Wednesday 4-24-24
Verses for today:
Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.
Colossians 3:2 KJV
Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must
be saved.
Acts 4:12 KJV
In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
1 Thessalonians 5:18 KJV
What one RINO just did to the Supreme Court will leave you, red with rage:
Conservatives thought they only had to worry about Democrats attacking the Court. Now their allies in the Republican Party are joining in.
And what one RINO just did to the Supreme Court will leave you red with rage.
The Left has been after the Supreme Court for years.
They hate that Donald Trump was able to nominate so many justices to the Court that they can’t live with it.
That’s why they’ve been trying to push out old liberals for newer, more radical liberals.
And it’s why they’ve pushed for packing the Court with more and more justices to dilute the conservative majority.
Now one RINO is trying to strong arm the Court into ruling against Trump.
Former Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney said Monday that the Supreme Court should rule that former President Donald Trump has “no immunity” from prosecution and that any delay in his federal trial will have a “profoundly negative impact.”
“If delay prevents this Trump case from being tried this year, the public may never hear critical and historical evidence developed before the grand jury, and our system may never hold the man most responsible for Jan. 6 to account,” Cheney, who is one of Trump’s biggest critics on the Right, wrote in a New York Times op-ed.
Cheney’s remarks came just days before the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on Thursday on whether Trump may be immune from prosecution in special counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 election subversion case.
Smith has frequently stated that there is a considerable “public interest” in holding a trial on the four-count indictment before the November presidential election, and he has also encouraged expediency in settling the immunity argument.
Trump’s lawyers recently conceded to the Supreme Court that if it does not grant him full immunity in Smith’s case, it should at the very least return the case to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to determine whether any partial theory of immunity would apply to his case, a result that would still push the trial back several months.
Legal experts warned the case might face more delays if Trump is given the opportunity to contest the extent to which each of the four counts in the indictment is based on official conduct of the then-president.
Smith claims Trump’s alleged involvement in a conspiracy to submit forged election certificates to Congress in the hopes of overturning Joe Biden’s victory constituted a series of crimes.
Trump claims he was only voicing his fears about possible voter fraud and has pleaded not guilty to the allegations.
Cheney, a former chairwoman of the Republican Conference, stated that the Supreme Court’s action is critical for the public to watch “historic testimony” that is “likely to remain secret until the special counsel presents his case at trial.”
Trump had previously suffered losses on his immunity theory after Chutkan and a three-judge panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied his attempt to dismiss the accusations.
“Early this year, a federal appeals court took less than a month after oral argument to issue its lengthy opinion on immunity,” Cheney said, adding that “history shows that the Supreme Court can act just as quickly, when necessary.”
Trump’s case on Thursday will be the only one argued this term, with a judgment expected between early May and late June.
D.C. Daily Journal
Tommy Robinson's Arrest Overturned Due to Police Error
By Robert Cunningham
updated on April 23, 2024
In a striking legal turnaround, Tommy Robinson, a controversial figure often in the spotlight, has seen charges against him dismissed. The Westminster Magistrates’ Court ruled that the police order banning him from a pro-Israel protest was invalid due to a clerical error.
According to Breitbart News, the error, a misdated dispersal order by Met Police Inspector Steve Parker-Phipps, was admitted in court, where it was revealed that the inspector's laptop battery had died, leading to the critical mistake.
Robinson was arrested while attending the demonstration organized by the Campaign Against Antisemitism, which had specifically requested police to bar him from participating.
During his arrest, police employed synthetic pepper spray and restrained him with handcuffs, an action that has now been declared unlawful along with the entire arrest process. Robinson, acting as a journalist at the time, claimed this incident was a significant infringement on his rights, including freedom of speech and assembly.
The High Cost of Legal Battles
The financial and emotional toll on Robinson due to these legal proceedings has been substantial. Despite his victory in court, Robinson was not awarded costs and has cited personal financial losses amounting to £60,000 due to repeated court appearances. This situation underscores a broader issue of what he describes as "lawfare," where the process itself becomes a form of prolonged punishment.
Robinson expressed the depth of his ordeal:
For the last six months I’ve had to go to a Muslim police officer and ask permission to come into my own capital city, of which one of the meetings was to interview a member of Parliament. That Muslim police officer refused that request. That is a police state, that is not freedom. The judge today stood on the side of truth, but I have been in these politicized buildings too many times.
Sheila Gunn Reid, a supporter of Robinson, also highlighted the punitive nature of the ongoing legal battles, stating that the process is designed to suppress opposition effectively through financial and logistical hardships.
Upcoming Protest and Societal Implications
Looking ahead, Robinson plans to organize a demonstration on June 1st in London to protest "two-tier policing." This term refers to a perceived disparity in how the law is applied to different groups within society. This concern resonates with a segment of the public wary of governmental and policing biases.
Robinson's case also touches on broader societal concerns. He points out the constraints placed on his movements and interactions, contrasting them with what he perceives as leniency shown towards other groups.
This sentiment taps into ongoing debates about fairness and equality before the law, echoing wider national and global discussions on civil rights and liberties.
In conclusion, Tommy Robinson’s legal ordeal ended in a victory that raises significant questions about the UK's balance of civil liberties, law enforcement, and political bias.
The clerical error leading to the dismissal of charges against him has exposed vulnerabilities in the legal process, highlighting the potential for misuse and the heavy toll it can take on individuals. As Robinson plans his next steps, the implications of his case continue to resonate with those concerned about justice and equity in law enforcement.
Capitalism Institute
Legal Maneuvers Against Trump Reflect Polling Fears
By Robert Cunningham
updated on April 23, 2024
In a bold statement from the heart of Manhattan's legal district, controversy surrounds former President Donald Trump. Alina Habba, Trump’s attorney, asserts that legal actions against him are politically motivated and aim to counter his poll numbers rather than his actions.
Habba's fiery remarks followed the initial arguments in what is known as the hush money case, where Trump faces accusations over the alleged misuse of business records.
According to Breitbart News, Habba, who spoke outside the New York State Supreme Court Building, criticized the dual use of criminal and civil courts in dealing with Trump, branding these efforts as a strategic move by Democrats.
The legal battles span various charges, including the alleged inflation of asset values to gain favorable loan conditions. A significant bond was initially set at $454 million, later reduced to $175 million by an appellate court, allowing Trump to appeal without the immediate seizure of his assets by Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Alina Habba’s Critique of the Judicial Process
As the legal skirmishes unfold, Habba has not minced words in her critique of those she holds responsible. She accuses Judge Arthur Engoron and Attorney General Letitia James of lacking a fundamental understanding of financial principles, underlining a perceived incompetence in handling Trump's financial litigation.
Habba stated:
I am sick of coming in front of the press and saying this, but you have to because you people need to understand what is going on. God, forbid you put an accounting thing in for ‘legal counsel.’ … Because they’re afraid of 2024. And you know what? They should be because the American people are not stupid. They see what’s going on.
This exasperation stems from what Habba describes as Bragg's prosecution team's trivialization of the judicial process in the hush money case, which she labels a “joke” and “an affront” to the system.
Public and Legal Perceptions in a Politically Charged Environment
Habba’s rhetoric is sharp and mirrors a broader sentiment among Trump supporters who view these legal challenges as nothing short of a witch hunt.
“You should not have two teams of lawyers here today. You should not even be here today because he did nothing wrong. It is the epitome of a witch hunt,” she declared. This statement encapsulates the frustration felt by Trump's legal team in the face of the ongoing legal proceedings.
The case highlights broader issues within the American judicial and political arenas, as perceived by conservatives, especially regarding how legal systems are leveraged during politically sensitive times. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, these legal entanglements could significantly impact public opinion and political strategies.
In conclusion, the unfolding legal drama around former President Donald Trump continues to stir significant debate and scrutiny. Alina Habba stands at the forefront, vocally defending Trump against what she deems are politically motivated legal attacks aimed at influencing poll results rather than addressing legitimate legal concerns.
The implications of these cases extend beyond the courtroom, hinting at underlying political strategies and the possible influence on upcoming electoral battles. This saga questions the integrity of legal processes and underscores the deep political divisions within the United States.
Capitalism Institute
Supreme Court Critiques Biden’s Enforcement on Protestors
By Robert Cunningham
updated on April 22, 2024
A contentious dialogue unfolds within the hallowed walls of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The highest court in the land is scrutinizing the Biden administration’s handling of protests and riots, particularly those involving conservative groups.
Questions posed by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito during the Fischer v. United States case highlight perceived inconsistencies in applying laws, especially concerning the January 6 Capitol riot, the Washington Examiner reported. This case revolves around Joseph Fischer, charged with obstruction and assaulting police officers during the events of January 6, 2021.
Critical Examination of Law Enforcement Disparities
Like over 300 others from the nearly 1,400 defendants from that day, Fischer was indicted under a statute designed to penalize obstruction of federal proceedings. Gorsuch and Alito pointed out what they saw as a selective application of these laws, with a particular focus on those supporting conservative causes.
They contrasted this with the lighter penalties faced by left-leaning individuals who disrupted government proceedings, such as progressive Representative Jamaal Bowman, who set off a fire alarm before a key vote.
The Supreme Court's questioning further extended to how these laws are applied across different political spectrums. Alito and Gorsuch raised concerns about whether the same rigorous standards were applied to protests supporting leftist causes compared to those by conservative groups. This inconsistency was noted particularly in the contrasting treatments of anti-abortion protesters and urban rioters, suggesting a double standard in the enforcement of federal statutes.
Judicial Queries Highlight Potential Bias
During the oral arguments, Justice Gorsuch inquired about the broad applications of the obstruction statute:
Would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify [as illegal obstruction]? Would a heckler at today’s audience qualify or a heckler at the State of the Union address? Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?
These questions underline the justices' concern about the potential for a broad interpretation of the law, which could disproportionately impact certain groups over others. Gorsuch further questioned the application of the law to protests that were mostly peaceful yet obstructive:
Why would a mostly peaceful protest … that actually obstructs and impedes an official proceeding for an indefinite period would not be covered?
Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, emphasized the importance of intent in such cases, stating, “We would have to have the evidence of intent.” However, the administration's rationale behind its prosecutorial discretion was not detailed in the discussions.
Political Repercussions of Judicial Scrutiny
The case and the subsequent discussions in the Supreme Court have sparked a broader debate on the political ramifications of legal interpretations and their enforcement.
Critics of the Biden administration, including voices from the conservative spectrum, view this as a fundamental issue of fairness and equity in the judicial process. They argue that the administration's approach could be seen as part of a broader trend of politicizing legal standards depending on the administration's alignment.
Conclusion:
A Matter of Equity and Justice
The Supreme Court's deliberations in the Fischer v. United States case have highlighted significant questions about the equal application of laws. The concerns raised by Justices Gorsuch and Alito reflect a deeper unease within segments of the American populace regarding potential biases in how justice is administered.
Whether these concerns will prompt changes in prosecutorial practices remains to be seen, but the dialogue has undoubtedly set the stage for further discussions on justice and fairness in America.
Capitalism Institute
David YEO:
W!TCH HUNT (1 Min)
G@MBL!NG ADD!CT!0N RU!N3D his L!F3 (19 Min)
N0T3: P30PL3 R h@V!Ng $3R!0U$ D3BT !$$U3$.
T0P 5 Pr00F$**TH@T W3 D0N'T L!V3 0n a GL0B3 (8 Min)
R3-P0$T: P!K3**M@N!PULAT!NG 3 W@R$ for P0W3R (11 Min)
N0T3: XC3LL3NT V!D**$@T@N's CounT3RF3!T $CR!PT
DUB@! FL00D$ and W3@TH3R W@R$ !n TH3 M!DDL3 E@$T (60 Min)
J3W$ Pr3P@R3 +o $L@UGHT3R R3D H3!F3R$ @ AL-AQ$A M0$QU3 (3 Min)
B0B-3LV!$'s $0N (1 Min)
X-LUC!F3R!@N***D@NG3R$ 0f TH3 N3W AG3 (27 Min)
N0T3: H0N3$T D3P!CT!0N of his J0URN3Y.
WhY TH3 J3W$ are N0T G0D's CH0$3N P30PL3 (83 Min)
CDN CHR!$T!N3**EV!D3NC3**V!R0L0GY !s F@K3-$C!3NC3 (41 Min)
N0T3: V!RU$3$ R a U$3FuL T00L 4 TH3 EL!T3**F!CT!0N.
$W!$$ M@RATH0N CH@MP!0N D!3$ 0f H3@RT ATT@CK @ 32 (2 Min)
David Yeo
Post by The Real Toria Brooke:
JUST IN The U.S. House Sergeant at Arms is threatening members of Congress with $500 fines if they do not delete the below video.
Make it go viral! pic.twitter.com/PWq25ScdBH
This is the U.S. House of Representatives under the direction of Speaker Mike Johnson.
Democrats are celebrating his total capitulation with no victory for securing our border. #MTV
Donna Warren
WARNING for LONDON, ON CANADA
Glenn Beck's version of our Flaming Train Disaster:
While officials indicated there were no "dangerous goods" inside the affected train cars, state media confirmed the train was nevertheless pulling hazardous materials. LFD Chief Colin Shewell indicated that the hazmat cars were successfully separated and moved away from the fires.
Freight trains carrying hazardous materials routinely barrel through the Canadian city of London, Ontario. They are typically not engulfed in flames and trailing massive columns of thick smoke. However, the city witnessed one such glowing aberration Sunday night.
According to the London Fire Department, old wooden railway ties inside five train cars caught fire, transforming a Canadian Pacific Kansas City Railway train into a rolling inferno. Officials indicated they will "treat everything as arson until proven otherwise."
Several onlookers captured video of the CPKCR train blaze past homes, trees, and other potential kindling.
The train was ultimately brought to a stop around 10:49 p.m. in a residential area near Richmond Street and Pall Mall Street.
Officials urged nearby residents to remain indoors and to shut their windows over fears of smoke inhalation while multiple fire crews worked diligently to extinguish the flames. It took fire crews and Canadian Pacific Railway personnel roughly two hours to bring the fire under control.
The torched train section was taken to a rail yard where firefighters could put out the remaining smoldering material.
The LFD lauded the "excellent job by fire crews to contain this fire," adding, "It was a very efficient knockdown of a large fire and great work by CPR train crew who disconnected cars."
While officials indicated there were no "dangerous goods" inside the affected train cars, state media confirmed the train was nevertheless pulling hazardous materials. LFD Chief Colin Shewell indicated that the hazmat cars were successfully separated and moved away from the fires.
LFD noted on X that "thanks to multiple 911 callers that advised our Communication Operations of an eastbound train on fire going over Oxford St. [w]e were able to get on scene & contain the fire in the downtown area very quickly with limited damage and no injuries."
The damage did an estimated $25,000 in damage to the rail cars and $10,00 to a nearby building.
"The incident remains under investigation. We thank the London first responders for their effective response to the fire last night." CPKCR spokesman Terry Cunha said in a statement.
Malcolm Cairns, a former CPR worker, told state media, "The Transportation Safety Board [TSB] will have their review of this incident and they will go into great depth, taking witness statements and looking at all the evidence, and eventually you'll know what caused it and whether the rules were obeyed."
"We will treat everything as arson until proven otherwise," said LFD Chief Shewell. "These were scrap railway ties, so there's really no dollar value on them. They were actually destined to be destroyed."
The Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs shared the following unanswered questions:
· "When did the train crew notice the fire on board and why didn't they call 911?"
· "Why did the train stop where it did, in the middle of a residential neighborhood just west of a shunting yard?"
· "How did the railway ties, coated in flammable wood preservative creosote, catch fire?"
· "Did the fire spread from one car to the others, or did all five catch fire at once?"
The BLAZE News Media
Patrick Bestall
Rumors – Rumors - Rumors – Rumors – Rumors
RUMOURS Circulating out there...:
You need to MAKE-UP Your own MIND!
SUMMARY:
Note:
What We Think We Know as of Tues. 23 April 2024:
The Federal Reserve (founded in 1913), Internal Revenue Service and US Inc. were not part of the US government, but were private companies set up for the sole purpose of making money for their owners – most of whom were private Central Bankers and non-US citizens such as the Rothschilds, UK Royalty and Vatican – the Deep State Cabal.
The Deep State Cabal’s Direct Energy Weapons not only started fires such as happened in Maui, but were used to trigger cancers, heart attacks and strokes.
Back in 2010 Ted Gunderson, ex-FBI Chief of the LA Office, tried to warn everyone that Underground Tunnels existed to this day. Gunderson died of mysterious causes after claiming that the Underground Tunnels were used for Satanic rituals and human trafficking by the Elite and even members of the White House.
Q was created long ago on 1 April 1860 when 20 Generals placed Abraham Lincoln into office to fight the Khazarian Mafia, who created the slave trade and owned 99% of the U.S. slaves. Christmas Eve 1963 was the day 77 U.S. Generals came together and The Plan was born to Save The World. Three months later 133 Generals became part of Operation Freedom Eagle 35. By 2014 there were 22 Nations, 1,600 Generals. Today this battle is coming to an end. No One Can Stop What Is Coming (NCSWIC). The last days of Joe Biden! …Trump, Q The Storm on Telegram Tues. 23 April
“President Of IRAQ Announced Iraqi Dinar Reinstatement & Revaluation | CBI & Sudani | Iraqi Dinar” https://youtu.be/n-pxOxUN5dA?si=iKf1u6Uw3VLE86aN
Tues. 23 April BOOM! Judy Byington Bombshell Report: Activate. The Perfect Storm Is Here. Worldwide Sting Operation! Where We Go One, We Go All! …JFK Jr, VP, USA Republic! Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Tues. 23 April 2024 – American Media Group (amg-news.com)
Timing:
Wed. 24 April Tucker Carlson: Black Swan Events have begun. Big things to happen over the next 24-48 hours, WW3 rhetoric is on increase, Balfour Agreement expired a little over an hour ago at 6pm Israeli time (6 O’clock is a dangerous time – Q) Worldwide Martial Law Lockdown Imminent.
Tues. 23 April TIME CHANGE – GREEN LIGHT- Free Walk – [Freedom] – Warning, stay tuned. …Trump Explicit on Telegram Tues. 23 April 2024
Tues. 23 April: Patriots, fear not about what’s happening. God Speed the Constitutional Republic and 19th President of the Republic: Law and Order, Gold, Silver; DC done. Dead are alive. Alive are dead – actors, Fake Flags, AI. A new World of Peace. 1776 is back. Question everything. Storm on it’s way. …Q on Telegram Tues. 23 April 2024
Black Swan Event: Cyber Attack = EBS Alert = Blackout = Banks close = liquidity needed = (Global Currency Reset?)
Sun. 21 April Mr. Pool on Telegram: EBS Activation complete for a Worldwide Black Swan. President Trump will send out five more presidential messages in four days, 11 hours and 53 min.
Wed. 24 April: 115th day of the year 11.5 = Duty of the Occupying Power to Ensure Public Order and Safety (EBS Alert?).
Black Swan Events have begun. Big things to happen over the next 24-48 hours (Wed, Thurs. 24, 25 April), WW3 rhetoric is on increase, Balfour Agreement expired a little over an hour ago at 6pm Israeli time (6 O’clock is a dangerous time – Q) Worldwide Martial Law Lockdown is imminent. …Tucker Carlson Wed. 24 April
Thurs. 25 April 116th day of the year 11.6 = Protection of the population of an occupied territory (Stock Market Crash?). The Storm Comes As Trump Comes! A Stock Market Crash Will Give a Green Light to Freedom Through a Global Currency Reset
Fri. 26 April 117th day of the year 11.7 = (?)
Tues. 23 April National Guard Prepping for the Big One: https://beforeitsnews.com/prepper/2024/04/dire-warning-national-guard-is-prepping-for-the-big-one-get-ready-patrick-humphrey-news-3691.html
END
Comments