Thursday 4-18-24
Verses for today:
Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
1 John 4:4 KJV
And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine.
Leviticus 20:26 KJV
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:
Ephesians 6:17 KJV
Trump TAKES ACTION when Assassin Strikes, his Response is Legendary:
INSIDE THE ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS AGAINST DONALD TRUMP:
Being a world leader is dangerous business. Surprisingly, in more than two centuries, only four American presidents have been killed while in office, beginning with the shooting death of President Abraham Lincoln in 1865. In office from 2016 through 2020, the 45th U.S. Commander-in-chief, Donald Trump, clearly survived his time in the White House.
There were several attempts on his life, though, including three during his administration and two while a presidential candidate (although one turned out to be a false alarm). Perhaps unsurprisingly, "The Divider: Trump in the White House 2017-2021" claims that Trump was worried about attacks on his life, despite his public persona suggesting otherwise. "At a cocktail party, Trump told several of his Florida friends he was afraid Iran would try to assassinate him, so he had to go back to Washington where he would be safer," the book reads.
American Wire
Canada... here's the Real Trump:
This 5-minute video will do it.
American woman says "I'm tired" of the witch-hunting for Trump crimes that were never crimes until he went after the true criminals.
Patrick Bestall
Trump Prosecutors Barred from Discussing Melania's Pregnancy During Trial:
In a pivotal decision in the trial of former US President Donald Trump, the court has ruled out mentioning Melania Trump's pregnancy during discussions of an alleged affair according to The Telegraph.
https://americandigest.com/trump-prosecutors-barred-from-discussing-melanias-pregnancy-during-trial/?
Donald Trump faces charges of falsifying business records to cover up payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign. The decision to bar the prosecution from bringing up Melania Trump's pregnancy is a rare win for Trump who has had a tough time so far in New York thanks to the politics around this case.
The trial, which began this Monday in New York, revolves around payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels. These payments are central to the charges Trump faces.
Prosecutors argue that the falsification of business records should be classified as a felony due to its potential impact on the election results.
Judge Sets Boundaries on Evidence Presentation
Judge Juan Merchan has allowed the inclusion of evidence regarding Trump's affair with Playboy model Karen McDougal. However, he specifically prohibited any mention of Melania Trump's pregnancy at the time of the affair.
This ruling came after considerations that highlighting Melania's pregnancy could prejudice the jury unfairly. Merchan emphasized that "At this moment the prejudicial value excuses the probative value."
The affair with McDougal is said to have occurred between 2006 and 2007, coinciding with Melania Trump's pregnancy with their son, Barron.
Chronology of Trump's Alleged Affair Emerges
Karen McDougal has publicly claimed that her relationship with Trump started just before his 60th birthday, having first met him at the Playboy Mansion.
This timeline places the start of their affair near the time Melania was expecting, which adds a layer of controversy to the allegations.
The court's decision to exclude Melania's pregnancy from the trial was supported by Trump's defense, with attorney Todd Blanche commenting, "The risk of unfair prejudice is through the roof."
Trump's Conduct in Court Under Scrutiny
During the jury selection process, Justice Merchan addressed issues of potential intimidation from Trump, insisting, "I will not have any jurors intimidated in this courtroom."
One juror was dismissed after being deemed potentially biased, highlighting the tension surrounding the high-profile case.
Melania Trump has reportedly expressed significant distress over the revelations of the affair, which she considers a public disgrace.
Trump Criticizes Trial's Impact on His Campaign
Trump has vocally criticized the trial, claiming it hinders his political activities. "I should be right now in Pennsylvania, Florida, in many other states – North Carolina, Georgia. This is all coming from the Biden White House," he stated.
His comments underscore his belief that the trial is politically motivated, orchestrated by the current administration to thwart his campaign efforts.
As the trial progresses, Trump's frustration with being unable to participate in key campaign events has become increasingly evident.
Legal and Political Stakes Are High
The outcome of this trial could significantly influence public perception and Trump's future political viability.
With both legal and electoral implications at stake, the trial of Donald Trump continues to draw national attention, reflecting the intertwined nature of politics and personal conduct in high office.
As the proceedings advance, the public and political observers alike are keenly watching the developments, which could have far-reaching consequences for the former president and the political landscape.
In conclusion, former President Donald Trump's trial in New York, charged with falsifying business records related to hush money payments, focuses on his personal life and alleged election influence but avoids discussing Melania Trump's pregnancy during his alleged affair. The legal debates and public scrutiny highlight the broader implications of the case against Trump, impacting both his personal reputation and political future.
The American Digest
Appeals Court Sides with Obama in Fight Over Presidential Center Site
Federal courts have cleared the way for the Obama Presidential Center's ongoing construction in Chicago's Jackson Park, rejecting the latest lawsuit from Protect Our Parks.
The Hyde Park Herald reported that in 2018, the nonprofit organization Protect Our Parks initiated legal action to stop the development of the Obama Presidential Center, arguing that Jackson Park was an inappropriate site for such a project.
They claimed the park's usage for the center violated the public trust doctrine and was not compliant with environmental standards.
Their legal battles focused on the transfer of city-owned land to the Obama Foundation, which they argued was improperly handled.
Initial Lawsuit and Court Rulings
The case, officially titled Protect Our Parks v. Buttigieg, was escalated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit after a district court ruled against the plaintiffs in November 2022. This decision supported the city of Chicago and the Obama Foundation, allowing them to proceed with the construction.
The appeals court, comprising Judges Diane Wood, Ilana Rovner, and David Hamilton, upheld the lower court’s ruling this Monday, finding that Protect Our Parks had not presented any new evidence to support their claims against the development.
The appellate court’s decision was clear and succinct, emphasizing that the ongoing construction should not be halted. The judges noted that the plaintiffs were unable to demonstrate entitlement to any form of relief from their claims against the Obama Presidential Center, dismissing the overarching legal challenges presented.
"Construction of the Center is now well underway, and yet the plaintiffs demand that we put a stop to it and, we assume, order the defendants to restore the site,” the ruling elaborated. “But they have failed to show that they are entitled to any relief relating to their overarching claim against the Center, no matter under what theory," the court further clarified.
Response from the Obama Foundation
Following the court's ruling, Valerie Jarret, CEO of the Obama Foundation, expressed satisfaction and reiterated the foundation’s commitment to the South Side of Chicago. “Our focus throughout the legal journey has been to protect the interests of our community and ensure we are able to deliver on the commitment we’ve made to bring our world-class institution to Chicago,” Jarret stated.
She highlighted the expected benefits of the center, “The Center will bring hundreds of thousands of visitors to explore the South Side each year, boosting the local economy, creating new opportunities for young people and delivering new amenities,” she elaborated.
Plans for the Obama Presidential Center
The Obama Presidential Center is planned as a 19-acre campus in Jackson Park, featuring a presidential library tower, a branch of the Chicago Public Library, various outdoor play areas, and a state-of-the-art athletic and conference center. Originally scheduled for completion in 2021, the project has been delayed, with the new timeline setting the opening in 2026.
The center’s design is focused on being more than just a presidential library; it aims to serve as a vibrant community hub. Late 2025 is now the expected completion time for the athletic center and new park spaces around the complex.
Ongoing Legal Challenges and Community Impact
Despite the appellate court’s ruling, Richard Epstein, counsel for Protect Our Parks, indicated that the legal battle might not be over. He plans to seek a re-hearing in the circuit court. Epstein criticized the financial terms of the land transfer, asserting, “If this were private lands, this would be selling for over $10 million an acre in that kind of location,” rather than the nominal amount paid by the foundation.
The continued legal wrangling underscores the complex nature of using public land for private development, especially when it involves significant changes to historically significant public spaces.
Conclusion: Future of the Obama Presidential Center
This recent court ruling marks a significant victory for the Obama Presidential Center, allowing construction to proceed amidst ongoing legal challenges. The project promises to bring substantial economic and social benefits to Chicago's South Side, transforming Jackson Park into a dynamic civic space. Despite ongoing opposition, the center is poised to become a cornerstone of community development and historical reflection.
The American Digest
Oregon Court Of Appeals Maintains Stay on Gun Control Measures:
The Oregon Court of Appeals has upheld a decision to maintain a temporary injunction on key aspects of a new gun control law.
Breitbart reported that the court declined to lift a hold on Ballot Measure 114, which includes restrictions on 'high capacity' magazines and a permit-to-purchase requirement. This is a big win for the 2nd Amendment campaign championed by Donald Trump and the conservative movement.
In December 2022, Harney County Circuit Judge Robert Raschio issued a temporary hold against the implementation of Ballot Measure 114, initiated by Gun Owners of America and the Gun Owners Foundation. This measure aimed to establish significant changes to Oregon's gun control laws, including a ban on 'high capacity' magazines and a new permit-to-purchase system.
Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum quickly appealed the decision, leading to a review by the Oregon Court of Appeals. The appeals court, however, decided to maintain the temporary hold last Friday, leaving the new gun measures unenacted since their approval in the same year.
Court Cites Importance of Maintaining Status Quo
The Oregon Court of Appeals highlighted the importance of maintaining the status quo in their decision. This approach is typical in judicial reviews to avoid unnecessary changes while legal challenges are assessed.
According to the court, "[BM 114] is not currently enacted and has never been since it was passed in 2022, and that these stays typically are granted to support the status quo, not do the opposite." This statement underscores the court's rationale for not lifting the hold.
The appeals court is still evaluating the likelihood of Oregon's success in defending Ballot Measure 114 as the case progresses, indicating that the outcome remains uncertain.
Arguments Presented by Both Sides Considered Strong
The deliberations have been complicated by the strength of the arguments from both sides of the lawsuit. The Oregon Court of Appeals acknowledged this by noting that both sides were presenting ‘good arguments’.
This complexity hints that the final decision in the case could swing in either direction. Such judicial battles often draw significant public and legal interest, particularly when they concern constitutional rights and public safety.
As the legal proceedings continue, both proponents and opponents of Ballot Measure 114 are watching closely, aware that the final ruling will have profound implications for gun control in Oregon.
Implications for Oregon's Gun Laws Remain Uncertain
The decision to keep the temporary hold in place does not resolve the broader legal battle over Ballot Measure 114. This ongoing uncertainty highlights the challenges of implementing significant changes in gun laws through ballot measures.
The outcome of this legal dispute will play a critical role in shaping the future of gun regulation in Oregon, affecting both gun owners and the general public concerned with gun violence.
With the appeals court's decision to maintain the hold, the status of 'high capacity' magazine bans and permit-to-purchase requirements hangs in balance until further judicial review.
A Look Forward at Oregon's Legal Landscape
The Oregon legal system continues to grapple with these complex gun control issues as both sides prepare for the possibility of a long legal journey.
Given the contentious nature of the debate surrounding gun control laws, further appeals and legal challenges are expected, regardless of the final ruling on Ballot Measure 114.
This case could eventually reach higher courts, potentially setting precedents for how similar laws are treated across the United States.
In conclusion, the Oregon Court of Appeals' decision to maintain the temporary hold on Ballot Measure 114 reflects the judiciary's cautious approach to changing gun laws. Both sides have presented strong arguments, making the final outcome unpredictable. The court's emphasis on maintaining the status quo highlights the ongoing debate over gun control measures and their implications for public safety and constitutional rights.
The American Digest
Brian Mast Criticizes Democrats for Requesting Biden Halt Arms Transfers As Israel Is Attacked By Iran:
Representative Brian Mast (R-FL) vocally opposed calls from House Democrats to suspend military aid to Israel following recent conflicts involving the nation.
Breitbart reported that Mast has openly criticized a group of 40 House Democrats, including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, for their stance on military aid to Israel. This group had penned a letter to President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken on April 5, urging them to reconsider a previously authorized arms package that included advanced fighter jets.
The letter from the Democrats came in the wake of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza, which tragically resulted in the deaths of seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen.
They argued that such incidents necessitated a thorough investigation before proceeding with arms transfers. Of course, they ignored the fact that Israel was also attacked this past weekend with missiles and drones from Iran.
Context of the Controversial Arms Package
The arms deal in question involves substantial firepower, including 25 F-35A fighter jets, 1,800 MK-84 2,000-pound bombs, and 500 MK-82 500-pound bombs. It was reportedly approved in March, although the delivery to Israel was not expected for several months.
This package became a point of contention due to the capabilities of the F-35 and F-15 fighter jets included in the deal. These aircraft were reported by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to have been crucial in defending against a series of attacks involving UAVs, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles.
According to the IDF, the defense efforts achieved an approximately 99 percent intercept rate, showcasing the effectiveness of the systems in question. CNN further highlighted this effectiveness by showing photos of the fighter jets returning to base after successfully completing their defense missions.
Reactions to the Democrat's Letter and Airstrike Fallout
In their letter, the Democrats expressed grave concerns over the recent authorization of the arms transfer. "Given the horrifying facts on the ground, we are also greatly concerned by your recent decision to authorize an arms transfer to Israel," the letter stated, outlining the specifics of the arms included in the package.
They further implored the administration to withhold these and any future offensive arms transfers until a full investigation into the airstrike could be completed. This stance highlighted the tension between strategic defense needs and humanitarian concerns arising from military actions.
Brian Mast's Forceful Defense of Military Support for Israel
Rep. Mast, in his statement to the Daily Caller, criticized the Democrats' request as detrimental to Israel's ongoing defense against regional threats. "Just last week, Pelosi and the Squad demanded Joe Biden stop transferring ‘offensive weapons’ to Israel," he said, equating their demands to a call for abandoning Israel during a conflict.
“Can you imagine how much more devastating Iran’s attack would have been if Israel didn’t have American-made fighter jets to shoot down some of these missiles?” Mast posed, underlining the strategic importance of the arms transfer in the broader context of Middle Eastern security.
The controversy touches on broader issues of international policy, military aid, and the complex dynamics of the Middle East. As the situation develops, the implications of these decisions will likely influence U.S. foreign policy and international relations in the region.
Conclusion:
Weighing Defense Needs Against Diplomatic Concerns
In conclusion, the debate over the arms package to Israel encapsulates a significant dilemma facing modern geopolitics: the balance between supporting allies with military aid and ensuring that such support does not exacerbate existing conflicts or lead to unintended civilian casualties. As the global community watches, the outcome of this debate will undoubtedly leave a lasting impact on international relations and U.S. foreign policy.
The American Digest
Health Canada is putting a massive Tax on SUPPLEMENTS:
We need your help. Health Canada is going to be implementing a massive tax on the supplements and Chinese herbal medicines you have been purchasing for your canine and/or feline companions. We have until April 25th to help stop this from happening. The link below provides detailed information.
Health Canada has couched this tax as a ‘cost recovery’ effort. They intend to charge manufacturers and consumers for all the money needed to run their supplement oversight program. This might seem reasonable, except that Health Canada does not do the same for Cannabis and drugs. Someone else collects the fees (if any) to run those programs, making this cost recovery effort a targeting of the supplement industry and effectively punitive.Holistic practitioners are hit the hardest because we would have to pass on these increased costs to you, our valued customers.
This could result in an increase of $17 or more per bottle on the herbal supplements you use. There is no added value for this exorbitant increase as the products remain unchanged.Companies supplying veterinarians and human practitioners have already started to leave Canada in droves in anticipation of Health Canada plowing ahead with its plans. You may have noticed it is harder or even impossible to find many supplement items that you used to purchase easily. The result of this action is no added value but a dramatic decline in consumer choice.
The deadline for you to respond to the government is April 25th, 2024. One way to do this is by going to the website below and letting your MP know this is an issue that will be remembered in the next election and that votes are at stake if Health Canada proceeds with this unfair and targeted tax. This link sends a letter electronically to their MP as soon as a few form fields are filled out. It’s the easiest way for you to take action. https://www.saveoursupplements.caIf you want to read about Health Canada’s plans and provide more specific feedback, here is a link they have provided where you can provide input until the deadline. https://healthcanada.qualtrics.com
To stop what is effectively a punitive tax, we need to act immediately. Please help preserve access of Canadians to supplements, so that holistic medical practices do not become a thing of the past! Feel free to forward this email to any friends or family that may also be affected.Thank you in advance for your help!Make it a pawsitively great day!The Care TeamMain Street Veterinary ServicesIntegrative Veterinary Medicine- A True Alternative
Anne McLachlan
Health Canada
Israel Shelved Iran Strike Plans Due to US Pressure: Report:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backtracked on a pre-approved military response to Iran's massive drone and missile attack due to pressure by U.S. President Joe Biden, Israel's Kan public broadcaster reported Wednesday.
Biden reportedly told Netanyahu during a phone call on Saturday that Washington would not participate in nor support an Israeli retaliatory attack.
According to the report, Netanyahu thereafter shelved a series of options that had already been approved by the Cabinet.
"The response won't be what was planned, diplomatic sensitivities won out," the report quoted a senior Israeli source as saying. Nevertheless, the source stressed that there would be some form of action against Iranian interests.
A U.S. official told ABC News on Wednesday that the Israeli response could now come after the Passover holiday, which begins Monday evening and ends April 30.
The ABC report cited Israeli officials as saying that Jerusalem on two occasions this week dropped imminent plans to strike Iran. Overnight Saturday, Iran launched more than 300 missiles and drones at Israel. The IDF said it and its military allies intercepted some 99% of the projectiles.
On Wednesday, Netanyahu said that Israel would make its own decision on how to respond to Tehran's unprecedented attack.
"I thank our friends for supporting Israel's defense — support both in words and in deeds," Netanyahu said ahead of a Cabinet meeting in Jerusalem.
"They also have all kinds of suggestions and advice. I appreciate those, but I want to make it clear: We will make our own decisions, and the State of Israel will do everything necessary to defend itself," he added.
Netanyahu addressed the government ministers shortly after meeting with British Foreign Secretary David Cameron and German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock at the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem.
Western governments have called on Israel to refrain from retaliating against Tehran, fearing the expansion of regional war.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog on Wednesday urged the international community to confront Iran, saying, "The whole world must work decisively and defiantly against the threat posed by the Iranian regime, which is seeking to undermine the stability of the entire region."
Herzog reiterated the Jewish state's "unequivocal" commitment to defending its people, including by working for "the immediate return home of all the hostages held in captivity by Hamas in Gaza."
Unnamed Egyptian officials told the Qatari Al-Araby Al-Jadeed news outlet on Wednesday that the United States has agreed to back an Israeli operation in Gaza's southernmost city of Rafah in exchange for foregoing a major strike in Iran.
Netanyahu reiterated on Tuesday that the Hamas battalions in Rafah will be defeated, after the IDF announced the withdrawal of ground forces from the southern Gaza after four months of fighting in Khan Yunis and six months of war, leaving only one battalion left in the Strip.
After what [Hamas] has done [on Oct. 7], it will not do this again. Neither will it exist," the premier said.
Republished with permission from Jewish News Syndicate
Special Links:
Rumors – Rumors - Rumors – Rumors – Rumors
RUMOURS Circulating out there...:
You need to MAKE-UP Your own MIND!
SUMMARY:
Note:
The Real News for Wed. 17 April 2024:
· Kevin Annett will be interviewed Thurs. 18 April at 12 Noon on That Channel, a community TV station in Toronto. Kevin will be discussing the Chinese corporate takeover of Canada and the collusion of native politicians; recent evidence from the massacre of Cree people in Saskatchewan; and upcoming actions in Toronto to banish and reclaim the genocidal Catholic, Anglican, and United churches and their crown accomplices. Go to thatchannel.tv and hit the blue button that says "Watch live stream."
· Wed. 17 April Congress Ignores Jan. 6 “Rioters” Who Continue to Face Injustices: OPERATION JERICHO 2024 ~ Freeing our Fellow Americans | Opinion - Conservative | Before It's News (beforeitsnews.com)
· Wed. 17 April The FBI approached an engineer at Telegram in an attempt to secretly hire him and integrate a backdoor so that U.S. intelligence agencies could spy on users. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-government-tried-to-spy-on-people-telegram-founder-claims/ar-BB1lNOAe
· Wed. 17 April The Official Statement by the White Hats – Trust the Plan – God Wins! - American Media Group (amg-news.com)
· Wed. 17 April BQQM! Exposing the JFK Jr. Mystery: How to Make The Swamp Believe They Killed You! - American Media Group (amg-news.com)
· Wed. 17 April Biden is filth. Absolute human garbage. No sane person would allow a man like him anywhere near their kids or their families. His gross history with his family, and his perverted behavior around children and women, would be enough to get a visit from social services or law enforcement if he weren’t a Democrat. He’s a plagiarist, a liar, a sociopath, and a traitor to the United States. And that’s a fact. Receipts everywhere. …The 17th Letter (JFK Jr.) on Telegram Wed. 17 April
· Tues. 16 April EXPOSED: Project Blue Beam | How Do You Fool the Entire Earth? You Fake Reality Itself! Project Blue Beam EXPOSED on Camera (VIDEO) - American Media Group (amg-news.com)
· We Didn’t Go To The Moon: NASA / NASHA in Hebrew means, “To Deceive.” We are all being lied to. People often ask, why would NASA make all this up? The answer is very simple and straight forth from a financial aspect alone: 365 (days) X 62 (years) with funding on average of $55,000,000 dollars a day from tax payers. They had $1,244,650,000,000 reasons to lie. The Deep State netted 100's of BILLIONS of dollars. They put that money in a vast underground tunnel system for child trafficking after living their lavish lifestyle. NASA and their lies very much matter.
· Al turns WiFi Routers into 'Cameras' that can see people through walls.
· Tues. 16 April: The Hidden Truth: The Astonishing Revelation of JFK Sr’s Secret Survival | Witness Protection Program and the Cabal’s Dark Secrets - American Media Group (amg-news.com)
· Tues. 16 April Dubai ALERT: Stay-home advisory issued as heavy rain lashes all 7 Emirates including Dubai.
· Tues. 16 April: The NSA is just days away from taking over the Internet. …Rubix Q on Telegram Tues. 16 April 2024
· Wed. 17 April New York City: Swarms of hundreds, possibly thousands of undocumented immigrants have gathered outside New York City Hall for a meeting centered on their experiences.
· Wed. 17 April Donald Trump: “This conflicted, Trump Hating Judge won’t let me respond to people that are on TV lying and spewing hate all day long. He is running rough shod over my lawyers and legal team. The New York System of “Justice” is being decimated by critics from all over the World. I want to speak, or at least be able to respond. Election Interference! RIGGED, UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL! Take off the Gag Order!!!”
· Wed. 17 April Selective Service Recruiting Young Adult Children, Dave Hodges: ARE YOUR YOUNG ADULT CHILDREN RECEIVING SELECTIVE SERVICE NOTICES TO REPORT? MANY WILL SOON! | The Common Sense Show
· Donald Trump's attorney, Alina Habba, exposed Judge Lewis Kaplan: He took a $5,000,000 BRIBE from Joe Biden to convict Donald Trump.
END
