top of page
Search

MONDAY

New BLOG – Great ARTICLES

MONDAY 6-[29]-26



SPIRITUAL:

 VERSE-for-TODAY

New International Version

 

The Lord will vindicate me; your love, Lord, endures forever— do not abandon the works of your hands.

Read all of Psalm 138 ►

 

 

CANADIAN:

Eby to travel to China later this year in 1st visit by B.C. premier since 2018

Premier said he will pitch B.C. as stable jurisdiction for trade, similar message delivered during India trip

A trade delegation headed by British Columbia Premier David Eby will travel to China later this year in an effort to drum up business for the province.

The premier says the trip will focus on deepening trade relations around agriculture and energy, but he did not provide a timeline or other details. 


Eby's trip to China comes after Prime Minister Mark Carney visited the country in January, when he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping, and signed trade deals around Chinese-made electric vehicles and Canadian canola. 

Eby says the mission to China will deliver the same message as his trip to India earlier this year, which is that B.C. is a "stable jurisdiction in a very unstable time." 


The premier says the province's "calling card" is being a "predictable" place that consistently builds things to the highest possible standard.

Figures from the provincial government show China was the second-largest export market for B.C. products in 2024 at 15.6 per cent, behind the United States with almost 53 per cent.

Japan is the third most important market with 10.4 per cent, followed by South Korea with 6.6 per cent and India with 2.3 per cent.

The last B.C. premier to travel to China was John Horgan in 2018, when he visited the country as part of a 10-day tour that also included stops in South Korea and Japan.


Eby's trip will take place during thawing relationships between China and Canada as both countries are experiencing trade tensions with the United States under the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.


Ferry controversy

It also comes after B.C. Ferries announced last June that it hired a shipyard owned by the Chinese state to build four new large ferries.

B.C. Ferries also received a $1-billion loan from the Canada Infrastructure Bank to help pay for the new ferries.

Both the decision to contract a Chinese shipyard for the ferries and the federal government's loan for their purchase received criticism last summer. 

·       

B.C. Ferries said then that no Canadian companies bid for the contract.

At the time, Eby acknowledged reservations about the decision, but said the ferries were needed and that reopening the bidding process would lead to additional costs.

He also promised that B.C. would work with the federal government and industry to ensure that future ferries would be built in B.C. 


Some mayors say criticism of ferries contract misguided:


B.C. Ferries’ announcement that its four new ships will be built in China has caused a political storm. Some federal and provincial politicians are calling for the deal to be scrapped entirely. But as Katie DeRosa reports, local mayors say the criticism ignores the pressing needs of people in ferry-dependent communities.


Related Stories

 

 

TRUMP: 

Ocasio-Cortez demands Big Tech Breakup after Apple hikes prices by $200

By 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants Congress to break up Apple and other tech giants, not because they broke the law, but because they raised their prices. The New York Democrat seized on Apple's recent decision to hike MacBook and iPad prices by as much as $200, citing a global memory chip shortage, to renew her push for sweeping antitrust action and a moratorium on AI data center construction.


It is a familiar pattern from a lawmaker who has never met a market outcome she couldn't blame on corporate greed. Apple raises prices. Ocasio-Cortez reaches for the sledgehammer of federal intervention. Consumers, meanwhile, are left to wonder how dismantling a company would make chips cheaper or laptops more affordable.


What Apple actually did

Apple raised prices on a handful of MacBook and iPad products last week, the New York Post reported. Mac prices climbed roughly 15 to 20 percent. iPad prices jumped 15 to 25 percent. In some cases the increase exceeded $200.

Outgoing Apple CEO Tim Cook told the Wall Street Journal the hikes were driven by supply constraints, not corporate whim. "Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable," Cook said.


Apple analyst Mark Gurman argued the increases represent a "new normal" for the company and are likely to persist even after the memory chip crunch eases. The underlying cause, analysts say, is straightforward: data centers built to power artificial intelligence are consuming enormous quantities of memory chips, squeezing the supply available for consumer electronics.


Ocasio-Cortez's prescription: break them up

Ocasio-Cortez laid out her case in a Fox News interview. Her logic runs like this: Big Tech companies are building data centers that devour the chip supply, which drives up the cost of laptops and tablets for ordinary buyers. Therefore, Congress should pursue antitrust enforcement and impose new consumer protections.

"We need to break up a lot of these companies that are far, far too big, and we need to be instituting consumer protections for people."


She went further, accusing tech giants of behaving like sovereign governments. "The problem that we have is that these big companies, they think they are governments, they want to be governments, they want to have totally unchecked power," she told Fox News. "I believe that we need to pursue antitrust, and we also need to give some more protections for consumers."


The congresswoman also took aim at the CHIPS Act, the bipartisan legislation that directed billions in federal funding toward reshoring semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. Ocasio-Cortez argued the law was written before the AI boom and never anticipated how much chip supply data centers would consume.


"The CHIPS Act was passed before we saw this huge development in AI, so the CHIPS Act was really passed before data centers were a thing, so it wasn't designed to anticipate the huge amount of supply that these centers are sucking up."


That framing conveniently ignores that the CHIPS Act was designed to reduce American dependence on foreign chip production, a goal that remains valid regardless of who is buying the chips. The law aimed to expand supply. Ocasio-Cortez now faults it for not also controlling demand.


A moratorium on progress

Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont have backed legislation to impose a moratorium on AI data center development. The specific bill name and number have not been disclosed in public reporting, but the thrust is clear: pause the construction of the very infrastructure powering America's lead in artificial intelligence.


This is the same congresswoman who faced broad backlash after declaring billionaires "can't earn" their wealth. Her instinct is always the same, if the private sector produces an outcome she dislikes, the answer is more government control, not more competition or innovation.


Consider the chain of reasoning. Memory chips are expensive because demand outstrips supply. The demand comes from data centers. So Ocasio-Cortez wants to ban building data centers. By that logic, Congress should also cap the number of cars Americans can buy whenever steel prices rise.


The congresswoman also criticized Big Tech for mass layoffs conducted over recent months, for pushing up energy prices, and for threatening jobs through AI adoption. She framed consumers as unwilling subsidizers of data center expansion.


"Now [the price] to buy laptops, computers, iPads, electronics in general will go up, because the data centers are sucking up all of our own industrial supply, and so we're paying in a lot of ways, we are subsidizing the development of a lot of data centers."

There is a kernel of legitimate concern buried in there. When a single sector absorbs a disproportionate share of a critical input, prices do rise for everyone else. But the solution to a supply shortage is more supply, not freezing the industry that creates it.


The antitrust question she won't answer

Breaking up a company requires more than displeasure with its pricing. Federal antitrust law targets monopolistic behavior, anticompetitive mergers, predatory pricing, exclusionary conduct. Ocasio-Cortez offered no specific allegation that Apple has violated antitrust statutes. She pointed to no merger, no exclusive dealing arrangement, no market foreclosure. She pointed to a price increase caused by a commodity shortage affecting the entire industry.


Apple is not the only company raising prices. The memory chip crunch touches every electronics manufacturer. Breaking Apple into smaller pieces would not produce a single additional memory chip. It would not lower the cost of NAND flash or DRAM. It would not slow the construction of data centers in Texas or Virginia.


What it would do is signal to every successful American company that if Washington dislikes your prices, it will restructure your business. That is not antitrust enforcement. It is economic coercion dressed up in populist language.


Ocasio-Cortez has a long record of reaching for government power first and asking economic questions later. She once pledged Democrats would launch "aggressive" investigations after midterm wins, treating oversight as a political weapon rather than a check on genuine misconduct. The pattern holds here: identify a headline, skip the analysis, propose the most expansive federal response available.


Who pays for populism

The people Ocasio-Cortez claims to champion, working families buying laptops for their kids, small business owners replacing aging iPads, would not benefit from a data center moratorium. America's AI sector employs hundreds of thousands of workers. It attracts hundreds of billions in private investment. Freezing that buildout would hand the advantage to China and other competitors without lowering the price of a single MacBook.


Nor would breaking up Apple help consumers. Apple's integrated ecosystem, hardware, software, services, is precisely what many buyers pay a premium for. Splitting the company apart would not create competition; it would destroy a product consumers voluntarily choose.


Critics on both the left and right have questioned whether Ocasio-Cortez's public positioning is designed more for cameras than for legislation. Even left-leaning commentators have called her out for engaging only friendly critics while avoiding substantive policy debate.


The congresswoman's allies in the progressive wing have also drawn scrutiny. Sanders, her partner on the data center moratorium bill, has spent decades proposing government interventions that sound bold in press releases but rarely survive contact with economic reality.


Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez herself has faced questions about her own conduct. A watchdog complaint accused her of spending nearly $19,000 in campaign funds on a psychiatrist, raising questions about how carefully she manages the money entrusted to her before she lectures corporations on how to manage theirs.


The real problem, and the real fix

Memory chip shortages are real. Prices are rising. Consumers feel it. But the answer is not to freeze American innovation or shatter successful companies. The answer is to accelerate domestic chip production, streamline permitting for new fabrication plants, and let the market expand supply to meet demand.


The CHIPS Act, for all its imperfections, pointed in the right direction. If Ocasio-Cortez believes it fell short, she should propose targeted amendments, not a blanket moratorium on the fastest-growing sector of the American economy. And if she believes Apple has violated antitrust law, she should name the violation, cite the statute, and build a case. Vague gestures toward "breaking up" companies are not policy. They are slogans.


Her well-documented appetite for the spotlight makes it difficult to separate genuine policy concern from political performance. A lawmaker serious about lowering consumer prices would start with supply-side solutions, not press conferences calling for corporate dismemberment.


When your only tool is government, every price tag looks like a reason to swing it. Consumers deserve better than that, and so does honest policy debate.

The AMERICAN Almanac

 

 

 

 

Alaska Judge orders same-name challenger restored to Senate primary ballot

By 

A Superior Court judge in Juneau has ruled that a retired teacher named Dan J. Sullivan can appear on the August primary ballot alongside incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Dan S. Sullivan, overturning an election official's decision to block the challenger on grounds the judge found had no basis in law.


The ruling by Superior Court Judge Thomas Matthews sets up a fast-moving appeal to the Alaska Supreme Court, with a Tuesday deadline looming for ballots to be printed ahead of the state's Aug. 18 primary. The Division of Elections confirmed Saturday it is already appealing.


At stake is whether a state bureaucrat can invent a new eligibility test, one never written into statute or regulation, to keep a legally qualified candidate off the ballot. The judge's answer was unambiguous: she cannot.


How the same-name saga unfolded

Dan J. Sullivan, 69, is a retired teacher and former U.S. Forest Service employee from Petersburg, a small fishing community in southeast Alaska. He filed to challenge the incumbent senator in the Republican primary, triggering immediate alarm from the senator's campaign and national Republicans, who accused him of running a confusion operation on behalf of Democrats.


The challenger changed his party affiliation to Republican in conjunction with his candidacy. He had registered to vote as Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. His campaign website bore similarities to the senator's site. And he worked with a consultant whose client list has included some Democrats.


Those facts were enough for Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher. On June 15, she disqualified the challenger, ruling that his candidacy was not filed in good faith and was intended to confuse voters.


But Judge Matthews found that Beecher's "good faith" standard was made up on the spot. As the Associated Press reported, the judge wrote in his ruling:

"Instead, the decision was based upon a new, previously unstated, 'good faith' criteria."

That criteria, Matthews concluded, had no grounding in the U.S. Constitution, Alaska law, or the division's own regulations.


The state's argument, and its limits

Attorneys for the state did not go down quietly. Rachel Witty of the Alaska Department of Law, along with outside attorneys Christopher Murray and Michael Francisco, filed briefs arguing that the ballot could not be designed to adequately prevent voter confusion from two candidates with the same name and party.


Their filing, as the Washington Times reported, put the argument bluntly:

"The Constitution does not require States to place a sham candidate on the ballot and then attempt to mitigate the damage through design choices."


The word "sham" does heavy lifting there. But calling a candidate a sham is an assertion, not a legal finding. And the judge noted that Beecher's own investigation did not turn up evidence of the coordination that Sen. Sullivan and the National Republican Senatorial Committee alleged.


The Washington Examiner reported an additional detail: Matthews wrote in his 32-page decision that the Division of Elections Director's "assertion that Mr. Sullivan seeks to confuse or misguide voters is not supported by a preponderance of evidence."

That is a significant finding. The state could not meet even a civil evidentiary standard, preponderance, meaning more likely than not, that the challenger's intent was to deceive.


Suspicions without proof

Republicans have not been wrong to raise questions. The circumstantial picture is suspicious. A man changes his party registration, files under a name nearly identical to the incumbent's, builds a lookalike website, and hires a consultant with Democratic ties, all in a race that Democrats badly want to flip.


Sen. Sullivan has accused the challenger of working with Democrats and the campaign of former Democratic U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, who is described as his main opponent in the general election. The NRSC has echoed those concerns. Republicans have even asked the FEC to investigate the alleged spoiler scheme.


The Washington Examiner noted that metadata from the challenger's campaign press release was authored by someone named Amber Lee, the same name as a Democratic strategist and Peltola supporter. That detail deepens the suspicion of coordination.

But suspicion is not law. And that is the core of Judge Matthews' ruling. The challenger's attorney, Jeffrey Robinson, said in an email that he expected the appeal and could not comment until the Alaska Supreme Court rules.


Dan J. Sullivan, for his part, denied working with Democrats or Peltola's campaign. He said he had considered a run for some time, had grown frustrated with the senator, and acknowledged that sharing a name and party affiliation gave him "an instant megaphone." Both the Peltola campaign and Alaska state Democrats have denied any coordination.


The constitutional question

The challenger's legal team argued a straightforward constitutional point: the U.S. Constitution sets out three exclusive qualifications for the Senate, age, citizenship, and residency. Dan J. Sullivan meets all three. Beecher, they contended, lacked legal authority to add a fourth requirement, subjective "good faith", that appears nowhere in the law.


Judge Matthews agreed. And that should give pause to anyone, regardless of party, who cares about the rule of law in elections. The preliminary ruling that found the challenger ineligible rested on a standard that no candidate had ever been told existed.

If a state election director can invent new ballot-access criteria on the fly, criteria untethered to any statute, the implications reach far beyond one Alaska primary.


Every bureaucrat in every state could claim the power to decide which candidacies are "genuine" and which are not, based on nothing more than her own judgment.

That is not how elections work in a constitutional republic.


What happens next

The Division of Elections, through Department of Law spokesperson Sam Curtis, confirmed by email Saturday that it is appealing. The case now goes to the Alaska Supreme Court, which faces a tight timeline. Tuesday is the deadline for a final ruling so that ballots for the Aug. 18 primary can be printed.


Alaska's election system adds a wrinkle. Under the state's open primary and ranked-choice general election structure, the top four candidates from the primary, regardless of party, advance to the November ballot. Sen. Sullivan and Peltola are the only candidates reported to have raised any money in the race, which is considered one of roughly half a dozen highly competitive U.S. Senate contests nationally.


If the Alaska Supreme Court upholds Matthews' ruling, voters will see two Dan Sullivans on the primary ballot, one listed as Dan S. Sullivan and identified as the incumbent, the other as Dan J. Sullivan. Whether that causes meaningful confusion, or whether voters can read a ballot and tell the difference, is a question the state apparently does not trust Alaskans to answer for themselves.


The real lesson

There is a reasonable case that the challenger's candidacy is designed to siphon votes. The circumstantial evidence is real. Republicans are right to investigate it, and the FEC complaint may yet produce findings.


But the remedy for a suspected spoiler candidacy is not to hand an unelected bureaucrat the power to strike names from the ballot based on a test she invented the same week she applied it. If Alaska wants a "good faith" candidacy requirement, the legislature can write one. Until then, the law is the law.


The appeal now sits with the Alaska Supreme Court, which has days, not weeks, to decide. The answer will tell Alaskans whether their elections are governed by written rules or by whatever standard an election director feels like enforcing on any given Tuesday.


When the government starts deciding which candidates are sincere enough to run, the voters have already lost something more important than one Senate seat.

The AMERICAN Almanac

 

 

 

GLOBAL:

Patrick Bestall’s INPUT:


Predator "Jesus" Videos

It's heartbreaking to imagine the people who will watch any of these Jesus videos.  The one that says, "You're about to become a billionaire" takes you to a link where you can pay just $34 to hear a special frequency that attracts money.  I don't know how Jesus will help me find a wife, I didn't watch that video.

.pb

 

Don added:

Wow! What a gross misuse of God’s Provision [His SON] for Man’s SIN...

Man keeps digging the Pit DEEPER!

.PB

 

 

 

3 Letters to the Editor June 27

Letters to the editor of the LFP told me this:

 

1.    large numbers of children age nine and younger in west, east and south London.  Many neighbourhoods also have more than 1,000 lone-parent households.  Source 2021 census.  Submitted by London and Middlesex Local Immigration  Partnership.

2.    "For a guy who was not given a majority, Carney has a lot of nerve only showing up for 38 days out of 138 even though he was in town for 64 of those days"  writes Sandra Barker

3.    Andy McGuigan wrote, "As Council strives to devise a plan for our city, we need to recognize the impact of changing demographics....The re-imaging of downtown makes no reference to demographics or cultural change."

 

.PB

 

 

 

Get what you pay for

Remember when the customer was always right? Now it’s the customer can wait. The bigger the company, the longer you wait. In fact, it’s a tactic. The company makes money by not hiring more employees to help you out. And, if you get frustrated trying to get a refund and give up, then the company makes more money.


Sometimes the India-based call centre will offer you a refund. You’re happy but the refund never comes. It happened to me and to a friend of mine. In his case, he asked them to send him an email with the promise to refund. They did not refund him and when he called back he was told he was never offered a refund by email or over the phone. He produced the email and got his refund. I got shafted.


Some large companies play dirty tricks. My wife’s Air Canada flight was cancelled by Air Canada. She was never reimbursed. She bought the ticket through an agent and Air Canada told her to take up her grievance with the agent. The agent said, “We didn’t cancel the flight.” She hasn’t given up but her demand for a refund has been going on for months. At what point does one give up on getting back $900? They want you to give up. Large companies will often lie about their responsibility and make their refund or cancellation policy extremely difficult to navigate online.


Companies like Netflix will often get away with charging you an extra month because who wants the hassle of fighting over 10 bucks. I tried to cancel Netflix. It took months. Meantime, they were charging me monthly fees on two separate credit cards.

Banks make up their own rules. At the Royal Bank, if you aren’t watching your bank account closely and there is a bank error that lifted money from your account you have three months to find it. This happened to an Eastern Ontario dairy farmer.


The Nussbaumer’s 13-year-old daughter discovered more than $7,000 missing from a savings account that she rarely looked at. It was an error made every month over several years so the bank kept most of the money. The family pushed back. When Farmers Forum began asking questions the matter was “resolved” to everyone’s satisfaction.


What do all of these groups have in common? They have power because of their size or because you can’t reach them. You can’t walk into their office and demand to see the manager. Some online companies give you no options to reach them. Avoid companies that do not have a physical address and do not have a phone number or email address that you have tested.


Other companies are big, multinational and unresponsive. They tell you that their products and service are great but you discover it’s a lie when they give you the run-around.


all big companies are bad, of course, but avoid the ones that are faceless and don’t want to hear from you. Big media can be easily side-stepped as honest independent experts are now ubiquitous. We also have to up our business with the little guy or we will increasingly live under the thumb of entities that appear more and more like schemes to extract more and more of our money.


I frequent the mom-and-pop shops, the independent small businesses, family operations, places where you actually see the owners who you can meet and talk to about the product.


Yes, sometimes it’s more expensive but that’s not the point. Walmart strangled small businesses by offering cheap goods. Now they hire fewer locals and increasingly use self-checkouts and the product prices are increasing.


Yes, it’s convenient and it can be a one-stop shop but much of the money you spend there flows out of your community.

The local guy who runs the local store might not always have the best selection and maybe he can be a bear on an off-day but get to know him, shop there and keep the money local.


We should be buying meat, fruit and vegetables from local farmers when we can.

Support local charities that will actually help local people. Go to the coffee shop owned by someone who lives in the community and hires local people. Increasingly, Tim Hortons and other franchises are getting subsidies to hire non-Canadians. Local government employees should live in the community. They should have a stake in the jurisdiction they work for.


The more we all live local and buy local the stronger our communities will be. Investigate who actually owns the products and services you buy. How far away from your farm do they live? Is it a world away?


Yes we can often avoid Amazon but it’s more expensive. No, we cannot avoid some products made in China and most of us need a cell phone and a computer.

But we have to stop looking at price alone and look at who am I benefitting besides me when I make a purchase.

 

.PB

 

 

 

CANADIAN CHRISTIAN BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS

If you are looking for a community of faith-based business leaders or a directory to buy from and network with other Christian companies, these are the primary national bodies:

  • · Canadian Christian Business Federation (CCBF): This is the most direct equivalent for faith-based business integration. They publish an extensive annual Christian Businesses Directory (similar to the directory functions of U.S. Christian business indexes) and host "BIZ Groups" across Canada to help leaders apply biblical principles to daily commerce. [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

  • · The Shepherd’s Guide: Canada’s most long-standing and widely recognized comprehensive Christian Business, Church, and Ministry Directory. It is heavily utilized by consumers and business owners looking to support faith-aligned Canadian enterprises. [8, 9]

  • · 6 Days: A modern, growing Canadian Christian business directory and community hub designed to link faith-aligned workers, students, and businesses for employment and commerce. [10]

  • · Entrepreneurial Leaders Organization (ELO): Operating primarily across Canada, ELO provides elite peer advisory groups, high-level networking, and resources specifically tailored for Christian CEOs, executives, and entrepreneurs. [11]

 

 Legal Protection & Freedom Advocacy (CEA Equivalents)

The Christian Employers Alliance in the U.S. heavily focuses on defending religious freedoms against government mandates. Because Canadian tax, labor, and constitutional laws differ significantly from the U.S., separate specialized entities handle these issues in Canada: [1] 

  • · The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (EFC): While not strictly an employer alliance, the EFC is the primary national organization that tracks legislation, interfaces with the government, and defends religious freedom in the public square. They frequently intervene in legal cases involving freedom of conscience for faith-based institutions and business owners. [12]

  • · Canadian Centre for Christian Charities (CCCC): For non-profits, ministries, and faith-based employers, the CCCC provides the administrative, legal, and ethical framework assistance required to navigate Canadian employment and charity laws. [10, 13, 14, 15]

 

 Missional Business Networks

  • · Business As Mission Canada (BAM Canada): A national network for Canadian business leaders who view their commercial enterprises as a vehicle for spiritual and cross-denominational missional impact. [16]


If you are looking to get plugged in, a great first step is to look through the CCBF Member Directory or locate a local chapter of a CCBF BIZ Group near you to connect with peer business owners. [4, 5]


you looking for an organization to help with legal advocacy regarding workplace faith, or are you primarily seeking a directory/networking hub to do business with other believers?

 

.PB

 

 

 

Politics makes Strange Bedfellows

Don Added

International conflict can often lead to some pretty bizarre alliances. We all remember World War II, when Germany and the Soviet Union teamed up to split up Poland. But then Germany invaded the Soviet Union, and the US and UK joined the war on the side of the Communists.


The situation in Syria today is similar, but even more fragmented. The US and its allies were trying to take out the Syrian government, which was backed by Russia. The US worked with the Kurds against the Syrians, but the US’ NATO ally Turkey was simultaneously trying to attack the Kurds. Meanwhile the Syrians were trying to wipe out Islamic State forces, which the US was trying to do too with the assistance of Al Qaeda-affiliated rebel forces.


Turkey wasn’t happy with the US getting involved in its affairs in Syria, so it decided to get friendlier with Russia. President Erdogan famously turned down the US’ offer to sell Patriot missiles in favor of the Russian S-400 system. But now that Erdogan wants to take Idlib, Syrian and Russian forces are working against him, and Erdogan is now asking the US to deploy Patriot missiles on Turkey’s behalf against Russia. Meanwhile the US is working alongside Russian forces, not supporting Turkey, but President Trump is praising President Erdogan’s work.


Got all that? There is much more to come...

.PB

 

 

HEALTH:

BREAKING NEWS: Another Fake “Freedom Fighter” Doctor takes aim at Terminally Ill Cancer Patients who are using Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole.

He’s worried about cancer patients taking Ivermectin!!

Good Lord, these freedom movement frauds are falling like dominoes...Listen, Syed... there are thousands of cancer patients who have been told “we have nothing left to offer you, go and make final arrangements”In Canada they are given appointments for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID or euthanasia)or they are told they have to take chemo for the rest of their lives that is so toxic, so destructive to their body, they want to die. And you’re worried that they might take Ivermectin to try and save their lives?


You can always tell a fraud by the way they talk and the arguments they make.Vast majority of cancer patients I know, have been through the mainstream Oncology meat grinder of chemo, radiation, immunotherapy and almost all of them still work with their Oncologist.There is a very small minority that refuses mainstream treatments and this very small group doesn’t do it because “Ivermectin = miracle cure”, you absolute moron.They were going to avoid mainstream treatments even if Ivermectin didn’t exist. 


Ivermectin had no input on their decision. This group is also exceedingly small.Your entire argument is a fraud, a fake strawman fallacy that has no basis in reality.Virtually no one approaches Ivermectin thinking they will only take Ivermectin and be cured, that is a fictional narrative invented by Big Pharma and you claiming

“I have been approached by countless patients convinced they only need to take these two drugs” is a preposterous fabricationDo you need social media engagement that badly?


Dr.Syed Haider... you should be ashamed of yourself.I hope there isn’t a single cancer patient coming to you for your useless “help”.


Another day, another “Freedom Fighter” fraud exposed…

Notice how Dr.Syed Haider is responding to a post from 10 months ago by Midwestern Doctor who was attacking me at the time, for posting Ivermectin Cancer success stories on substack and X.

Doctor

William Makis

from "Makis Health"

 

 

 

RUMOUR:

 

RUMOURS Circulating out there...:

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website, and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

 

I may not agree with everything from the content-producers that I share.

Apply critical thinking and use discernment to

Come to your own conclusions regarding the content!

 

You need to MAKE UP Your own MIND!

 

What we think that we now know...

 

REPORT Today

 

The world keeps spinning, and now you’re caught up.

 

JUDY’s UPDATED 26th June ARTICLE

Restored Republic via a GCR as of June 26, 2026

  • EBS, GCR To Activate on Sun. 28 June 2026 [This DID NOT HAPPEN]!

  • Nesara Gesara Debt Forgiveness Laws Have Already Been Activated

  • Massive Funds Seized From The Corrupt To Be Distributed to Humanity

  • Predatory Income Taxes Abolished

  • Return To The Gold Standard Worldwide


Patriots Around the World Stand United in this War Between Good and Evil.

Pray

Trust The Plan


Judy Note: Congrats Patriots of the World!!! 

  • The Transition To Freedom From S---n Worshipper

  • Globalist’s Mind Control Has Begun:

  • Worldwide Events Scheduled:

Fri. 26 June 2026: Global Military Alliance Broadcast begins worldwide transmissions. [This DID NOT HAPPEN]!

 

Sat. 27 June 2026: Mass Arrests accelerate with Seal Teams and Special Units deployed to key locations.

 

Sun. 28 June 2026: EBS and new Global Quantum Financial System activate.[This DID NOT HAPPEN]!

 

Mon. 29 June 2026: Worldwide curfew in effect. Citizen movements restricted between 11 pm and 5 am. [We Will See]

 

Tues. 30 June 2026: Video archives begin streaming on secure government platforms.

 

Obama, Fauci Set To Face Arrest, Military Tribunals For Treason and Crimes Against Humanity:

 

On Wed. 24 June 2026, just as US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was retiring, she appeared on Fox News to confirm that former US President Barack Obama and senior officials around him, attempted a coup on the American people.

 

Obama and Fauci have been referred to the Department of Justice by the new US Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte. Fauci for his multiple Crimes Against Humanity. Obama for alleged criminal conspiracy tied to Russiagate. More than 30 former Obama administration officials were reported to be cooperating with federal investigators in the probes.

 

Another Barack Obama accusation was that while in office, Obama used his USAID Department to pretend to send money to a country for “aid” and instead laundered it to the Cayman Islands. He would then use that money to fund and train “Rent-a-Riots” for protests to overthrow governments, including our own. USAID money was also used to fund Coronavirus Research in China.

 

Mike Benz on Joe Rogan said, “A scandal during the Obama USAID era. We were running a number of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. — I’m simply showing the American people where your tax dollars are going and how these things are structured in order to systematically fool you and to fool Congress and to fool the White House.

 

“USAID pumped $1.2 billion in, and we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, lose, learn how to use hashtags, learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knows where to go, what street to show up on, what kind of slogans to know, to use in order to create the pro-democracy predicate for it.”

 

Mike Benz exposed that USAID has been sending money to George Soros NGOs, he then used that money to fund and train protesters.

 

“He talked about how Obama funded a Twitter clone that would be used to push propaganda in Cuba to inspire these protests and overthrow the government (Mike Benz explained how Barack Obama overthrew many governments)

 

“So, what they did is they took the exact same thing as Twitter, same user interface, same like, and retweet button zunzunio is, is the Cuban slang word for hummingbird. So just, it means it’s a bird, it was the Twitter bird, the whole thing. But the whole trick about it was you have to make it look like it’s coming from the Cubans if you’re going to do this operation

 

“Contractors were funded by USAID. The data would then be used for micro targeting efforts towards anti and pro government users. In Cuba, the developers aim to, at first used non-controversial content such as sports and music and hurricane updates — What was the plan the whole time? Once they built up enough subscribers, they would begin to introduce political messages through social bots and encourage dissent in this, in this astro-turfing — the whole point is, once they hit a critical mass, they would create ‘Rent-a-Riots”

 

“You’re using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You’re saying it’s, you’re earmarking it for Pakistani aid.” But the money was never sent to Pakistan, it was sent to the Cayman Islands to fund this whole operation.”

 

Among other startling revelations for the DOJ probe was the accusation that Obama never qualified to run for the US Presidency in the first place. Malik Obama had recently come forth with evidence that his half brother Barack was not born in the US, renewing long-standing accusations about the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency.

 

The birth certificate Malik produced showed that Barack Hussein Obama was born in the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya.

 

Another proof: a photo of an alleged Kenyan passport circulating online listed, “Mr. Barack Hussein Obama” as a bearer with “British Subject” status.

 

A third piece of evidence circulating online: Barack’s student card from New York University indicated that Barack Obama was registered as a foreign student.

 

The U.S. Constitution states that to be president, one must be a natural-born citizen — born on American soil to two American citizen parents. Obama’s father was a Kenyan, a British subject under the colonial rule of the Crown. By British law, that automatically made Barack Obama a British subject at birth. By U.S. law, that disqualified him permanently from being a natural-born citizen.

 

The question: Was Obama truly eligible to serve as president — or was he the face of something far more calculated? A carefully crafted CIA operation globalist puppet, with a fake family built on lies.

 

The truth was that Obama was never a natural-born citizen. Apparently he was a manufactured candidate — a Manchurian project — planted by globalist intelligence networks to capture America’s highest office. To many the Obamas appeared to be an intelligence operation made to infiltrate and destroy America.

 

Long ago Attorney Sidney Powell wrote a 270 page document on Election Fraud that showed a Biden/Harris and Pelosi link to foreign interference in US Election Fraud. Kamala Harris’ husband Doug Emhoff, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, former FBI Director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were all suspected to be involved.

 

The document contained affidavits, evidence, testimony from numerous witnesses and sources. Evidently the Communist parties of Iran, Venezuela, Russia and China worked with Democrats to taint the 2020 Election. It detailed interference, origins of voting machine fraud, Cyber-security intrusion into US elections and military and alphabet testimony. https://wpcdn.zenger.news/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/24190822/2020-12-23-Sidney-Powell-Team-Binder-ZENGER-NEWS.pdf

 

Biden was in the thick of things, and even bragged about it on national TV. Way back on Sunday 27 Dec. 2020 a Ukrainian Press Conference outlined international corruption sanctioned under a request from Democratic Senators and demanded return of billions stolen from the Ukrainian people laundered through what has been referred to as the Biden Crime Family. /prophecy/2020/12/ukraine-releases-bombshell-information-on-biden-today-mirror-this-asap-2516957.html

 

While serving as Vice President in the Obama Administration Joe Biden outwardly bragged on TV about blackmailing a Ukraine prosecutor, plus just before the 2020 Election was also filmed while admitting, “We have put together the most comprehensive voter fraud organization in the history of politics (and you guys did it for the Obama Administration also.”

 

For further information read:

 

 

 

 

 

What we thought we knew, but didn’t really know and now are supposed to know but don’t have a clue.

With clones, doubles, made up movies Hollywood style and Trump’s Military Alliance throwing more popcorn at us, it gets sooo confusing:

Thurs. 25 June 2026 MASSIVE COURT VICTORY for Trump! DC Circuit just ruled 2-1 to UPHOLD and RESTORE the President’s nationwide expedited removal policy. Illegal invaders beware, the fast-track deportation machine is back in action.  No more endless hearings, no more games. Time to enforce the law like Congress intended and send them home.

 

Possible Timing:

PREPARE YOURSELVES. THE GAME IS OVER. THE TIMELINE IS LOCKED IN AND THERE IS NO TURNING BACK. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE BEFORE THE GRID GOES DARK! …Tier4b ISO 20022 on Telegram

 

FRI. 26 JUNE 2026: MILITARY BROADCAST SYSTEM ONLINE.[This DID NOT HAPPEN]! SECURED CHANNELS BEGIN GLOBAL TRANSMISSION. COMMAND STRUCTURE VERIFIED. NO INTERRUPTIONS PERMITTED.

 

SAT. 27 JUNE 2026: MASS ARRESTS ACCELERATE UNDER GLOBAL COORDINATION. SEAL TEAMS AND SPECIAL UNITS DEPLOYED TO KEY LOCATIONS. DEEP CLEANING INITIATED.

 

SUN. 28 JUNE 2026: BANKING RESET PROTOCOL INITIATED. ALL FIAT TRANSACTIONS HALTED. NEW QUANTUM SYSTEM ACTIVATES. PUBLIC NOTICE ISSUED THROUGH EBS CHANNEL 4.

 

MON. 29 JUNE 2026: WORLDWIDE CURFEW WINDOWS IN EFFECT. [We Will See] CITIZENAL OPERATIONS RESTRICTED BETWEEN 11PM–5AM. COMPLIANCE MANDATORY. MONITORED BY SAT GRID.

TUES. 30 JUNE 2026: DECLAS PHASE ONE. VIDEO ARCHIVES BEGIN STREAMING ON SECURE GOVERNMENT PLATFORMS. THE WORLD WATCHES WHAT WAS HIDDEN.

 

Global Currency Reset:

Thurs. 25 June 2026 Bruce, The Big Call The Big Call Universe ibize.com)  667-770-1866,

  • • The new Iraqi Dinar rate and all new currency rates were supposed to be up on the Forex on Sun. night 28 2026. Redemption Centers should have those rates on their screens on Mon. 29 2026.

  • • Two different sources said that Tier4b (us, the Internet Group) would have our notification to set redemption appointments on Mon. 29 June, or Tues. 30 June 2026.

  • • 1.2 million Zim Holders would receive notification first and 12-14 hours before other currency holders receive their notifications.

  • • That would have people in exchanges before July 4 2026. 

 

Judy Note: No one knows the exact date for notification of appointments for Tier4b (us, the Internet Group) to exchange foreign currencies, but deadlines shown in the above Timing indicate it to be very soon. We have been told that Wells Fargo, which is controlled by the Chinese Elders – (the ones who own the gold behind the Global Currency Reset) – will send out emails to currency and bond holders worldwide telling them how to set redemption & exchange appointments.

 

It is advised to exchange/redeem your foreign currency at an official Redemption Center (RC) rather than a bank. You can only redeem Zim at a RC, the Dinar Contract Rate can only be given at a RC and banks will offer you lower exchange rates than what you can obtain at a RC. You can only set up your new wallet (bank account) at a RC. It was my understanding that most banks were under control of the Cabal and would soon play a different roll in the Global Financial System.

 

Re-inhabited Republic For the United States of America

On Thurs. 5 March 2026 the Cabal foreign banker owned US Inc. was dissolved, with Common Law Sovereignty installed in the US under concepts of the original Constitution. Admiralty Law fraud was forever crushed.

 

On July 4 2026 President Donald J. Trump would make an announcement of this change to a Sovereign Republic based on principles of the original Constitution in a massive Fourth of July Celebration of the Restored Constitutional Republic.

 

What We Think We Know as of Fri. 26 June 2026:

 

 

 

 

Thurs. 25 June 2026 NESARA Is Finally Being Activated! …Nesara Gesara QFS on Telegram

Remember when they told us that NESARA/GESARA was just a “myth”? That it was too good to be true? The elites hoped it would stay that way. But no longer—NESARA is being implemented before our eyes! Years of planning are coming into action right now.

 

The evidence is all around us. Look at what’s happening step by step:

 

Abolishment of predatory income taxes – The President has already announced a plan to free the middle class from the tax burden. This is the beginning of the end of the oppressive tax system.

 

Return to the gold standard – Currency will once again be tied to gold and real assets, ending the endless printing of unbacked money.

 

Debt forgiveness – The global debt forgiveness project is in play, freeing millions from debt slavery.

 

Prosperity funds – Massive funds seized from the corrupt are prepared in trust funds, soon to be distributed to humanity.

 

All of these are the key pillars of NESARA/GESARA, and they are finally coming to life. The Federal Reserve and old central banks are already under the control of patriots, ready for shutdown and transition to a people’s Treasury bank. Thousands of tons of stolen gold and wealth are being returned to the hands of the people.

 

The Cabal is in total panic—their worst nightmare is coming true. What they called a “conspiracy” is now a real reform dismantling their centuries-old games. We, the people, will feel the benefits of these changes very soon. A new chapter is beginning where justice and abundance will become the norm.

 

[Note: NSFW content, CSA/SA content, medical speculation, and other sensitive content in this report was redacted for safety].

===========

 

Mind-Blowing Epstein Connection with North Korea and Uranium One

 

1) ALERTI just made a MIND-BLOWING connection about Epstein, and it has nothing to do with the t---------g stuff… it’s about North Korea and Uranium One!

According to a 2013 email exchange between Epstein and French diplomat, Olivier Colom, Epstein was “very” interested in North Korea. Stay with me, it will all add up at the end.


Colom emailed Epstein and asked if he was “interested in N Korea?”, to which Epstein replied, “very”.

Then Colom says, “I have something for you then. Huge. Ultra Confidential. Come to Moscow with me in January?”.

Keep in mind, this email exchange took place on December 6, 2013, less than 2 months after the Uranium One deal was completed and Rosatom (Russia) took 100% ownership of Uranium One.


Then after Epstein says he “likes the idea” of North Korea as a potential location for whatever they were planning, Colom says, “Issue is very sensitive. Have to meet you.”

A LOT of connections here, but wait, there’s more.

 

2) Then in a January 2017 exchange between Epstein and NYTs journalist, Landon Thomas Jr., Epstein and Thomas Jr. discussed everyone’s panic and fear of Trump being inaugurated, as well as North Korean diplomacy and North Korea’s nuclear missile program.


There’s not much here in this email exchange that suggests Epstein was directly involved in North Korea’s nuclear missile program, but I found it interesting that Epstein brought it up unprompted.

But wait, it gets better.

3) Then June 12, 2018, the day of Trump’s historic summit with Kim Jong Un, Epstein tells David Stern, Prince Andrew’s right hand man/confidant, that he wanted to “go to North Korea to see No. 1” meaning Kim Jong Un…


Then two days later, he follows up to Stern and says “Ask Bannon to get me to North Korea?? I want to buy prime real estate. I have the money”.

That’s a bombshell connection I never made before. Epstein was freaking out about Trump having a summit with Kim Jong Un, and then is frantically emailing people trying to get a meeting with the North Korean dictator and buy “prime real estate” in North Korea? What’s going on here?


Why was Epstein so concerned about Trump reaching a nuclear deal with Kim Jong Un? I have a hunch.

But wait, it gets even spookier.

4) Then fast forward to June 30, 2019, Trump completes third and final meeting with Kim Jong Un, where Trump famously stepped into North Korea.

Then just 6 days later, July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested and his island was raided shortly after.

Is it a coincidence that as soon as Trump was done in North Korea, Epstein was locked up?

5) Now this is where I’m gonna lose some people as we go further down the rabbit hole.

According to the Q drops, material from Uranium One didn’t just end up in Iran, they claim it ended up in North Korea as well. Q alleged that the Obama administration helped supply North Korea with US uranium.

6) Then see drop 194, Q outlines the path of the Uranium, and alleges it ended up in Iran/NK, the home of both of the rogue nuclear programs that Trump has targeted in both his terms.

Then Q makes a reference to the Rothschild family with the line:-(Y) What does it mean to be covered in gold?


Q later confirmed the (Y) symbol and reference to “covered in gold”, was code for the Rothschild banking family.

And what did Epstein say in a 2016 exchange with Peter Thiel? Epstein said “as you probably know, I represent the Rothschilds.”


7) In conclusion, if we are going to assume there is any validity to the Q drops, that Trump himself has quoted/alluded to hundreds of times, I believe they are saying that North Korea and Iran were avenues for the Rothschilds (one of the ruling families of the Deep State) to gain control of nuclear weapons.

Epstein was an errand boy for the Rothschilds, and part of the Democrat/Obama/Clinton brain trust. If the allegations about Uranium One are legitimate, then Epstein surely would have been involved, and his email history adds some validity to it.

I don’t think the real story about Epstein is the p3do stuff. I think it’s about North Korea, the Rothschilds, and Uranium One.

 

Disclaimer: The content on Operation Disclosure—including articles, videos, and images—is contributed by our readers or curated for informational and educational interest. Views, opinions, and claims expressed in these posts belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Operation Disclosure. We do not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of this content; therefore, we encourage all readers to engage with the material with a spirit of personal inquiry and discernment.

THE END


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by The Brooks Truth. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page