Monday 7-24-23
Verse(s) for today:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 KJV
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, And a light unto my path.
Psalm 119:105 KJV
See that none render evil for evil unto any man; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men.
1 Thessalonians 5:15 KJV
Thought(s) for the Day:
United Nations Threatens Canada's Christian rights:
A storm is brewing at the United Nations... It's a challenge to our right to practice our Christian beliefs, and it's happening now.
Recently, during the 53rd United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), a report was released that claims religious freedom conflicts with LGBT rights.
It suggests that governments should enforce acceptable LGBT standards within religious contexts and penalize non-compliant religious leaders and organizations.
Make no mistake... This report isn't just a recommendation, it's a blueprint for governments to control religious practices and enforce LGBT ideologies within religious settings.
This means that Canada becomes an unsafe place for Christians.
The alarming effects of this could reach far and wide - from your local priest to your kids at university, and even you! Expressing your opinions based on your religious beliefs could potentially result in being reported.
There is an urgency to act now before this issue moves from a report to the negotiation table. We aim to collect 300,000 signatures in the upcoming weeks to prevent the radical proposal from advancing.
We were present in Geneva when this report came to light...
If you remember, I urgently asked for your help to raise awareness among the delegates from Canada and other countries. Our goal was to persuade them to reject the proposal. Well...
I hate to be the bearer of such news, but the pro-LGBT lobby's report taken into consideration and the ramifications of it are truly outrageous and cause for alarm.
It implies that priests may be forced to officiate same-sex marriages or risk losing their privilege to conduct legally recognized marriages.
It also suggests that UN member states should utilize supportive religious leaders to advocate for LGBT ideologies, thereby imposing these ideologies on all religions, including our Christian faith.
This is a direct encroachment on our religious freedom and beliefs.
Victor Madrigal-Borloz, the UN independent expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI), who drafted this report, believes that unless all religions endorse pro-LGBT ideas, individuals identifying as LGBT will be alienated, causing them pain and potentially violating their human rights.
However, this is not just an opposition between two different beliefs. It's about the right to practice our faith freely and independently, versus a world where governments dictate our religious practices.
Our petition could avert this dire situation. But we must act immediately. Help us collect 300,000 signatures in the upcoming weeks to prevent the radical proposal from advancing in Canada and worldwide.
Canada has a strong Christian community that values its freedom of religion. We believe that by standing firm in our faith and urging our leader to reject this UN report, we can demonstrate the strength of our conviction.
If we stand together and make our voices heard, our leaders will have to listen. The voices of thousands of citizens cannot be ignored.
By collecting 300,000 signatures across all countries participating in this global campaign, we will successfully deter the threat. Based on our experience, applying pressure early increases the chances of preventing the radical left, LGBT groups, and advocates of gender ideology proposals from reaching negotiation stages.
You and I find ourselves in a conflict between our religious convictions and the imposition of ideologies, such as transgenderism and homosexuality, that contradict and challenge these convictions.
It's a battle for the preservation of respect towards our beliefs.
Winning this battle means preserving the freedom to practice our Christian faith independently and without government interference.
Losing means the erosion of our religious rights and freedoms.
This is a pressing issue, and we need to act now. We must confront this proposal before it gains traction and risks going to a vote.
Let us assert that our Christian rights are non-negotiable!
Thanks for joining this critical fight!
Ignacio Arsuaga and the entire CitizenGO Team
[Sylvia Flemming]
P.S. After you've signed, please share this petition with as many people as possible. It is only through our collective effort that we can make a real impact.
For more information:
UN Expert Argues Religious Beliefs Must Change to Accommodate LGBT Ideology
UN Attempts to Impose LGBT Orthodoxy on All Religions
Freedom of religion or belief not incompatible with equality for LGBT persons: UN expert
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/06/freedom-religion-or-belief-not-incompatible-equality-lgbt-persons-un-expert [CitizenGO Team]
The SMEAR of RFK, Jr.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/07/lew-rockwell/the-smear-against-rfk-jr/
Robert F. Kennedy has been polling well against brain-dead Biden. Biden neocon controllers don’t like this, so they have resorted to a time-tested smear campaign against him. He has a long record of being pro-Jewish and supporting Israel, but this hasn’t stopped his enemies from calling him “anti-Semitic”. The charge is ridiculous. What his enemies fear is that he will bring to public attention issues our masters in Washington don’t want us to think about.
What gave rise to the smear? According to the New York Post, which broke the “story,” Kennedy said in a press conference at an Italian restaurant in New York, “’COVID-19. There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately’ Kennedy said. ‘COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.’
‘We don’t know whether it was deliberately targeted or not but there are papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact,’ Kennedy hedged.
They story did not claim that Kennedy said that Jews had targeted anyone. It said that there was a theory that Covid was targeted, but Kennedy didn’t endorse the theory—he just mentioned it. Further, the theory said nothing about Jews doing the targeting.
Kennedy responded immediately. He posted on Twitter, pointing out the distortions in the story. He noted his long pro-Jewish record and quoted a conversation with a famous rabbi who was upset by the smear directed against him. This was his tweet:
You might think that would put an end to the story, but of course it wasn’t. The New York Times solicited statements from members of Kennedy’s family and others denouncing him for “anti-Semitism,” even though he had said nothing critical of Jews. “Several members of the Kennedy family have condemned a bigoted conspiracy theory from the Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who suggested that the coronavirus was ‘ethnically targeted’ to spare Jews and Chinese people.. .
His sister Kerry Kennedy called his remarks ‘deplorable and untruthful’ and said they did not represent the principles espoused by Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the organization she leads — named after their father, the former attorney general and presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy.
His brother Joseph Kennedy II issued a similar statement, telling The Boston Globe: ‘Bobby’s comments are morally and factually wrong. They play on antisemitic myths and stoke mistrust of the Chinese. His remarks in no way reflect the words and actions of our father, Robert F. Kennedy.’ “
Naturally the White House joined in the smear. “White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre sharply denounced a conspiracy theory floated by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that Covid-19 was engineered to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people, calling the longshot Democratic candidate’s remarks ‘false’ and ‘vile.’
‘The claims made on that tape is false,’ she said during a Monday press briefing about a video published over the weekend. ‘It is vile, and they put our fellow Americans in danger.’
Jean-Pierre declined to discuss Kennedy directly, citing the legal constraints on the administration’s ability to address campaign matters. But she warned that Kennedy’s remarks amounted to encouraging racist theories around the virus.
‘If you think about the racist and antisemitic conspiracy theories that come out of saying those type of things, it’s an attack on our fellow citizens,’Jean-Pierre said. ‘And so it’s important that we essentially speak out when we hear those claims more broadly.’
Jean-Pierre also cited a statement from the American Jewish Committee that called Kennedy’s claims ‘deeply offensive’ and reflective of ‘some of the most abhorrent antisemitic conspiracy theories throughout history.’
‘This is something that this president, and this whole administration, is going to stand against,’ she added.”
Why the massive and unfounded campaign against Kennedy? The answer is this he has raised issues Biden’s neocon controllers want swept under the carpet. The great Dr. Naomi Wolf highlighted some of these issues in a conversation she had with him: “In the latest episode of ‘TRUTH’ with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Kennedy sat down with the iconic Naomi Wolf for a spirited discussion on abuse of power, standing up to tyranny and preserving our Constitution. Wolf explained how tyrants always follow the same predictable route in their attempts to bring democracies to a close and how she believes our society has reached ‘Step 10’ of her ‘Fascism in 10 Easy Steps.’
Highlights of their conversation include:
· We’re reaching a point reminiscent of what led to the American Revolution: People were willing to die rather than give up their rights.
· The Constitution wasn’t written for easy times but for emergencies such as the current COVID crisis.
· Arbitrary restrictions are being put in place by those abusing emergency powers at local, state and federal levels. In a free society, points are made and arguments won through free speech and open debate rather than censoring opinions that differ from ours.
· Authoritarianism has no place in medicine although most liberals are accepting edicts promoted by Fauci and Bill Gates.
· Direct-to-consumer advertising that started in 1997 marked the beginning of Pharma’s takeover of American media.
· The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation neutralized once-independent media including The Guardian, NPR and public television through financial gifts.
· Democrats are leading the ‘biofascism’ charge.
· There’s no science to back up the widespread suspension of our Constitutional rights.
· Non-partisan grassroots efforts are gaining momentum and can preserve our freedom and prevent totalitarian takeover.
Kennedy has been the foremost exposers of the dangers posed to our health and safety by “Dr.”Anthony Fauci. “Children’s Health Defense’s board chair and lead counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s highly anticipated book, is available today in bookstores throughout the U.S. and Canada.
The New York Times bestselling author’s latest work details how Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and their cohorts used their control of media outlets, scientific journals, key government and quasi-governmental agencies, and influential scientists and physicians to flood the public with fearful propaganda about COVID-19 virulence and pathogenesis, and to muzzle debate and ruthlessly censor dissent.
As people the world over are questioning the origins of the COVID crisis, news continues to emerge about U.S. taxpayers’ funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. Some U.S. Senators including Rand Paul are calling for Fauci’s resignation while U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace is leading a bipartisan effort to investigate his agency’s treatment of beagle puppies during experiments that the group of lawmakers calls ‘cruel.’
exposes a side of Dr. Fauci that has thus far been shielded from the public by the ongoing media blackout of any information that counters the Pharma/government narrative.
‘The research I conducted for this book exposes how Fauci’s gargantuan yearly disbursements allow him to dictate the subject, content and outcome of scientific health research across the globe,’ said Kennedy.
‘These annual disbursements also allow Fauci to exercise dictatorial control over the army of “knowledge and innovation” leaders who populate the ‘independent’ federal panels that approve and mandate drugs and vaccines — including the committees that allowed the Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 vaccines.’
‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ informs readers of how Fauci, Gates and their collaborators:
· Invented and weaponized a parade of fraudulently concocted global pandemics, including bird flu (2005), swine flu (2009) and Zika (2015-2016), in order to sell novel vaccines, enrich their Pharma partners and increase the power of public health technocrats and Gates’ entourage of international agencies.
· Used ‘gain-of-function’ experiments to breed pandemic superbugs in shoddily constructed, poorly regulated laboratories in Wuhan, China, and elsewhere, under conditions that almost certainly guaranteed the escape of weaponized microbes, in partnership with the Pentagon, the Chinese military and a shady cabal of bioweapons grifters.
· Made a series of prescient predictions about the imminent COVID-19 pandemic — almost to the day. Their precision soothsaying further awed a fawning, credulous and scientifically illiterate media that treats Gates and Fauci as religious deities, insulates them from public criticism and vilifies their doubters as heretics and ‘conspiracy theorists.’ Adulatory mainstream media abetted Fauci’s conspiracy to cover up COVID’s origins at the Wuhan lab.
· Teamed with government technocrats, military and intelligence planners, and health officials from the U.S., Europe and China to stage sophisticated pandemic ‘simulations’ and ‘Germ Games.’ Exercises like these, encouraged by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, laid the groundwork for imposition of global totalitarianism, including compulsory masking, lockdowns, mass propaganda and censorship, with the ultimate goal of mandating the coercive vaccination of 7 billion humans.
· Practiced, in each of their ‘simulations,’ psychological warfare techniques to create chaos, stoke fear, shatter economies, destroy public morale and quash individual self-expression — and then impose autocratic governance.
‘Fauci’s COVID policies also spawned new insidious authoritarianism — and propelled America down a slippery slope toward a grim future as a dark totalitarian security and surveillance state,” said Kennedy.’”
Charles Burris tells us what is at stake in the fight about Kennedy: “When I was a junior in high school I became determined to get involved in politics and go to work in the Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign. I suppose I had a vague romantic notion of RFK being a noble family legacy of his brother whom I much admired as the martyred president.
I had no idea of any conspiracy theory concerning the death of John Kennedy at that time.
Robert Kennedy’s youthful persona as an idealist against the Vietnam War appealed to me. He seemed genuine and authentic while the rude, crude, earthy LBJ was a shifty, lying mass murderer. I saw Kennedy killed on live TV after the California Primary when he addressed his supporters shortly after midnight on June 5, 1968, in a ballroom at The Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. Leaving the ballroom, he went through the hotel kitchen after being told it was a shortcut to a press room. He did this despite being advised by his bodyguard—former FBI agent Bill Barry—to avoid the kitchen. In a crowded kitchen passageway, Kennedy turned to his left and shook hands with hotel busboy Juan Romero just as Sirhan Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian, opened fire with a .22-caliber revolver. Kennedy was hit three times, and five other people were wounded. We now know that it was NOT Sirhan who ultimately killed RFK.
RFK died the next day on my birthday June 6. It really struck home. Later in August I intensively watched the Chicago 1968 Democratic national convention and the subsequent police riot, how the peace plank was voted down, and Johnson’s VP Hubert Humphrey anointed as the party’ presidential candidate. I pretty much buried my enthusiasm for the Kennedys with him.
Watching a 2020 interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I don’t really know when I last was so impressed by an interview which forced a total paradigm shift concerning an individual or subject as this one. His later brilliant extended hour-long interview with an emotionally impressed Tucker Carlson was also very impactful. Putting aside all the fascinating detailed information concerning the cover-up of deleterious effects vaccines have caused world wide, the role of Bill Gates and Big Pharma, the WHO, in this tragic story, and how it all relates to COVID-19, the part that hit home especially to me was the final part of the interview concerning the role of the CIA in the assassinations of his father Robert Kennedy, and of his uncle President John F. Kennedy. As our LRC community readers well know I have extensively studied and investigated these events, have probably over 100 books on them, and have written many articles and blogs over them for decades. Everything RFK, Jr. said about them incredibly rings true. His concise discussion of them was absolutely remarkable and directly on-target.
His from the heart descriptions of growing up Kennedy, with the intense family traditions of deep religious faith, familial piety, and an educational approach to life stressing rigor and argumentative debate and questioning of all subjects, was truly enlightening — as was his illuminating discussion of the future technocratic authoritarian surveillance state planned for American serfs modeled on the Chinese Social Credit economy, again something I have written about to our LRC community’s readers.
The fact that this amazing, courageous man has been so criminally marginalized and cast into the outer darkness in regards to communicating to the American people about these crucial matters is one of greatest national disgraces I have encountered in my lifetime.
I most earnestly hope he does commit to seeking the Democratic Party 2024 nomination for the presidency, making a central focus of his campaign his family’s 60 years challenge to the deep state, the coterie of remorseless killers who savagely murdered his father Robert F. Kennedy, and his uncle, President John F. Kennedy.”
Let’s do everything we can to support this great American patriot in his battle against Big Pharma, Fauci, and the CIA.
[Lew Rockwell]
Salim Mansur:
Scott Ritter - "Waging Peace - In Search of the Russian Soul"
Here is a very fine piece of writing by Scott Ritter, retired Major of the US Marine Corp that I am sharing with you and, unless you have already come across it, I trust you will find time to read it.
Scott Ritter is writing about his recent speaking tour of Russia with his book Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika: Arms Control and the End of the Soviet Union. Apart from some recollection of his time as a US member of the weapons inspection team in the Soviet Union and later in Saudi Arabia at the time of the first Gulf War 1990-91 against Iraq that deals with technical details, this essay which I believe will eventually be part of a book that he is probably preparing to write or is in the process of writing is more than a glimpse of an American patriot into the "soul of Russians" during a time of war unleashed against their country by the collective West.
I loathe to describe the "Special Military Operation" or SMO launched by Putin in February 2022 as an invasion in the utterly false narrative spun by the mainstream western media turned propaganda arm of the member states of NATO/EU. The SMO is the equivalent of R2P, adopted by the UN as a legitimate response against armed violation of a peace accord, that the collective West has used time and time again since the end of the Cold War to launch its NATO run operations against countries that it declared to be in violation of UNSC resolutions, as in former Yugoslavia and in Libya as two examples. The Russian SMO was launched in the Donbas region when the Kyiv regime was in violation of Minsk I and II accords backed by UNSC resolutions. The endless hypocrisy, if not criminality, of the collective West is now so blatantly obvious both in retrospect and now made normal that apart from American patriots like Scott Ritter most have become complicit in furthering these falsehoods of the American Deep State and its vassals, such as Canada.
What impressed me in Scott Ritter's essay, though not surprising, is his capacity to write with empathy about Russians in the context of the war that his country's government, the Biden administration backed by the Uniparty in the Congress without declaring war is engaged against Russia. It is the near complete inversion of politics that has taken place in the three decades since the end of the Cold War and the fall of Soviet Communism wherein the land of the "brave and free" has gone down the slippery slope toward becoming a version of the former totalitarian Soviet state or a lawless warmongering country, while Russia has been shedding the past debris of totalitarianism to recover its pre-Bolshevik identity as the centre of Orthodox Christianity and in becoming a multiparty democracy.
[Salim Mansur]
'The Perfect Crime':
Tech Companies Are Manipulating Our Elections and Indoctrinating Our Children — How We Can Stop Them:
by Robert Epstein July 23, 2023 at 5:00 am
Big Tech companies are deliberately manipulating the outcomes of our elections and the thinking and beliefs of our children. And they are having an enormous impact.
Consider this: The GOP currently has a slim 10-seat majority in the House of Representatives. Without Google's interference in 2022, it would likely now have a majority of between 27 and 59 seats.
If Google had not interfered in the 2022 midterm elections, the GOP would likely have ended up with a Senate majority of up to eight seats.
The Big Tech companies that exploded into existence over the past 20 years – as some of their prominent insiders have stated – have undermined our democracy, indoctrinated our children, and increasingly turned our freedom into an illusion.
The techniques we have discovered – the Search Engine Manipulation Effect, the Answer Bot Effect, the Targeted Messaging Effect, and others – can easily shift the opinions and voting preferences of undecided voters by between 20% and 80% after just one manipulation. Google can also repeat these manipulations many times over a period of months prior to an election.
Assuming the effects of these techniques are additive, Google can likely produce even larger shifts in opinions and voting preferences than the ones from a single manipulation used just once.
Google also knows exactly who is vulnerable to these manipulations – who is still undecided before Election Day, for example – so they can target and bombard just the right people on a massive scale 24 hours a day.
Our research has shown repeatedly that the manipulations used can make them invisible to people and can often produce shifts of 40% or more in the voting preferences of undecided voters without anyone having the slightest idea they have been manipulated. They feel free, even while they are being strongly controlled. As one journalist wrote, "It really is the perfect crime."
Finally, our research measures the influence of "ephemeral experiences" -- their term -- meaning content that is seen briefly, affects the user, and then disappears forever, leaving no paper trail for authorities to trace, Most online content – search results, newsfeeds, video sequence, and so on – are ephemeral.
Can Google deliberately use ephemeral content to manipulate people? You bet. If you doubt that, read this 2018 article from the Wall Street Journal about some leaked emails from the company.
In the days leading up to the 2022 midterms, the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology... preserved overwhelming evidence of Google's manipulations on their search engine, on their video recommendations on YouTube (owned by Google), and even on their homepage on Election Day. On that day in Florida, for example, 100% of liberals received go-vote reminders on their version of Google's homepage, but only 59% of conservatives did.
If, in 2024, 158 million people cast ballots, as they did in 2020, it means Google could likely shift the votes of between 6.4 and 25.5 million people, thereby easily controlling the outcome of any election in which the projected win margin is less than 4%. No laws or regulations are in place to stop them, but our monitoring can. We are monitoring their systems and doing to them what they do to us. When the Big Tech companies know that their manipulations are being watched, they back off. It has already worked to completely shut down manipulations in one important election.
On November 5, 2020, three U.S. Senators sent a strong warning letter to the CEO of Google expressing concern about the extreme political bias our monitoring system had detected in the days leading up to the presidential election – bias sufficient to have shifted at least 6 million votes to Joe Biden.
As a result, Google immediately shut down its election manipulations in the two upcoming Senate runoff elections in Georgia.... Go-vote reminders ceased, and so did bias in Google search results.
In other words, monitoring, combined with political pressure from our leaders and our public, can and will force Google and other tech companies to stay clear of our elections and our children. It will also give legislators, regulators, and litigants the ammunition they need to challenge both the company and its executives in court.
Yes, they do mess with us. As explained in "How Google Stopped the Red Wave," whenever you see online content screaming about Democrats who have perpetrated widespread ballot harvesting or ballot box stuffing, you are being manipulated by Google-and-the-Gang. It is their algorithms – controlled very precisely by their employees – that decide what content goes viral and what content is suppressed... because Google-and-the-Gang want them to. Why? So you will not look at them – at the tech companies themselves.
The problem is: unless we can find additional major funding soon, we will have to start scaling down our effort in August and may have to shut it down completely soon after. If this type of election interference continues unmonitored and unchallenged, could the GOP itself – and ultimately all of American democracy – become ephemeral experiences?
Big Tech companies are deliberately manipulating the outcomes of our elections and the thinking and beliefs of our children. And they are having an enormous impact.
If you doubt that, consider this latest snippet of data from my lab, the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT).
Consider this: The GOP currently has a slim 10-seat majority in the House of Representatives. Without Google's interference in 2022, it would likely now have a majority of between 27 and 59 seats.
The 2022 midterm elections that gave the Democrats a two-vote majority in the U.S. Senate had quite a bit of help from Google, and, to a lesser extent, from a couple of other major tech companies.
If Google had not interfered in the 2022 midterm elections, the GOP would likely have ended up with a Senate majority of up to eight seats.
The Big Tech companies that exploded into existence over the past 20 years -- as some of their prominent insiders have stated – have undermined our democracy, indoctrinated our children, and increasingly turned our freedom into an illusion.
Tristan Harris, a former "design ethicist" at Google, says that he was a member of a team at the company, whose job it was to influence "a billion people's attention and thoughts every day." Jaron Lanier, a computer scientist and one of the early investors in Google and Facebook, claims that Big Tech content has "morphed into continuous behavior modification on a mass basis." Another early investor in these companies, the prominent author and venture capitalist Roger McNamee, has said that he now regrets having financed them, and asserts that they constitute "a menace to public health and to democracy."
Rigorous Research
Such concerns are valid and the Senate numbers correct: we have been using rigorous, scientific methods to study Google and other tech companies for more than 10 years. During this time, we have discovered and quantified about a dozen powerful new forms of influence that the internet has made possible. We have also developed and deployed monitoring systems that track, record, and analyze the personalized content that Google and other tech companies send to voters and children 24 hours a day – in other words, we are monitoring their systems and doing to them what they do to us.
Our basic scientific, peer-reviewed studies clearly show the power that Google and other companies have to alter thinking and behavior. Our monitoring systems confirm that these companies are actually using these techniques, as confirmed by company whistleblowers, as well as by leaks of documents, emails, videos, and other materials from Google, Facebook, and Twitter.
The techniques we have discovered – the Search Engine Manipulation Effect, the Answer Bot Effect, the Targeted Messaging Effect, and others – can easily shift the opinions and voting preferences of undecided voters by between 20% and 80% after just one manipulation. Google can also repeat these manipulations many times over a period of months prior to an election.
Assuming the effects of these techniques are additive, Google can likely produce even larger shifts in opinions and voting preferences than the ones from a single manipulation used just once.
Google also knows exactly who is vulnerable to these manipulations – who is still undecided before Election Day, for example – so they can target and bombard just the right people on a massive scale 24 hours a day.
Our research has shown repeatedly that the manipulations used can make them invisible to people and can often produce shifts of 40% or more in the voting preferences of undecided voters without anyone having the slightest idea they have been manipulated. They feel free, even while they are being strongly controlled. As one journalist wrote, "It really is the perfect crime."
Finally, our research measures the influence of "ephemeral experiences" -- their term -- meaning content that is seen briefly, affects the user, and then disappears forever, leaving no paper trail for authorities to trace, Most online content – search results, newsfeeds, video sequence, and so on – are ephemeral.
Can Google deliberately use ephemeral content to manipulate people? You bet. If you doubt that, read this 2018 article from the Wall Street Journal about some leaked emails from the company. In that email exchange, Googlers are discussing how they might use "ephemeral experiences" to change people's views about Trump's temporary 2017 travel ban on visitors from seven majority-Muslim countries.
Rapidly Growing Monitoring Capabilities
In the days leading up to the 2022 midterms, the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology monitored Big Tech content through the computers of 2,742 registered voters in 10 swing states and preserved more than 2.5 million ephemeral experiences – data that is normally lost forever – on Google and other platforms.
We preserved overwhelming evidence of Google's manipulations on their search engine, on their video recommendations on YouTube (owned by Google), and even on their homepage on Election Day. On that day in Florida, for example, 100% of liberals received go-vote reminders on their version of Google's homepage (Figure 1), but only 59% of conservatives did (Figure 2).
The Tried and Tested Solution:
A Permanent, Self-Sustaining Monitoring System
Google can, overall, easily shift the votes of between 20-80% of undecided voters; right now, that is about 40% of the electorate. This could be enormously consequential. By mid-2024, 20% of voters will likely still not have made up their minds on who to support. At that point, Google will still be able to shift up to 80% of the votes of those individuals -- or up to 16% percent of the electorate.
If, in 2024, 158 million people cast ballots, as they did in 2020, it means Google could likely shift the votes of between 6.4 and 25.5 million people, thereby easily controlling the outcome of any election in which the projected win margin is less than 4%. No laws or regulations are in place to stop them, but our monitoring can. We are monitoring their systems and doing to them what they do to us. When the Big Tech companies know that their manipulations are being watched, they back off. It has already worked to completely shut down manipulations in one important election.
On November 5, 2020, three U.S. Senators sent a strong warning letter to the CEO of Google expressing concern about the extreme political bias our monitoring system had detected in the days leading up to the presidential election – bias sufficient to have shifted at least 6 million votes to Joe Biden.
As a result, Google immediately shut down its election manipulations in the two upcoming Senate runoff elections in Georgia.
We were monitoring Google content through the computers of a politically-balanced group of more than 1,000 registered voters in that state. Go-vote reminders ceased, and so did bias in Google search results.
In other words, monitoring, combined with political pressure from our leaders and our public, can and will force Google and other tech companies to stay clear of our elections and our children. It will also give legislators, regulators, and litigants the ammunition they need to challenge both the company and its executives in court.
Since 2016, we set up six election monitoring systems, for only the weeks leading up to each election. After the 2022 midterms – with the results being so blatant and disturbing – we decided that the time had finally come to set up a permanent monitoring system in all 50 states – a $50 million project that we were able to launch with $3 million indentations from some patriotic Americans.
Without a permanent system like this in place, we will never know the extent to which Google-and-the-Gang are messing with our elections, our kids, or even with our own heads.
Yes, they do mess with us. As explained in "How Google Stopped the Red Wave," whenever you see online content screaming about Democrats who have perpetrated widespread ballot harvesting or ballot box stuffing, you are being manipulated by Google-and-the-Gang. It is their algorithms – controlled very precisely by their employees – that decide what content goes viral and what content is suppressed. If stories about other election irregularities are spreading like wildfire online and then being echoed on the news, it is because Google-and-the-Gang want them to. Why?
So you will not look at them – at the tech companies themselves.
As of this writing, we are preserving and analyzing Big Tech content through the computers of a politically-balanced group of 9,838 registered voters in all 50 states, and we have met our minimum "representative sample" thresholds in 5 states. We are also now monitoring and preserving content – some of which is quite alarming – through the phones and mobile devices of children and teens.
Best of all, we have now preserved more than 25 million ephemeral experiences on Google and other platforms – content that is normally lost forever. Our goal is to make our findings available to the public in real time, 24 hours a day, through dashboards such as America's Digital Shield.
The problem is: unless we can find additional major funding soon, we will have to start scaling down our effort in August and may have to shut it down completely soon after.
If this type of election interference continues unmonitored and unchallenged, could the GOP itself – and ultimately all of American democracy – become ephemeral experiences?
Note from the author: If you are concerned about the dangers the Big Tech companies pose to our democracy, our children, and our autonomy, please contribute at https://MyGoogleResearch.com. All donations are fully tax-deductible.
* * *
Robert Epstein earned his Ph.D. at Harvard University in 1981. He is currently Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology. He has published 15 books and more than 300 articles in both mainstream media outlets and scientific journals, among them, Science, Nature, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. He is the former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today magazine and was a longtime contributing editor at Scientific American. His 2019 Congressional testimony about Google can be viewed at https://EpsteinTestimony.com. To support or learn about his work, visit https://MyGoogleResearch.com or https://TechWatchProject.org. [Gate Stone Institute]
Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors:
This is just ‘Informational’ and YOU
must make up YOUR OWN MIND!
===================
General Summary
Global Currency Revaluation
· On Sun. 23 July all financial changes completed.
· Texas Snake Sun. 23 July: Banker advised to have all trained staff in currency exchange process to be on immediate call beginning Mon. 24 July.
· Goldilocks Sun. 23 July: The Stock Market is getting ready to go into correction after FOMC meeting this week.
· On Thurs. 27 July Basel 3 Compliance will be implemented in the banks. This was expected to create shocks and adjustments in our markets and payment systems as they move into a real value.
· Thurs. 27 July was also said to be “Restart of Planet Earth” with implementation of Basel 3 compliance and activation of NESARA/GESARA: INTEL – July 27th ‘Restart of Planet Earth’ & The GESARA / NESARA Announcement – Schedule of Events (rumormillnews.com)
· The last week of July US citizens were expected to receive restoration allowances that paid them back illegal interest given to the Cabal, plus SS payments would increase.
· On Wed. 23 August the new gold/asset-backed Quantum Financial System would be made public.
BRICS Update 30 June 2023.
· The BRICS Alliance currently includes: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
· Candidate countries that want to join the Alliance or already joined: Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Brunei, Cambodia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Egypt, El Salvador, Ecuador, Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, Honduras, Indonesia, Iraq, Iran, Kazakhstan, Laos, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Texas and another 19 Federal States https://t.me/CaptKylePatriots/160277, Thailand, Tunisia, Türkiye, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zimbabwe, plus two unnamed countries from East Africa, and one from West Africa.
Durham Report: 99.99% of Americans won't read the 306 page Durham Report. But I strongly recommend that everyone read at least pages 91-101 of the Durham Report. Takeaways:
A. Obama and Biden were told about what the intelligence community referred to as "the Clinton Intelligence".
B. The "Clinton Intelligence" was clearly viewed within the intelligence community as a spurious effort to tar and feather Trump with a concocted story that he had colluded in a nefarious way with the Russian government.
C. In sum, in August of 2016 Obama and Biden were in a room with Brennan and were clearly informed of the highly sketchy and dubious information intentionally contained in the "Clinton Intelligence".
D. There is no ambiguity here..in fact the CIA issued a memo expressly referring in a negative way to "the Clinton Intelligence". Obama and Biden were clearly and unequivocally notified that "the Clinton Intelligence" was viewed by the FBI and CIA as being based on a falsehood.
E. Who was Clinton's "Foreign Policy Adviser 1"? This is important because according to the Durham Report "Foreign Policy Adviser 1" cooked up the Trump Russia Collusion plan and gave it to Clinton.
F. Jake Sullivan was Clinton's senior foreign policy adviser. Was he the one who cooked up the plan? Is Sullivan going to be called to testify before Congress?
G. After reading pp. 91-101 of the Durham Report, ask yourself- is it humanly possible for Robert Mueller to NOT HAVE KNOWN that the CIA and the FBI had told Obama and Biden that the "Clinton Intelligence" was considered by the agencies as nothing more than a political campaign dirty trick?
Comments