Sunday BLOG 12 - 31 - 23
Verse(s) for today:
He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
Ecclesiastes 3:11 KJV
He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might he increaseth strength.
Isaiah 40:29 KJV
My flesh and my heart faileth: But God is the strength of my heart, and my portion for ever.
Psalm 73:26 KJV
Marjorie Taylor Greene just revealed how woke extremists tried to have her Murdered-on Christmas:
Marjorie Taylor Greene is one of the most outspoken supporters of Donald Trump and his America First agenda in Congress.
Her refusal to back down from a fight makes her a major target of the woke left-wing outrage mob.
And Marjorie Taylor Greene just revealed how woke extremists tried to have her murdered on Christmas.
Democrats and their media allies frequently claim that former President Donald Trump and his supporters are a “fascist” group of “violent extremists” who represent a “threat to democracy” in America.
Of course, the Democrat Party proved to be the party of violence after Democrats cheered on violent left-wing Antifa and Black Lives Matter riots.
But Democrats and their media allies were dead silent after their woke extremist minions attempted to have Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) murdered at her home on Christmas Day.
In a post on X, Greene revealed that she had just been “swatted” for the eighth time.
“Swatting is the act of making a false call to emergency services with the goal of sending law enforcement or first responders to someone’s home,” Breitbart reported. “The prank qualifies as a criminal offense in many cities and states.”
Greene said her family was with her at the time a false phone call to authorities claimed she had murdered her ex-husband.
“I was just swatted,” Greene wrote. “This is like the 8th time. On Christmas with my family here. My local police are the GREATEST and shouldn’t have to deal with this. I appreciate them so much and my family and I are in joyous spirits celebrating the birth of our Savior Jesus Christ!”
In a follow-up post, Greene revealed that she was also swatted on Thursday, December 21 and shared an image of a death threat she received from a deranged woke extremist.
“We received this death threat where this man is saying I will be shot in the head and skinned to make a ‘parasol’ making a reference to Gein, who was a psychopath killer who would make things out of his victim’s skin,” Greene wrote. “He also says he would like to smash Pres Trump’s and [Green’s boyfriend and Right Side Broadcasting Network director of programming Brian Glenn’s] heads on a curb.”

“They have not arrested Ben McLean yet,” Greene wrote. “They simply called him on the phone and Cap Police sent us this email about what he said.”
“The outright absurdity of this email response and the fact that they have not arrested this guy is shocking, thankfully I’m a gun owner,” the Congresswoman continued. “But compare it to how the FBI and DOJ treat J6’ers, Pres Trump, and their political enemies.”
Greene pointed to the “incredible double standard” set by President Joe Biden and his Democrat allies in the Department of Justice and FBI.
They have not arrested Ben McLean yet. They simply called him on the phone and Cap Police sent us this email about what he said. The outright absurdity of this email response and the fact that they have not arrested this guy is shocking, thankfully I’m a gun owner. But compare it to how the FBI and DOJ treats J6’ers, Pres Trump, and their political enemies. Why doesn’t the FBI just call J6’ers on the phone, like the man who says he wants to shoot me in the head and use my skin to make a parasol, and just ask them about what they said on January 6, 2021 instead of hunting them down and locking them up doing the bidding of the DOJ who continues to issue arrest warrants almost everyday for people who said the 2020 election was stolen. Incredible double standard. Also, if you read McLean’s messages he says he knows the FBI, names an agent, says he likes them, and says the FBI is recruiting him. Is the FBI recruiting a man who is threatening to kill a member of congress and crush the skull of President Trump?

Conservative Underground News
Fox News Suffers Devastating Blow — End of An Era:
During the year 2023, the cable news industry experienced notable transformations, characterized by substantial difficulties and alterations in audience engagement. Fox News retained its status as the top-rated cable network, a position it has held for eight consecutive years, despite the alterations. Nevertheless, it experienced its most meager mean viewership since 2015, tallying 1.2 million people, as per Nielsen data.
The fall can be partially ascribed to the departure of Tucker Carlson, a prominent prime-time anchor who was the highest-rated on the network at that time. He has since achieved success on Elon Musk’s X, previously known as Twitter. In 2023, during the beginning of Trump’s presidential campaign, many faithful Fox News viewers subsequently transitioned to Newsmax.
During the broadcast, Carlson cited the medical examiner’s report on George Floyd, asserting that Floyd did not die from asphyxiation and implying that a drug overdose, rather than Chauvin’s conduct, could have been the underlying cause of death. He emphasized the significant concentrations of fentanyl detected in Floyd’s system, claiming that this crucial information has been widely disregarded or neglected by the mainstream media and the general public.
MSNBC experienced a 7% surge in its viewership over the past year, reaching an average of 792,000 people. The surge in viewership can be ascribed to its emphasis on Trump’s legal predicaments, as well as the popularity of left-wing hosts like as Rachel Maddow.
CNN’s viewership hit its lowest point since 2014, with an average of 481,000 viewers, setting a record low in the 25-54 age demographic. Nevertheless, CNN continued to outperform MSNBC in this specific age group, maintaining its dominance for the ninth consecutive year in total day viewership and the fourth consecutive year in prime time.
According to Mediaite:
While Fox has remained atop the industry, the network saw an 18 percent drop in year-over-year total viewers from 1.49 million to 1.2 million – its lowest total viewership since 2015. MSNBC averaged 784,000 total day viewers, up from 733,000 the year before. CNN, meanwhile, averaged 482,000 total day viewers, a 15 percent drop from 2022’s 568,000 average viewers.
In the total day demo, MSNBC was up 5 percent with 87,000 total average viewers – landing in third. CNN was second with 95,000 – a 22 percent drop year over year. Fox led the pack with 150,000 total average viewers – a 34 percent drop from the previous year.
Fox’s The Five brought in 2.9 million total viewers and 303,000 demo viewers to top the charts. Jesse Watters came in second with 2.5 million total viewers and saw 255,000 demo viewers. Sean Hannity scored 2.4 million total viewers but landed in second overall in the demo with 217,000 demo viewers. Bret Baier was the only other cable news show to average over 2 million viewers for the year and landed in fourth place overall followed by Laura Ingraham, who continues to be the most-watched woman on cable news. Greg Gutfeld landed in sixth place in total viewers.


The Political Signal
Georgia Sec. Of State Blows Up Fani Willis’ Case Against Trump:
Absolute bombshell in Trump’s favor.
Based on the statements and testimony of Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, the former President, Donald Trump, did not request that he to partake in any illicit activities in the presidential election of 2020.
The denial of the assertion that Trump requested Raffensperger to criminally “find votes” significantly undermines Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ racketeering argument against Trump and 18 individuals associated with him.
As to the statement made by Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School, Raffensperger’s testimony indicated that the phone call, although deemed “extraordinary,” was characterized as a “settlement negotiation.” This conversation occurred within the context of a deliberation on the pursuit of an additional vote recount, rather than a request to fabricate new votes.
According to Turley, “The call was misrepresented by the [Washington] Post and the transcript later showed that Trump was not simply demanding that votes be added to the count but rather asking for another recount or continued investigation. Again, I disagreed with that position but the words about the finding of 11,780 votes was in reference to what he was seeking in a continued investigation. Critics were enraged by the suggestion that Trump was making the case for a recount as opposed to just demanding the addition of votes to the tally or fraudulent findings.”
“Raffensperger described the call in the same terms,” he added. “He correctly described the call as ‘extraordinary’ in a president personally seeking such an investigation, particularly after the completion of the earlier recount. That is manifestly true. However, he also acknowledged that this was a ‘settlement negotiation’.”
“So what was the subject of the settlement talks?” Turley questioned. “Another recount or further investigation. The very thing that critics this week were apoplectic about in the coverage. That does not mean that Trump had grounds for the demand. Trump’s participation in the call was extraordinary and his demands were equally so. However, the reference to the vote deficit in demanding continued investigation was a predictable argument in such a settlement negotiation. As I previously stated, I have covered such challenges for years as a legal analyst for CBS, NBC, BBC, and Fox. Unsupported legal claims may be sanctionable in court, but they have not been treated as crimes.”
However, Fani Willis considers the phone call between Donald Trump and Brad Raffensperger as a significant element in her “racketeering” lawsuit, which attempts to portray the legal process of contesting elections as a criminal operation. Former President Donald Trump used legal avenues to address concerns with the outcome of the 2020 election, with the intention of seeking a lawful resolution rather than engaging in any illicit attempts to invalidate the election results.
There appears to be a lack of viable criminal charges in this situation, as it seems that the story has been fabricated by individuals who oppose Trump politically, with the intention of preventing him from participating in a presidential election and denying voters the opportunity to elect him as president.
According to a recent study commissioned by a local media outlet, a majority of respondents in Georgia expressed their opposition to the idea of former President Donald Trump accepting a plea deal offered by District Attorney Fani Willis.
According to a study conducted exclusively by 11Alive in Atlanta, the majority of respondents, accounting for 55 percent, expressed a preference for President Trump to undergo a trial. Meanwhile, 21 percent of participants indicated that he should consider accepting a deal, while 24 percent either remained uncertain or refrained from expressing an opinion.
According to an unidentified individual, referred to as Eros, who leans towards the Republican party and resides in Cobb County, “I would rather him do a plea agreement.”
“He wants to prove everyone wrong and become president again. So I don’t think his pride would allow him to plead guilty,” asserted Beth Carter, a voter in Midtown who tends to support the Democratic party.
Richard Holloway, a member of the Republican Party hailing from Lithia Springs, expressed his support for a trial concerning Donald Trump, as he holds the belief that such a trial would result in his exoneration.
“I’m for Trump. Go, Trump. ‘Know what I mean?’ Good luck,” Holloway said, expressing his skepticism over the likelihood of successfully convicting him.
According to Leelt Ermias from Atlanta, the outcome would be contingent upon the specific circumstances surrounding the plea. “It would depend on the details of the plea,” Ermias said, adding that she does not support Trump.
Prosecutors are vested with the power to engage in plea bargaining, wherein they have the ability to offer plea agreements that go beyond the customary terms of probation or sentencing requirements. According to 11Alive, the agreements may encompass the defendant’s consent to participate in counseling or their exclusion from a specific jurisdiction.
According to Clint Rucker, a former Fulton County prosecutor who currently practices law privately, “Imposing a requirement that the person never run for public office again could be a condition that could be part of a negotiated plea.”
Trump has said he will not take a plea offer.

The Republic Brief
The Reason Melania Was Missing From Family Christmas Card
It has been claimed that Melania Trump, the previous First Lady, is getting ready to substantially enhance her public presence in the period leading up to the 2024 presidential campaign, openly endorsing her husband Donald Trump. The decision would signify a significant change in her strategy since departing from the White House, indicating a fresh determination to get more actively involved in the political sphere.
Throughout her tenure in the White House, Melania assumed a very restrained position, frequently opting to be inconspicuous in contrast to her predecessors in the First Lady role. Nevertheless, according to a new revelation from PageSix, she is prepared to make a significant impact on history by assuming a more prominent and powerful position in the forthcoming presidential campaign.
Following former President Trump’s departure from Washington, Melania has adopted a discreet public persona, which sharply contrasts with her husband’s frequent media appearances and public engagements. This has prompted discussion over her prospective career and engagement in politics. After a little farewell gathering in January 2020 upon departing from Washington D.C., Melania Trump has thereafter maintained a low public profile.
Melania’s heightened public involvement seems to have been triggered by her attendance at Rosalynn Carter’s burial, with other previous first ladies. Her choice to go to the funeral unaccompanied, in the absence of her husband, attracted notice.
During the meeting, Melania opted for a gray tweed overcoat, which contrasted with the black attire worn by the other renowned female attendees and first ladies. Additionally, her coat showcased her legs and black heels. The event purportedly enhanced her self-assurance and preparedness to reenter the public domain.
“Melania realizes it’s her time to join the ranks of historic first ladies and leave her mark on history… She feels better prepared for her potential role the second time around,” a source told PageSix. They also mentioned that Melania believes she can now allocate more time to her responsibilities, as her son Barron is now older at 17 years old.
Another source shared, “The immediate family including Melania is solidly behind the former president.” Following her uncommon presence at Carter’s funeral, Melania, 53, was also seen at a subsequent event alongside Trump. Reports confirmed her presence at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach during a Patriot Awards ceremony.
“They were both in great moods,” observed an onlooker, noting their demeanor. “Melania was going around greeting everyone.”
Adding to this transformation is the recent triumph of Donald Trump in his federal election lawsuit, which has enhanced the assurance among the Trump family and their intimate acquaintances. Reports suggest that there is a prevailing conviction inside Trump’s close circle at Mar-a-Lago that his re-assumption of the president in 2024 is quite likely.
According to reports, this view has resulted in an agreement between Donald and Melania for her to take on a more significant role, particularly at high-level diplomatic events in 2024. Her choice to increase her public appearances and assume a significant role in the 2024 campaign should be regarded as a calculated maneuver. Her heightened visibility has the ability to introduce a fresh element to the campaign, potentially garnering attention and support.

The Republic Brief
The Climate continues to CHANGE:
Dr. Matthew Wielicki: I Refuse to Stay Silent about Climate Change
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns, mainly caused by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels.
When Dr. Matthew Wielicki refused to stay silent about climate change and earth science, he became a professor-in-exile. Even though members of the scientific community routinely discuss the negative effects of irrational fear in private, they dare not speak out lest they lose their positions and research funds. Dr. Wielicki shares his story and encourages the next generation to reject the doomsday narrative and maintain hope for the future.


Dr. Matthew Wielicki
Daniel Brooks
NEW & Improved Solar Generator “Worth Its Weight in Gold"
More Battery Capacity, More Power, including a FREE 100-Watt Solar Panel
First, I'm Cade Courtley — former Navy SEAL and sniper.
I know first-hand about "secret technology" the U.S. military uses to solve one of the biggest threats to any mission... A dead battery.
For a soldier, a dead walkie or night-vision goggles could be a matter of life and death.For you, a dead phone or a powerless fridge in a dangerous blackout could mean your family goes hungry. With no way to call for help.
Which is why military scientists and engineers ditched, our aging, vulnerable power grid. And developed technology that's portable, silent and never needs gas... ever.
Solar Power.
This technology is now used on military bases, in the field and rumor has it... it's sewn into the very fiber of our soldier's uniforms.
It can replace 20-pound battery packs that soldiers carry around on. It lightens their load and made our troops more agile.
But most importantly, it keeps their critical devices — radios, night vision, weapon scopes — powered and ready.
We took a page from the military's playbook. And built a NEW generation of solar-powered generators.
Our NEW & improved unit can protect you and your family from the aging power grid.
Last time, We Sold Every Solar Generator We Had
But They’re (Finally) Back in Stock… For Now
When we launched our NEW & improved solar generator, we had 1 goal...
Revolutionize the way Americans power their critical devices in a blackout. With more power, more flexibility and ultimate convenience.
But the minute we told our VIP customers about our NEW & improved solar generator…
Poof. 122 generators sold in one day.
We knew folks would love it! But our jaws dropped when we opened up this page to the public a few days later... and every single solar generator sold. 864 units. Sold out!
If you need more Information:
You can ORDER your Solar Generator
From this LINK

The Babylon Bee
FOX & Friends
Recent study of CDC data delivers a startling revelation the radical Left wishes was never uncovered:
In the wake of the landmark decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the battle to defend the preborn rages on in states across the nation.
And early data is revealing a staggering outcome.
This recent study of CDC data delivers a startling revelation that the radical Left wishes was never uncovered.
A November study, drawing on preliminary data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), delivers a startling revelation.
“In the first six months of 2023, births rose by an average of 2.3 percent in states enforcing total abortion bans compared to a control group of states where abortion rights remained protected, amounting to approximately 32,000 additional annual births resulting from abortion bans.”
Pro-life champion Michael New, an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, emphasizes the significance of this study, affirming that it is the latest in a series demonstrating that “pro-life laws have resulted in an increase in children being born.”
New highlights the challenges in accurately counting abortions due to factors like women crossing state lines or resorting to mail-order abortion pills.
However, he underscores the undeniable rise in births, offering robust evidence that more pregnancies are carried to term due to these life-affirming laws.
The study reveals distinctive patterns, with Texas and Mississippi experiencing more substantial increases in birth rates.
Melanie Israel, a policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, lauds the study as an “encouraging trend” that underscores the life-saving impact of pro-life laws.
Israel emphasizes that these percentage increases represent real opportunities for countless babies who might not have had the chance to celebrate a birthday otherwise.
Israel acknowledges that fully comprehending the impact of pro-life laws will take time.
However, she remains optimistic about the preliminary signs, noting that many lives are being saved in pro-life states.
Moreover, preceding the Dobbs decision, a June 2023 study delves into the effects of the Texas heartbeat law, implemented in September 2021.
This law, which prohibits abortion at around six weeks’ gestation, was associated with a significant uptick of 9,799 additional births in Texas between April and December 2022.
However, amidst these promising developments, a shadow looms over a reported increase in abortions nationwide post-Dobbs.
A study by the pro-abortion nonprofit Society of Family Planning suggests a rise of 2,200 cumulative abortions during the 12 months from July 2022 to June 2023 compared to the pre-Dobbs period of April and May 2022.
Michael New expresses reservations about the study’s methodology, pointing out the limited pre-Dobbs data considered.
He advocates for a more comprehensive analysis, comparing a year’s worth of pre-Dobbs data with a year of post-Dobbs data to provide a more accurate picture of trends.
Israel adds her perspective, highlighting the growing prevalence of abortion pills, particularly in blue states.
The 2021 CDC numbers show a shift, with 44.8% of abortions occurring at or before six weeks’ gestation, and medication abortion accounting for 70.6% of those cases.
In response to the study indicating an increase in births in pro-life states, Alison Gemmill, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, deems it an “assault on reproductive autonomy.”
Israel dismisses this reaction as “bizarre,” emphasizing that we are talking about babies who are already born. The study itself predicts negative consequences, asserting that the Dobbs decision may result in unintended births and exacerbate economic inequality.
However, pro-life scholars argue against the narrative that women need abortion for societal and economic advancement.
In an amicus brief for the Dobbs case, 240 women scholars and pro-life organizations questioned the idea that women rely on abortion for progress, highlighting the decline in abortion rates and the rise of women in the workforce with a college degree.
As the battle for life rages on, these studies provide a snapshot of the complexities and triumphs in the evolving landscape of pro-life legislation.
The surge in births following total abortion bans serves as a powerful testament to the tangible impact of laws that protect and cherish the sanctity of every unborn life.

The Profile Press
EM3-in 2029 Everything Changes:
This asteroid is 3 football fields long, as big as the Eiffel Tower, or the Empire State Building, and the exchange of electric charges between earth and the asteroid will be more devastating than anyone can imagine (except for the writer of the Book of Revelation).
The ASTROIDS: https://www.openbible.info/topics/the_asteroids
I assume those in the know will be down deep under the earth with their own power sources in their shielded underground cities and mansion size bunkers, unaffected by the loss of satellites and power circuits on the surface, or any giant rocks splitting off the asteroid by discharges of electrified plasma. (See trajectory of Apophis below, coming in on the right side of the picture.)
The good news is that the globalists will temporarily lose their control over survivors on the surface. Babylon will fall in one hour. Then there will be a short era of peace.

Patrick Bestall
EM4 -Penetrating your Brain Control Centers:
I know people who have been helped by TMS treatment at the local psychiatric hospital by the application of electromagnetic fields to the brain. But often what we mean for good Satan intends for evil.

MORE:
Two teams of scientists have developed new ways of stimulating neurons with nanoparticles, allowing them to activate brain cells remotely using light or magnetic fields. The new methods are quicker and far less invasive than other hi-tech methods available, so could be more suitable for potential new treatments for human diseases.
Researchers have various methods for manipulating brain cell activity, arguably the most powerful being optogenetics, which enables them to switch specific brain cells on or off with unprecedented precision, and simultaneously record their behaviour, using pulses of light.

First they genetically modified (and patented) foods. Now they can do it with humans (and patent what's part of you). Skip the first half from many researchers who filmed how vaccines create artificial cells that replace your blood cells. (The artificial ones light up like blinking Christmas tree lights.)
And last week, a blog post from the University of Miami revealed that much progress has been made toward this goal, describing how magnetoelectric nanoparticles (MENPs) can move through human bloodstreams, permeate the human brain, and identify subtle signals from your neurons, subsequently transmitting information to an external computer device in a helmet.

December 2020, researchers in China solved a problem called Gaussian Boson sampling, which can accelerate computing speed by a factor of 100-trillion.

Patrick Bestall
DAVID YEO:
$0nG: F@!TH 0V3R F3@R (4 Min)
!s LUC!F3R L@DY L!B3RTY? (13 Min)
Th3 B@NK3R$ run Th3 V@T!C@N (5 Min)
"Am ! TurN!nG !nTo a FL@T E@rTH3R?" (25 Min)
N@T!0NaL C!T!Z3N$ !nQU!rY: R0DN3Y P@LM3R (49 Min)
Th3 2024 W3F R3L3@$3D !T!N3R@RY**L3FT-R!GHT**F@L$3 FL@G (20 Min)
C3L3RY Ju!C3 (1 Min)
$0nG: JU$T $@Y No (5 Min)
D0N@LD !s an !LLUm!N@T! Pupp3T (9 Min)
FL@T E@rTH !s C0mPr3n$!V3 $C!3NC3 (22 Min)
H0LLYW00D: V@ND3RPUPer has STR0K3 @ 34 (2 Min)
EmB@LM3R$ C0nT!Nu3 F!nD!nG F!Br0u$ KL0T$ !n VXXd D3@D (21 Min)

December 30, 2023

Seven tag teams successively raised the floor for total spending
Governments in the USA have in large part been grown by tag teams.Bixby, Rev. Dr. WesBest Price: $8.72 Buy New $13.59(as of 07:47 UTC - Details)
In the 1800s, Thomas Jefferson’s embargo, which broadened into James Madison’s War of 1812, ratcheted total government spending up from the American colonies’ 1–2% of GDP to a new floor of 3.1%. James Buchanan’s promotion of union, which broadened into Abraham Lincoln’s Civil War, ratcheted spending up to 5.3%.
In the 1900s, William Taft’s Progressive centralization, which broadened into Woodrow Wilson’s Great War, ratcheted spending up to 11%. Herbert Hoover’s initiation and Franklin Roosevelt’s followthrough of Progressive interference with recovery, and the resulting failure to prevent World War II, ratcheted spending up to 18%. A series of Progressive presidents and major wars, capped off by Richard Nixon’s, Gerald Ford’s, and Jimmy Carter’s Great Inflation I and wage and price controls, ratcheted spending up to 32%.
In the 2000s, George Bush’s initiation of financial-crisis spending and Barack Obama’s followthrough ratcheted spending up to 35%. Donald Trump’s initiation of Great Inflation II spending and Joe Biden’s followthrough ratcheted spending up to 36%. And we’re still early in Great Inflation II and in the increasingly-likely Great Depression II.
Out of all income earned on labor, the national government takes a freedom-suffocating 36%, and state and local governments take another whole 36%. We serfs are far more productive now, so we suffer less deprivation, but even so, we’re already nearly 3/4 of the way down the road to full socialism.
Tag teams double down
Whenever we’ve gotten tag-teamed, we’ve gotten stuck with the same bigger-government actions no matter which candidate has won. This includes when we’ve gotten tag-teamed by Trump-Biden.
Under Trump, spending skyrocketed to an all-time high of 48% of GDP. Under Biden, spending then briefly settled back, but only down to 36%. That means that overall, Trump-Biden has already ratcheted up spending by at least another 1%.
Trump expresses no regrets over covid lockdowns and spending, and expresses great pride over novel genetic therapies that from the start have been deadly and debilitating. Well before those defining actions, Trump already had saved Obamacare. He had continued massive legal and illegal immigration that favors people who vote for bigger governments. He had ratcheted up racially-calculating jailbreak of violent criminals that he favored because of a political calculation that was racially motivated. Capping it all off, for years, Trump has endorsed both incumbents and contenders for open seats who are Republican Progressives, ratcheting into place “the swamp.”
Never in history has a former officeholder who expanded governments then turned around and shrunk governments.Merritt, JamesBest Price: $3.49 Buy New $13.99 (as of 07:47 UTC - Details)
Genuine leaders turn around.
Every officeholder has had to contend with people who push for bloated government. Cronyism—the mercantilism that Alexander Hamilton labored to bring about, using all possible cunning—is nothing new.
Early Democrat Andrew Jackson turned around and instead shrunk government, paying off the national debt. Martin Van Buren responded to a Great Depression-sized crisis by letting prices and wages fall, allowing people to keep working and producing. Warren Harding responded to Great War debt by drastically shrinking government, which let productivity leap up through the Roaring Twenties and continue rising across the Great Depression. Ronald Reagan responded to Great Inflation I by holding firm politically while Paul Volcker slowed down the money creation.
Under Ron DeSantis in the 3 years reported so far, Florida state-government spending as a fraction of Florida GDP was barely increased from 7.9% to 8.0%, and then was sizably decreased to 7.1%.
DeSantis responded to Trump’s covid disruptions by locking down late and then lifting lockdowns early. DeSantis responded to Trump’s support for novel genetic therapies by making these available, then banned mandates, and finally—like no one else—impaneled a grand jury to investigate covid vaccine wrongdoing. On immigration, DeSantis signed the USA’s strongest illegal immigration legislation. On criminal justice, DeSantis signed stronger pre-trial detention legislation. Politically, in four years DeSantis transformed the Republican margin of victory in Florida from 0.4% to 19.9%.
Heading into 2024, polls now systemically favor Democrat “surprises.” In elections in 2022, Republican candidates for senate underperformed polls by margins of 1.5% to 11.5%—overperforming only in Florida, by 7.6%. Republican candidates for governor underperformed polls by 1.3% to 9.6%—overperforming only in Florida, by 7.2%. In elections in 2023, Republicans underperformed Trump’s 2020 margins, on average, by 7%. Polls have become psyops that have proven effective for electing the most-Progressive candidates, except on ballots that feature DeSantis.
The polls that count:
caucuses and primaries
For 2024, unlike most times, this time voters can make a choice that will make a huge difference.
In the Republican caucuses and primaries, don’t vote to add 4 more years of Trump-Biden tyranny. Vote to begin 8 years of DeSantis freedom.
... Clearly a DeSantis supporter
Donna Warren asks a great QUESTION about TAXES!
[Dec 30, 2023 at 12:29 PM]Tax his land,Tax his bed,Tax the table At which he's fed.Tax his work,Tax his pay,He works for peanuts Anyway!Tax his cow,Tax his goat,Tax his pants,Tax his coat.Tax his tobacco,Tax his drink,Tax him if he Tries to think.Tax his car,Tax his gas,Find other ways To tax his ass.Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough.When he screams and hollers;Then tax him some more,Tax him till He's good and sore.Then tax his coffin,Tax his grave,Tax the sod in Which he's laid.When he's gone,Do not relax,Its time to apply The inheritance tax.Accounts Receivable Tax Airline surcharge tax Airline Fuel Tax Airport Maintenance Tax Building PermitTax CigaretteT ax Corporate Income Tax Death Tax Dog License Tax Driving Permit Tax Environmental Tax (Fee)Excise Taxes Federal Income Tax Federal Unemployment (UI)Fishing License Tax Food License Tax Gasoline Tax (too much per litre) Gross Receipts Tax Health Tax Hunting License Tax Hydro Tax Inheritance Tax Interest Tax Liquor Tax LuxuryTaxes Marriage License Tax Medicare Tax Mortgage Tax Personal Income Tax PropertyTax Poverty Tax Prescription Drug Tax Provincial Income and sales Tax Real Estate Tax Recreational Vehicle Tax Retail Sales Tax Service Charge Tax School Tax Telephone Federal Tax Telephone Federal, Provincial and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Vehicle License Registration Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Water Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Well Permit Tax Workers Compensation Tax
THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 60 years ago, & our nation was one of the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had a large middle class, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
So, what in "H_ll" happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'
I hope this goes around CANADA at least 100 times. YOU can help it get there.
GO AHEAD ~ be a CANADIAN
Forwarded by:
Donna Warren
Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors:
This is just ‘Informational’ and YOU
must make up YOUR OWN MIND
==================
SUMMARY:
No REPORT on SUNDAY
Comments