top of page
Search

SUNDAY

New BLOG – Great ARTICLES

SUNDAY 8 -[16]-26



SPIRITUAL:

 Verse-for-TODAY:

New International Version

 

Therefore, since we have these promises, dear friends, let us purify ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit, perfecting holiness out of reverence for God.

Read all of 2 Corinthians 7 ►

 

 

 

CANADIAN:

Inside Pierre Poilievre’s summer of Conservative ‘Disenchantment’

Tories both inside and outside caucus reveal concerns over low morale, lingering frustrations about the party’s loss in the last election and uncertainty about how they can close the gap with Liberals.


For Pierre Poilievre, this summer was meant to be one of reset.

Instead, it brought public infighting sparked by a remark Poilievre made about a prominent Conservative organizer, a tightening fundraising race and the loss of another caucus member, leaving some MPs and insiders worried more departures could follow.

“I think anyone that tells you that everyone’s feeling great right now is either lying to you or to themselves,” said Ben Woodfinden, who worked as Poilievre’s communications director until after last year’s election.


But conversations with Conservatives both inside and outside caucus reveal concerns that run deeper than a difficult few months.

“There is no plan,” one Conservative insider said.


To understand the state of the Conservative party after a turbulent summer, the Star spoke to more than a dozen sources from inside caucus, outside operatives, insiders and supporters, granting them the ability to speak on background to express themselves freely. 



What emerged was a picture of a party struggling to define its path forward. MPs and insiders described low morale, lingering frustrations about the party’s loss in the last election and deep uncertainty about how Conservatives can close the gap with a Liberal government that continues to lead on the question of who Canadians trust to be prime minister.


“There’s a complete lack of enthusiasm for the future,” one caucus member said.

“There’s a lot of disenchantment,” they added. “Mr. Poilievre has to look in the mirror.”

Poilievre’s office did not respond to the Star’s request for comment.

Despite the grumbling about Poilievre, there are private debates over whether, given his popularity with the party, enough members would even be willing to sign a letter to successfully trigger the Reform Act, the mechanism that Conservative MPs used to oust their former leader, Erin O’Toole.


And caucus members are acutely aware of the gravitational pull Poilievre still holds over the party, with one member, who supports Poilievre, rejecting any notion there’s an appetite for a leadership change, saying more than once that constituents have informed them that, “If Pierre’s gone, so am I.”

“There’s no clear answer on how long people are going to give Mark Carney the benefit of the doubt for,” the person said.


“The one thing we can’t control as an opposition party is time,” they added.

Then comes another reality: the lack of a clear alternative — a common refrain from Poilievre’s supporters and party officials and something his critics know.

There also exists the risk that should the party descend into a leadership race, the ensuing contest could be highly divisive and potentially result in a successor that makes things worse.


“Lots of Mr. Poilievre’s critics would miss him quite quickly,” Woodfinden said of a hypothetical leadership change, noting that conservative parties tend to pick those who satisfy the base, which, for the federal party, finds itself increasingly distant from where the wider Canadian public stands on issues.


A third caucus member noted how without Poilievre, there is no guarantee the voters he attracted — more working-class Canadians, first-time voters and men under 40 — will stick around and the reality that, like leaders past, anyone new would be subject to the same public scrutiny and attacks from Liberals.


“Anyone that is thinking about anyone else for leader has to think about ... can they win that leadership?” said Ginny Roth, who worked on Poilievre’s 2022 leadership campaign as his communications director. 


Still, for others, where the frustration lies is not on whether Poilievre stays or goes, but what they perceive as a lack of direction.

“People are very perplexed about the strategic choices and vision for the future,” one Tory insider said. 

While Conservative infighting marked the start of Poilievre’s summer, it did not begin that way.


He earned applause at the end of June for a critic shuffle that saw him place Michael Chong, a well-respected Ontario MP for his work on foreign affairs, into the high-profile finance portfolio, with Shuv Majumdar, a Calgary MP with a background in international relations and connections in Washington, taking the role of critiquing the Carney government on Canada-U.S. trade.

Other moves viewed positively included the promotion of newer MPs, such as Ontario’s Sandra Cobena.


Four days later, that praise evaporated when Poilievre made an unscripted remark during his annual speech at the Calgary Stampede directed at the campaign manager behind Caroline Elliott’s bid to become leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia: Kory Teneycke.


Poilievre took aim by dismissing Elliott’s campaign as being run by “Liberal lobbyists from out east.” The rebuke landed with particular force because three of Poilievre’s former staffers, including Woodfinden, worked on the campaign. Elliott ultimately finished a close second to Kerry-Lynne Findlay.

That speech, billed as a call for unity, had the opposite effect for the Conservatives listening.

 


Opinion


“I thought it was immature and unbecoming of a leader of a party,” said Dan Robertson, who worked as chief of strategy during the party’s 2021 campaign under O’Toole and for both the party and former prime minister Stephen Harper before that.

“The Conservative Party of Canada is a coalition,” he said, that is made up of “many different constituencies.”

“Your job as the leader is to hold that coalition together, it’s not to go to war with one faction of it, or one part of it.”

The jab spread among Conservatives at private dinners and those hitting the party circuit at other Stampede events, many of which were attended by lobbyists — including those who previously worked in conservative politics — and representatives from corporate Canada.


“Who’s going to be bringing their clients to fundraisers anymore?” asked one lobbyist, who has worked on Conservative campaigns in Ontario.

During Stampede, Poilievre also faced questions that brought the party’s struggle to define itself into sharper focus.


Some of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s policy moves, in stark contrast to those of his predecessor Justin Trudeau, have left Conservatives feeling boxed in. Indeed, members of the party’s national council wanted to know from Poilievre how he planned to respond to a Liberal government that appeared more supportive of pipeline development, including its proposal to advance a new million-barrel-a-day link to the West Coast from Alberta.


For his part, Poilievre has spent his summer on the road, attending his MPs’ barbecues and smaller-sized townhalls, filming videos highlighting local candidates.

In September, he is slated to huddle with his caucus for its annual pre-fall sitting in Penticton, B.C., located in one of the ridings Poilievre picked up in the last election. It’s listed as a “toss up” with the Liberals by the polling aggregator 338canada.com.


Before that, Conservatives are watching two key events that could tip the scales.

First is the Aug. 19 deadline when U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest tariffs on a range of Canadian goods are set to take effect unless a trade deal is reached.


Conservatives see vulnerability in what Canada may concede. They point to Carney’s handling of the opening of the Gordie Howe bridge — where he later admitted that he could have done a better job explaining the terms of the deal that will see toll revenue split with the U.S. — as an example of a prime minister who campaigned on standing up for Canada capitulating to Trump.


The other event is a byelection in the Quebec riding of Chicoutimi—Le Fjord, a seat vacated by Conservative MP Richard Martel after Carney appointed him to the Senate.

While Poilievre has been campaigning with the party’s candidate ahead of the Aug. 31 vote, Conservatives have downplayed the prospect of losing the seat, arguing it belonged more to Martel than to the party itself. They point to the former hockey coach’s personal popularity in the riding, which has been represented by all four major federal parties over the past 20 years.


The plan from the Conservatives for now is to make the case that Carney is failing to deliver the change he promised and show Canadians that they are focused on affordability, which remains a top-of-mind issue. 

Robertson said the window for Poilievre to prove he can win is not closed, but warned that “it’s closing.”


“We’re sort of getting into the territory now where Conservatives have to start hoping that ... certain things happen or go their way — and as the saying goes, hope is not a strategy.”

For Woodfinden, his advice is simpler.

“Move on from the summer as quickly as you can and get back to it in the fall.”

The TORONTO STAR



TRUMP: 

CENTCOM fires back at false reports about USS Abraham Lincoln conditions

By 

U.S. Central Command publicly denied claims that seven sailors died in a brawl aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, calling the coverage "rampant misreporting" that harms troops and their families.


CENTCOM posted on X late Thursday, August 11, labeling specific allegations about conditions aboard the carrier as outright fabrications. The command denied that any service members have died during the Lincoln's current deployment and pushed back against reports of a spike in suicidal ideation among the crew. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth backed the response, saying conditions on the ship have been "completely misrepresented."


The Lincoln Carrier Strike Group has spent more than 260 days at sea supporting U.S. operations in the Middle East. That is a grueling stretch by any measure. But the specific claims circulating online, that seven sailors were killed in a fight aboard the carrier, originated in Iranian media and carry no credible supporting evidence, Mediaite reported.


CENTCOM puts its numbers on the table

The command's post did more than issue denials. CENTCOM cited an 84.4 percent crew reenlistment rate aboard the Lincoln, described as among the highest for any Navy aircraft carrier. The strike group has conducted 10,000 aircraft flights and expended 1.5 million pounds of ordnance during the deployment.


Those are not the statistics of a ship in collapse.

CENTCOM did confirm one serious incident: a sailor went overboard on August 3. The sailor recovered within an hour and received medical care, CNN reported. A U.S. official characterized the incident as a mental health episode. But the Navy told CNN it had "not observed an increase in suicidal ideations or attempts aboard the ship."


CENTCOM called the false reports "a disservice to our men and women in uniform and their loved ones." Hegseth, for his part, emphasized the extraordinary demands placed on sailors during lengthy deployments, without conceding that the coverage reflected reality.


Families raised concerns in San Diego, but Iranian propaganda muddied the picture

The Lincoln's deployment has not been without real strain. Approximately 200 family members met with senior Navy officials in San Diego to raise concerns about mental health and safety. Reports have also referenced complaints about food, plumbing, water, mail delivery, and sailor exhaustion, though the Newsmax account does not specify which sailors or families lodged those complaints or when the San Diego meetings took place.


Legitimate concerns from military families deserve serious attention. Extended deployments push crews and their loved ones to the limit, and no one benefits from dismissing that reality. But the fabricated claim that seven sailors died in a brawl is a different matter entirely. That story traces back to unnamed Iranian outlets, the same hostile actors who routinely seek to exploit reports about American forces for propaganda purposes.


Mixing real family anxiety with enemy-sourced fabrications does not help the Lincoln's crew. It undermines them.


Relief is already en route

CNN reported that the USS George Washington is heading to the Middle East as part of a previously planned replacement of the Lincoln. That rotation signals the deployment is winding toward its conclusion through normal operational channels, not because of a crisis manufactured by foreign propaganda or credulous domestic coverage.

The Pentagon has also challenged broader portrayals of conditions aboard the carrier, though no specific Pentagon spokesperson beyond Hegseth is quoted in available reporting.


Open questions remain. No official start date for the Lincoln's deployment has been made public, making it difficult to pin down exactly when the 260-day count began. The specific outlets CENTCOM had in mind, beyond Iranian media, when it referenced "rampant misreporting" are not identified. And the full text of the CENTCOM post has not been reproduced beyond the key phrases quoted.


Sailors who spend nine months at sea defending American interests deserve honest reporting about their service, not recycled Iranian propaganda dressed up as journalism.

The AMERICAN Almanac

 



GLOBAL:

TONIGHT [Saturday]: The UK is putting 1,200 migrants into a town of 700 people

— I’m going there to report

I'm headed to the 700-person English town that could soon house 1,200 migrants

I want to speak directly with the residents, document the protests, confront the people making these decisions and show you what is actually happening. And if I can, I’ll speak with the migrants, too.


I am on my way to England to document the massive protests opposing the Home Office’s plans to house about 1,200 so-called “asylum seekers” at the former military base RAF Barnham, near Thetford.

This little community has around 700 inhabitants. If the plan goes ahead, that would mean almost two migrants for every local resident.


And this is only one of the sites where protests have erupted.

In Thetford, some HMOs — Houses in Multiple Occupation — have already started lodging asylum seekers, and one of the locations is reportedly situated next to a primary school.


The unrest intensified after leaked HMO addresses were published online, with many residents expressing serious safety concerns and saying there had been little to no public consultation.


Usually, it would be Rebel News Commander Ezra Levant going to cover a story like this.

But just a few months ago, when he was planning to travel to England to cover the Tommy Robinson rally, the UK government banned him — along with my colleague Avi Yemini — from entering the country.

So now, I’m going.


I am ready to be on the ground in Thetford to give a voice to those concerned citizens who feel that the Home Office has refused to acknowledge them.

England is facing enormous pressure from illegal migration, including people arriving by small boats across the Channel. This issue is even more important now following what we documented in Ceuta, where thousands of undocumented people crossed into Spanish territory. Once migrants enter Europe, many may continue moving toward other countries — England, France and beyond.


Europe is under pressure, just like we are in Canada, and their problems could very quickly become our problems. Once someone reaches Europe, Canada is only a flight away — and our immigration system has become another destination for those looking to enter the West.

That’s why I’m going there, to see it with my own eyes — and to be your eyes on the ground.


I want to speak directly with the residents, document the protests, confront the people making these decisions and show you what is actually happening. And if I can, I’ll speak with the migrants, too.


Follow my journey at MigrantReports.co.uk. And if you believe it is important to shine a light of scrutiny on this crisis, please consider chipping in to help offset my travel expenses.

I’m heading to England. Stay tuned.


Alexa Lavoie is heading back to Britain to report from the ground on the country's growing migrant crisis.

She'll be covering protests over migrant hotels and illegal Channel crossings, speaking directly with local residents, protesters, police and public officials to show you what's really happening.


Sending a journalist overseas isn't cheap. Flights, accommodations, local transportation and production costs quickly add up. And unlike the government-funded media, Rebel News relies on viewers like you to make this kind of independent reporting possible.

If you want Alexa on the ground in Britain asking the questions others won't, please chip in below to help fund this reporting mission.


Every contribution helps us cover the costs and bring you the stories the legacy media won't.

REBEL News


Clarence Thomas says elite law schools are 'off limits' for conservatives

— Stanford disputes the claim

By 

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas says schools like Stanford Law are "presumptively off limits" to conservatives like himself, a charge the university flatly denies even as its own recent history tells a different story.


Thomas made the remarks during an on-stage conversation with Peter Robinson at the Hoover Institute, singling out Stanford Law School as an elite institution he has never visited. He did not hold back about why.


"That's the reality. That's the world we're in, because there's certain places that are just presumptively off limits," Thomas said. "This is the way it works. And that's true. I mean, I've been to Yale Law School, but that's the way it works. And to say it isn't, is to lie."

Stanford fired back with a statement to Fox News Digital, calling the characterization wrong and extending what amounted to a public invitation.


"We would be honored to host Justice Thomas at Stanford Law School. The Stanford Constitutional Law Center, directed by Professor Michael McConnell, former Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, regularly hosts members of the judiciary on campus."


The spokesperson added that students and faculty "would welcome the opportunity to hear from Justice Thomas and engage with his perspectives on the Court, the Constitution, and the law."


Warm words. But anyone who watched what happened the last time a conservative federal judge tried to speak at Stanford Law might be forgiven for skepticism.


Ninety students, bullhorns, and a DEI dean who sided with the mob

On March 9, 2023, Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit arrived at Stanford Law School to deliver a presentation titled "Covid, Guns, and Twitter." The Stanford chapter of the Federalist Society had organized the event. Two LGBTQ-affiliated student groups, OutLaw and Identity and Rights Affirmers for Trans Equality, known as IRATE, pressured the Federalist Society to cancel the talk or move it to a Zoom call.


The Federalist Society held its ground. Roughly 90 law students did not.

They showed up with signs and bullhorns. The disruptions grew loud enough that Duncan could not finish his presentation. He asked for help from school officials. What he got instead was Tirien Steinbach, Stanford Law's associate dean of diversity, equity, and inclusion, who took the podium and delivered a message that landed squarely on the side of the protesters.


Steinbach told Duncan directly:

"For many people here, your work has caused harm. Is the juice worth the squeeze?"

That is what "welcome" looked like for a conservative judge at Stanford Law School in 2023. Not a debate. Not a tough Q&A. A DEI administrator publicly questioning whether a sitting federal appellate judge's legal work was worth hearing at all.


Stanford Apologized after the Damage was done

Stanford's leadership eventually issued an apology. Dean Jenny Martinez and then-President Marc Tessier-Lavigne told Duncan they were sorry. The school required students to complete mandatory training and clarified its disruption policy: protesting Duncan was protected speech, but physically preventing an invited speaker from delivering a presentation was not.


The apology came after the fact. The training came after the fact. The policy clarification came after the fact. Duncan never got to finish his talk.

And the Duncan episode was not even the first time conservative speakers had been run off at Stanford Law. Three years earlier, then-Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins visited the school to host a discussion.


Twelve student organizations organized a walkout to protest Hawkins's involvement in litigation to end DACA protections for illegal immigrants. More than three-quarters of the audience walked out five minutes into his address.

Hawkins was not shouted down with bullhorns. He was simply abandoned by the room.


Thomas didn't say whether Stanford ever asked him to come

Thomas did not say during his Hoover Institute appearance whether Stanford Law School had ever extended an invitation. He also did not point specifically to the Duncan or Hawkins incidents during his remarks. He spoke more broadly about a culture at elite institutions that he sees as hostile to conservative thought.


Part of that critique extended beyond who gets invited to speak. Thomas argued that the ideas of American economist Thomas Sowell, whom Thomas credits with profoundly shaping his own political views, are absent from college curricula entirely.


"And so what these kids are getting is all that stuff [that] is not there," Thomas said. "It's just on YouTube. It's available to everybody, and they get to make up their own mind."

The implication was plain: students at elite schools are not encountering conservative intellectual traditions in the classroom. They have to find them on their own, outside the institution.

Thomas did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.


Stanford's invitation rings hollow against its own record

Stanford's spokesperson pointed to Professor Michael McConnell, a former Tenth Circuit judge who directs the school's Constitutional Law Center, as evidence that the judiciary is welcome on campus. McConnell's presence is real enough. But McConnell is a faculty member, he works there. The question Thomas raised is whether a conservative Supreme Court justice could walk onto that campus as a guest speaker and expect to be heard.


The record suggests the answer is uncertain at best. A Fifth Circuit judge was shouted down by 90 students while a DEI administrator took the protesters' side from the podium. A Texas solicitor general watched three-quarters of his audience leave within five minutes. The school apologized both times and tightened its policies, but the pattern was already established.


Stanford says it would be "honored" to host Thomas. Maybe so. But honor is measured by what happens when the speaker arrives, not by what the press office writes after the fact.


When the longest-serving current justice on the Supreme Court says elite law schools are closed to people like him, and the school's own recent history backs him up, the polite rebuttal does not carry much weight. Actions speak. Stanford's have spoken clearly.

The AMERICAN Almanac



Patrick Bestall’s INPUT:

Canada = Procrastination Nation

Liberals’ promise to review Bill C-59 now three years overdue

The Liberals have failed to meet their own deadline to review a major national security law that gave security and intelligence agencies such as CSIS sweeping new powers, including citizen review and oversight.

In 2019, the review was stressed with so much importance that its requirement was written into the legislation itself.

.PB

 

 

Human Brain Cells in a Computer? (1 min)

Questions that come to mind:

1.     Why Brain Tissue?

2.     The Ethical Challenges of Biocomputing

3.     The Future of Biocomputing


Biocomputers explained in 15 min.

.PB

 

 

Kiev reburies Nazi hero with honours

The coffin with Konovalets’ remains was driven to the cathedral in a historic Austin armored vehicle from the period of the Russian Civil War of 1917-1922. It was greeted at the scene by two rows of troops, holding torches in their hands.


The unit was formed earlier this year by members of the Azov nationalist movement, which stems from the neo-Nazi Azov regiment that emerged in 2014 during Kiev’s crackdown on Donbass. The regiment faced repeated accusations of war crimes, including torture, rape, and looting, from the UN and international NGOs such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.


.pb comment:  This is why Russians intervened to help their brothers in Donbass.

.PB

 

 

Prophecy about Iran


You can look back over the past few months and see if these prophecies are true.

March:  14 minutes



March:  32 minutes

Notice Jonathan Cahn talks about the Haman plot that backfired.  This is a statement right out of the 6 Cycles of God chart which Don Brooks and I published in April 2015.  We predicted it for the cycle we are in today (the grey box).  Email me if you want a copy...

Patrick <tradingpost777@aol.com>  

.PB

 

 

Is Freemasonry coming out of the closet?


.PB

 

 

 

 

INFORMATION:

Interview with Brian Chau on his new venture leveraging AI to help humans conduct higher quantity and quality investigative journalism (59 min)

 and Brian Chau

Congratulations to Brian Chau for starting Effort News, an independent publication for document-led investigative reporting turbocharged by AI.

The crown is laying in the gutter. Stories go unreported for years, for the sole reason that no one puts in the effort. Ground truth records are available, ignored, and memory holed over time. Now is the time to build new media that is honest, refined, and beautiful.

Everything on Effort News is written by a human, but AI helps with reviewing millions of source materials that would otherwise take years.


In our conversation, we discuss:

·        The gap in data-driven investigative reporting

·        Finding signal in the noise of slop and propaganda

·        How much AI can reduce the manpower and time needed to produce impactful investigations, as seen with welfare and academic fraud

·        Case studies on Effort’s initial stories regarding refugee services, degrowth, and UK interference in American lawmaking

·        Making source materials more digestible and normie/lefty friendly

·        The importance of aesthetics to establish credibility - NYT vs NYP

·        Distribution and economic strategy

·        What topics deserve more attention

·        How we can help Effort find stories worth publishing with human judgment

·        Lessons from Network State’s move from Malaysia to Kazakhstan

 

***Brian is hiring at jobs@effort.news and taking leads at tips@effort.news

From the New World

I am automating investigative journalism at Effort.News…

About Effort News

EFFORT News... defined:

Effort is an independent publication for document-led investigative reporting.

It all started when I was experimenting with using AI for financial auditing. I found stories that were crucial to the public’s right to know, including several of the stories now available at /

 I knew we had to sprint to the launch and launch a publication, directly applying this technology.

I believe the crown is laying in the gutter. Stories go unreported for years, for the sole reason that no one puts in the effort. Ground truth records are available, ignored, and diminished with time. Now is the time to build new media. The time has come for new media that is honest, refined, and beautiful.


I founded Effort on the principle that no diligence will be spared for an investigation. The scope of what we can investigate has massively expanded, because we can chase 1,000 misses for one hit. But the final product cannot be slop. There’s plenty of slop on the internet. The way to surpass that, and what really matters, is manual curation and review of every finalized story. That judgment is what we look for in Effort employees and contributors, both technical and non-technical. If curating the future inspires you, a job is waiting for you at

Brian ChauFounder and CEO, Effort News


Editorial Independence

Effort is a subscriber-funded publication. Subscribers do not receive control over findings, subjects or publication decisions. Effort is dedicated to publishing all the news that is fit to print, however socially, politically, or even financially inconvenient. We will never let the threat of subscriber cancellations supercede our mission of publishing the most valuable information in the public interest.


Jobs

Working at Effort is a once in a lifetime experience. If you are a writer, it might be your first experience with the daily loop of a software startup. If you are a programmer, it might be your first experience with the scrambles of new media. I promise it will be rewarding, I hope it will be fun, and I warn you that it won’t be easy.

We are hiring:

  • Staff writers / editors

  • Frontend designers and programmers

  • Harness engineers

Send us an email at jobs@effort.news.

 

 

 

RUMOUR:

 

RUMOURS Circulating out there...:

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website, and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

 

I may not agree with everything from the content-producers that I share.

Apply critical thinking and use discernment to

Come to your own conclusions regarding the content!

 

You need to MAKE UP Your own MIND!

 

What we think that we now know...

 

REPORT Today

 

The world keeps spinning, and now you’re caught up.

 

Greg Hunter’s USA-Watch-Dog

— Martin Armstrong: 2026 Midterms Very, Very Tight Election


2026 Midterms Very, Very Tight Election

– Martin Armstrong

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

Legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong is out with a new report (more than 100 pages) that takes a deep dive on the “2026 Midterm Elections” in November.  Armstrong says, “The computer is showing this is going to be a very, very tight election.  It’s a 50/50 deal where we didn’t see either party coming in with a landslide.  The bottom line looks like the Democrats can take the House, but not the Senate.  So, you will have a 50/50 divided government.  You are going to get a lot of the crazies on the Democrat side.  Even the conservative Democrats are getting very nervous. 


You recently had (Democrat) James Carville talking about how the party is going to split, which was our forecast in 2024.  So, this is where we are heading.  By the Dems taking the House, you will see all kinds of investigations, there will be another impeachment of Trump, etc.  They will be real obstructionists.  They don’t give a crap about the country.  If Trump says the sky is blue, they have to say it’s red.  This is the way politics degenerated.”

The implications for the Democrats will be long lasting and not in a good way. 


Armstrong says, “If the Democrats take the House, they will basically make this a real s--t fight.  Our computers show for 2028 something very, very interesting.  I have never seen it do this, and it’s showing the Democrats will lose dramatically.  On the Republican side, it shows they win even slightly above 70%. 


You take the two favorites from both sides, which would be Vice President Vance against AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez), Vance would blow her out, yes.  I think the Democrats need to take the House to show the world how screwed up they really are.  There will be a check against them from Trump and the Senate.  They can do an impeachment, but the trial has to be in the Senate, and it’s not going to go anywhere. . ..


It’s going to get much worse before the Midterms.  As I said, these people don’t care about the country.  This has turned into a bloodsport.  This is part of what the computer has been projecting.  By 2032, we are looking at the collapse of Republican forms of government.”


On the war in Ukraine, Armstrong says, “I am not optimistic.  It looks like it goes off the boards by 2030 or so.  Even the EU looks like it’s going to collapse after 2029 and break up again.”


With the Iran war, Armstrong says, “China is using Iran to drain our resources, which has happened.  It takes two to three years to replace the missiles.  Taiwan is up in arms saying to the US, you don’t have the fire power to protect us. . .. You see the same thing with Russia and Ukraine.  They say Russia is weak.  They can’t take Ukraine, and Ukraine has seriously weakened Russia.  That is what Ukraine is doing.  That’s the whole purpose of this, and that was to drain Russia.  Iran is doing the same thing to America.”


Armstrong says don’t expect the stock market to crash anytime soon as money is flowing into and not out of America.  Armstrong also is forecasting a new gold bull market in 2027.


There is much more in the 48-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog as he goes one-on-one with Martin Armstrong to talk about Iran, Ukraine, gold, oil and the 2026 Midterm Elections for 8.15.26.

èRUMOUR-1    

Contact AuthorIf you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.

The END


 
 
 

Comments

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by The Brooks Truth. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page