top of page
Search

THURSDAY

New BLOG – Great ARTICLES

THURSDAY 5-[07]-26



SPIRITUAL:

New International Version

 

Rejoice always, pray continually, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus.

 


 


Note of Appreciation:

Just a quick note for you Don,

I for one am so grateful for the monumental effort you put out each day .... for the benefit of others.

It is sooo ... important that collectively we learn how to share information that seeds decisions, thoughts and practices in a lot of lives, not just ourselves. 

Widom, I believe, is "earned" ... not learned... for the betterment of all, not just ourselves.

May God continue to watch over, guide, project and bless not only you, but all whom you love.

Your friend, now and forever,

Fred

 

CANADIAN:

Is Pharmacare on Ice?

Health minister says no new deals with provinces in the works

Carney Government's recent Budget missing Cash for Nationwide Expansion

Canada’s public pharmacare program appears to be in limbo, with the federal health minister confirming Ottawa isn't in talks with the remaining provinces and territories to reach deals.


This month's budget also did not include additional money to expand coverage nationwide — leaving advocates questioning the future of the public drug plan.

More than a year ago, the Trudeau Liberals passed the Canada Pharmacare Act. In it, the federal government committed to signing agreements with all provinces and territories to cover the cost of contraceptive and diabetes medications and devices.

Seen as the first step to bring in nationwide, universal drug insurance for Canadians, four provinces and territories — B.C., Manitoba, P.E.I. and Yukon — signed deals with Ottawa before the federal election.


But since then, no more agreements have been announced. Health Minister Marjorie Michel tells CBC News her department is not in active discussions to sign any others.

“For now, we have the four provinces with this coverage,” Michel said.

“I'm continuing conversation with provinces and territories on next steps. So not for today, but I'm still continuing conversations."

But are those conversations happening in earnest?

WATCH | Is the Carney government stalling pharmacare?:

Some provinces ready to sign on

CBC News reached out to the remaining provinces and territories to see if they were currently in talks with Ottawa to sign a deal. No jurisdiction said they were.

Ontario’s Ministry of Health did not provide a response. Saskatchewan and New Brunswick both said they were ready to speak with Ottawa. Quebec and Alberta said they were waiting to hear back from the federal government.


Alberta also said it has “serious concerns” about the program’s long-term sustainability. That province has told Ottawa it wants to decide what medications are covered.

“We also have yet to receive details on the federal government's long-term vision for pharmacare or how it will be financially sustained,” the Alberta Ministry of Primary and Preventative Health Services wrote in a statement to CBC News.

WATCH | Health minister confirms talks for diabetes, contraceptive coverage are off:

When asked repeatedly about the nature of negotiations with the remaining provinces, Michel pointed to some of them wanting different medications covered.

“When the pharmacare agreement happened last time, some provinces or territories didn't want to have the two coverages that we offered at that time. And it's still true,” Michel said.


“We are there to support our partners. And I'm having conversation with them on how we can best support them for now.”


But other provinces appear ready to sign agreements with Ottawa under the original framework. Nova Scotia said five months ago it wanted to restart talks.

A spokesperson for the Nova Scotia Health Department tells CBC News the province still hasn't heard back from the federal government.


No new money in budget

Pharmacare advocates point to this fall’s budget as another signal the government may be slow-rolling its commitment.

In over 400 pages, the budget only mentions pharmacare once, when the Liberals say they are “protecting the vital social programs Canadians rely on, from child care to dental care to pharmacare.”


Prime Minister Mark Carney has used the word “protecting” for some time, seemingly a promise to keep existing deals but not pursue more.

“There are certain demands or desires to expand in different areas, and we won't be able to move as quickly as we otherwise would,” Carney said last month.

But the prime minister’s messaging on pharmacare has been mixed. In September, he told reporters that Ottawa was committed to signing the remaining agreements.

If that’s the case, Carney hasn’t earmarked enough cash to make that happen.

His new budget sets aside no additional money to cover the cost of drugs for future deals.

Sixty per cent of the $1.5 billion set aside in 2024 to pay for the medication is already spoken for by the four provinces and territories with existing agreements.

“That’s worrying,” said Teale Phelps Bondaroff with AccessBC, a grassroots group that successfully lobbied for free contraceptives in British Columbia and has advocated for access across the country.


“If the federal government wants to negotiate with large jurisdictions like Quebec and Ontario, they're going to need to bring more money to the table. And we didn't see that in this budget,” he said.


Only 17% of Canadians currently covered

Phelps Bondaroff said the current four pharmacare deals only cover about 17 per cent of the population.

"There's now a huge disparity in Canadians' ability to access life-saving and life-changing medicine. And that's fundamentally unacceptable,” he said.


According to the federal government, one in five Canadians have little to no private drug insurance and must pay out of pocket for their medication. 

A 2024 Leger poll commissioned by the Canadian Cancer Society and the Heart & Stroke Foundation found one in four Canadians surveyed had to choose between paying for prescription medication and cutting back on groceries, rent, house payments, bills or incurring debt.


It's concerning for diabetics like Roger Cook, a New Brunswick man who pays hundreds of dollars a month for his medication and has been waiting to see his province join the national plan.

“People shouldn’t have to go without food to buy medicine, or go without medicine to buy their food. It should be there for them,” he said. “It’s very alarming.”


'Kicking the can down the road'

The lack of clarity from the federal government is also alarming to the federal NDP.

The pharmacare legislation was the result of the confidence-and-supply agreement between the previous Trudeau Liberals and the opposition New Democrats. The NDP agreed to support the Liberal minority government on key votes for more than two years in return for social programs like dental and pharmacare.


"Everyone feels like they're kicking the can down the road,” said the NDP’s health critic Gord Johns.

"We've asked the minister repeatedly and they say they're committed to pharmacare, but there's still no action on any new deals. It's been months that they've had opportunities to sign new agreements,” Johns said.


He said the lack of money in the budget shows the Liberals aren’t truly committed to pharmacare.

“It's not nation-building when you only give certain provinces access.”

CBC

 

 

 

TRUMP: 

FBI raids Virginia Senate leader's office and cannabis dispensary in federal corruption probe

By 

FBI agents executed court-authorized criminal search warrants Wednesday at the Portsmouth, Virginia, office of state Senate President Pro Tem L. Louise Lucas and simultaneously conducted a SWAT-team search of a nearby cannabis dispensary she co-owns, as Fox News Digital reported, citing federal law enforcement sources. At least three people were detained during the raids.


The searches are tied to a federal corruption and illegal marijuana sale probe. A federal judge signed off on the warrants after finding probable cause to authorize the operation. Lucas, a Democrat who chairs Virginia's powerful Finance and Appropriations Committee, told Fox News she had "no idea" what FBI agents were doing at her office.


The raid lands squarely in the middle of Virginia's charged political environment. Lucas is a close ally of Democratic Gov. Abigail Spanberger, for whom she stumped on the campaign trail in 2025. A spokesperson for Spanberger acknowledged the governor "is aware of today's law enforcement operation in Portsmouth" but added that "in the absence of additional details, the Governor will not be commenting on a federal investigation at this time."


What the FBI found in Portsmouth

Federal agents descended on two locations in Portsmouth: Lucas's district office and a cannabis dispensary next door that federal law enforcement sources described as co-owned by the senator. AP News reported that photos showed an armored FBI vehicle and agents outside Lucas's Cannabis Outlet business, which she opened in 2021 and has said sold legal hemp and CBD products.


The FBI confirmed it was conducting a court-authorized search warrant in Portsmouth but did not publicly name Lucas or detail the investigation, the AP noted. Newsmax reported that multiple sources confirmed the raid to ABC affiliate 13 News Now in Virginia, while no statements had been posted by the FBI, the Department of Justice, the FBI Norfolk Field Office, or the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.

The identities of the three people detained have not been disclosed. Whether those detentions led to formal arrests remains unclear.


A long trail of political power

Lucas is no backbencher. As president pro tem of the Virginia Senate and chair of Finance and Appropriations, she wields enormous influence over state spending and legislation. She co-sponsored the 2021 law that legalized marijuana possession in Virginia and continued to back efforts to establish a regulated retail market, a market in which she apparently had a personal financial stake through the Cannabis Outlet.


That intersection of lawmaking and business ownership sits at the heart of the federal probe. When a legislator helps write the rules for an industry and then opens a business in that same industry, the public has every right to expect rigorous scrutiny. A federal judge evidently agreed there was enough to justify sending agents through her door.

The case echoes a broader pattern of Democratic officeholders facing serious misconduct findings while their party leadership looks the other way or deflects.


Republican reaction: 'Sunlight is the best cure'

Virginia state Delegate Wren Williams, a Republican, did not mince words after news of the raids broke. He pointed to what he described as a long-standing culture of impunity among Virginia Democrats.

"Rumors of corruption and pay-to-play politics have long surrounded the Democratic Party's infrastructure in Virginia. However, no one has been willing to do anything to hold these power brokers accountable."


Williams acknowledged the presumption of innocence but stressed the significance of a federal judge authorizing the warrants.

"Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but it takes a federal judge to issue search warrants to the FBI."

He also raised a pointed historical comparison. Williams told Fox News Digital that the last time local officials tried to hold Lucas accountable, they paid a price.

"When the chief of police and prosecutor tried to hold Senator Lucas accountable for her actions last time, each were removed from office shortly thereafter."


Williams closed with a line that read like a warning to Richmond's political class: "Sunlight is the best cure for corruption. I'm sure the Commonwealth of Virginia will be very interested to see what comes of this investigation."


Democrats circle the wagons

The Democratic response followed a familiar script. Virginia House Speaker Don Scott, as quoted by the AP, urged caution: "Right now, there is far more theatrics and speculation than actual information available to the public."

That framing, casting a federal judge's probable-cause finding and a SWAT-team search as mere "theatrics", tells you something about how Virginia Democrats plan to handle this. Dismiss, deflect, wait for the news cycle to move on.


Spanberger's decision to stay silent beyond a boilerplate acknowledgment is politically understandable but hardly reassuring. Lucas was a visible surrogate for Spanberger's gubernatorial campaign. Voters deserve to know whether the governor's office had any prior awareness of the federal investigation and whether any policy decisions involving cannabis regulation crossed paths with Lucas's business interests.


The FBI has operated under intense political scrutiny in recent years, with questions about whether the bureau's investigative decisions have been shaped by partisan considerations. The ongoing debate over FBI leadership only sharpens public attention when agents show up at a state legislator's door.


Lucas's combative posture

Lucas has not been shy about political combat. During the recent fight over Virginia's redistricting map, she took to X to rip into opponents, posting that Democrats would "fight fire with fire" and attaching a GIF of herself dancing. In another post, she declared: "You can bet your a** that Democrats are ready for this fight."


That swagger looks different now. A senator who positioned herself as a fearless partisan fighter is suddenly claiming ignorance about why federal agents are searching her own office and her own business.


The New York Post noted that the warrants were court-authorized based on probable cause, reinforcing that this was not a fishing expedition but a judicially approved search tied to specific allegations of corruption and illegal marijuana sales.

There is a difference between political bravado and legal exposure. Lucas may soon discover which side of that line she stands on.


Open questions the public deserves answered

Much remains unknown. Federal authorities have not disclosed the specific offenses under investigation. The name and precise address of the cannabis dispensary searched have not been officially confirmed beyond Lucas's Cannabis Outlet. The identities of the three people detained remain undisclosed, as does whether any formal charges are imminent.


The court that issued the warrants, the case number, and the docket are all sealed from public view for now. Lucas has not provided any substantive comment beyond her claim of ignorance, and it is unclear whether she has retained counsel.


Concerns about politically motivated federal investigations cut in every direction. When the FBI targets Republican lawmakers on thin pretexts, conservatives rightly object. When the FBI targets a Democratic lawmaker with court-authorized warrants based on probable cause, the same standard of fairness applies, but so does the expectation that the investigation will be pursued to its conclusion, wherever it leads.


Virginia's cannabis industry has grown rapidly since the 2021 legalization law that Lucas helped write. The question now is whether the senator who shaped those rules also exploited them. If the federal probe reveals that a sitting legislator used her position to enrich herself through an industry she regulated, the implications extend far beyond one Portsmouth office.


The broader pattern of Democratic leaders facing uncomfortable scrutiny they once insisted should only apply to their opponents is becoming harder to ignore.


Accountability, finally?

Delegate Williams's most striking comment was not about Lucas herself. It was about what happened to the people who previously tried to hold her accountable. A police chief and a prosecutor, he said, were "removed from office shortly thereafter." If that claim holds up, it paints a picture of a political machine that punishes anyone who gets too close.


Federal investigators are harder to remove than local officials. That may be exactly why this probe is happening at the federal level.

For taxpayers and lawful residents of Virginia, the message is simple: no one, not a committee chair, not a senate leader, not a governor's ally, should be above the law. If the evidence supports charges, bring them. If it doesn't, say so publicly and move on. What Virginia cannot afford is another round of quiet accommodation for the politically connected.


When a legislator writes the rules, opens a business under those rules, and then claims ignorance when the FBI comes knocking, the rest of us are entitled to more than a shrug and a "no comment."

The AMERICAN Almanac

 

 

 

GLOBAL:


Child pred­ator served on school's par­ent coun­cil

Board won't answer ques­tions about man who was group's chair for two years

The Toronto Catholic District School Board has refused to answer questions.

A con­victed child pred­ator who runs a web­site accused of spread­ing pro-rus­sian pro­pa­ganda recently served on a Toronto ele­ment­ary school's par­ent coun­cil.

The Toronto Cath­olic Dis­trict School Board has refused to say why the man was allowed to serve as chair of the coun­cil for two school years, or whether it's changed its vet­ting pro­cess.

Jared Nolan, who also goes by Gerry, pleaded guilty in 2018 to lur­ing a child over the inter­net.


The vic­tim, a 16-year-old girl, wanted to become a nurse and applied in early 2016 for a co-op pos­i­tion at a hos­pital in Allis­ton, Ont., where Nolan worked as a dir­ector of com­mu­nic­a­tions. Nolan, then 33, con­tac­ted her privately through Face­book and said he could assist her, accord­ing to an agreed state­ment of facts.

But their con­ver­sa­tion turned sexual. A few months after she turned 17, Nolan sent the high school stu­dent a pic­ture of his penis and asked for nude pic­tures of her in exchange for money.


She sent him sev­eral pic­tures but he did not pay and blocked her. Even­tu­ally, the vic­tim's father found out about their exchanges and con­tac­ted police. When search­ing Nolan's devices, police found about 50 images and five videos of child por­no­graphy. Nolan was sen­tenced to 18 months in jail and two years of pro­ba­tion.

From 2022 to at least April 2024, Nolan was the chair of the par­ent coun­cil for Pre­cious Blood Cath­olic School in Scar­bor­ough, accord­ing to the coun­cil's news­let­ters and meet­ing minutes.


It is board policy that all volun­teers enter­ing the school or work­ing with chil­dren first undergo a Vul­ner­able Sec­tor Screen­ing police check, but the TCDSB would not say whether that was a require­ment for Nolan to serve on the par­ent coun­cil.

When approached at his home by the Star, Nolan declined to answer any ques­tions, includ­ing why he stopped being on the coun­cil. The fol­low­ing day, he pos­ted on X claim­ing that his 2018 guilty plea was the res­ult of an elab­or­ate con­spir­acy to retali­ate against his “anti-glob­al­ist, anti-war” polit­ical agenda gain­ing trac­tion in a local fed­eral Lib­eral rid­ing asso­ci­ation.


Nolan's post alleges it was the vic­tim who instig­ated con­ver­sa­tions on Face­book, pos­ing as a flir­ta­tious 22-year-old who tried to extort him for $10,000. He said it was a “polit­ic­ally motiv­ated hon­ey­pot.”

“My law­yer sat there with tears in his eyes and begged me to take the plea deal even though he told me he knew I was inno­cent — because it was the only way I could stay with my kids,” Nolan wrote on X.


Asked about this account, Daniel Brown, the law­yer who rep­res­en­ted Nolan in the child-lur­ing case, declined to com­ment. “Regard­less of whether I agree with Mr. Nolan's recol­lec­tion, I am leg­ally and eth­ic­ally pro­hib­ited from com­ment­ing.”

Pre­cious Blood prin­cipal John Pasia declined to com­ment, refer­ring the Star to the school board.


The board declined an inter­view request and did not answer writ­ten ques­tions.

Frank Bene­detto, a law­yer appoin­ted by the Ford gov­ern­ment to super­vise the board last year, did not answer a request for com­ment. Neither did the Min­istry of Edu­ca­tion.

Ontario school coun­cils include the school's prin­cipal, a teacher, another school worker, one or more com­munity mem­bers, and sev­eral par­ents. Their pur­pose is “to improve pupil achieve­ment and to enhance the account­ab­il­ity of the edu­ca­tion sys­tem to par­ents.”


In a June 2024 Ins­tagram post from the par­ent coun­cil, Nolan is seen cook­ing hot dogs at a school event along­side volun­teers, Toronto police officers and dozens of kids. “BBQ suc­cess!!! An unbe­liev­able turnout with unbe­liev­able stu­dents!!” the cap­tion reads.

Dur­ing his second year on the coun­cil and to this day, Nolan has also run The Islander News, which he describes as “a fast-grow­ing plat­form rooted in truth, justice, and the idea that storytelling still mat­ters in a world starved of sin­cer­ity.”


The Islander has been accused of being a mouth­piece for Rus­sian pro­pa­ganda.

French author­it­ies have iden­ti­fied the web­site as one of sev­eral amp­li­fy­ing nar­rat­ives from Storm-1516, a Rus­sian oper­a­tion aim­ing to dis­credit the Ukrain­ian gov­ern­ment, “most likely to lead to the sus­pen­sion of West­ern aid to Ukraine in the con­text of Rus­sia's inva­sion of its ter­rit­ory.”


The Islander's Substack account says it was cofoun­ded by Nolan and Chay Bowes, a self-described Irish journ­al­ist work­ing for Rus­sian state media.

In his recent post on The Islander's X account, which has more than 72,000 fol­low­ers, Nolan said “I've never been part of any for­eign oper­a­tion. I'm anti war and pro.san­ity (sic), full stop.”




Patrick Bestall’s INPUT:

Our army? It's worse than we thought!

It's an invasion of woman-hating foreigners.

(3 min.)

.PB w tx to Joanne Thomas for sending.

 

.PB

 

 

We can afford more than ever?

Politicians don't lie through their nose.  They lie through a different body part.

.PB

 

 

2 CANADIAN POLITICAL SHOCKS

  1. 15 min. describing the latent power and politics of our new Governor General (scary). 

  2. 15 min. describing Canada's EV catastrophe, and the lies about it.

.PB

 

 

Carney threatens Martial Law to stop Alberta

.PB

 

 

Danielle Smith Goes NUCLEAR As Carney OFFICIALLY Plans to BLOCK Alberta Referendum!

The Tim Reports do not seek to discredit or defame any individuals, organizations, or groups. The goal is to promote thoughtful dialogue and critical analysis.

Alberta’s premier announced the province would challenge the constitutionality of the national clean energy regulations it claimed would see its residents “freeze in the dark.”

Alberta's government is seeking a court ruling on the constitutionality of Ottawa's clean electricity grid regulations.

The regulations, finalized late last year, lay out a plan to decarbonize electricity grids across Canada by 2050.

Premier Danielle Smith, who invoked her controversial sovereignty act for the first time in 2023 against draft versions of the regulations that aimed for a clean grid by 2035, says regardless of the timeline Ottawa's goals are too far-fetched and are a breach of provincial jurisdiction.


At a news conference Thursday announcing the court action, Smith said the regulations will only harm the affordability and reliability of Alberta's electricity grid, which is largely powered through natural gas.


"This is about protecting the lives and livelihoods of Albertans," Smith said, saying the regulations would increase electricity costs by over 30 per cent.


"We will not accept the reckless and dangerous policies — policies that will harm our economy, stifle our energy industry, jeopardize the reliability of our electricity grid and raise electricity prices for Albertans."


No indication of action

Abandoning the regulations was also one of nine demands Smith laid out in March after meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney.

On Thursday, she said she's received no indication that the new government under Carney will take action on the file.


The election was on Monday. 

"It depends very much on whether we have pragmatic Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney as our prime minister, or whether we have environmental extremist, keep it in the ground, phase out fossil fuels ... Mark Carney as prime minister," she said.

"I don't know the answer to that yet."


Carney's office did not respond to a request for comment.

Justice Minister Mickey Amery said Thursday the province is referring the question of the constitutionality of the regulations to the Alberta Court of Appeal.

He said a schedule with the court needs to be determined before it's known when a decision on the case can be expected.


'Three days in'

Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi told reporters that Smith seems more concerned about fighting with Ottawa than striking a deal that is beneficial for both levels of government.


"Three days in with no minister in place, no one to fight against, she launches this lawsuit," Nenshi said, referring to how Carney has yet to appoint a new cabinet.

"If she sat down with the prime minister and made a deal, we would have proper regulations that would bring certainty for investment to Alberta within the next month. Instead, she's going to take years."


Nenshi said he also thinks the federal regulations would be punishing for Alberta, but said Smith's insistence on taking Ottawa to court rather than negotiating will make it worse.


"We heard (Carney) talk about Canada as a clean and conventional energy superpower," Nenshi said. "So rather than insulting him and saying, 'You're lying,' why not give him an opportunity to prove that he wasn't lying?"


Jason Wang, a senior electricity analyst with the clean energy think-tank the Pembina Institute, said Alberta is right to be concerned about the affordability and reliability of its energy grid, but should act on those concerns by expanding opportunities for renewable electricity to come online.


"Alberta is swimming against the tide by focusing on gas to run its grid long into the future," Wang wrote in a March report.


"This erodes its attractiveness as an investment destination — given that we know demand for low-cost, clean power is going to keep growing as new power-hungry industries, like data centres, look for places to set up business."


Wang said in a statement Thursday that the finalized regulations addressed Alberta's concerns about reliability, as carbon intensity thresholds were increased as was the length of time that newly built gas-powered generators can remain online.


Smith said Thursday those concessions mean little because Ottawa is still overstepping.

"It violates the Constitution, and we're going to argue that vigorously in court," she said.


Related Stories

 

 

.PB

 

 

Truth about the Scofield Bible (13 min)

I first learned all this from Rick Wiles' TruNews.

The Scofield Bible is like a Bible Cliff Notes that Christian Zionists use as their reason behind supporting Israel.

What most of them don't know is that the Scofield Bible was funded by Wall Street elites and supported by early Zionists long before the state of Israel ever existed.

.PB

 

 

We celebrate destruction of CDN history?

.PB

 

 

New laws hide our politicians from Freedom of Information Access

This was in May 2 London Free Press

.PB

 

 

 

RUMOUR:

 

RUMOURS Circulating out there...:

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website, and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

 

I may not agree with everything from the content-producers that I share.

Apply critical thinking and use discernment to

Come to your own conclusions regarding the content!

 

You need to MAKE UP Your own MIND!

 

What we think that we now know...

 

REPORT Today

 

The world keeps spinning, and now you’re caught up.

 

Restored Republic via a GCR as of May 7, 2026

Judy Note: I’m sorry, but I just have not had time to complete an update tonight.My personal opinion is that we will have messages over our phones beginning Sunday, possibly notification to set exchange appointments next Tuesday and the ten days of darkness after that… but that is just my guess.Love, Judy

==========

Ep 3899a – Marco Rubio Confirms Energy Is Being Set Free, Right On Schedule, Watch What Happens Next

Streamed on: May 6, 6:00 pm EDT

Companies are jumping ship in Canada, it makes no sense to manufacture in Canada and ship to the US when there is trade friction. 4.3 million have been removed from SNAP. ADP employment is improving. Marco Rubio confirms that Iran/[CB] control the price of oil and that control is being removed.

Ep 3899b – [DS] Players No Longer Have Protection, Kash Reveals We Got It All, Timing Is Everything

Streamed on: May 6, 6:30 pm EDT

The [DS] players no longer are getting the intelligence information, they don’t have protection from the FBI/DOJ, they are panicking. Trump is close to getting a deal with Iran, no nukes and they will hand over the Uranium and the Strait will not be controlled. Obama/HRC and others are panicking now. Kash reveals that they have investigation happening and they got it all. Timing is everything.

========

A Legacy Worth Defending,              Fight for What is Right, ICE to NICE, Boom Communicate!

In an era of rapid change and increasingly complex global and domestic challenges, staying informed has never been more crucial. The latest video from And We Know Official delivers a wide-ranging discussion, offering a comprehensive overview of political, military, and social topics that shape the current landscape. From geopolitical strategies to domestic law enforcement triumphs and the ongoing battle for election integrity, the video aims to provide viewers with an in-depth perspective on the forces at play.


One of the central pillars of the discussion revolves around U.S. foreign policy, particularly concerning Iran. The video emphasizes the marked shift under President Donald Trump’s administration, portraying a “tough stance” that starkly contrasts with what is described as his predecessor, Barack Obama’s, policy of “financial appeasement.”


Viewers are presented with a detailed account of military operations credited with significantly degrading Iran’s navy, air force, and missile capabilities. The ongoing blockade of Iranian vessels is highlighted as a testament to this assertive approach, underscoring a strategic pivot in how the United States engages with its adversaries on the global stage.


Shifting gears to domestic matters, the video illuminates significant successes in law enforcement and the fight against fraud. Audiences learn about massive fraud takedowns across the country, attributed to the diligent efforts under FBI Director Kash Patel. The discussion points to impressive statistics, including a reported 112% increase in violent criminal arrests, suggesting a vigorous push to reclaim law and order.


A particularly revealing segment exposes widespread fraud within federal programs, such as SNAP benefits, detailing instances of benefits being issued to deceased recipients and individuals receiving double benefits – issues that underscore the need for greater oversight and accountability in government spending.


The intricate world of election integrity and political developments also takes center stage. The video delves into critical issues like redistricting and efforts to ensure fair electoral processes. The Supreme Court’s rulings on race-based congressional maps are discussed, alongside the ongoing push to remove dead voters from electoral rolls, highlighting the profound political consequences these actions have in various states.


These discussions aim to foster a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that uphold—or challenge—the integrity of the democratic process.

Beyond politics and policy, the discussion also touches upon salient social issues, including various vaccine-related controversies, important addiction recovery programs, and thought-provoking cultural contradictions brought to light by public figures.


The broad scope ensures that viewers receive a holistic picture of the challenges and opportunities facing the nation.

The video from And We Know Official concludes with a powerful message, offering affirmations of faith, patriotism, and a compelling call for unity and perseverance.


It encourages viewers to stand firm in defending American values and sovereignty, especially when confronted by foreign threats and domestic adversities. To truly grasp the depth and breadth of these discussions and to gain further insights into the presented information, we encourage you to watch the full video from And We Know Official.

===========

THE END


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by The Brooks Truth. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page