top of page

Friday 7-7-23

Friday 7 – 7 - 23

Verse(s) for today:

…but made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

Philippians 2:7-8 KJV

Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest.

Joshua 1:9 KJV

The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

John 1:29 KJV

Thought(s) for the Day:

Jim Jordan uncovered one huge problem on Elon Musk’s hands:

Big Tech has become the new free speech battleground.

The Left have been hard at work to shut down online debate.

And Jim Jordan uncovered one huge problem on Elon Musk’s hands.

Elon Musk played the role of disruptor when he purchased Twitter and took the company private.

Musk wanted to restore free speech on the platform, which was a huge obstacle for the establishment.

And the Twitter Files exposed massive collusion between Big Tech and the federal government.

Now Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee are publishing a report on the government’s abuses regarding online speech.

In a report titled, “The Weaponization of CISA: How a ‘Cybersecurity’ Agency Colluded with Big Tech and ‘disinformation’ Partners to Censor Americans,” the committee detailed disturbing levels of coordination to shut down dissent from the establishment narrative.

CISA debacle serves as a case study in mission creep in already bad ideas

The 37-page report focused on the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), a new group inside the Department of Homeland Security that has worked behind the scenes to censor Americans through direct coordination with Big Tech platforms, or through third-party intermediaries who engage in pressure campaigns.

The report stated that the “First Amendment recognizes that no person or entity has a monopoly on the truth, and that the ‘truth’ of today can quickly become the ‘misinformation’ of tomorrow. Labeling speech ‘misinformation’ or ‘disinformation’ does not strip it of its First Amendment protection. As such, under the Constitution, the federal government is strictly prohibited from censoring Americans’ political speech. The government also may not use third parties to bypass the First Amendment and conduct censorship by proxy.”

But “censorship by proxy” is precisely what has been happening.

The COVID regime was a perfect example.

“Conspiracy theories” like the lab leak hypothesis were banned from public discussion, even though the lab leak was always the most plausible explanation and has become the most widely accepted position.

However, Dr. Anthony Fauci and other agents of the government leaned on Facebook to shut down debate about the lab-leak theory and discussions that could create vaccine hesitancy. Based on messages received via FOIA requests, Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg obliged and helped silence Americans.

The report continued, “Founded in 2018, CISA was originally intended to be an ancillary agency designed to protect ‘critical infrastructure’ and guard against cybersecurity threats. In the years since its creation, however, CISA metastasized into the nerve center of the federal government’s domestic surveillance and censorship operations on social media. By 2020, CISA routinely reported social media posts that allegedly spread ‘disinformation’ to social media platforms. By 2021, CISA had a formal ‘Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation’ (MDM) team. In 2022 and 2023, in response to growing public and private criticism of CISA’s unconstitutional behavior, CISA attempted to camouflage its activities, duplicitously claiming it serves a purely ‘informational’ Role.”

Many government agencies often suffer mission creep like CISA; the original purview gets expanded into something that becomes censorious and intrusive.

Jordan and others are only scratching the surface of the censorship regime.

[Un-muzzled News Media]

[Jim Jordan]

Donald Trump attacks Joe Biden over July 4th with memes

Former President Donald Trump celebrated Independence Day by sharing several humorous memes directed at President Joe Biden online, the Washington Examiner reported. Meanwhile, other Republican candidates made formal campaign stops.

GOP presidential hopefuls campaigned on July 4 using the holiday as a patriotic backdrop. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis attended a pair of parades in New Hampshire, one of which included an appearance with North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott.

The Merrimack, New Hampshire, event also included other GOP candidates like Vivek Ramaswamy, Perry Johnson, and Will Hurd. Author and inspirational speaker Marianne Williamson was the lone Democratic candidate at the event and is too far behind Biden to make a dent in his reelection.

Former Vice President Mike Pence made stops in Iowa, visiting both Urbandale and Boone. However, Trump was not out and about in America and pressing the flesh like the rest of them but rather posting funny memes on social media.

One he shared had a flag that read, "F--- Biden." Another said, "81 million votes…and I’ve never seen pro Biden hat, shirt or flag in my life."

"True: No Biden hats anywhere. Never seen one!" Trump captioned the simple meme. The former president posted these in the early morning hours on his TruthSocial account.

Later, he released a more conventional Independence Day message. "Happy Fourth of July to everyone," Trump wrote.

"We are working hard, we will take back our country, and make America great again. The 2024 election is our last great chance!"

Trump also shared others' posts about him, including one that said "Trump Won" while another depicted him as George Washington leading his troops into battle. He did this all while not officially making any campaign stops on the holiday.

His team explained that weekend stops in South Carolina and Pennsylvania in the days leading up to July 4 were intended to cover the holiday. The former president is also expected to make a campaign stop in Iowa this week.

Perhaps Trump is resting on his laurels, considering he has a handsome lead over DeSantis, his closest competitor. The former president received 52.4% support in the RealClearPolitics average, while DeSantis garnered 21.5%.

Biden is unpopular as president, but he's still light years ahead of his competition in the polls for his reelection. He used the advantage of his office to host a barbecue for active-duty service members at the White House before watching fireworks with other spectators on the South Lawn.

The president also took a meeting with the National Education Association that same day. Like all Democrats, Biden relies heavily on the deep pockets of unions to fuel his campaign, and the NEA is the largest union in the nation.

Trump got where he is by being the out-of-the-box candidate in 2016 and making his case largely on social media. His supporters love that he's not like other polished candidates who do all of the "right" things but instead takes to social media to mercilessly mock his enemies when they deserve it.

[American Digest]


The U.S. Supreme Court last week ruled against the notion that the government has the ability to compel an individual to engage in speech violative of their firmly held beliefs, and in response, President Joe Biden has implored Congress to take action to thwart what he suspects could be an onslaught of anti-LGBTQ discrimination, as Fox News reports.

Biden's concerns come in the aftermath of the high court's decision in the case of 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, an outcome he believes demonstrates the need for lawmakers to pass legislation referred to as the Equity Act.

SCOTUS Ruling Roils Biden

As National Review explains, the case at issue involved a graphic designer in Colorado who planned to grow her business by offering wedding website design services, but who was also concerned that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission would force her to provide those products to same-sex couples, a concept that ran afoul of her firmly held convictions.

Once it was established that the type of content at issue fell under the umbrella of “pure speech,” the court held – by a margin of 6-3 – that the state government could not compel the web designer to provide those services, no matter if her beliefs were disfavored by the Commission.

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion, “The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.”

The dissenting justices – all on the liberal wing of the court – contended that the ruling paves the way to state-sanctioned discrimination against LGBTQ Americans, a theme with which the president appears to agree.

President Responds

In public remarks made after the high court's decision was handed down, Biden slammed the ruling and declared the need for legislative action at the federal level.

Biden began, “In America, no person should face discrimination simply because of who they are or who they love.”

“While the Court's decision only addresses expressive original designs, I'm deeply concerned that the decision could invite more discrimination against LGBTQI+ Americans. More broadly, today's decision weakens long-standing laws that protect all Americans against discrimination in public accommodations – including people of color, people with disabilities, people of faith, and women,” Biden added.

The president continued, “When one group's dignity and equality are threatened, the promise of our democracy is threatened, and we all suffer. Our work to advance equal rights for everyone will continue. That is why we must pass the Equality Act, which will enshrine civil rights protections for LGBTQI+ Americans in federal law and strengthen public accommodations protections for all Americans. I urge Congress to swiftly send this legislation to my desk.”

Legislation Reintroduced

The legislation at issue is designed to amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act in order to explicitly outlaw discrimination rooted in gender identity and sexual orientation, and though it has been introduced by lawmakers a number of times in the past, it has yet to secure passage by both chambers.

Just last month, the legislation was reintroduced once again by a cadre of Democratic members of Congress, who lamented the need for such action, but deemed the proposed protections necessary safeguards for the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans.

A press release from Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler (NY-12), a longtime proponent of the bill, stated that the Act would amend existing law to prohibit discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals in a host of areas, including “employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federally funded programs, credit, and jury service.”

The statement added that the measure “would also prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in public accommodations and federally funded programs, while expanding the definition of public accommodations in the Civil Rights Act, strengthening protections not just on the basis of sex (including sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics), but also on the basis of race, color, national origin, and religion.”

Critics React

However, conservative advocacy groups have argued that the Equity Act is a deceptively named piece of legislation that will have the effect of hindering the rights of women and girls and will also permit the government to compel speech in a manner contrary to the First Amendment.

Last week, in an op-ed published in Newsweek, Christiana Kiefer of the Alliance Defending Freedom outlined what she believes are the risks posed by the legislation Biden is championing.

According to Kiefer the addition of “gender identity” language to federal laws preventing discrimination will result in males identifying as females being permitted to compete in women's athletics, would force homeless shelters to admit males into female areas, provided they identify as women, and could ultimately force medical professionals to participate in abortion procedures regardless of their beliefs.

Noting that the Act would also likely eliminate “critical protections” for the free speech rights of creative professionals such as the web designer in the 303 Creative case, Kiefer declared, “[t]olerance is a two-way street, and in a diverse society like ours, we all must respect the rights of those with whom we disagree. The Equality Act would do the opposite.” Whether Biden's plea for congressional action on the measure gains any traction in the current political environment, only time will tell.

[Washington Digest Media]


Summary: Democrats and liberals are expressing frustration and outrage over recent Supreme Court decisions that have favored conservative outcomes. Some Democrats, including Representatives Adam Schiff, Ayanna Pressley, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are calling for the expansion of the Supreme Court in order to dilute the conservative majority. They argue that the court's decisions have been extreme and that expanding the court would help restore balance. However, a survey indicates that a majority of Americans oppose adding justices to the bench, despite the support for the idea among Democrats.

The detailed Article follows:

The Left can’t stand the number of Supreme Court cases decided in favor of conservatives. Now they want to take the entire Court down.

And Democrats shot Clarence Thomas a terrifying threat that will end the Supreme Court.

Democrats resumed calls this week to load the Supreme Court with liberals after the court’s conservative majority ruled incorrectly in multiple cases, according to liberals.

On Thursday and Friday, the Supreme Court issued three decisions in a variety of widely anticipated cases. The court overturned Harvard and the University of North Carolina’s race-based admissions processes, decided in favor of a Christian graphic designer who refused to create wedding websites for same-sex couples, and overturned President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program.

Democrats and liberals were outraged at the Supreme Court, with some pushing for the court’s bench to be expanded in order to dilute the conservative majority, which was cemented by former President Donald Trump’s three conservative choices.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) stated that adding more justices would not be a “extreme” step.

“Expanding the size of the Supreme Court isn’t extreme or unprecedented — but the opinions of this Court certainly are,” Schiff wrote in a tweet Friday.

In an email to Senate campaign supporters, Schiff reiterated his desire to load the court, but he changed the phrasing, calling it “unpacking” the court.

“We must unpack the court by expanding the number of justices on the court, instituting term limits, and enacting a code of ethics like every other federal court,” Schiff wrote to supporters, according to Washington Examiner columnist Paul Bedard.

“I’ve spent years talking about the need to expand, unstack, and reform the Supreme Court after Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell stacked it with partisans. This week we saw firsthand the consequences of its imbalance,” Schiff added in the email.

Schiff was recently censured in the House last month. The vote of censure accused Schiff of deceiving the American public about Trump’s alleged ties to Russia while leading the House Intelligence Committee’s investigations against the president.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) remarked on Sunday that packing the court should be considered.

“I think everything should be on the table,” Pressley said on MSNBC, responding to a question about whether she supports adding more justices.

The Supreme Court “has been emboldened in rolling back the hands of time, undermining and rolling back what should be fundamental civil human rights,” she added.

“So everything should be on the table: reform and expansion,” Pressley said.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has previously asked for the Supreme Court to be expanded, and on Sunday she called for the court’s power to be limited.

“The courts, if they were to proceed without any check on their power, without any balance on their power, then we will start to see an undemocratic and, frankly, dangerous authoritarian expansion of power in the Supreme Court,” Ocasio-Cortez said Sunday on CNN.

Some liberal professors have also asked for the court to be packed.

“Biden Won’t Pack the Supreme Court, and It’s Killing Democracy,” read the headline of a Friday Newsweek opinion article by David Faris, an associate professor of political science at Roosevelt University in the Chicago area.

“With or without Biden, court expansion must become a litmus test for any Democrat who wants to pursue federal office,” Faris wrote. “The alternative is to spend the next 15 Junes learning which part of American public life has been needlessly upended by corrupt, originalist fanatics, and which new ways the Supreme Court has made it easier for Republicans to gain and wield power.”

Meanwhile, most Americans oppose adding justices to the bench, despite the fact that most Democrats appear to favor a crowded court.

According to a survey conducted last year by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, approximately 55% of people oppose extending the Supreme Court to 13 justices, while 64% of Democrats support adding the extra four members.

[The Federalist Wire Media]

David YEO:

V!T@M!N $3Cr3T$ (1 Min)

!s Th3 US a C0unTry 0r C0rP? (1 Min)

X-W!TCH**1970's**$!gN$ 0f a W!TCH (52 Min)

D0C AnDY: Xp0$3$ Th3 Curr3nT H!V-K0v!D Ag3nda (32 Min)

B!Ld3rB3rg M0v!nG F@$T**A! B3@$T $y$T3M !mpL3menT@T!0N (14 Min)

G0D'$ N@M3 !n DNA (1 Min)

P0K3R: "! W!$H ! N3v3r G0T !+." (1 Min)

UFC F!gHT3R $uFF3r$ fr0m T? P0T!0N (1 Min)

$H@K!nG: R00M 101**Th3 B!G P!cTur3 #5 (27 Min)

R3-P0$T: Wh@T !s N@TT0? $up3R $prouT3D S0Y-B3@N**K2 (10 Min)

2,500 G!@NT$ (1 Min)

$3LF A$C3n$!0N?**H0W C@N U? (6 Min)

D0c $@M B@!L3Y: Th3 $T0rY 0f 5Z3R (27 Min)

Dynamite! Interview:

Andrew Johnson with Reiner Fuellmich on what happened on 9/11. Dustification. Brilliant interview:

Do you want the details about what happened on 9/11? I interviewed Andrew Johnson for an hour for the Truth Summit. A beginning. Now, 3 one-hour interviews along with the presentation of dozens of photographs. Andrew Johnson interviewed by Reiner Fuellmich. Dynamite. Detail after detail. Fact after fact. Truth.

And now, a personal story. On April 2, I had the idea to put on a Truth Summit in mid-June. 20 interviews with amazing truth-tellers. In mid April, I came across a presentation on 9/11 by Richard Gage. Great, it went inside me. Perfect for the Truth Summit. I reached out to him, interviewed him, and posted about the interview. The next day, a reader contacted me, suggested I look into the work of Judy Wood. I did. Found a 2 1/2 hour presentation. Watched it. Dynamite. Did more searching. Found Andrew Johnson. More dynamite. I reached out to both Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson. Andrew replied. I interviewed him. Dynamite, it said inside me. Dynamite.

I was on one course of action, putting things together for the Truth Summit. Masses of work. I was delighted to bring Andrew’s information to the Truth Summit.

But it didn’t occur to me to write a post about my dynamite discovery, even if only to get people more eager to watch the Truth Summit.

Now I ask myself: what was going on inside me? What kept me from posting about Andrew’s information, when I had posted about Richard Gage’s account? My sense: something in me didn’t want to hurt Richard Gage.

I didn’t even highlight Andrew’s evidence in the Truth Summit, as the dynamite I was sure it was. Actually, there was a lot of dynamite information, day after day.

Yet even while I didn’t blast out about the information from Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson about 9/11, I was eager to share it. I sent it to friends. And right after I found the information, Reiner Fuellmich responded to my request for an interview. I was very eager to pass the information on to him, to have him interview Andrew (but have his interview come out after the Truth Summit - I did want my interview to come out first).

I knew the truth presented by Andrew and Judy Wood - denigrated and suppressed as much as possible by people like Richard Gage - should blast out into the world.

I knew this mattered enormously not because it was the truth about 9/11. But because of what this truth was. The title of Judy Wood’s book on 9/11 asks: Where Did the Towers Go? The subtitle proclaims: Evidence of Free-Energy Technology. In other words, there is absolutely no energy shortage, absolutely no need, for instance, to corral people into 15-minute spaces.

Another part of the personal story. I could not believe that Richard Gage was lying, that he knew Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson were telling the truth. I know how rigidly closed many people are to information about the plandemic. It’s easier for me to believe someone is brain-washed than a deliberate liar, doing all he can to suppress the very important information, that those against us have free-energy technology - than deliberately hurting, denigrating Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson as much as possible.

So anyhow, now I’m watching Reiner Fuellmich’s interview with Andrew. Excellent. Fabulous. Detailed. It came into my inbox from Truth Comes to Light, another Substack publication. So it’s being spread. As I am also spreading it.

One thought. My experience of myself is that there is always further to go, in terms of moving as freely as possible, doing as much as possible as effectively as possible.

The same is true, in my experience, of all of us.

Still, I rather kick myself a bit, that I didn’t post about what I found when I found it.

Then I get another image - of myself as part of a whole web of people, working to get the truth out. I think of the person who suggested I look into Judy Wood. He had stopped speaking out after death threats. I think of Andrew Johnson who has devoted a considerable chunk of his life writing books and keeping up his website and Judy Wood’s. I think of Judy Wood, who knew it was the end of her academic career, if she pursued the truth about 9/11, but was committed to telling the truth. I think of all the thousands upon thousands who listen and spread the information as widely as possible.

All of us are imperfect. But the imperfection is not standing in the way of the truth, blocking it, denigrating it, name-calling. We’re on the side of truth and life.

In the words of Shakespeare, All’s Well that Ends Well. In this case, we do not yet know the ending. But each of these actions makes it more likely all will end well. The interview I’m watching is great, bringing the information further into the world.

Last thought. Despite our many imperfections, we do so massively much, those of us on the side of truth and life.

Posted July 7, 2023

PS. Following; is the panel held after the Truth Summit. Andrew Johnson and Charles Gage are both present.

[Elsa <>]


Pope Francis' private meeting with Clinton was unannounced by the Holy See Press Office, and was reportedly about 'peace.'

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) –– In an entirely unannounced visit, Pope Francis hosted former U.S. President Bill Clinton along with George Soros’ son and successor Alexander Soros in a cordial visit at the Vatican.

Late evening July 5, the Vatican News social media accounts posted a short video clip of Pope Francis receiving former President Clinton and his party at the Casa Santa Martha hotel.

According to a subsequent report by Vatican News – which appears to be the only official information released about the meeting – Clinton and Francis spoke about “peace.”

“At the end of the meeting, Francis looked out for a brief greeting to the security men and other friends accompanying the former president on his trip to Rome and Europe, who had meanwhile been taken on a tour of some of the Vatican sites.”

The 75-year-old Clinton is famous for his adulterous sexual affair with a young White House intern and subsequent impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice, as well as his adamant support of abortion and same-sex “marriage.”

Greeting the former president warmly, Francis presented him with a statue made at the Vatican which “symbolizes the work for peace,” according to the Pontiff.

Though unacknowledged in the Vatican’s brief report, accompanying Clinton was 37-year-old Alexander Soros – son and successor to the notorious abortion and population control advocate George Soros.

Alexander has been accompanying Clinton on recent travels, with the party having come straight from Albania the day before, where Clinton had been awarded the Great Star of Gratitude for Public Achievements.

Alexander was recently announced to have taken over the reigns of his father’s Open Society Foundations group, after he was elected chairman of the $25 billion empire. As LifeSiteNews has reported, Alexander Soros has promised to be more political than his father, a statement which he has appeared to fulfill.

His Instagram account has pictures of him alongside U.S. President Joe Biden, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, among others. Alexander has reportedly visited the White House more than 17 times in the last several years, according to Breitbart.

With Soros widely noted as linked to, and having funded, a wide variety of anti-family, anti-life and anti-Catholic endeavors, Alexander looks set to now continue his father’s works. “We think alike,” Alexander told the Wall Street Journal while speaking about his father’s political views.

His social media accounts provide evidence of Alexander’s political activism, with regular international travels and meetings with leading politicians documented, along with his support for campaigns such as Black Lives Matter and attempts to have the U.K. rejoin the European Union.

Speaking to the Journal, Alexander revealed that he would be investing more finances into promoting abortion.

The Soros family campaigns have thus not only caused concern for pro-family and Christian advocates, but have also drawn the ire of Twitter owner and billionaire Elon Musk, who has said that the elder Soros “hates humanity” and “wants to erode the very fabric of civilization.”

“You assume they have good intentions. They are not. He wants to erode the very fabric of civilization. [George] Soros hates humanity,” wrote Musk in May.

The meeting at the Vatican was not announced to journalists, nor was it included on the Pope’s calendar. Francis’ private and public meetings have ostensibly been cancelled for the month of July as part of the regular summer recess the Vatican traditionally observes, although Francis is known for not observing as much of a break as his predecessors did.

[Life Site News]

[Patrick Bestall]

Jesus in the City Parade… coming to Toronto:

September 9th ’23 in the City of TORONTO

See flyer following:

[Patrick Bestall]

New UN interference in religion etc.:

Be sure to view this one!


[Patrick Bestall]

Children with BaseballBats:

Gangs of baseball-bat wielding children are roaming San Francisco robbing moms at after-school pickup

Look, at a certain point we're going to run out of ways to make jokes about the hellish conditions in Democrat-run San Francisco. Before too long all the jokes we'll have made will just already be true:

Baseball bat-wielding gangs of children are mugging mothers and nannies on the school run in the latest crime wave to hit San Francisco.

Last week Noe Valley, also known as "stroller valley" because of the growing population of young families, endured 11 phone robberies that are believed to have been carried out by the same gang who are targeting women picking up children from school.

One San Francisco supervisor said that "kids not being in school" is driving the juvenile crime surge, and that the city is "going to be experiencing [it] for a while." Which is another way of saying: "For the next two months the streets are going to be filled with violent children beating women with baseball bats and we're not going to do anything at all to stop it."

The jokes write themselves. Except at this point they're not jokes. It's just the dying throes of a crumbling, once-great American city.

The city, meanwhile, kinda sorta maybe suspects that the brutal isolation of the COVID lockdowns maybe, justmaybe, had a negative effect on childhood development in the city:

"Sociologically, who knows what was going on, but I would not be surprised if we are going to be experiencing the lingering impacts of that for a generation."

I would not be surprised either.

[Patrick Bestall]

ATTENTION – ATTENTION – Attention – Attention - attention

The Sound of FREEDOM:


· Note: The “Sound of Freedom” blockbuster movie at last

  • · The “Sound of Freedom” blockbuster movie at last exposes International Child Sex Trafficking under the theme of “God’s Children are Not for Sale” – though does not touch on the Satanic Ritual Abuse of children that was so rampant in our global society.

  • · As difficult as it may seem to believe, there were thousands of children across the world who had yet to gain attention that those in child trafficking were about to enjoy. Having been born into multigenerational Satanic Ritual Abuse families, there was little belief that such children even existed – yet they were daily subjected to rape, torture and murder throughout their childhoods.

  • · Satanic Ritually Abused children literally had no hope. They were born (many without birth certificates) into the grips of parents and a politically powerful network of friends who gave honor to Satan through Child Sacrifice and pedophilia parties of sophisticated CIA Mind Control Programming.

  • · It is my humble prayer that the general public’s awareness generated through Tim Ballard’s release of “Sound of Freedom,” will at last also open the door to understanding and eventually freedom for those ritually abused.

  • · See this heartwarming interview with Tim Ballard and Sound of Freedom film director Alejandro Monteverde: ‘Sound of Freedom’ becomes top-grossing movie on Independence Day | Entertainment News (

  • · “Sound of Freedom”

  • · Shot five years ago, “Sound of Freedom” was once signed with Disney but then dropped. Multiple Hollywood studios also rejected the film, but Angel Studios acquired worldwide distribution rights earlier this year and it is now a certified success.

  • · The movie will have viewers at the edge of their seats, waiting to see what Ballard does next on his mission to reunite a vulnerable family whose worst nightmare comes to life when both children are taken captive for sex work. Featuring mild foul language and some violence, the film’s scenes that are not shown but suggested have a haunting effect on audiences.

  • · The studio wants families with teenagers to view the film together since teenagers should also be educated on the evils of the world.

  • · At the Miami premiere of the film, Monteverde told CP that he takes what Jesus said to His disciples seriously in Luke 17:1-2: “It is inevitable that stumbling blocks will come, but woe to the one through whom they come! It would be better for him to have a millstone hung around his neck and to be thrown into the sea than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.”

  • · According to a report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development released in January, Mexico “ranks first in child sexual abuse; first in exploitation, homicides, and trafficking of minors; and first in creation and distribution of child pornography.”

  • · The United States was identified as the “number one consumer of sex worldwide,” which includes child pornography, according to Geoff Rogers, co-founder of the United States Institute Against Human Trafficking, as quoted in a 2019 Fox News report.

  • · Verástegui previously shared with CP that he wants to “put pressure on the government so these things become a prime priority, not just for the government, for everyone.”

  • · “What really hurts me the most is that the people who are doing this to these kids are human beings like you and me, made of the same. This is not people who are coming from other planets that are our enemies. This is people like us. So at what moment, what happened to these guys?” Verástegui continued. “They were kids at some point full of dreams. So what happened in what moment they decided to, ‘You know what? I’m going to use my life to hurt kids.'”

  • · The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime defines human trafficking as any situation in which someone experiences “force, coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or vulnerability, or giving payments or benefits to a person in control.”

  • · Multiple Hollywood studios rejected the film, but Angel Studios acquired worldwide distribution rights earlier this year.

This MOVE is now playing at LANDMARK and SILVER CITY Theatres here in LONDON.

Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors:

This is just ‘Informational’ and YOU

must make up YOUR OWN MIND!


General Summary


FE: Wh@T D!ff3rence D03$ !+ Mak3, !f !+ !s FL@T? (4 Min)

FE: Wh3r3 D0 B0@T$ G0? (5 Min)

24 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page