Friday 3-8-24
Verses for today:
Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest.
Joshua 1:9 KJV
Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
James 1:17 KJV
Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
Romans 5:1 KJV
Manitoba Now:
Trudeau’s climate chief threatens Saskatchewan’s Scott Moe for refusing to collect carbon tax
'If Premier Scott Moe decides that he wants to start breaking laws and not respecting federal laws, then measures will have to be taken,' Steven Guilbeault told reporters Monday.
OTTAWA, Ontario (LifeSiteNews) — Trudeau’s Liberal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault has threatened to take “measures” against the premier of Saskatchewan for refusing to collect the federal carbon tax on home heating in his province.
On March 4, Guilbeault condemned Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe’s decision not to collect the carbon tax on home heating in the western province. Moe’s decision came after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government gave a carbon tax exemption on home heating oil, a break that almost exclusively benefits the Liberal voting Atlantic provinces.
“If Premier Scott Moe decides that he wants to start breaking laws and not respecting federal laws, then measures will have to be taken,” Guilbeault told reporters Monday.
“We can’t let that happen. What if somebody tomorrow decides that they don’t want to respect other federal laws, criminal laws? What would happen then if a prime minister, a premier of a province, would want to do that?” he questioned, apparently forgetting his own criminal history.
“It’s irresponsible and it’s frankly immoral on his part,” Guilbeault continued. “We can have disagreements about things like climate change, but to be so reckless is unspeakable, really.”
Beginning January 1, Saskatchewan stopped collecting the carbon tax on electric and natural gas home heating, a move which has already been shown to have lowered the province’s inflation rate.
Moe made the announcement in October after Trudeau suspended his carbon tax on home heating oil, which is almost exclusively used in Atlantic Canada to heat homes, and not in his province.
“I cannot accept the federal government giving an affordability break to people in one part of Canada but not here,” Moe said in a video posted on X at the time.

Moe promised that if the Trudeau government did not provide the exemption provided to Atlantic Canada to the rest of the nation, he would tell SaskEnergy, the province’s Crown corporation that provides energy to all residents, to stop collecting the carbon tax on natural gas. This, Moe said, would effectively provide “Saskatchewan residents with the very same exemption that the federal government has given heating oil in Atlantic Canada.”
Moe’s government has gone as far as introducing legislation to back the scrapping of the federal carbon tax on natural gas. The legislation will shield all executives at SaskEnergy from being jailed or fined by the federal government if they stop collecting the tax.
Despite the popularity and seeming fairness of Moe’s decision, Trudeau’s Liberal government has refused to rule out jail time for Moe if he refuses to collect the carbon tax on home heating.
Moe, however, has refused to be intimidated by Guilbeault’s threats, telling media this week that the carbon tax “is driving inflation and we still are paying a good chunk in other areas and the position from the government of Saskatchewan’s perspective hasn’t changed nor will it change. It should be removed on all products for all.”
Additionally, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre pointed out that while Guilbeault challenges Moe for breaking the law by refusing to collect the carbon tax, Guilbeault himself has a history of breaking the law.
“Guilbeault calls out Saskatchewan’s lawlessness for refusing to collect his carbon tax,” Poilievre posted on X with a photo of Guilbeault being arrested in 2001.
While a current member of the Trudeau government cabinet, Guilbeault has a history of taking extreme action in the name of the climate.
In 1997, he joined Greenpeace and served for a time as a director and then campaign manager of its Quebec chapter for about 10 years.
He was arrested many times for environmental protests, the most famous arrest coming after an incident in 2001 when he climbed Toronto’s CN Tower with British activist Chris Holden. The pair hung a banner saying “Canada and Bush — Climate Killers.”
Greenpeace is a group that advocates for population control in addition to calling for an end to all oil and gas use.
Last month, Guilbeault was publicly ridiculed after he said the federal government would no longer fund any road construction projects and instead funnel the savings to “climate change” projects that promote walking instead of driving.
However, Guilbeault’s push for “climate change” regulations are consistent with those of Trudeau. Since taking office in 2015, Trudeau has continued to push a radical environmental agenda like the agendas being pushed the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” and the United Nations’ “Sustainable Development Goals.”
The reduction and eventual elimination of the use of so-called “fossil fuels” and a transition to unreliable “green” energy has also been pushed by the World Economic Forum – the globalist group behind the socialist “Great Reset” agenda – an organization in which Trudeau and some of his cabinet are involved.
The reality of Trudeau’s push for so-called renewable energy showed itself just over a month ago after Alberta’s power grid faced near certain collapse due to a failure of wind and solar power. Many called out the Trudeau government’s green energy agenda that is attempting to phase out carbon-based power in favor of “renewables” as the reason for the near failure.
Tell your MP and Senators to drop the carbon tax Send a message TODAY
Life Site News Media

Tucker Carlson Responds to Joe Biden's State of the Union Address:
TCN presents our first live stream event: Tucker Carlson’s Response to the State of the Union. Find out more at TuckerCarlson.com.
Rumble Media

The Pride of Canada's Finest:
The Faulkner Show | The Canadian Armed Forces is facing a CRISIS | Ret. Lt.-Gen. Michel Maisonneuve | True North (tnc.news)
The Canadian military was once feared by our enemies and respected by our allies. Today, that is no the longer case. The Armed Forces are subjected to a relentless onslaught of DEI and radical progressive ideology enforced on the ranks along with a chronic underfunding that continues unabated. An attrition crisis and a morale crisis are thinning out the officer and leadership class and nobody at the federal level is prepared to make a change.
How did it get so bad? More importantly, how can we turn it around?
Joining Harrison on The Faulkner Show is ret. Lt.-Gen. Michel Maisonneuve to discuss the crisis faced by the Canadian Armed Forces and how it can be solved.
TRUE NORTH Media


GLOBE & MAIL:
Morning Update:
A 19-year-old is accused of stabbing a Sri Lankan family with whom he shared a suburban Ottawa townhouse, killing an infant, three other children and their mother, as well as another resident of the home, in what police believe is the deadliest mass homicide in the capital’s history.
Febrio De-zoysa was charged Thursday with six counts of first-degree murder and one count of attempted murder. Police said he was believed to be in Canada as a student but otherwise did not comment on how he knew the family or how he came to be living with them. They also did not speculate on a motive.
The victims were identified as Darshani Banbaranayake Gama Walwwe Darshani Dilanthika Ekanyake, 35; Inuka Wickramasinghe, 7; Ashwini Wickramasinghe, 4; Rinyana Wickramasinghe, 2; Kelly Wickramasinghe, who was 2½ months old; and Amarakoonmubiayansela Ge Gamini Amarakoon, 40, the other resident whom police described as a friend of the family.
Members of the coroner's office talk at the scene of a homicide where six people were found dead in the Barrhaven suburb of Ottawa on March 7, 2024.
PATRICK DOYLE/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Trump blindsided by Supreme Court news on presidential immunity:
The Supreme Court will change Trump’s life forever. Especially after this latest news And Trump was blindsided by this stunning Supreme Court news on presidential immunity.
Everyone knows that Trump is knee deep in legal battles in the middle of his campaign for a second term as the President of the United States. He’s been hit with case after case, most of which just seem absolutely bogus in the estimation of the vast majority of the American public.
A few cases, however, threaten the former Republican president from being able to win that second term in the White House that he has been seeking ever since he left the Oval Office back in January of 2021.
One of those cases is the one involving the alleged mishandling of classified documents that Donald Trump has been facing an indictment for at the hands of the Biden administration’s Department of Justice.
Donald Trump claims that he has presidential immunity in this case and that he even classified the documents while he was a sitting U.S. president.
Everyone knew that the matter of whether or not Donald Trump has presidential immunity would fall to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices to finally provide some finality on the matter.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court is prepared to hear the arguments and decide once and for all. The High Court has announced that they will be hearing arguments on April 25 before their incoming decision.
In a recent order, the Supreme Court specified the scope of Trump’s immunity appeal, limiting it to the question of whether a former president enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken during their tenure. Additionally, another case scheduled for April, Fischer v. United States, addressing the obstruction statute relevant to Trump’s indictment, could significantly influence his case’s trajectory.
A separate ruling by the Supreme Court determined that Trump could not be disqualified from Colorado’s ballot, emphasizing Congress’ responsibility for enforcing relevant constitutional provisions.
John Malcolm, a legal expert, expressed skepticism regarding the likelihood of the D.C. federal trial occurring before the election, citing pending Supreme Court decisions and pretrial matters before Judge Tanya Chutkan.
“In light of the Supreme Court taking up the presidential immunity case, I seriously doubt the D.C. federal trial will take place before the election,” John Malcolm said.
Judge Chutkan had previously rejected Trump’s attempt to dismiss the case based on presidential immunity, a decision upheld by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Despite efforts by Special Counsel Jack Smith to expedite proceedings, including a rejected request for Supreme Court intervention, the timing of Trump’s trial remains uncertain.
Malcolm highlighted additional factors, including Department of Justice policies regarding election-adjacent legal actions and potential scheduling conflicts, such as the classified documents case in Florida, which may prolong the legal process.
These complexities underscore the intricate legal landscape surrounding Trump’s legal challenges and the significant role the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decisions will play in shaping their outcomes.
In summary, the Supreme Court’s decision to hear Trump’s immunity appeal on April 25th adds another layer of complexity to his ongoing legal battles. With multiple high-profile cases on the docket, including Fischer v. United States, the implications of these rulings extend beyond Trump’s individual circumstances, influencing broader legal interpretations and precedents. The uncertainty surrounding the timing of Trump’s trial underscores the intricate interplay between legal proceedings, judicial decisions, and broader political considerations.
Of course, the Left is losing their minds that the Supreme Court Justices are even willing to consider Trump’s case at all. They are worried sick that Trump will get another High Court win that could lead to him getting back into the White House for another four years.
Rachel Maddow, the radical Leftist Big Media talking head, took to her show on MSNBC to say that she knows better than the Supreme Court by arguing that the Justices shouldn’t even be hearing the case at all.
The D.C. Daily Journal

Which PM - None of the above?? What???!!
CANADA does not have much to CHOOSe from...
‘If’ TRUDEAU calls a ‘SNAP’ ELECTION...

NOTE: The Gray Line... ‘none of the above’ is where 1/3 of the Nation stands!
Patrick Bestall
David YEO:
H!GH3R TH@N $UG@R (1 Min)
ALL H@!L D0N@LD**$UBM!T (9 Min)
TH3R3 R N0 P!CTUR3$ 0f E@rTH (20 Min)
TH3Y are G0NNA $HUT !t ALL D0WN (12 Min)
W@$H!NGT0N DC: FR33M@$0NRY T3MPL3 (15 Min)
0h $@Y C@N U $33 By TH3 D@WN$ E@RLY CH3MTR@!L$ (14 Min)
JU$T!N's G0V'T SCAND@L$ N3V3R 3ND (17 Min)
TH3 M@NY F@C3$ 0f D3MAG0GU3 of D0N@LD (4 Min)
JU$T!N B3!B3R: J@Y Z D03$ R!TU@L$ 4 LUC!F3R (8 Min)
VXX G@M3$**P33R R3V!3W3D P@P3R R3TRACT3d (30 Min)
"TH3 E@rTH !S a CL0$3D $Y$T3M. U C@N'T L3@V3 E@rTH" (18 Min)
David YEO
ANOTHER MUST SEE AN INTERVIEW... ROBERT, PROFESSIONAL ARBORIST:
Robert has been a “nature geek” for half a century. As a boy, when he went into nature, he took along books, so he could learn about what he was seeing. Now for 33 years, he has been a professional arborist.
A big change happened about 8, 9 years ago. Forest fires became more frequent. He had only seen 3 in all the years - over 2 decades - before that. Not only were they more frequent, they were strikingly different.
Robert spent 7 years going to every forest fire in California, taking photos, gathering evidence. About a year ago, he began to show his photos. That’s how I learned about him - through an interview by Peggy Hall, the Healthy American. I immediately asked to interview him. I was putting together my second Truth Summit. Here was a major truth teller. A few days after I reached him and interviewed him, he got a call from someone he had never heard of - G Edward Griffin - inviting him to speak at Red Pill Expo. Robert didn’t go, but he did accept to have a video interview.
Robert was stepping into the world of truth tellers with major information.
A couple of weeks ago a mutual friend requested that I re-interview Robert, both in light of the many recent forest fires, and in light of several people in California being charged with having set fires though Robert had evidence that these people could not have set these fires. They were not natural fires.
Our mutual friend was especially concerned about Ed Wackerman, a 71-year-old volunteer firefighter, who has been in prison for over half a year. His daughter said he was not doing well. The person who is Ed’s lawyer did not return messages - including an email message from me.
So today, here is Robert with his evidence: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XDlWUilhAzr6/
Also on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v4hwqlb-robert-arborist-documents-unnatural-forest-fires.-years-of-evidence.-with-e.html
I will also, for the next week, make public my initial interview with Robert. (It’s part of the second Truth Summit package.) https://truthsummit.info/robert-arborist-SPEC.html
I will end with 2 things:
- 1. Ed Wackerman’s address, if you’d like to write to him;
- 2. Robert’s list of 10 anomalies in unnatural forest fires.
HERE IS THE ADDRESS:
Ed Wackerman
c/o Mariposa County Detention Center P.O. Box 727
Mariposa, CA 95338

Posted March 8 2024
Ed Wackerman has been in a California prison for months, charged with committing a crime impossible for him to commit. An unnatural forest fire. What is an unnatural forest fire? ROBERT, PROFESSIONAL ARBORIST for 33 years, has years of evidence about the differences between natural and unnatural forest fires in California and also elsewhere. Maui. Texas. And more. Here Robert gives an overview of the situation, with photos from fire after fire where trees did not burn but were dead from the inside out, where houses were gone but the trees beside them remained, the needles unburned, untouched. We need to see this evidence, know this evidence, act together to protect those charged with crimes they did not commit - and to protect this world as well as we can. This is being done to us. Robert has years of evidence. Watch now. And be involved, active, doing what you can. Every step helps.For more interviews and updates and thought talks, subscribe to:
What does the new world order warfare look like??
Weaponizing nature intentionally … against people.
- through fires
-manipulation of viruses
-Geo-Engineering the weather
-releasing chemicals into the atmosphere
Destroying infrastructure-
-destroying animal processing plants that feed the population
-destroying food plants
-destroying natural gas plants
-Train derailments
-disruptions in plane travel
-blowing up bridges
I think we are at war, we’re just unaware.
Ed Wackerman

Kamala Harris Caught Meeting with Fani Willis Before Trump Incitement:
By Robert Cunningham,
updated on March 7, 2024
Fulton County's top prosecutor is now facing her own legal drama.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is currently embroiled in a controversy involving allegations of nepotism and political bias.
Allegations of Impropriety Shaking Fulton County
The integrity of the Fulton County District Attorney's office is being questioned following allegations against its current DA, Fani Willis.
Ashley Merchant, an attorney involved in the case, has brought forward claims that Willis engaged in an improper relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who was reportedly paid almost double the salary of his colleagues. These allegations surfaced during a Georgia state Senate hearing while Willis' qualification to lead the Trump prosecution was under review.
Merchant's testimony also highlighted concerns regarding Wade's remuneration, suggesting a lack of transparency and accountability in his billing practices. The claim that Wade received over $650,000 with minimal invoice details to account for his services has raised eyebrows, especially considering the 12,000 text messages between Willis and Wade before the public acknowledgment of their relationship.
Willis is contending with possible removal from the high-profile Trump trial due to these allegations, which she vehemently denies.
Political Overtones and Personal Conduct Under Scrutiny
The case's political implications are hard to ignore, given the nature of the charges against former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants. A GOP-run panel is now probing Willis' office amid these racketeering conspiracy charges, further complicating matters.
Adding fuel to the fire, Merchant mentioned a meeting between Willis, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens, questioning its timing and relevance to the Trump prosecution, which could suggest political motivations.
Trump and the 18 co-defendants face charges of a racketeering scheme aimed at overturning the election results. Amidst these serious allegations, concerns about Willis lying regarding the start of her relationship with Wade and exploiting racial politics have surfaced.
Merchant's insinuation that Willis and Wade managed the case for financial gain, despite the scrutiny over their purported motives, casts a shadow over the integrity of the legal process.
"People are angry because I’m going to do the right thing and stand up for justice," Willis stated. "They can continue their games and I’ll continue to do the work of the people."
The Balance of Justice and Political Gamesmanship
The case has been further complicated by Merchant's client, Michael Roman, who is involved in the scheme to appoint 'fake electors.' Merchant represents Romans and was the one to bring many of these concerns to light. Willis has been criticized for reimbursing Wade in cash for travel expenses to destinations such as Napa Valley, raising more questions about their professional relationship.
Willis has defended her actions and criticized the proceedings, claiming they are politically motivated and asserting her commitment to justice. On the other hand, State Sen. Harold V. Jones II has openly questioned the fairness of the trial process and whether the ongoing controversies may lead to Willis' potential disbarment.
Conclusion
The allegations against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis have cast a pall over the high-profile case against former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants. The claims of nepotism, lack of transparency in billing practices, and potential political motivations are serious matters that have drawn the attention of both legal experts and the public. Merchant's allegations, combined with the meeting between Willis and Vice President Harris, raise questions about the impartiality of the legal process.
Willis' defense of her actions and insistence on her commitment to justice have not silenced critics who remain concerned about the integrity of the proceedings. The unfolding events will undoubtedly have significant implications for the legal system and the political landscape.
Capitalism Institute

Criminal Charges Dismissed Against Colts Star Drew Ogletree
In a surprising turn of events, the legal landscape for a professional athlete has been dramatically altered. All domestic battery charges against Indianapolis Colts tight end Drew Ogletree have been dropped due to a lack of evidence, marking a significant moment in his career and personal life.
Drew Ogletree's journey through the judicial system began with a stark accusation. At the end of December, the Colts' tight end found himself entangled in legal troubles when the Avon Police Department was alerted to an incident of physical violence between two adults.
This report led to the issuance of an arrest warrant for Ogletree on December 28, and he was subsequently arrested.
The Legal Battle and Its Outcome
Following his detention, Ogletree was charged with two grave felonies: one for "domestic battery resulting in moderate bodily injury" and another for "domestic battery committed in the presence of a child under 16 years old."
These accusations suggested a serious conflict, which initially appeared to have a strong basis to the arresting officers. Nonetheless, the foundation of any judicial process is the evidence presented.
The charges were later dismissed "with prejudice," a term indicating that the case is closed permanently and cannot be reopened or filed again. This decision marks a critical juncture in Ogletree's case.
The shift in his favor occurred when subsequent interviews and inquiries unearthed new evidence and viewpoints that were not initially accessible to the law enforcement bodies involved.
Ogletree's Claim of Self-Defense
Within the courtroom documents, a narrative of self-defense was presented by Ogletree. He claimed that he did not initiate the altercation but was a response to an attack, claiming the alleged victim attempted to hit him first. This claim, coupled with the new evidence obtained through subsequent interviews, appears to have shifted the balance in his legal battle.
The fact that Ogletree was placed on the NFL commissioner's exempt list following his arrest adds another layer to this complex situation. Although the criminal charges have been dismissed, Ogletree's future in professional football remains uncertain as his arrest is still under NFL review. This underscores the broader implications of legal issues for professional athletes beyond the immediate legal consequences.
A Career on Pause
Drew Ogletree's professional life offers a poignant backdrop to this legal drama. After being drafted in the sixth round of the 2022 NFL draft by Indianapolis, his career hit an early stumbling block due to an ACL injury, sidelining him for his entire rookie season.
Despite this setback, Ogletree made his NFL debut in the following season, appearing in 10 games and showcasing his potential with nine receptions for 147 yards and two touchdowns.
These achievements illustrate not only Ogletree's athletic talent but also his resilience. The juxtaposition of his burgeoning NFL career with his legal entanglements highlights the precarious balance professional athletes often must maintain between their public personas and private lives.
Lessons to Learn
While Drew Ogletree's story has taken a turn towards vindication, it is a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding allegations of domestic violence.
1. Always Seek the Full Story: Initial reports do not always capture the entirety of an event. This case underscores the importance of withholding judgment until all evidence is reviewed.
2. Legal Representation Matters: Ogletree's defense illustrates the crucial role that skilled legal counsel plays in navigating the intricacies of the law.
3. Support Systems Are Crucial: The athlete thanked his family, friends, and fans for their unwavering support. It's a poignant reminder that irrespective of precautions, crime can affect anyone, and victim-blaming only exacerbates the trauma.
It is essential to remember that despite our best efforts to stay safe, crime can happen to anyone, and blaming the victim is not only unhelpful but unjust.
The dismissal of domestic battery charges against Drew Ogletree is significant not only for the individual involved but for the broader community. It is a cautionary tale about the complexities of legal accusations, the importance of thorough investigation, and the impact of public opinion. Moreover, this case highlights the delicate balance professional athletes must navigate between their careers and personal lives and how quickly one can affect the other.
In conclusion, Drew Ogletree's legal saga—from the initial charges of domestic battery to their eventual dismissal—underscores the intricate layers of legal, professional, and personal challenges faced.
While Ogletree can now move forward without the immediate threat of legal repercussions, the broader discussions about athlete behavior, legal proceedings, and the quest for truth remain pertinent. The lessons from this case, both legal and personal, resonate beyond the courtroom and into the wider community, reminding us of the complexities inherent in the pursuit of justice and redemption.
Related Posts
· Zuckerberg Under Fire After Deepfakes Found In Ad Platform
· CEO Of Titanic Expedition Jokingly Confessed In Leaked Audio
· Air Force Contractor Arrested After Exposing Top Secret Information On Dating App
· Aspiring Doctor Takes Selfie Moments Before Plunging To Her Death
· Criminal Charges Dismissed Against Colts Star Drew Ogletree
· MI Vape Distribution Center Sparks Explosions As Debris Rains Down On Town
US Crime ALERTS
Biden’s Big Move on Gaza:
MIDDLE EAST LATEST — President JOE BIDEN this evening will announce during his State of the Union address that the U.S. military will establish a temporary seaport in Gaza, effectively sidestepping a de facto Israeli blockade to allow more humanitarian aid in, Alex Ward reports, citing multiple Biden administration officials. The move to expand aid flows also includes “the opening of a third land crossing into Gaza, which the United Nations confirmed Thursday will allow aid to flow into the northern part of the territory.”
The move raises immediate and serious questions, including to what degree the government of Israeli PM BENJAMIN NETANYAHU is consenting to the plan, how the transfers of vital aid will be secured once they are in Gaza, and what it means for the future of U.S.-Israel relations and the multilateral effort to negotiate a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas.
This much is known, Alex reports: It will be a complex operation that could take 45 to 60 days to establish a “regular cadence of large assistance packages” into Gaza through Cyprus. And it will somehow be done without U.S. troops having to set foot in Palestinian territory: “The U.S. military has ‘unique capabilities’ that allow it to construct a port or causeway without having to send forces to Gaza’s shores, said one of the officials.”
The planned announcement comes as Hamas withdrew at least temporarily from cease-fire talks in Cairo, with negotiations expected to resume next week. The departure makes “it extremely unlikely that mediators will broker a deal before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan,” AP’s Samy Magdy, Abby Sewell and Aamer Madhani report from Cairo — a milestone that Biden had cited as crucial last week.

NOTABLE EXCHANGE — You can expect reproductive health care to be a key theme of Biden’s address tonight, after the recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling put IVF in the legal crosshairs. Alabama lawmakers voted yesterday to reverse the court decision, and GOP Gov. KAY IVEY immediately signed the bill. But an interview with Speaker MIKE JOHNSON this morning illustrates how the IVF debate could continue to trip up Republicans.
Speaking with CBS News’ Tony Dokoupil, the Louisianan Republican steered away from confirming whether he believed that discarding embryos — a key part of typical IVF procedures — amounted to murder, stating, “It’s something that we've got to grapple with. You know, it’s a brave new world. IVF’s only been invented, I think, in the early ’70s.” Pressed further, Johnson said, "If you do believe that life begins at conception, it's a really important question to wrestle with.”
“You don’t want to say where you are on it personally?” Dokoupil continued. Said Johnson: “I think I have said. I believe in the sanctity of life, every life and I think it’s something we have to very carefully consider.”
MINIBUS LATEST — WaPo’s Marianna Sotomayor notices signs that Johnson is finally accepting the fact that he’s not going to bring the hard-right faction of his conference on board with all of his decision — that’s good news to Johnson’s allies in the House, who have been “heartened by moments over the past week that they believe show he is more willing than previously thought to sideline detractors in an effort to find workable solutions.”
And in the Senate … Now that the House has passed the first six-bill government funding package, the clock is ticking for the Senate to pass it before the Friday midnight shutdown deadline. Final passage is possible today, Katherine Tully-McManus reports, but that will require all 100 senators to agree on a deal to speed things up: “Republicans are likely to demand amendment votes in exchange for that fast-track process. (Though those proposals, which aren’t public yet, are unlikely to succeed.)”
POLITICO Playbook PM

Joe Biden makes one sneaky Federal Government change to sway the Election:
Election interference comes in many forms. Sometimes most miss it happen right before their eyes.
And now Joe Biden’s made a sneaky change to the government to sway the outcome of the elections.
There are two issues that can dramatically change the outcome of a presidential election depending on how Americans view how well the incumbent president is handling these two issues.
They are, of course, national security and the economy.

The economy is more often discussed during election years. It is the most potent issue that Americans think about as they head to the ballot box in November every four years.
Without a solid economy, an incumbent President is truly up against it. It’s hard to overcome the disapproval Americans will have for the White House if they are hardly able to get good jobs and pay for a roof over their heads and put bread on the table.
It’s no surprise, then, that Joe Biden’s utter failure on these two issues has led to Americans harboring a seriously negative view of his job so far as the President of the United States.
The Biden administration’s fiscal policy has ruined families all over the country as inflation ravages household savings as Americans are just trying to get by and keep their mortgage or rent payments up to date.
Groceries continue to explode in prices making it increasingly difficult for people to balance their income to be able to simply feed their families. In some regions, groceries are about twice as expensive as they were just a few short years ago.
Gas prices are once again back on the rise this election year, and while they were somewhat stomachable for a few months in the last half of 2023, there’s growing concern that gas and transportation costs in general will never get back to where they were before 2021.
There’s many reasons why this has all happened. One of the major reasons is the Biden administration’s policy with the Federal Reserve of hiking up interest rates as they continue to print money out of thin air.
They’ve exploded the national interest rates to combat inflation, which doesn’t actually do anything. That’s not how economics truly works. The way to actually combat inflation is to stop printing money out of thin air so that the federal government can continue to spend the nation into oblivion.
Conveniently, the Federal Reserve under Joe Biden’s “leadership” is starting to have a change of heart about eight months out from the presidential election.
According to reports, the Federal Reserve is considering lowering interest rates for the first time in years. They say that it will likely happen at “some point this year.”
USA Today reports:
Responding to questions from committee members, Powell added, “because the economy has been so strong we think we can and should be careful” about slicing rates. He added the Fed wants “to see more good inflation readings” to feel confident that the recent pullback in price gains won’t stall or reverse.
What brought about this change of heart? At one point the Federal Reserve said they wouldn’t be lowering interest rates until they saw multiple quarters of inflation being at or under their 3% annualized target.
That hasn’t happened yet. What gives?
Joe Biden’s critics are arguing that the White House is desperate for a real “win” as the presidential election heats up and Biden faces a rematch against Donald Trump.
The White House using power as the head of the executive branch to sway outcomes of elections is a legal grey area to be sure. Some legal experts say that if it were proven in court to be true that the Biden administration was intentionally lowering federal reserve rates to get back on the good side of the voters ahead of the election cycle, it could be considered an impeachable offense.
D.C. Daily Journal
Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg pleads guilty to perjury charges in NYC court:
Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg pleaded guilty to perjury in a Manhattan court Monday, the Associated Press reported. The 76-year-old is on the hook for statements he made testifying during former President Donald Trump's civil fraud case in New York.
The plea deal means Weisselberg will serve five months in jail after his April sentencing hearing. He's already spent 100 days in prison for failing to pay taxes on gifts from his employer.
The retired CFO had been employed by the Trump family for almost half a century. Weisselberg was respected and treated well, including receiving a $2 million severance upon his retirement.
Trump has continued to pay his legal bills through all of the ordeal. However, Trump's detractors have been after Weisselberg in an attempt to use those connections to get Trump on something significant.
The Case Against Weisselberg
Weisselberg is useful to the courts as Trump is the target of several cases. One of those cases includes prosecution over alleged hush money payments brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
"It is a crime to lie in depositions and at trial — plain and simple," a statement from Bragg's office noted. The trial is set for March 25, but part of the plea deal includes an agreement that Weisselberg won't have to testify further in that case.
The former CFO accepted two counts of perjury for allegedly lying during a lawsuit New York Attorney General Letitia James brought against Trump for allegedly overvaluing his assets. As the CFO, Weisselberg would have known the value and cooperated in the supposed scheme but claimed not to.
The charges come from Weisselberg's testimony given in July 2020 and May 2023. However, he has only copped to the most recent testimony so as not to interfere with the plea bargain on his tax evasion case.
"Allen Weisselberg looks forward to putting this situation behind him," a statement from his attorney Seth Rosenberg said. Weisselberg's ordeal may be mostly behind him, but he's only a pawn in a larger game.
A Political Witch Hunt
Throughout these trials, Trump has maintained his innocence and said it was the work of Bragg, a partisan Democrat. Trump's attorney, Christopher Kise, railed against Weisselberg's prosecution as bait to catch Trump, the bigger fish.
"This plea was no doubt extorted by threatening an elderly and innocent man with immediate and lengthy incarceration. Such alarming, shameful, and oppressive tactics have no place in our justice system and expose the citizens of New York to irreparable and life-altering harm," Kise said.
Caught up in the scheme is Weisselberg, who was handcuffed despite his old age and the fact that he surrendered himself. Judge Laurie Petersen questioned him in the Manhattan court about his knowledge of the value of Trump's luxury penthouse in Manhattan.
"You knew that testimony was false?" Petersen asked him. "Yes," Weisselberg responded.
Trump is getting closer to becoming the nominee in the 2024 GOP presidential primary. Democrats are scared of the prospect of another Trump presidency, and these cases and the collateral damage they're causing are likely linked to that fact.
The American Digest

Capitol Hill stunned after leading Senator calls it Quits:
Being a politician has its challenges. But this senator couldn’t handle the pressure any longer.
And Capitol Hill is stunned after a leading senator calls it quits.
On Tuesday, Senator Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) announced that she will retire from the Senate at the end of this year.
That will now make the race for her senate seat between Kari Lake (R) and Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ).
Sinema was only able to raise just $595,000 for her campaign in the last quarter of 2023.
Lake and Gallego were able to raise much more in comparison.
“Because I choose civility, understanding, listening, working together to get stuff done, I will leave the Senate at the end of this year,” Sinema said in a video that was posted on X.

If Republicans are able to pick up Sinema’s seat in the Senate, then that would be a massive victory for the party.
“An open sea in Arizona creates a unique opportunity for Republicans to build a lasting Senate majority this November. With recent polling showing Kyrsten Sinema pulling far more Republican voters than Democrat voters, her decision to retire improves Kari Lake’s opportunity to flip this seat,” National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair Steve Daines (R-MT) announced.
Lake had some rather kind words to say about Sinema regarding her decision to step down at the end of 2024.
“Senator Sinema had the courage to stand tall against the Far-Left in defense of the filibuster–despite the overwhelming pressure from the radicals in her party like Ruben Gallego who called on her to burn it all down,” Lake said in an X post.
“Ruben Gallego would be a radical departure from the representation we have had in Arizona. He votes with Joe Biden 100% of the time, supported the Iran Deal, sanctuary cities, defunding the police, and voting rights for everyone pouring across the border. He even called the border wall ‘stupid.'”

Gallego thanked Sinema in an X post of his own before pushing his radical Leftist agenda that includes “protecting abortion access.”
“I want to thank @SenatorSinema for her nearly two decades of service to our state,” Gallego’s post said.
“Arizona, we are at a crossroads. Protecting abortion access, tackling housing affordability, securing our water supply, defending our democracy–all of this and more is on the line. Its time Democrats, Independents, and Republicans come together and reject Kari Lake and her dangerous positions.”
Right now, Democrats have a two seat majority in the Senate. So, the fight between Gallego and Lake for Sinema’s seat will prove to be a major race that will contribute to which party has the majority in the Senate for the next several years.
The Federalist Wire
Rep. Gaetz Files Complaint for Election Interference Against Jack Smith:
By Jerry McConway,
updated on March 7, 2024
The gamesmanship began on Donald Trump's behalf with his surrogates in Congress.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) fired the first shot and filed a formal complaint against Special Counsel Jack Smith for election interference.
Talking Points…- Jack Smith indictments against Trump- Gaetz files complaint- Analysis
Jack Smith Cases Against Trump
Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed two indictments against Trump: the first is in the classified documents case, and the second is in the election interference case. These are arguably the two cases that have the most teeth in terms of Trump's conviction, but both cases are actually in jeopardy right now because of the delays that the Trump legal team has been able to maneuver.
The classified documents case has faced significant challenges, especially now that the Supreme Court has accepted the Trump immunity motion. It is unlikely to be successful, but arguments for that case are not being heard until late April, so we are unlikely to see a decision until June unless the court expedites its ruling. Even so, Judge Aileen Cannon has already stated that a July 8 trial date, as Smith requested, is out of the question.
The second case, the election interference case, was crafted in such a manner that Smith was able to present the same charge with several different plans of attacks, all but ensuring that he would get at least one conviction against Trump. This case was supposed to start on March 4, but Trump's legal team has been bombarding the court with motions. This case is also tied to Trump's immunity claim, but Trump will have to prove his actions on January 6 were in the country's best interests as president rather than actions taken on behalf of his campaign.
Gaetz Files Complaint Against Smith
On Wednesday, it was announced that Rep. Gaetz had filed a formal complaint against Special Counsel Smith for election interference. The premise is that these cases were brought against Trump to try to block him from being the nominee for the GOP in the 2024 election. Gaetz is now claiming that the timing of the case was meant to influence the election. He stated:
"The witch hunt against President Trump by Attorney General Garland and Special Counsel Smith is a partisan exercise, and the American people know it. The actions of the Special Counsel Smith to speed up the trial against President Trump violate the DOJ's rules and the law.
"His public comments and his office's briefs before the Supreme Court demonstrate that he has no reason for his actions other than to unlawfully interfere in the 2024 presidential election."
The DOJ generally has a policy that it does not take any action within 60 days of the election to prevent influencing the election, and with these court dates getting pushed back further and further, the conclusion of at least one of these trials would fall into that window. To that point, Gaetz continued:
"It is the core of prohibited conduct that a purpose (not the purpose) of any official action of a prosecutor be to affect any election.
"It may be morally correct that the American people should see swift resolution of this case, perhaps with dropped charges or a Trump acquittal before the November 2024 Presidential election, but wielding Executive Branch authority in the service of this is a violation of law. Prosecutors must be held to a higher standard."
Analysis
Donald Trump is a master at manipulating the legal system, and his legal team has played this particular plan to perfection. Trump knows that if he is found guilty of a felony, his poll numbers start to go down, even more if he is sentenced to prison. These delays have all but ensured the case would not come to a conclusion, meaning verdict, sentencing, and appeals before the election arrived.
Trump has claimed that this has always been election interference, which I disagreed with. However, if the cases fall into that election window, that obviously changes. My belief was that if they were going to try these cases against Trump, it should have happened well before the primary election to give voters an honest idea of where Trump stood.
The fact that Trump has now sewn up the nomination with four federal cases pending is simply unfair to voters.
Having said that, the voters knew all this was hanging over Trump's head and that he very well could be found guilty before the election, but they still chose him over DeSantis and Haley. When I first saw the indictments against Trump, I was positive that voters would shy away from the unknown, but Trump's diehard supporters have proved they are now the majority of the party. So, that not only impacts this race, but it will clearly impact the 2028 election as it would appear Donald Trump will be hand-picking the candidate to succeed him if he wins this election. If Trump loses, that would likely change how voters see him and anyone he supports.
The Capitalism Institute

Biden’s Gaza Aid Drop Plan Ignites Congressional Firestorm!
President Joe Biden recently made a bold statement by announcing his plan to drop over 38,000 meals into the war-torn Gaza region. This decision was met with both praise and criticism from members of Congress, sparking a heated debate on the best course of action for addressing the humanitarian crisis in the region.
Biden’s airdrops into Gaza sees mixed reaction in Congress https://t.co/tnqGL1SAA9
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) March 2, 2024
Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) was one of the voices expressing support for Biden’s plan, emphasizing the urgent need for humanitarian assistance in Gaza. Reed praised the president’s decision to order airdrops of aid, highlighting the moral and strategic significance of providing immediate assistance to the people of Gaza.
On the other hand, Republican representatives raised concerns about the potential repercussions of sending aid to the region. Representative Tim Burchett (R-TN) expressed skepticism about the aid reaching its intended recipients, citing the risk of aid falling into the hands of the enemy.
Additionally, Representative Don Bacon (R-NE) drew historical parallels, arguing that the United States did not provide aid to Germany and Japan during the conflict in 1944. Bacon suggested that sending aid at this stage could inadvertently benefit Hamas, urging for a more cautious approach in addressing the ongoing conflict.
Furthermore, Representative Jim Banks (R-IN) accused Biden of letting domestic politics sway his foreign policy decisions, linking the president’s move to a recent Michigan Democratic Primary. Banks alleged that Biden’s decision to send aid was influenced by the primary results and criticized the president for basing his foreign policy on a state election outcome.
The announcement of airdrops of humanitarian aid into Gaza has triggered a fierce debate within Congress, with opposing viewpoints reflecting the broader political divisions surrounding US foreign policy and the Israel-Palestine conflict. This polarizing issue continues to highlight the complexities and challenges of navigating humanitarian crises in the midst of geopolitical tensions.
The Patriot powered Network

Rumors – Rumors - Rumors – Rumors – Rumors
RUMOURS Circulating out there...:
You need to MAKE-UP Your own MIND!
SUMMARY
Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Fri. 8 March 2024
Compiled Fri. 8 March 2024 12:01 am EST
I must confess that I had a hard time listening to Actor Biden’s State of the Union address tonight. Guess I’m tired of trying to figure out who’s real, who’s not, who’s alive, who’s dead and who’s faking it.
I yearn for the time when reality was really reality, when you could trust what a US President said in the State of the Union was true. When you could go to the polls and feel your vote meant something – now I’m wondering if it ever did.
I yearn for the Emergency Broadcast System’s documentaries to air so I can intelligently discuss with friends and family what’s really going on in this World.
We’re all tired, yet we have such a long way to go. It’s time we got on with it – together, united as Patriots of the World, and with God’s help, we can do this.
Where we go one, we go all!!!
· Since the end of World War II the American taxpayers have been paying for the CIA Mind Control of humans, mainly children, which involved Torture, Sexual Abuse and Satanic Human Sacrifice rites that murdered innocent children.
· In our recent past Nations of the World who wanted independence of Deep State IMF loans and control have been removed from power using CIA Mind Control Operatives, and replaced by CIA backed military dictatorships – and the US Taxpayer paid for it.
· CIA backed illegal migrants were set to ignite violence across the US through assaults, riots and destruction of the nation in a Civil War – and the US Taxpayer paid for it to happen.
· NASA preparing for 'internet Apocalypse' threat. Coming soon to a modem near you. https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1874263/nasa-internet-apocalypse-solar-storm-spt
· Thurs. 7 March: Multiple US government websites, including DHS, ICE and the Secret Service etc. are down. Testing for the EBS?
· Evidence has surfaced that the Texas Panhandle so-called “wildfires” that destroyed a great part of the cattle industry, were actually started by Cabal Direct Energy Weapons – just as they were in Maui and other places.
· Arrest Wars Begin: Trump has notified those on a FBI Most Wanted List to surrender or face assassination. JAG has convicted US Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona to 20 years at GITMO. Two foreigners plotting to assassinate President Trump have been executed by White Hats. Marines have arrested US third highest ranking diplomat Victoria Nuland (along with her husband), who recently resigned as the Under Secretary for Political Affairs US Department of State. https://realrawnews.com/2024/03/marines-arrest-victoria-nuland-and-husband/
· Thurs. 7 March Haiti: Violence in Haiti has caused a Security Alert: U.S. citizens in Haiti should depart Haiti as soon as possible. Massive Prison Break in Haiti: More than 4,000 inmates, among them gang members implicated in the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse, have escaped from Haiti’s main prison. With gangs said to be controlling 80% of Port-au-Prince, there’s an increase in violence and concerns over a potential coup against the government.
· Never Forget: It Was Barack Obama Who First Pushed Teaching Sex Education to Kindergarteners Back in 2007. Makes sense since he's married to a guy that likes to dress up like a woman.
President Trump is asking everyone to forward the below to a minimum of 20 people, and to ask each of those to do likewise. In three days, most people in the United States will have the message. This is an idea that should be passed around, regardless of political party.
Serving in Congress is an honor and privilege NOT a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators should serve their term(s), then go home and go back to work … not get all kinds of freebies.
The TRUMP Rules: Congressional Reform Act of 2017
1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office. And, no more perks go with them.
2. Congress (past, present, & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress must purchase their own retirement plan, just as ALL Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people (i.e. NO MORE INSIDER TRADING!!!).
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congress made all these contracts by and for themselves.
NO WONDER THEY’RE FIGHTING EVERYTHING HE TRIES! Pass it on!!!! Let's help TRUMP drain the swamp! Send it to everyone you know. Let’s help Trump get the country straightened out.
Global Financial Collapse
· Wed. 6 March Bank of America Issues Warning of US Dollar Collapse. The US national debt is growing by $1tn every 100 days since 2023, Bank of America has shockingly revealed. Uncontrolled debt could lead to a financial disaster wreaking havoc not only in the US but across the world. Keeping the US dollar in reserves is now seen as a threat by other countries - that could undo years of financial stability.
· Thurs. 7 March Breaking: Trump’s Secret Financial Move Triggers NDAs and EBS Alert – Wells Fargo’s Secret Quantum Leap That Could Change Everything! - Gazetteller
· Thurs. 7 March New York Community Bank Bonds($NYCB) were now down 45% so far today on the Stock Market and trading has been halted for news pending. Bank Runs Imminent? NYCB Trading Halted, Seeks Emergency $1 Billion In Funding. https://en-volve.com/2024/03/06/bank-runs-imminent-nycb-trading-halted-seeks-emergency-1-billion-in-funding-we-told-you/
· Thurs. 7 March US bank profits fell 44% in the fourth quarter of 2023. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) says the banking industry continues to face "significant downside risks." In particular, office space and other types of CRE loans are subject to monitoring. The FDIC also added eight banks to its list of “troubled banks,” bringing the total assets of these troubled companies to $66.3 billion.
· Thurs. 7 March: https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2024/03/new-kirk-elliots-warning-banking-collapse-imminent-brace-for-impact-2550364.html
End
Comments