top of page
Search

Tuesday 1-17-23

Tuesday 1-17-23


Verse(s) for today:

Cause me to hear thy lovingkindness in the morning; For in thee do I trust: Cause me to know the way wherein I should walk; For I lift up my soul unto thee.

Psalm 143:8 KJV


And this is the confidence that we have in him, that, if we ask any thing according to his will, he heareth us:

1 John 5:14 KJV



TWO Major EVENTS this WEEK:


Trading Post event tomorrow eve in Lambeth:

See FLYER following… [Patrick Bestall]


Calling all CHRISTIANS:

See FLYER followingSee you at LGT Friday Evening!

We are looking to Have a Re-Boot Conference here in London in MARCH…

Come and find out what is happening… This is scheduled as a Men’s Event! [Norm Steele]


FDA Advisers Are Angry at Moderna for Hiding Data:

Are they pretending to be independent to save themselves?


It turns out that the FDA advisers approved Moderna booster shots based on “antibody counting,” a quack medicine approach called immunobridging.

The reason immunobridging is medical quackery is pointed at by the “laughing emoji” above. Despite having “more antibodies,” MORE people in the bivalent group caught Covid compared to people in the monovalent (old booster) group.

Despite being there in larger numbers, the antibodies facilitated the infection instead of preventing it. Thus, reliance on antibody counts is medical quackery, as the real-life experimental data proves them useless at best.

FDA charlatans approved the Moderna bivalent Covid booster for millions of people based on antibodies in TEN MICE (who all got sick with Covid when challenged with the virus).

And now, the FDA advisers are “angry” that Moderna did not present real-life data showing that bivalent-boosted people are 68% (3.2/1.9) more likely to get Covid.

Why did they not get angry several months before?

The data that was not presented was available in plain sight!

Despite these imperfections, the data was included in a preprint study that was posted online in June, again in September in an FDA document and then later that month in a top medical journal – and advisers to the FDA and the CDC said the data should have been shared with them, too.

The FDA advisers are not reading the literature and top medical journals. What do they do in their spare time?

Michael Felberbaum, an FDA spokesman, told CNN in an email that “the FDA received the preprint less than a day prior to the advisory committee meeting,” and “the information was therefore not provided in an adequate timeframe for it to be included in the agency’s meeting materials, and generally the FDA only discusses data at advisory committee meetings that the agency has had the opportunity to substantively review.”

Hm. The FDA only discusses data at advisory committee meetings that the agency has had the opportunity to substantively review??? That’s a lie. The FDA approved the “Covid vaccine for babies” just TWO DAYS after receiving the submission.

The FDA was good at rubber stamping stuff while they considered themselves invincible.

Now that the public is asking pointed questions, FDA advisers are suddenly “angry” at Moderna. Are they trying to save themselves from repercussions and future prosecution?

Should we offer them “pandemic amnesty”? [Global Research]

PETITION:

STOP Bill 42!!

https://www.pafe.ca/stop_bill_42?

You might remember the email we sent out before Christmas, informing you of the NDP Bill 42, the replacement of 2021’s Bill 17, the Gender Affirming Health Care Advisory Committee Act, which passed first and second reading within 24 hours and was then referred to the Standing Committee on Social Policy. It died before making it to third reading when Parliament was dissolved for the June election.

On November 16, 2022, four other NDP MPPs introduced a new version of Bill 17--Bill 42—with the same name as before, which passed on first reading.

The Swedish medical journal, Lakartidningen, published an article in December 2022, stating that new guidelines will advise against invasive procedures for anyone under 18. Instead, Sweden (and also Switzerland which announced their similar guidance on December 21, 2022) will offer psychological assistance to help individuals thrive in the bodies they were born in.

Bills like Bill 17 and Bill 42 set out to make “gender affirming” health care—care that supports gender transition, including through hormone blockers and surgeries,--more easily accessible to ALL Canadians, including minors.

If this bill passes, children will be able to seek gender transitioning procedures, without parental consent. In fact, in schools already, some teachers are suggesting that children do not tell their parents, and keep their gender-transitioning, a secret. They have gone so far as to even instruct fellow classmates not to mention their peers' gender treatment to their parents. Bill 42 provides a list of who should be consulted for advice, and big surprise; parents are not mentioned in the Bill, anywhere.

There are numerous groups of people whose experiences should be considered when such guidelines are drawn up, including the numerous Canadian “de-transitioners” who choose to reverse their transitions. Trans regret is very real, and has already affected too many real people and their families. To read a story on a Canadian group that was founded to speak for Canadian de-transitioners, please CLICK HERE. Another group that deserves recognition is young people with co-morbidities such as autism, ADHD, anxiety and trauma. Such co-occurring conditions tend not to be taken into account under the gender affirmative model of care. As with parents, the bill makes no reference to recruiting people from these communities.

Instead of travelling further down the road of incredibly damaging and life-altering “health care”, the Ontario government ought to scrap this unproven and high risk “care” model.

The child abuse of hormone treatment and surgical mutilation that is hidden behind the “gender affirmation”, the euphemism of choice for radical gender ideologues, has no business in Ontario or in Canada.

ACTION ITEM:

Please sign our petition to express your disgust with Bill 42 to the Members of the Ontario legislature and Premier Doug Ford. CLICK HERE to sign the petition!

We want to continue to keep you updated on these issues, but we need your help! Please donate to PAFE, so we can continue to keep you informed on more issues like these!

Best regards,

Teresa Pierre, Ph.D. [Parents As First Educators… PAFE]




They’ don't want you to see this:

It's happening right now.

As you're reading this, international Elites are meeting in Switzerland at the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit.

This week I'm giving away my must-read book -- "The American Response to the Great Reset" -- FOR FREE.

This powerful book EXPOSES the danger of the Great Reset and empowers every American to help DEFEAT this radical leviathan.

And this week, as the World Economic Forum meets AGAIN to discuss their "Great Reset" agenda, I want to get this book in the hands of as many patriots as possible.


Although patriots like YOU have helped to expose the WEF's dangerous "Great Reset" agenda, the work of this powerful, un-elected group has not let up.

That means freedom-loving Americans like you and me can't let up either!

Maybe you've heard of the Great Reset before -- or maybe this is all new to you.

But make no mistake: this radical agenda, formed by the world's so-called "Elite," could soon control OUR lives and OUR country.

  • • the shadowy figure, a man named Klaus Schwab, who founded the World Economic Forum and the role that Elites like Bill Gates and others have played


  • • the WEF's "8 predictions" for the future ... or, put more bluntly, the ways they want to force every citizen in the world to live


  • • the Great Reset plans of attack against Western Civilization and the damage it has done to our economic and social infrastructure already [Charlie Kirk, TPUSA]



Biden Aides Discover Shocking Secrets Inside Joe’s Home:

The most recent batch of classified information was found in a different location than the private office Biden held in Washington, DC, which was associated with a University of Pennsylvania think group.

Asserting his ignorance of their contents, Biden said on Tuesday that he was “surprised” that secret documents had been discovered in his hands.

At a press conference in Mexico City, Biden responded to the revelation for the first time, saying, “I was briefed about this discovery and astonished to see that there are any government records that were moved there to that location.”

He continued, “I don’t know what’s in the docs. My attorneys have not advised me not to inquire as to what documents they were.”

Additionally, Biden stated on Tuesday that “boxes” of records had been given to the archives.

Any further information regarding the records, which were first uncovered just days before the 2022 midterm elections, has been rebuffed by the White House.

[American Right – TV]


Report:

Left-wing activists nudging Justices Sotomayor, Kagan to retire:

Amid concerns of a repeat scenario in which the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's refusal to retire when Democrats controlled the Senate resulted in the now-pronounced conservative shift at the U.S. Supreme Court, a growing number of far-left activists are urging current Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan to consider early retirement, as Politico reports.

Ian Millhiser of Vox also recently wrote in favor of Sotomayor and Kagan stepping down earlier than they may have expected, suggesting that with Democrats in charge of the White House as well as the Senate, now is the time to act.

Putting the situation in rather blunt terms, Millhiser declared, “We have now lived with the consequences of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's late-life arrogance for more than two years, and according to several progressive advocacy groups, the point is indeed well-taken.

Millhiser warned in particular that “[b]arring extraordinary events, Democrats will control the White House and the Senate for the next two years. They are unlikely to control it for longer than that. The 2024 Senate map is so brutal for Democrats that they would likely need to win a landslide in the national popular vote just to break even.”

“If Sotomayor and Kagan do not retire within the next two years, in other words, they could doom the entire country to live under a 7-2 or even an 8-1 Court controlled by an increasingly radicalized Republican Party's appointees,” he continued.

Slate senior legal affairs writer Mark Joseph Stern seemed to agree, writing on social media, as the Washington Examiner noted, Ian is indisputably correct about the political calculus here,” though he expressed regret about the situation, adding, “Sotomayor and Kagan are brilliant justices, and I'd be sad to see them go.”

Even so, Stern continued, “After 2025, Democrats may not hold the White House and the Senate for a decade+. This argument should be taken seriously.”

According to Politico, there are some Democrats in the Biden administration's inner circle who indicated – on condition of anonymity – that they believe Sotomayor, at least, should retire.

They did, however, note the potentially troublesome optics of publicly seeking the retirement of the first Latina to sit on the high court.

“It's absolutely a conversation that's being had. But the public conversations are very different from the behind-the-scenes conversations,” Molly Coleman, executive director of progressive legal reform group People's Parity Project told Politico.

Brian Fallon, the leader of Demand Justice, a progressive court reform group that aggressively prodded former Justice Stephen Breyer to retire, indicated that no such initiative will be launched with regard to Sotomayor.

Fallon told Politico, “I certainly understand the argument and think it is fair to ask the question, but we do not plan to mount any campaign on this like we did last year for Breyer.”

“No judge is above reproach, but as crisis-level situations go, this does not seem as acute as Breyer was,” Fallon added.

Though progressives harboring hopes that Kagan or Sotomayor – or both – will depart the court while Democrats have the power to nominate and confirm an ideologically suitable replacement remain reluctant to mount a real pressure campaign just yet, as 2024 gets closer, the changed political landscape may end up stoking enough fear to force their hands. [The American Digest]


Mining:

With climate change pushing the U.S. toward more rapid adoption of new technologies, many Republicans and Democrats are in rare agreement on one key point: This country needs a lot more mines.

But exactly how much new mining is required for the energy transition isn’t clear.

Electric cars, wind turbines and solar panels are made with a wide variety of minerals — from graphite to tellurium — that currently are only available in a few corners of the globe. Some of these minerals are not mined enough to feed a world powered without fossil fuels — particularly lithium, a metal vital for electric cars and other battery-reliant products.

[GreenWire Publications]

[Don Hill]



THE W.H.O. WANTS TO CONTROL EVERYTHING YOU DO:

I think it's 23 min., and I'd say, if I understood the researcher correctly, these three days (Jan. 16-18) they are working on proposed amendments for WHO, that are to be submitted 4 mos. ahead (meaning they could be passed in May), which would be legal (because of the way they're planning), and our national sovereignty would be GONE, that we NEED to get OUT of WHO. You may understand much more than I did, on my listening/grasping the consequences of what is going on quietly, as evil moves in like a flood. (I pray, in Jesus' Name, for evil to be exposed, and righteousness exalted.) [Dianne Dawson]


Who ya gonna trust?

COMPARE STATS:


Not American institutions…


Not Canada's institutions



Maybe Russia, the only undivided country (even China is split with as many Christians as Communists).


Not the "leaders" at Davos WEF this year


Hal Turner Radio Show

Something really major is going on concerning the World Economic Forum gathering in Davos, Switzerland. I reported earlier that WEF Chief Klaus Schwab would not attend due to health reasons, and later, George Soros backed out due to a scheduling conflict. Now I can report to all of you that upwards of FIFTY PERCENT of invitees, will not be showing up. The last time a WEF Meeting was ditched like this . . . . was the week of the 9-11 attacks!

As of 4:29 PM eastern US time here in the New York city area, we are told that “REBEL NEWS” from Canada is at the Davos location, and they are allegedly reporting only a few dozen people were at the opening and a maximum of maybe 400 are in attendance. There were 2700 confirmed attendees (plus staff) scheduled to be there today — and they’re not.


So, the bad news is the failure of democracy to earn trust. The GOOD news is that people are waking up to their games! Listen to our own Ezra Levant reporting to Alex Jones today for 11 minutes direct from Switzerland.




David YEO:



$0ng: Ju$T $@Y N0 (5 Min)


BT0 Drumm3r R0bb!e G0n3 @ 69 (1 Min)


$T3W: G3rm@ny J@!L$ AnT!-M@$K D0cT0r (14 Min)


25 Y3@R 0Ld MD**Ran W@xxed CL!nic$*D!3d Sudd3nLy (2 Min)


D0c Chr!$: W@xxed Pr3gn@n+ W0m3n (1 Min)


C0nV!D 1984**Th3 Gr3@T R3$eT D0cum3nT@ry (106 Min)


Gr33N $cr33n: B3fore & Aft3r (2 Min)


$T3W: D!D Nur$3 D0v3r F@ke h3r D3@TH? (10 Min)




Here’s what World Economic Forum [W.E.F.] leaders hope to push at this year’s Davos conference:

(LifeSiteNews) — Since World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab announced in 2019 that “[w]hat the fourth industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, digital, and biological identity,” the annual meetings of the globalist organization in Davos have broadly focused on this agenda for the future. What does this mean?

The WEF publishes a Global Risks Report before every meeting, which usually takes place in January each year. This year they have reduced their risk forecasts from the two-, five-, and ten-year model of previous years to a simpler prediction of the threats facing the world over the next two and ten years. [Thank you. Debbie Mattson]

Events in Davos & Ukraine:

Listen from :37 to 1:07 (half an hour). For highlights and hypocrisy, just open my attached Word document.

After that, Clayton and his wife discuss the fake main stream media news about Ukraine (they know it's fake because they have friends in journalism who are over there telling us the truth). Zelensky likes to sabotage and destroy his own infrastructure to get more out of NATO countries when they hear of the innocent deaths. Naive friends must watch this for 20 minutes (until the 1:27 mark). [Thank you, Patrick B. & Fred S.]

TOMORROW in LAMBETH




23 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page