why our Jerusalem matters. How can we walk with people, disciple them, teach them, and encourage them to grow in obedience to Jesus if we are never present where they live? Gospel mission is not simply about having one conversation and moving on. We want to see people come to Christ and then walk alongside them as they learn to follow Him.

 

For me, that meant looking at the town where God has placed me—Tillsonburg.

Through The Cross Current, I have been equipped to have everyday gospel conversations. I have joined GO Teams and stepped out in other communities, but I realized I had not intentionally stepped into my own Jerusalem.

 

So this summer, I began setting aside time almost every Thursday to go out, pray to the Lord of the harvest, and ask Him to make me one of the laborers He sends.

And He has been faithful to open doors!

 

One Thursday, my sister Sue, my seven-year-old niece Melina, and I were walking down the main street of Tillsonburg. We saw three women sitting together at a table. We tried to make contact, but it seemed the door was closed.

 

As we walked past, Melina said, “Mom, I think that’s the lady we talked to last week!”

 

So we turned around and asked. Sure enough, it was Kayla, a woman my sister and another sister in Christ had already met and shared the gospel with. God used a seven-year-old to recognize someone He had already placed in our path!

 

We were able to reconnect with Kayla and meet Tina and Tammy. We shared food and drinks, shared the gospel, prayed with them, and gave Kayla a Bible. I had placed a gospel tract inside the Gospel of John and told her to start reading there, while encouraging her to read through the whole Bible. She received it with joy.

 

What an open door!

 

This reminded me that gospel faithfulness is not reserved for evangelists, pastors, or adults. It is for every believer—and it is never too early to model gospel faithfulness for the next generation.

So, what is holding you back?

 

First, honestly recognize before God where you have been hesitant or disobedient. Second, pray for open doors and boldness to speak, as Paul did (Colossians 4:2–4; Ephesians 6:18–20). Third, step out in faith and trust God with the results.

Because Canada needs Christ,

 

Nettie


Please pray for me and other believers to faithfully step into our own “Jerusalem,” asking God for open doors, boldness, and opportunities to share the gospel.

 

Please pray for the Body of Christ to recognize that gospel mission belongs to every believer—not just evangelists—and that we would obey Jesus by making disciples wherever He has placed us.

 

Please pray for The Cross Current for greater open doors to equip the saints for the work of ministry, as Ephesians 4:11–12 calls us to do, so that more believers are equipped, encouraged, and sent out as faithful gospel laborers.

NOTE:

If you are interested in EVANGELISM TRAINING... Please contact: don.brooks777@gmail.com, and I will introduce you to Nettie, [The Cross Current].




CANADIAN:

LONDON:

Upcoming City Hall Meetings & All-Candidates Debates

— Mark Your Calendars

CCAL Members,

Election season is heating up, and the next four weeks are packed with opportunities to hear directly from the people who want to represent you — and to watch the people already making decisions at City Hall.

We’ve got two City Hall meetings in the coming days and fourteen all-candidates debates hosted by the Urban League of London spanning every ward. Let’s fill those seats.

⚠️ A Note on the Urban League Debates

The Urban League is organizing and moderating every ward debate. Most of you already know where they stand. Their framing of questions, which candidates get follow-ups, which topics get airtime versus which get buried — none of this is neutral.

That’s exactly why showing up matters. You need to hear what the candidates say when the questions come from that angle. Does the candidate parrot the expected lines, or do they push back? Do they have independent thoughts, or are they reading from the same script?

Pay attention to:

·        Which questions get asked — and which never come up

·        Who gets interrupted versus who gets to filibuster

·        What assumptions are baked into the phrasing of each question

🎤 Come With Your Own Questions

Don’t let the moderator control the entire conversation. When the floor opens up, be ready. The CTA page on our website has a full breakdown by category, but here are some sharp ones to keep in your back pocket:

Money & Taxes

·        Why did our property taxes increase 26% compounded over four years, and will you commit to going through the entire budget line by line instead of rubber-stamping it?

·        Why did council approve a 34–40% salary increase for themselves — and do you support rolling that back?

·        How many millions are sitting in city reserve funds, and why aren’t surpluses returned to taxpayers?

Housing & Homelessness

·        Why did activists write our homelessness plan instead of elected officials — and what’s your plan to change that?

·        Homelessness keeps climbing while spending keeps rising. What’s the actual cost per person in a micro-shelter, and are we just duplicating services?

Transit & Infrastructure

·        Why was the Wonderland Road widening killed, and what’s your position on the 27 km of bike lanes that sit mostly empty while congestion gets worse?

·        What was the real impact on travel times after the rapid transit system went in?

Safe Supply & Public Safety

·        Is London still supporting safe supply, and what have the injection sites actually done to our neighbourhoods?

·        Why are addicts and offenders being housed next to vulnerable residents — and what’s the plan for recovery and mental health spending?

Bureaucracy & Accountability

·        How much does the city spend on consultants, DEI reporting, ESG reporting, and painting crosswalks — and can you justify every dollar?

·        Why do non-elected organizations like GCoM, AMO, and FCM influence local policy with zero voter input?

·        Which NGOs and non-profits get city money, and why don’t they have to publicly account for how they spend it?

Jobs & Economy

·        London has the worst unemployment rate in Canada. Why is the city still advertising for immigrants to come here, and what’s the actual plan to bring jobs?


Pick two or three that matter most to your ward. Memorize them. Ask them calmly and clearly. Make them answer on the record.


👕 Wear Your CTA Shirt

If you’ve got one, wear it. Nothing says “we’re paying attention” like a room dotted with CTA shirts.

Need one? Shirts are only $20 each. We place a bulk order once we hit 12 on the list, but we do have a few extras on hand in limited sizes — contact us if you want to grab one before your debate date.

 

🤝 CCAL Meetup — 15 Minutes Before Each Event

We’re organizing a quick group huddle 15 minutes before each event so we can walk in together, sit together, and coordinate who’s asking what.

If you plan to attend your ward’s debate (or either City Hall meeting), let us know so we know who to wait for.

 

📅 City Hall Meetings

check full calendar here

🏛️ Community and Protective Services

Tuesday, September 8, 2026 City Hall — 1pm

🏛️ Planning and Environment

Wednesday, September 9, 2026 City Hall — 1pm

These are your tax dollars at work. Worth attending even if you don’t speak — knowing what’s moving through the system is half the battle.

 

🗳️ All-Candidates Debates by Ward



 

 

📋 Quick Summary by Date

Monday, Sept 8

·        City Hall — Community and Protective Services

Tuesday, Sept 9

·        City Hall — Planning and Environment

·        Ward 12 Debate — Jalna Library, 7:00 PM

Thursday, Sept 10

·        Ward 1 Debate — Crouch Library, 7:00 PM

·        Ward 10 Debate — Bostwick Library, 7:00 PM

Wednesday, Sept 16

·        Ward 4 Debate — Beacock Library, 7:00 PM

Thursday, Sept 17

·        Ward 9 Debate — Byron Library, 7:00 PM

·        Ward 14 Debate — Chalmers Presbyterian Church, 7:00 PM

Saturday, Sept 19

·        Ward 11 Debate — Woodland Heights PS, 1:00 PM

·        Ward 13 Debate — Central Library, 2:00 PM

Wednesday, Sept 23

·        Ward 2 Debate — East Lions Community Centre, 7:00 PM

·        Ward 8 Debate — West Oaks French Immersion, 7:00 PM

Thursday, Sept 24

·        Ward 5 Debate — Stoneybrook Public School, 7:00 PM

·        Ward 6 Debate — The Mercato, 7:00 PM

Thursday, Oct 1

·        Ward 3 Debate — Fanshawe College, 7:00 PM

·        Ward 7 Debate — Northwest Public School, 7:00 PM

 

✅ What to Do Now

1.    Find your ward and mark the date in your calendar

2.    Let us know if you’ll be there so we can coordinate the 15-minute pre-meetup

3.    Pick your questions from the CTA list and come ready to ask them

4.    Wear your CTA shirt — or contact us to order one ($20, order placed at 12 shirts; limited extras available now) It takes 3 weeks to order shirts. So don’t wait. Alternatively, we also have CTA stickers you can place on a shirt or baseball cap.

5.    Bring a neighbour — the more of us in the room, the harder we are to ignore

6.     

See you there.

— CCAL



TRADE-WAR between CANADA & U.S.A.



As US-Canada ties unravel, Beijing pulls the threads:

Stephen Nagy in Real Clear World

While current Canada-US tensions create immediate policy challenges, the documented pattern of Chinese influence operations reveals a systematic effort to exploit these frictions for long-term strategic advantage.

This article originally appeared in Real Clear World.

By Stephen Nagy, September 4, 2025


President Donald Trump’s tariff threats and aggressive negotiation tactics are placing unprecedented strain on the Canada-United States relationship. As Canada struggles to navigate these choppy trade waters, China is seizing the moment to sow discord and fracture North America’s long-standing security partnership.

Beijing has systematically deployed influence operations designed to exploit these frictions – seeking to erode trust in Canada among its NORAD and NATO allies, while advancing a narrative across the West that Canada is an unreliable partner for AUKUS and QUAD involvement.

 

At the same time, China positions itself as a reliable partner: These tactics are part of a well-developed approach – China’s Marxist-Leninist organizational model – that promotes the use of wedge tactics and other ploys to fragment rival coalitions and influence foreign governments.

 

A recent Canadian government inquiry revealed considerable Chinese interference activities in the country. There are several structural factors that leave Canadians especially vulnerable to China’s influence efforts, which are widespread and deep-rooted.


Beijing’s institutional approach: The United Front Work Department (UFWD)

China’s influence operations in Canada operate through the United Front Work Department (UFWD), a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) organ that coordinates overseas influence activities. 

 

According to the 2023 report by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), the UFWD maintains extensive networks within Canada’s Chinese diaspora communities, business associations, and academic institutions. The report documented how UFWD-affiliated organizations have “cultivated relationships with Canadian politicians at all levels of government” through a combination of political donations, community events, and business opportunities.

 

Re-affirming the NSICOP, Canada’s Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions details how the UFWD leverages cultural associations, media collaborations, and grassroots groups to “amplify pro-China narratives, suppress dissent, and align diaspora groups with the CCP’s agenda.” Its network is “sophisticated and enables Beijing to carry out influence operations while masking its role behind ostensibly independent organizations.”

 

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has repeatedly warned about UFWD activities. In a 2021 report titled Foreign Interference Threats to Canada’s Democratic Process, CSIS identified the UFWD as coordinating “clandestine and deceptive” operations targeting Canadian political figures. These operations intensified during periods of Canada-US tension, with UFWD-linked organizations increasing their outreach to Canadian politicians precisely when bilateral relations with Washington deteriorated.

Notwithstanding the above well document investigations and interference into Canada’s democracy, scholars and organizations continue to advocate for Canada to normalize relations with Beijing.

 

Economic incentives and elite capture

China’s influence strategy heavily relies on economic incentives targeting Canadian business elites and political figures. The 2020 House of Commons Special Committee on Canada-China Relations documented how Chinese state-owned enterprises systematically offered lucrative contracts and board positions to former Canadian politicians and their family members. The committee’s report, A Threat to Canadian Sovereignty, detailed how these economic relationships created advocates for Beijing’s positions within Canada’s policymaking circles.

 

Former Canadian Ambassador to China David Mulroney testified before the committee that “China has been remarkably successful in convincing Canadian business leaders that their prosperity depends on accommodating Beijing’s political demands.” This economic leverage became particularly potent during US-Canada trade disputes, with Chinese officials explicitly presenting their market as an alternative to US economic pressure as outlined in the white paper titled China’s Position on Some Issues Concerning China-U.S. Economic and Trade Relations, which was released by the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China in April 2025.

 

The documented case of the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) illustrates this dynamic. Despite CSIS warnings about sovereignty implications, Canada ratified the agreement in 2014 with strong support from business lobbies that had received substantial Chinese investments. Internal government documents released under Access to Information requests revealed that Chinese officials explicitly linked FIPA ratification to increased investment opportunities for Canadian firms, creating what one briefing note called “conflicting loyalties” among Canadian negotiators.

 

Weaponizing accusations of racism

Beijing has systematically employed accusations of anti-Asian racism to deflect criticism and divide Canadian society. The 2023 report by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, “Targeting Canada in Service to China’s Global Agenda,” examines where Chinese diplomatic officials or state media accused Canadian institutions of racism when they investigated Chinese influence operations or criticized Beijing’s policies.

 

Following the 2021 declaration by Parliament that China’s treatment of Uyghurs constituted genocide, Chinese Ambassador Cong Peiwu stated that Canada was “influenced by anti-Chinese and anti-Asian sentiment,” despite the motion being based on extensive human rights documentation. This tactic proved particularly effective in multicultural Canadian society, with several documented cases of politicians withdrawing criticism of Beijing after being accused of racism.

 

The “racism card” has been effective in undermining Canada-US cooperation on China policy. When Canada considered joining US initiatives on technology restrictions or investment screening, Chinese officials and affiliated organizations launched campaigns accusing both countries of “racist containment” of China. These campaigns, documented in a 2022 Public Safety Canada assessment, successfully delayed several joint Canada-US initiatives by creating domestic political pressure within Canada.

 

The “Peaceful Development” narrative

China’s influence operations consistently promote a narrative of peaceful intentions while simultaneously engaging in aggressive activities. The 2023 final report of Canada’s Commission on Foreign Interference documented how Chinese diplomats publicly emphasized “win-win cooperation” while privately threatening Canadian citizens of Chinese origin who criticized Beijing.

 

This peaceful rhetoric has been particularly effective in contrasting China with what Beijing characterizes as American “hegemonic bullying.” During the Trump administration’s tariff threats, Chinese officials intensified their “peaceful partner” messaging. Ambassador Cong’s 2023 comments to the Canada-China Business Council explicitly contrasted China’s “reliable partnership” with “unpredictable neighbors,” a clear reference to the United States.

 

Impact on Canada-US relations

Chinese influence operations have measurably impacted Canada-US security cooperation. The 2022 Five Eyes intelligence assessment, partially declassified by the Communications Security Establishment, Canada’s cryptologic agency, noted that Chinese operations had “successfully delayed or prevented several joint Canada-US initiatives on critical technology protection and investment screening.”

 

These delays manifested in three critical security decisions. Canada’s two-year hesitation to ban Huawei from 5G networks (2019–21) created what Pentagon officials termed a “security gap” in continental telecommunications. CSIS documented “intensive Chinese lobbying” that prevented Canadian participation in the US-led Clean Network initiative, while Chinese threats to divest from Canadian pension funds blocked Ottawa from adopting CFIUS-style investment screening in 2020-2021. Each case demonstrated Beijing’s ability to exploit economic leverage and elite relationships to fracture North American security coordination.

 

Structural impediments to Canadian response

Canada’s inability to respond decisively to Chinese interference stems from three interconnected factors. First, extensive business interests create powerful constituencies opposing firm action. The Canada-China Business Council’s 2022 member survey revealed that 73 percent of respondents opposed stronger investment screening measures, despite acknowledging security concerns.

 

Second, political conflicts of interest have paralyzed decision-making. The 2023 NSICOP report documented cases where political figures with family business interests in China consistently opposed interference investigations. While not naming individuals due to classification, the report noted “concerning patterns of political intervention” when security agencies attempted to investigate Chinese influence operations.

Third, Canada’s foreign policy establishment maintains what former CSIS Director Richard Fadden called an “idealistic worldview” that Canada can balance relations with both superpowers. This perspective, rooted in Canada’s historical role as a middle power, fails to recognize what the 2023 Canadian Department of National Defence policy update acknowledged as “an era of strategic competition where neutrality enables adversary objectives.”

 

The long game of division

While current Canada-US tensions create immediate policy challenges, the documented pattern of Chinese influence operations reveals a systematic effort to exploit these frictions for long-term strategic advantage. Beijing’s multifaceted approach that combines UFWD coordination, economic incentives, accusations of racism, and peaceful rhetoric. This approach has successfully delayed Canadian alignment with US security initiatives while creating dependencies that complicate future policy choices.


The evidence demonstrates that China views periods of Canada-US tension not as temporary opportunities but as moments to institutionalize division through elite capture, economic dependencies, and narrative warfare. As Canada navigates current bilateral difficulties with Washington, policymakers must recognize that Beijing’s influence operations aim not merely to provide an alternative partner but to fundamentally restructure North American security cooperation. The documented success of these operations in delaying joint initiatives, creating policy paralysis, and establishing conflicting interests within Canadian institutions suggests that without decisive action, temporary bilateral tensions risk becoming permanent strategic vulnerabilities exploited by an adversarial power.


Stephen Nagy is a professor of Politics and International Studies at the International Christian University. A senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (Ottawa) and the Center for North American Prosperity and Security (DC), Nagy also served as a visiting fellow at the Hungarian Institute for International Affairs (HIIA), and a distinguished fellow at the Corvinus Institute for Advanced Studies (CIAS), at Corvinus University, Budapest

Source:



TRUMP: 

Working Hard – Getting Results

The JUDICIAL WATCH:

On behalf of all of us at Judicial Watch, I want to wish you and those close to you an enjoyable and relaxing Labor Day weekend.


I hope you have had a great summer!

The Judicial Watch team has been hard at work this summer fighting for clean elections, government accountability and against unconstitutional woke policies.

And our hard work is getting results thanks to your support.

That’s why I want to ask you today to help keep this work fighting for the rule of law going!

Here are ONLY SOME of Judicial Watch’s recent victories your gifts have made possible:

· Our unprecedented voter-roll cleanup work, which has led to the removal of nearly 7 million ineligible names nationwide, including 372,000 recently removed in Colorado, a settlement to review and remove 800,000 ineligible voter names in Oregon, and ongoing litigation against California and Illinois which could result in the removal of an additional million dirty names.

· Defeating the city of Evanston’s attempt to dismiss our constitutional challenge to its race-based reparations program – A historic case which the S. Department of Justice has now filed to join.

· Securing a court order requiring the federal government to produce nearly 2 million pages of records discovered in a “hidden room” at the FBI.

· Alandmark 7-2 Supreme Court victory this spring affirming the right of federal candidates to challenge election rules in court;


We are now pivoting into a very busy fall where we must prepare for the very real prospect of a Leftist takeover of the House and Senate and a growing communist influence in Congress.


With congressional oversight in the hands of the far Left, your Judicial Watch could remain the only game in town for holding Deep State actors accountable, fighting back against the Left’s lawfare machine, and upholding constitution liberties.

Every Judicial Watch investigation, record request, and legal action comes with major costs against opponents with deep pockets (often funded by the Soros network).


But, with your continued financial backing, Judicial Watch will continue to file lawsuits wherever the rule of law is threatened, and I’m confident I’ll be able to keep sending you victory updates like this in the near future.


We are YOUR Judicial Watch.

Thank you, as always, for your commitment to our mission to uphold the rule of law and defend our shared American values.

Enjoy your well-deserved holiday weekend!

Thomas Fitton

President

Judicial Watch is a 501I(3) nonprofit organization.

Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and

corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

 

Judicial Watch, Inc.

 


 

GLOBAL:

The PATH-TO-ZERO – TROOPS!

The tragic Abbey Gate suicide bombing attack


The Path to Zero is an unflinching account of America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, told by the people who lived it. Structured around President Biden’s 2021decision to draw down to “zero” troops, the film traces how one choice cascaded into a chaotic, deadly ending—the closure of Bagram, the collapse of the Afghan army, and a frantic evacuation through three Kabul airport gates, culminating in the tragic Abbey Gate suicide bombing attack.


I was there on the ramp for the Air Force’s portion of this. In tears after watching this. Thank you so so much WSJ for putting this out. You did an amazing job and got details I never thought would really make it out there – like making the Marines “clean” right before we left. I was disgusted with that and thank God our Air Force leadership didn’t demean us in such a manner. Thank you again, WSJ. I’m sharing with everyone.


Through candid interviews with the diplomats, generals, and soldiers who were there, the film tells the riveting story of the unfolding tragedy—and gives voice to the moral injury many young Marines who manned the gates still carry.

 President Joe Diden’s HUGE DISASTER!

YouTube

 

THE DURDEN DISPATCH

YESTERDAY’S TOP 4: MUST-READ STORIES

Rogan To Lindsey Clancy Fans: Look At The Crime Scene

 

“Save Us From Our Traitor Gov’t”: Massive Madrid Protests Erupt Over Socialist Regime’s Handling Of Ceuta Invasion

 

Lindsay Clancy Jury Deadlocked Again; Insane Karen Arrested For ‘Aggravated Intimidation’ Of Jurors

 

Trump Rages Against ‘Treasonous Scum’ In Media For Iran War Coverage

 

The DURBAN REPORT

 


Patrick Bestall’s INPUT:

US colleges infiltrated by China

.PB

 

 

Cheap “pop up” Homes invented in London Ont.

 

Zebian says he’s already received some interest from a couple of churches across the city and is hoping to hear from other organizations that could use them. He hopes that through the donations, he can learn more about how his design can work in reality.

 

The home, which he calls the Bloom Smart Home, includes a bed, a small induction cooktop and a working bathroom, among other features. The homes measure 22 feet by 11 feet by 10 feet (6.7 metres by 3.3 metres by 3 metres) and can even be folded for easier transportation to different sites.

 

Zebian’s goal is to eventually mass-produce the homes for about $20,000 each, but he says he’s working on cutting the price even more. “You could always hike up the prices and charge a fortune, but if you’re not helping the people (then) you’re destroying the whole purpose of it.”

.PB

 

 

Epstein’s $158 MILLION Client SUES Congress To Stay Silent

Instead of sitting for a sworn deposition before the House Oversight Committee, Leon Black, the Apollo co-founder and longtime Jeffrey Epstein client, filed a lawsuit to block the subpoenas. 

Chairman James Comer put an empty chair in the room and charges that the billionaire is hiding behind lawyers rather than answering to the American people.

Black paid Epstein around $158 million between 2012 and 2017 for what he still insists were ordinary tax and estate-planning services — years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. 

.PB

 

 

Liberals spent $300M to axe the fax, and it failed

.PB

 

 

The Inside Loop – Part 9 — A Return to London, Ontario

The Same Model Appears Everywhere. The Kamloops case study is just the beginning.

This series has spent the last several weeks dissecting the financial architecture of Kamloops, British Columbia, a city that became part of the blueprint for a new form of municipal governance.

Summary

The passage argues that London, Ontario has developed a self-reinforcing homelessness funding system involving three interconnected groups:

  • Private/foundation capital: The London Community Foundation established a homelessness fund, initially backed by an anonymous $25 million donation and later increased through matching campaigns.

  • Municipal government: City Hall, particularly the mayor’s office and senior administrators, allegedly matches foundation money with taxpayer funds and provides additional financial support when agencies face shortfalls.

  • Non-profit agencies: Organizations such as London Cares, Ark Aid, and Unity Project receive government and foundation funding to operate homelessness services.


The author describes this as a “three-headed machine” in which foundation money attracts municipal funding, which supports agencies, while recurring funding shortfalls are treated as new emergencies requiring further public money.


The central controversy involves a London city councillor who had 30 days of pay removed after colleagues voted to sanction her. The passage presents this as evidence that elected officials who challenge the system can be punished through the municipal Code of Conduct and Integrity Commissioner process.


The author’s broader thesis is that homelessness has become institutionalized as a funding ecosystem whose participants have incentives to preserve the existing model. The passage claims that the same governance pattern can be seen in other Canadian cities, using Kamloops, B.C., as a comparison.

Important caveat


Much of the passage is argumentative rather than established fact. Claims such as the system “requires homelessness to justify its own existence,” that particular officials are “protecting the apparatus,” or that criticism is being deliberately suppressed are interpretations by the author. The passage says supporting records exist, but it does not itself provide enough evidence to independently establish those conclusions.

.PB

 

 

 

 

 

RUMOUR:

 

RUMOURS Circulating out there...:

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website, and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

 

I may not agree with everything from the content-producers that I share.

Apply critical thinking and use discernment to

Come to your own conclusions regarding the content!

 

You need to MAKE UP Your own MIND!

 

What we think that we now know...

 

REPORT Today

 

The world keeps spinning, and now you’re caught up.

 

 

Narrative Has Shifted, Right On Schedule, Trump Is Reversing The [CB] Centralization Agenda

Streamed on: Sep 3, 4:30 pm EDT

Canada is in a difficult position, the [CB] is trying to fight Trump, but in the end the country will implode and the people will rise up against Carney. Less people are filing for unemployment, more job openings. Investments pouring into the US. The [CB] is already backtracking on the raising the rates, right on schedule, the bump is coming. Trump is decentralizing the country.

Do You See How Trump Is Setting The Stage? Military Is The Only Way, Eyes On Patriots

Streamed on: Sep 3, 5:00 pm EDT

The DEM’s are on their last leg of trying to delay Trump. The remaining corrupt judges are now trying to stop the removal of their election cheating system. This will fail. Trump is making sure everything is in place for the accountability phase. He is now setting the stage, the military is the only way, Trump is removing the enemy globally, it had to be this way.

 

And We Know — 9.3.26: White House EBS Drop, 34, MSM Lies about Elections, Watch Iran, Beef, Clancy

In an era defined by rapid information flow and shifting global paradigms, public discourse is increasingly shaped by deep-dives into policy, governance, and cultural evolution. A recent comprehensive presentation from And We Know Official on YouTube offers a wide-ranging examination of these pressing contemporary topics.


Touching on everything from domestic electoral processes to international diplomacy and cultural transformations, the video serves as a focal point for discussions surrounding the direction of modern leadership and the preservation of national identity. For those looking to dive deeper into these multifaceted discussions, watching the full video provides a thorough look at the underlying arguments and evidence presented.


At the core of the presentation is a heavy emphasis on the promotion of the America First platform, championed by President Donald Trump. The narrative closely examines key pillars of this political movement, including a steadfast commitment to election integrity, heightened national security measures, strict immigration enforcement, and the revitalization of the domestic economy. 


Proponents of this agenda argue that returning to these foundational principles is essential for restoring national prosperity and ensuring that the government remains accountable to its citizens. By spotlighting these themes, the commentary aligns with a broader national conversation about sovereignty, economic independence, and the rule of law.


Domestically, the discussion addresses several controversial subjects regarding governance and administrative integrity. Particular attention is paid to the complexities surrounding U.S. elections, with segments exploring suspected partisan manipulations of voting processes and signature verification protocols. These concerns are framed around the broader debate of securing the ballot box and maintaining public trust in democratic institutions. Additionally, the report tackles domestic industry challenges, shedding light on alleged systemic corruption within the commercial beef sector, which impacts both producers and consumers by threatening fair market practices and food supply transparency.


Immigration and national borders form another critical pillar of the narrative. The presentation outlines the challenges and enforcement strategies associated with U.S. borders, focusing on the strict control needed to maintain public safety and economic stability. Furthermore, it delves into specific, elaborate illicit operations, such as birth tourism schemes designed to exploit legal loopholes. By detailing these enforcement hurdles, the commentary underscores the ongoing policy debates regarding national sovereignty, legal immigration frameworks, and the allocation of domestic resources.


On the international stage, the video shifts focus to foreign policy and global trade dynamics. Special attention is directed toward U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, particularly concerning Iran. The discussion evaluates recent U.S. military operations, regional security strategies, and the critical geopolitical importance of maintaining control over vital maritime trade routes like the Strait of Hormuz to safeguard global energy supplies. Economically, the narrative addresses simmering trade tensions and economic disputes with northern neighbors like Canada, highlighting the delicate balance of international commerce, tariffs, and fair-trade agreements designed to protect American industries.


Cultural and societal developments also receive significant scrutiny, reflecting the ongoing culture wars in the United States. The report analyzes the current state of Hollywood, discussing its perceived cultural decline and the strategic overhaul needed to counter institutional biases. It frames the entertainment industry as a major cultural battleground that influences public perception and values.


Alongside media, the discussion touches on broader social issues, including the ongoing debates surrounding digital censorship, freedom of speech, and the direction of modern education. These segments resonate with audiences concerned about the ideological shifts within mainstream institutions and the protection of traditional values.


Ultimately, the video concludes on a reflective note, incorporating a religious invocation that calls for divine protection, wisdom, and justice in governance. This spiritual element ties the disparate themes together, appealing to an audience that views contemporary political and cultural challenges through a faith-based lens. To explore these intricate subjects further and gain a complete understanding of the commentary, viewers are encouraged to watch the full video from And We Know Official on YouTube.

Contact Author


If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.


The END


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by The Brooks Truth. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page