SUNDAY 1-21-24
- donbrooks777
- Jan 21, 2024
- 16 min read
Sunday BLOG 1 – 21 - 24
Verse(s) for today:
Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance.
James 1:2&3
So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
1 Corinthians 3:7 KJV
So, in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
Matthew 7:12 NIV
John Lennox TRUTH BOMB That Everyone MISSED? | Pastor Reacts:
https://youtu.be/rWfJeWhQk0g?si=syCf13koOnrXU09G Thank you, Donna Warren
Christian apologist, John Lennox, just said something to Jordan Peterson that is so profound and yet most people missed! This is actually a powerful argument in favor of Christianity. Check it out!
There is Transcendence... Ought must come from above – the Creator! He decided Right – Wrong... Good Evil... Morality!
What ADAM did in the Garden was to decide to become his own God determining Good / Evil. It was not in him to do that... because he was NOT God! And the; ‘Ought to be’ is God’s prerogative and no other! [about 17-minutes]
The best that Men could do over time was to default to... ‘Might is RIGHT’!
Excellent and Profound! Jordan Peterson
John Lennox
Wise Disciple Media
BLOCK BUSTER:
Tucker was fired to stop this film! (1 hour documentary):
Tucker Carlson highlights new January 6 documentary: 'Everything you have heard is a lie' - LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
‘Our leadership class is poisonous, power mad and dangerous,’ Carlson said. And this is not the case for ‘the people who showed up at the Capitol to protest the theft of their democratic election.’
(LifeSiteNews) — Tucker Carlson promoted a new independent documentary on the January 6, 2021, disturbance that he said “should be the most famous film in the United States” as it “shows you what actually happened at the [U.S.] Capitol” that day.
For the last three years, the media and the political “uniparty” made up of Democrats and Republican leadership has worked diligently to project and maintain a narrative that January 6 was an “armed insurrection” against the government of the United States led by President Donald Trump, Carlson explained in a January 8 commentary on his own new network.
VIEW THE video for FREE:
The reasons for this are “because January 6th is a perfect way” for this ruling class “to get what it wants: to suppress the population, to keep Donald Trump from running for president again, and to put its enemies in jail,” Carlson explained.
And they have been successful at keeping many Americans in the dark on this by limiting what can be seen from that day’s events, he argued.
Yet, ironically, “there’s probably no event in American history that was filmed by more people from more angles than January 6,” the former cable news star said. “And yet, until very recently, no one had put together a timeline” of that day’s events.
Despite the fact that the current Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, continues to suppress “to some extent” the U.S. Capitol’s surveillance video footage, “there’s still enough in the public domain that a group of filmmakers decided to put it all together,” Carlson explained.
“It’s called ‘January 6th: A True Timeline,’ and it should be the most famous film in the United States, but it’s not. We’re hoping that changes soon,” he continued.
“The movie lays out the day’s events, moment by moment. It shows you what actually happened at the Capitol from video that they did not shoot but collected once again from the public domain, in some cases from liberal journalists who were on the scene,” Carlson said. “And they discovered a lot.”
Contrary to the narrative put out by what Carlson calls “The January 6th special commission, the Fake Committee of Liars, who ‘investigated January 6th,’” the protesters did not “surge” to breach the Capitol after a 2:24 p.m. tweet by President Trump, but rather the Metro police at that moment “accidentily teargassed themselves” and ran away from the scene. “And that left a path to the Capitol wide open,” he said.
In providing some other highlights of the film, Carlson noted how “there were more than 200 plainclothes federal informants in the crowd. Some of them were already inside the Capitol before it was ‘breached,’” he mocked, “before law enforcement opened the doors for the protesters, in some cases.” And given the inside presence of some of these agents, the host encouraged his viewers to “draw your own conclusions” on the purpose of this deployment.
READ: Tucker Carlson: New Jan. 6 video shows Capitol Police acting as ‘tour guides’ to ‘QAnon Shaman’
“When Metro PD made their way to the Senate floor and asked Chansley to leave, Chansley complied immediately. He thanked officers and said, ‘God bless you’ as he left,” the pundit said before showing the clip.
Finding it absurd anyone could make the case based on this evidence that Chansley and his companions were “racist insurrectionists,” Carlson lamented that “Jacob Chansley did hard time in prison. But there he is [in the clip] telling cops he loves them as he walks peacefully, unarmed, out of the Senate chamber.”
The documentary also exposes that while President Trump was still speaking over a mile away at the White House, signage along the Capitol grounds designating the area to be “Closed” was quickly and easily removed, preventing many thousands of people who would be arriving after to understand they were entering a restricted area. Many would later be prosecuted for this violation.
Furthermore, the video appears to confirm that police violated the law when they failed to provide the crowd with the required three “clearly audible and understandable orders to disperse” before utilizing munitions upon them, which aggravated the crowd and injured many.
“So, you may have concluded correctly that virtually everything you have heard screamed at you for three years about January 6th is a lie, and this tape proves it,” Carlson concluded. “It’s an hour long. It is well worth your time. We hope every American watches it and draws the obvious conclusion, which is that our leadership class is poisonous, power mad and dangerous. They’re the dangerous ones, not the people who showed up at the Capitol to protest the theft of their democratic election.”
RELATED
Be sure to VIEW every-one of these... BEFORE they are REMOVED!
2. Tucker Carlson: Democrats reviewed Jan. 6 video footage and lied about the death of Capitol officer
5. Pro-Trump Jan. 6 ‘political prisoners’ rotting away in dedicated DC prison, without bail or trial
Tucker Carlson
Patrick Bestall
Shocking new development could disqualify Biden from ballots:
Even as the Radical Left is doing everything in their power to stop Trump, America-loving patriots are working hard to help. And we are fighting back.
And now, in a shocking new development, Biden could be disqualified from the ballot.
After Trump was recently disqualified from the Colorado ballot, it was made clear that the gloves are off and the Radical Left is playing dirty.
The Radical Left is terrified of what would happen if Donald Trump were to take back the White House.
They know that if elected again, Donald Trump will not allow their destruction of this great nation to continue.
But up until now, it has seemed like Donald Trump is fighting alone.
However, all of that has changed recently as patriots in Illinois are now fighting back against the Radical Left.
To keep Joe Biden off of the Illinois ballot, a number of Illinois voters have filed objections.
The move comes as many claim Biden is “ineligible” to even run in the 2024 election race.
According to the State Journal-Register three separate objections were filed before the January 12th deadline.
The objections state that Biden has “given aid or comfort to the enemies” during his time as Senator, Vice-President, or President, and therefore is “ineligible” for the office of President.
One objection states, “Biden has given aid and comfort to enemies of the Constitution and the United States by, among other things, failing to enforce the laws of the United States, allowing entry of enemy agents illegally into the country including tens of thousands of military age men, and abandoning assets of the United States to the possession of our enemies.”
It concluded, “Our objection is to reinforce that We the People will not tolerate betrayal.”
One argument that the objectors have focused on to highlight the differences between Trump and Biden, is that only held one political office in which he swore to “preserve, protect, and defend” whereas Joe Biden had decades of political office in which he was called to “support” the Constitution.
This is not the first time Illinois has seen a Democrat candidate’s ballot position challenged.
Voters in 2012 submitted multiple objections regarding claims surrounding President Obama’s citizenship.
All around us, we see the Radical Left constantly attacking the freedoms we enjoy as Americans.
And now, they are attacking everything there is about America.
They refuse to accept that Donald Trump is exactly what America needs right now, and so they have resorted to abusing their power and weaponizing the government against him.
It is even funny that the Left all of the sudden cares about the Constitution, and they are trying to even use that against Trump as well.
However, the Left has underestimated the will and the strength of Americans.
We will not give up or surrender so easily, and we will not stand by idly while the Left takes away our rights.
It is time to fight back and show the Left that we will not allow them to continue along their destructive path.
Whether or not this recent attempt in Illinois will work remains to be seen, but the reality is that Donald Trump is coming for the White House in 2024.
Prudent Politics Media
Fani Willis was blindsided after this former Obama official gave her this surprising advice:
Fulton County Democrat District Attorney Fani Willis is being rocked by scandal.
She has a lot to answer for after she put her alleged boyfriend on her payroll.
And Fani Willis was blindsided after this former Obama official gave her this surprising advice.
Fulton County Democrat District Attorney Fani Willis is on her heels after a court filing by a co-defendant in her RICO case against former President Donald Trump dropped a bombshell.
Willis hired her alleged boyfriend, Nathan Wade, to serve as special prosecutor in the case, despite the fact he was completely unqualified.
Wade was paid more than $600,000 in taxpayer money by the Fulton County DA’s office, and he reportedly used that money to take Willis on luxury vacations.
Hiring her boyfriend would violate a laundry list of state and local laws in Georgia and potentially get her thrown off of the Trump case.
Michael Moore was appointed by former President Barack Obama to serve as the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Georgia.
During an appearance on CNN, he said that Willis should resign if the allegations about her relationship with Wade are true.
“Cases are not lost because of some ‘Matlock’ moment, some moment like you see in ‘My Cousin Vinny,’ where suddenly somebody finds the evidence. Cases die by the death of 1,000 cuts. This is a cut on the case,” Moore said.
Willis hasn’t denied the allegations against her.
Instead, she tried to play the race card during a speech at an Atlanta church by claiming that she was only facing criticism because she is a black woman.
“I appointed three special counselors. It’s my right to do it. Paid them all the same hourly rate,” Willis said.
It was later revealed that she was paying Wade far more than an expert on RICO cases she hired to be a special prosecutor.
“They only attack one,” Willis claimed. “I hired one white woman: a good personal friend and great lawyer, a superstar, I tell you. I hired one white man: brilliant, my friend, and a great lawyer. And I hired one Black man, another superstar, a great friend, and a great lawyer.”
Willis added that “you cannot expect black women to be perfect and save the world. We need to be allowed to stumble.”
Moore said that the Trump case would be tarnished if the allegations of an improper relationship were proven true.
“I’d tell her to get out of the case,” Moore said. “I really think that in this type of case, with these allegations, this case is bigger than any one prosecutor. And I think, probably, to preserve the case and to show that what’s of most importance to her is the facts of the Trump case, as opposed to her political career.”
Fani Willis’ scandal has thrown her case against Donald Trump into chaos.
Conservative Underground News
Wyoming Secretary Of State Gives Trump Chance To Remain On Ballot
By Victor Winston,
updated on January 21, 2024
Chuck Gray submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, supporting former President Trump’s appeal to be reinstated on the Colorado presidential primary ballot.
The case hinges on a decision by the Colorado Supreme Court in December 2022. They ruled that Trump was ineligible to be on the ballot due to the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause. This ruling, contested by Gray and Trump's legal team, has sparked a heated debate across the political spectrum.
Gray’s brief, backed by America First Legal and Stone Hilton PLLC, challenges the constitutionality of the Colorado court's decision. It asserts that Trump did not engage in insurrection or support enemies of the United States. This stance is seen by many as a significant political move, given the potential implications for the upcoming election.
The Constitutional Debate Over Presidential Eligibility
At the core of this legal battle is the interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Gray and his legal team argue that the Colorado Supreme Court's decision is a misapplication of this crucial constitutional amendment. They claim it sets a dangerous precedent for future elections.
Gene Hamilton, Vice President of America First Legal, commended Gray's actions. He highlighted the importance of adhering to the historical interpretation of the Constitution.
This viewpoint is shared by many legal experts who fear that a broad interpretation of the 14th Amendment could lead to unforeseen consequences in American politics, Daily Wire reported.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on February 8, 2023. This comes just a month before Colorado's primary on March 5. The timing of these events adds to the urgency and significance of the case. Many are watching closely, aware that the Supreme Court's decision could have far-reaching effects on the primary process and potentially the general election.
Implications for Voter Rights and Election Integrity
Chuck Gray, in a forceful statement, condemned what he perceives as the "unAmerican and unconstitutional" efforts of the left. He emphasized the need to protect the American electoral process from such actions. This sentiment resonates with a significant portion of the American electorate, who view this case as a test of the integrity of the nation's electoral system.
Gray's support for Trump's appeal is not just about the former President's candidacy. It's seen as a broader defense of voter rights and the principle that the electorate should be able to choose their candidates without judicial interference.
He claimed, "Despite the repeated attacks I have received from the radical left-wing media for my efforts to ensure that Trump will be able to be on the ballot, I will continue to unapologetically defend the truth and ensure that the people of Wyoming can choose who to elect for themselves."
The legal team representing former President Trump has also weighed in. They warned of the potential chaos and disenfranchisement of millions of Americans if Trump is excluded from ballots in other states. This argument reflects a broader concern about the stability and fairness of the electoral process.
Legal and Political Repercussions of the Case
The outcome of this legal battle is eagerly awaited by both conservatives and liberals. Each side views the Supreme Court's upcoming decision as pivotal to the future of American democracy.
The stakes are high, and the implications are wide-ranging, affecting not just the 2024 election but potentially setting a precedent for future electoral disputes.
As the nation anticipates the Supreme Court's ruling, the debate continues over the balance between legal interpretations of the Constitution and the rights of voters. The decision could either reinforce or redefine the boundaries of judicial intervention in the electoral process.
Conclusion
Chuck Gray's amicus brief represents a significant moment in American politics.
It challenges the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove former President Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment.
This legal battle, set against the backdrop of a highly polarized political landscape, highlights the complexities of constitutional interpretation, voter rights, and the integrity of the electoral process.
The outcome of this case will likely have a lasting impact on the American political scene, underscoring the ongoing tension between legal precedents and democratic principles.
About Victor Winston
Victor is a freelance writer and researcher who focuses on national politics, geopolitics, and economics.
between legal precedents and democratic principles.
Victor Winston
Investigation Destroys Biden Admin’s ‘False’ Border Narrative
By Victor Winston,
updated on January 21, 2024
Mary Rooke, a columnist for the Daily Caller, has recently voiced strong criticism against the Biden administration's narrative on border issues. In a podcast appearance, she expressed her concerns about the treatment of border agents and the ongoing migrant crisis. Joe Biden was caught with spreading false information on the border crisis.
Mary Rooke's comments came during her appearance on the "Rod Arquette Show," where she tackled the complexities and challenges facing U.S. border agents amidst a surge in migrant crossings.
Rooke spoke about the viral photograph that falsely depicted border agents using whips against migrants. This image had previously led to public outcry and condemnation from President Joe Biden and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. However, subsequent investigations refuted these claims, raising questions about the administration's handling of border security information.
According to Rooke, these false narratives have significantly impacted the morale and effectiveness of border agents. She emphasized that agents are stretched thin, grappling with an unprecedented migrant crisis while also facing public scrutiny based on misinformation.
Rooke further argued that the Biden administration's approach to border policy tends to evoke emotional reactions, which she believes influences public opinion and policy decisions. This, she contends, leads to an oversimplified view of the border situation, ignoring the complex realities of illegal immigration and its consequences.
Impact of the Border Crisis on Individuals
Highlighting the adverse effects of illegal immigration, Rooke pointed to several incidents. One involved an alleged sexual assault on an autistic 20-year-old woman, Kayla Hamilton, by an illegal immigrant.
Another case included an elderly woman defrauded of $100,000 by an illegal immigrant from India, Daily Caller reported.
These incidents, according to Rooke, contradict the commonly held narrative that the majority of illegal immigrants are families seeking a better life. Instead, she suggested that human trafficking and criminal activities are significant aspects of the current border crisis.
The situation at the southern border has been a point of contention, with record-high migrant crossings reported during the Biden administration. House Republicans have expressed their concerns, reflecting the growing political divide over how to address this complex issue.
A Closer Look at the Border Narrative
Rooke's comments underscore a deepening skepticism towards the administration's portrayal of the border crisis. She believes that a lack of honesty in the government's narrative undermines public trust and exacerbates the challenges faced by border agents.
"We have a really great reporter, Jennie Taer, who is on the border frequently, and talks to the border patrol agents frequently. And they are fed up and they’re maxed out. They continue to do that to the American people because, it pushes the boundaries of eliciting that emotional response. If you can get a massive group of people to believe that you hold the high ground — the moral high ground on a subject, then you can control what policies that they’ll support."
Her assertion that emotional responses are being manipulated to shape policy debates adds another layer to the discourse on immigration policies and their implications for national security and social stability.
Rooke's critique extends beyond just the border agents' plight. She draws attention to the broader implications of open border policies, suggesting that they may not adequately address the complexities of immigration and could potentially lead to unintended consequences.
Reflecting on the Border Crisis
The incidents cited by Rooke, such as the alleged assault on Kayla Hamilton and the financial fraud by an illegal immigrant, serve as poignant examples of the potential risks associated with unregulated immigration.
These examples not only highlight the human cost of the crisis but also challenge the predominant narrative of immigration as solely a humanitarian issue.
Rooke's perspective suggests a need for a more nuanced approach to border policy, one that considers both the humanitarian aspects and the security concerns.
Conclusion
Mary Rooke's critical stance on the Biden administration's handling of the border crisis raises important questions about the accuracy of public narratives, the impact on border agents, and the broader implications for immigration policy.
Her comments reflect a growing debate over the best approach to managing the complex and often contentious issue of border security and immigration reform.
The Capitalism Institute
Satan in BC:
The province was also known as the home of the Satanic Panic explored in a new CBC doc, Satan Wants You
PTL Welcomes Dov Schwarz!
Dov Schwarz is a Jewish believer in Messiah Jesus who recently moved back to America after living in Israel. He is the founder of Watch Therefore Ministries and under this umbrella organization also co-founded the ministry Blessing Israeli Believers.
The primary vision for the program is to make faithful servant disciples of Messiah Jesus in preparation for the Rapture, the Millennial Reign of our Lord Jesus—and then eternity in the Kingdom of the LORD!
Dov has founded another Kingdom work called Poured Out For The Nations through which he has ministered multiple times in ten different African countries preaching the gospel, making disciples, and ministering to orphans and widows.
Watch [Watch Therefore] with Dov Schwarz Sundays at 9:00PM EST on the PTL Television Network!
Click the button below to Watch Live on PTL during showtimes or to access Video-on-Demand.
VIEW at this LINK: https://ptlnetwork.com/show-library/?mc_cid=c4c5f3feed&mc_eid=8ad61b22c6
The PTL Network
Patrick Bestall
DOJ wants former Trump adviser Peter Navarro to serve prison time, pay huge fine:
President Joe Biden's Department of Justice isn't stopping with just prosecuting former President Donald Trump.
According to Politico, they're also targeting his former trade adviser, Peter Navarro.
In a 20-page sentencing memo submitted to the court last week, Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Aloi argued that Navarro should serve prison time for ignoring a subpoena issued by the House Jan. 6 select committee.
She also believes Navarro should be subjected to a staggering $200,000 fine for his absence.
"The Defendant chose allegiance to former President Donald Trump over the rule of law," Aloi wrote.
The sentencing memo comes just before Navarro is scheduled for a sentencing hearing next week, which will take place in a federal courthouse. Aloi argued Navarro "thumbed his nose at Congressional authority" and would likely do so again to serve the "political interests of his allies and patrons."
Politico noted:
The prosecutor said Navarro summarily refused to aid the Jan. 6 committee’s investigation into the causes of the violent assault at the Capitol — including efforts by Trump to subvert the 2020 election and derail the transfer of power. Navarro worked with allies in Congress on a strategy to help slow Congress’ counting of electoral votes via a strategy that he and fellow Trump ally Steve Bannon dubbed “The Green Bay Sweep.”
Navarro, at the time, declined the subpoena and said he was protected by executive privilege.
Aloi argued that he wasn't able to provide proof that he was covered under executive privilige in her sentencing statement, writing:
"At no time did the Defendant provide the Committee with any evidence supporting his assertion that the former President had invoked executive privilege over the information the Committee’s subpoena sought from the Defendant, or otherwise challenge the Committee’s authority or composition."
She added, "The Court was left with only the Defendant’s fan fiction version of what the Defendant wished or hoped the former President might have wanted but left unsaid."
Navarro's lawyers responded, writing, "Dr. Navarro’s actions do not stem from a disrespect for the law, nor do they stem from any belief that he is above the law."
They added, "Rather, Dr. Navarro acted because he reasonably believed he was duty-bound to assert executive privilege on former President Trump’s behalf."
The American Digest
John Kerry explodes on reporter after being confronted on camera:
Kerry is another failed member of the Biden admin. He doesn’t handle it well when he’s called out on his failures.
And John Kerry explodes on a reporter after being confronted on camera.
Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry has announced his intentions to step down from his position so he can focus on President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign.
But one of his last official pieces of business as Biden’s climate czar includes his attendance at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.
Kerry has attended a lot of these forums and conferences over the years and uses private planes to get to each event.
This has caused Kerry to be deemed a hypocrite for leaving a carbon footprint while lecturing the rest of the world to be better stewards of the earth.
And now he’s been confronted by a reporter from Rebel News for that hypocrisy.
“What’s the carbon footprint of these events every single year that you come here? Do you think it’s worth it – peasants paying for your crimes?” Avi Yemini from Rebel News asked Kerry while he was in Switzerland.
“That’s a stupid question,” Kerry snapped back.
“Nobody ever suggested that”. “Don’t make up stupid questions,” he said after Yemini asked another question about Kerry’s carbon footprint.
Yemini confronting Kerry is something a large portion of Americans were hoping for.
The former secretary of state’s constant lecturing of everyday U.S. citizens has grown incredibly tiresome.
Kerry did more of that while attending the World Economic Forum, saying that Biden’s “clear policy” on electric vehicles “regrettably has been attacked by people who are engaged in high levels of disinformation.”
Perhaps people have realized that electric vehicles are not all that reliable compared to gas-powered cars.
They are also expensive and in the poor economy that the Biden administration has created, most middle-class families can’t afford an electric car.
Hopefully, Biden’s new climate czar won’t be as hypocritical as Kerry has been.
But don’t hold your breath.
The Federalist Wire
Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors:
This is just ‘Informational’ and YOU
must make up YOUR OWN MIND
==================
SUMMARY:
There is NO REPORT on Sunday
Comments