THURSDAY
- donbrooks777
- 2 hours ago
- 21 min read
New BLOG – Great ARTICLES
THURSDAY 6-[25]-26
SPIRITUAL:
VERSE-for-TODAY!
New International Version
Who can hide in secret places so that I cannot see them?” declares the Lord. “Do not I fill heaven and earth?” declares the Lord.
Read all of Jeremiah 23 ►
CANADIAN:
Taxpayers paid $2.8M in bonuses for high-speed rail project that hasn't laid a single track
The payouts come even though Alto has yet to break ground on the project and does not expect to begin construction until at least 2029.
Taxpayers have already shelled out nearly $3 million in bonuses to executives and staff overseeing the federal government's planned high-speed rail project between Toronto and Quebec City, despite construction being years away from beginning.
According to government records obtained by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation through an order paper question submitted by Conservative MP Andrew Scheer, the federal Crown corporation Alto handed out $2.8 million in bonuses between Jan. 1 and July 16, 2025.
All 18 Alto executives received bonuses totalling $1.2 million, for an average payout of roughly $68,500 each. The corporation's 116 non-executive employees also received bonuses, splitting another $1.5 million.
The payouts come even though Alto has yet to break ground on the project and does not expect to begin construction until at least 2029.
"We don't have a very precise alignment to start," Alto CEO Martin Imbleau told CBC, acknowledging the corporation has not yet finalized the route for the proposed rail line.
Nevertheless, Alto cost taxpayers $597 million in the 2025-26 Main Estimates, and the government has estimated the total cost of the project could reach as high as $90 billion.
"Why do these train executives think they deserve huge taxpayer-funded bonuses when they haven't laid a single metre of track?" asked Canadian Taxpayers Federation federal director Franco Terrazzano. "Government bureaucrats don't deserve bonuses before they finish their work, so they definitely don't deserve bonuses before they even start their work."
The bonus payouts are not unique to Alto.
Government records show that VIA Rail paid out $10.3 million in bonuses in 2025-26. All eight of its executives received bonuses averaging $115,293, while 99 per cent of non-executive employees also received bonus payments totaling approximately $9.4 million.
The payouts came despite VIA Rail relying on $1.8 billion in federal support over the past five years to cover operating losses, according to its latest annual report. The Crown corporation also reported that just 35% of its trains arrived on time last year.
"Prime Minister Mark Carney needs to end Ottawa's entitlement culture because it seems like government executives think they deserve bonuses just for showing up to work twice a week with their shoes tied," Terrazzano said.
The broader federal public service has shown a similar pattern. Government data indicates that approximately 98% of federal executives received bonuses in 2024-25, costing taxpayers $201 million, even though federal departments met only 54% of their own performance targets.
TAXPAYERS
Important LeaderImpact Update
As we approach the end of June, LeaderImpact is entering a new season of leadership and excitement.
After years of faithful service, Jeff Campbell (Executive Director), John Havercroft (Managing Director), and Dorothy Schroeder (Director of Resources & Development) will be concluding their staff roles with LeaderImpact. While stepping away from day-to-day leadership, each will continue to be engaged as volunteers, and we are deeply grateful for the lasting impact they have made on countless leaders across Canada and beyond.
Together, Jeff, John, and Dorothy have helped strengthen LeaderImpact through seasons of growth, challenge, and transformation. Their leadership, dedication, and love for people have left an enduring mark, and we thank God for their faithful service.
As we look ahead, we are excited to announce that Angel Morales has been appointed Interim Director of LeaderImpact.
Many of you know Angel through his leadership of LeaderImpact NEXT and his passion for investing in emerging leaders. Angel brings a deep commitment to our mission, strong leadership experience, and a clear vision for helping marketplace leaders discover and live out their God-given purpose and influence.
This transition comes at a time when the need for Christ-centred leadership in the marketplace has never been greater. Across Canada, thousands of leaders are searching for purpose, community, and opportunities to make a meaningful impact. LeaderImpact remains committed to building communities of leaders who are transformed by Christ and who influence their workplaces, cities, and spheres of leadership for His Kingdom.
As we begin the search for our next Director, our focus remains clear:
· Strengthening and supporting LeaderImpact groups across the country.
· Investing in the next generation of marketplace leaders.
· Expanding opportunities for leaders to connect faith, leadership, and influence.
· Advancing our mission of helping leaders know Jesus and experience His transforming power.
We invite you to pray with us during this season—for Angel and our leadership team, for wisdom in the search process, and for God's continued blessing on LeaderImpact as we pursue the opportunities He is placing before us.
Thank you for being part of the LeaderImpact community. We are excited about the future and look forward to what God will do in the years ahead.
If you have any questions, we would be pleased to hear from you.
With gratitude,
The LeaderImpact
Leadership Team
TRUMP:
Obama-nominated judge permanently blocks Trump citizenship-proof requirement for voter registration
By
A federal judge in Boston permanently barred the Trump administration from enforcing most of its first executive order on elections, ruling that the president lacks constitutional authority to require documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration or to punish states that count late-arriving mail ballots.
U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, chief judge in the District of Massachusetts and a nominee of former President Barack Obama, converted a preliminary injunction she issued roughly a year ago into a permanent ban, the New York Post reported. The ruling strips enforcement power from an order that sought to reshape how Americans register and vote in federal elections.
The blocked order carried three major provisions: requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, banning the counting of mail ballots that arrive after Election Day even if postmarked on time, and threatening to withhold federal funds from states that refused to comply. Judge Casper found that all three provisions exceeded presidential power and violated the separation of powers.
The constitutional argument, and who wins it
In her written ruling, Casper stated that the Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections." She agreed with the Democratic state attorneys general who brought the lawsuit that the Constitution reserves election authority to the states and to Congress, not to the executive branch.
As the Washington Examiner reported, Casper is the third federal judge to block the order. Separate courts in Washington, D.C., and Washington state have also struck down provisions of the same directive, making this a growing string of judicial defeats for the administration's election agenda.
The court rejected the administration's argument that the lawsuit was premature because the rules had not yet taken effect. Casper found the states had demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, and that the threat of withheld federal money gave them standing to challenge the order now.
A longer passage from the ruling, as Breitbart noted, laid out the constitutional boundary plainly:
"While the Constitution vests the President with executive Power and commands him to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, it does not grant the President any specific powers over elections."
That framing matters. The judge did not dispute the goal of verifying citizenship. She disputed the method, a unilateral executive order rather than legislation passed by Congress.
What the ruling does not say
Nothing in Casper's decision challenges the basic requirement that voters be U.S. citizens. The federal voter registration form already requires applicants to attest under penalty of perjury that they are citizens. Violating that attestation is a felony punishable by prison or deportation.
The question before the court was narrower: can the president, acting alone, impose a documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement on top of the existing attestation? Casper said no. That power belongs to Congress.
Nineteen Democratic state attorneys general filed the original lawsuit. California served as the lead plaintiff state. Just The News reported that the suit was filed in April, challenging the executive order signed in March 2025.
The same week, a separate federal judge blocked the Trump administration's voter verification system that combined Social Security data with citizenship records, a system already in use by 25 states. That ruling came from a Biden-appointed judge, adding another layer of judicial resistance to the administration's election-security push.
Democrats celebrate, and signal more fights ahead
New York Attorney General Letitia James framed the ruling as a defense of voting rights, saying in a statement:
"Generations of Americans fought tirelessly for the right to vote, and we honor their legacy by protecting that right against anyone who tries to undermine it."
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose office led the litigation, struck a more combative tone. He acknowledged the win but warned that the legal battles are far from over:
"While we are proud of this result, we are clear-eyed that President Trump's attacks on voting rights and our elections show no signs of slowing down. So let me be clear: we will keep fighting back every step of the way."
The White House pushed back. Spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told the Associated Press that the administration remains confident in its position:
"The President's executive order lawfully protects our elections, and we are confident that we will ultimately prevail in its implementation."
Whether the administration will appeal the permanent injunction remains unclear. Requests for comment to both the White House and the Department of Justice were not immediately returned.
Trump ties housing bill to voter citizenship fight
The ruling landed on the same day Trump escalated his pressure campaign on Congress. He abruptly canceled the expected signing of a bipartisan housing bill, declaring he would not sign any legislation until Congress passes his proof-of-citizenship requirement for voting.
That requirement is embodied in the SAVE America Act, which has already passed the House but stalled in the Senate. Trump has publicly advocated for eliminating the filibuster to force the bill through, a move that would mark a dramatic shift in Senate procedure and one that even some Senate Republicans have resisted on other fronts.
The legislative route matters now more than ever. With three federal judges blocking the executive order approach, the only viable path to a documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement runs through Capitol Hill. Newsmax noted that the ruling intensifies pressure on Congress to act, since courts have consistently struck down the same policy when imposed by executive fiat.
Trump has also signed a second executive order on elections, this one seeking to create a national voter list and limit mail balloting. That directive faces its own set of legal challenges. Media figures and Democratic officials have accused the president of trying to undermine elections through these orders, while the administration insists the measures protect election integrity.
The mail-ballot question heads to the Supreme Court
One piece of the election puzzle may soon be resolved at a higher level. The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion on whether mail ballots must arrive by Election Day. That ruling could immediately change the rules in 14 states that currently allow grace periods, ranging from days to weeks, for ballots postmarked by Election Day.
If the Court sides with the administration's position, it would accomplish through judicial review what Casper's ruling blocked by executive order. The distinction is procedural but constitutionally significant: the Supreme Court would be interpreting existing law, not validating unilateral presidential action.
Meanwhile, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., handling a separate challenge brought by civil rights groups and Democratic Party-aligned organizations, has already blocked the proof-of-citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form. That same judge later barred Trump's defense secretary from requiring documentary proof of citizenship when military personnel register to vote or request ballots.
The pattern is consistent. Courts across the country have drawn the same line: the president can advocate for election reforms, but he cannot impose them by decree. The Constitution assigns that power elsewhere.
The administration's broader push to reshape federal governance through executive orders has met resistance on multiple fronts, from workforce restructuring to election policy. Each time, the central legal question is the same, whether the president has the authority to act alone, or whether the change requires Congress.
The real cost of the wrong approach
Here is what makes this ruling so frustrating for anyone who cares about election security. The underlying policy goal, verifying that only citizens register to vote, is popular, reasonable, and grounded in common sense. Polls consistently show broad public support for citizenship verification. The federal registration form already treats false attestation as a felony.
But the executive-order route was always legally fragile. The Constitution is clear about who sets election rules, and it is not the president acting alone. Three federal courts have now said so. The AP reported that an estimated 21.3 million eligible American voters lack easy access to documents proving citizenship, a figure from a 2025 University of Maryland study that opponents will continue to cite in court.
The SAVE America Act exists precisely to address this gap through proper legislative channels. It passed the House. It has the votes in concept, if not yet in practice. The Senate is the bottleneck, and that is where the fight belongs.
Judge Casper may have been nominated by Barack Obama, and the 19 attorneys general who sued are all Democrats. But the constitutional principle they invoked is not a partisan invention. Separation of powers protects everyone, including the next Republican Congress that wants to pass election-security legislation without a future Democratic president overriding it by executive order.
Trump's instinct on election integrity is right. The method was wrong. And now the clock is ticking for Congress to do its job, or own the consequences of leaving the door open.
TRUMP TRIGGERS THE SWAMP
President Trump just put the entire Washington establishment on notice.Hours before he was set to sign a bipartisan housing bill both parties were eager to campaign on, Trump abruptly canceled the ceremony — vowing not to sign anything until Congress passes the SAVE America Act.Trump explained that he considers passing the SAVE America Act a “national emergency.”
The move predictably sent The Swamp into a frenzy. Democrat Chuck Schumer fumed that Trump was “petulant” and “looks ridiculous,” while Republican John Cornyn called Trump’s decision “inexplicable.” RINO Sen. Thom Tillis even accused Trump of helping Democrats.
Top Stories
· Obama-Appointed Activist Judge Takes Blowtorch to Trump’s Election Security Agenda
· Trump Declares "National Emergency" as The Swamp REFUSES to Pass SAVE America Act
· Democrat Party Faces Moment of Reckoning After Mamdani-Backed Socialists Win
· Sean Hannity Responds After Viewers Express Grave Concern About His Health
· House GOP May Steal Play From Trump’s Playbook to Force Senate to Pass SAVE America Act
The BONGINO REPORT
Supreme Court allows Immigration Officials to turn away Asylum Seekers at the Border
U.S. immigration officials can turn away asylum seekers at the Mexican border, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.
In a 6-3 decision, the justices greenlit a “metering” policy devised under the Obama administration and expanded during President Donald Trump’s first term, under which Customs and Border Protection agents posted on bridges between Mexico and the U.S. turned back many asylum seekers.
The high court’s ruling overturned lower-court decisions that found Congress intended to permit any immigrant approaching a border checkpoint to file for asylum.
The challenged policy was officially rescinded by the Biden administration in 2021, but most asylum seekers at the border have been thwarted by Biden and Trump edicts even broader than the “metering” program.
POLITICO Pro subscribers who follow topics related to this story will receive more in-depth updates as we publish them.To manage your alerts or learn more about Pro, click this link.
POLITICO
Breaking News
GLOBAL:
A Communist Takeover In NY
In this episode, I'll discuss the onslaught of radical communist ideas being pushed into New York and the foot soldiers that are doing it. Also, the SAVE Act comes to a climax today and we'll see what Donald Trump can do about passing it.Watch me, LIVE, on Rumble. Mon-Fri at 10am.www.rumble.com/bongino/
Dan's News Picks:
Leader of group convicted in antifa-inspired attack on Texas ICE facility handed 100-year prison sentence
The Obama Presidential Center is "requiring photo ID to enter."
Orders From Teachers Union Headquarters: No School Choice for You
Dan BONGINO
CENTCOM Forces Kill Senior ISIS Leader in Syria
A fighter with the Syrian Democratic Forces stands guard during a meeting with the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State group in Deir Hafer, Syria, on Jan. 16.
USCENTCOM
TAMPA, Fla. — U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces conducted an airstrike in northwest Syria, June 19, that resulted in the death of a senior ISIS leader.The precision strike killed Ali Husayn al-‘Ulaywi and is part of ongoing U.S. efforts to disrupt and eliminate terrorists seeking to attack Americans abroad or the U.S. homeland.
CENTCOM forces continue to work alongside regional partners.“CENTCOM and our partners remain committed to rooting out remaining remnants of ISIS to ensure its enduring defeat,” said Adm. Brad Cooper, CENTCOM commander. “We will continue to defend the U.S. homeland, our service members, and allies and partners across the region.”
MAGA Latino BURNS Democrat Elissa Slotkin in front of the entire nation for laughable mail-in ballot hypocrisy
"You care about the Constitution all of a sudden?!!"
GOP Sen. Bernie Moreno couldn’t resist mocking and calling out Democrat Sen. Elissa "Defy orders" Slotkin after her emotional plea to continue exploitable mail-in voting.
“Three years ago, the Democrats wanted to take over the entire election system in America, not to give it more voter integrity, but to diminish voter integrity!!” Moreno fired back.
POLITIBRAWL
Patrick Bestall’s INPUT:
#1.
How many centuries would it take to come up with this?
Ancient Arab stories relate how Cain, the great grandson of Adam, was a wonder-worker who travelled the world before the flood. There is actually evidence of this in the pic-to-grams of S. America which used the same symbols as were found in Egypt and the far east. And then there's all these carvings of different models of the helicopter which took us several centuries to develop.
Some people believe that there were survivors of the Flood, a line of "giants" who have been waiting to redevelop their technology and hybrid humans through bio-technology so they could emerge and challenge God once again.
Carved into a 3,000-year-old temple ceiling at Abydos in southern Egypt sits a shape that looks impossibly modern: a rotor, a tail, a cockpit — what millions swear is a helicopter. Did ancient Egyptians witness flying machines, or is there a simpler explanation hidden in the stone?
In this documentary investigation, we travel to one of Egypt's oldest sacred cities to examine the famous ""Abydos helicopter"" hieroglyphs. We weigh the lost-technology theory against the mainstream archaeological explanation of palimpsest carvings — overlapping inscriptions reused by later pharaohs — and let you decide what these mysterious symbols really mean. What do you think — ancient aircraft or an optical illusion in limestone?
EGYPT
.PB
#2.
Foster Care abuse
(LifeSiteNews) — A Christian Hollywood star has exposed the dark side of the foster care system which incentivises the bad behavior of people who medically and socially abuse children placed in their care.
Actress and singer Jen Lilley, a popular leading lady on the Hallmark and Great American Family Channels, went on the Shawn Ryan Podcast to discuss her experiences as a foster care parent.
Lilley explained how “bad people” make money by gaming the foster care system.
The actress recounted a disturbing exchange at a Los Angeles conference where she spoke with more experienced foster care parents.
“Oh honey, I make $28,000 a month off foster care … because I have this many kids,” one woman said.
“Here’s the thing: You want to get a D-Rate kid,” this woman continued, explaining that the more medical, emotional, and behavioral needs a child has, the more the foster care system will reimburse the foster parent.
“You want to make sure they fail in school. If they fail in school and you can get them on medication, your rate goes up,” the woman told Lilley. “Every time they don’t pass a grade, your rate goes up because they’re a more difficult kid. Every time they need medication, your rate goes up.”
Lilley declared, “This is a demonic situation that exists because the church closed her doors.”
Who's gonna compensate white kids in bad care?
.PB
#3.
Canada is STILL debating the purchase of more aircraft! after 30 years of bargaining.
.pb asks: Why does it take Canada so long to make up its mind about purchasing F-35 jets? Too many fingers in the pie or hands in each others' pockets? Each newly elected government wanted to start negotiations all over again.
AI replies: Major defense procurements ideally should take under 5 years to field new platforms, but Canada currently averages 16 years from concept to deployment, with some taking up to 28 years. This timeline is widely considered too slow to keep pace with rapid modern technological shifts and evolving threats. [.
.pb comments: no kidding. And did we finally made a purchase this year of new Hornets, F-35's or Gripins?
AI: Canada has still not made a final, definitive purchase between the two this year, as the decision remains locked in an intense, highly politicized review.
.pb: Sure, blame Trump
1. The Baseline: F-35 Program Costs Have Already Exploded
Even before factoring in Swedish planes, Canada’s original plan for 88 F-35s is no longer a $19-billion project.
The New Estimate: A June 2025 Parliamentary Auditor General report revealed that the acquisition cost for the F-35 program has ballooned by nearly 50%, rising to $27.7 billion. [1]
Hidden Upgrades: The Auditor General noted that essential infrastructure upgrades and advanced weapons will tack on at least another $5.5 billion. [1]
The Long-Term Lifecycle: Over a 30-year span, the true cost of operating, fueling, and maintaining 88 F-35s is projected to reach a staggering $73.9 billion. [1]
2. The Mixed-Fleet Premium: Duplicated Lifecycles (The True Burden)
Industry sources and defense analysts note that moving to a mixed fleet of 100 to 140 total aircraft—splitting the order between roughly 30 to 72 F-35s and 60 to 72 Gripens—will instantly drive total project commitments to between $30 billion and $50 billion just for acquisition.
Canada's CF-35A fighter jet cost estimate jumps nearly 50%
Jun 10, 2025 — By Ben Forrest. June 10, 2025. Canada's plan to renew its fighter jet fleet with the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II has seen co...
.pb comment: If you want a taste of the rotten politics, watch this 3 hour movie about the Canadian Arrow, staring Dan Ackroyd. It's free on YouTube. If anyone of you watches it, let me know and I'll tell you even more.
.PB
RUMOUR:
RUMOURS Circulating out there...:
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website, and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
I may not agree with everything from the content-producers that I share.
Apply critical thinking and use discernment to
Come to your own conclusions regarding the content!
You need to MAKE UP Your own MIND!
What we think that we now know...
REPORT Today
The world keeps spinning, and now you’re caught up.
Where we go One, we go Quantum, Indictments, Iran, Oil, USAID, Tesla
In an era defined by rapid change and complex global dynamics, understanding the forces shaping our world has never been more crucial. A recent comprehensive update from And We Know Official offers a unique lens through which to view current events, connecting political maneuvering, economic shifts, technological breakthroughs, and alleged hidden agendas under the overarching themes of American patriotism, government transparency, and a profound sense of an impending mass awakening.
This insightful presentation navigates a wide array of critical topics, from the shifting sands of international relations to the very fabric of our technological future, all while emphasizing the importance of vigilance and an unwavering commitment to truth and justice.
The video highlights a fundamental shift in U.S. foreign policy, particularly concerning Iran. Under President Trump’s administration, the strategy moved away from what is described as appeasement towards a firm stance of military and economic pressure.
This “America First” national security approach, it argues, has dramatically impacted Iran’s military capacity and exacerbated its internal inflation, thereby creating leverage for negotiation without resorting to direct conflict. This marks a significant critique of prior administrations, portraying the current approach as more effective in safeguarding American interests.
Domestically, the discussion extends to economic policy, particularly the directive for the Department of Justice to investigate oil price gouging. This concern arises from the disparity between falling raw oil prices and stagnant or rising costs at the pump, suggesting potential exploitation at the retail level. This initiative is presented as another example of direct intervention aimed at protecting average Americans from perceived corporate excess, reaffirming a populist economic policy focus.
A significant portion of the update focuses on a monumental government crackdown on a---e of public funds: the exposure and prosecution of large-scale healthcare fraud. We learn about the charging of 455 defendants in schemes totaling a staggering $6.5 billion.
These pervasive frauds, including predatory practices against vulnerable populations like the elderly, expose systemic vulnerabilities within vital programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The coordinated efforts by the Department of Justice, alongside the Vice President’s task force, are showcased as a powerful testament to the government’s commitment to enhanced federal oversight and legislative reforms necessary to protect public resources and maintain trust in our healthcare systems.
Perhaps one of the most controversial revelations centers on the role of USAID. The video presents evidence linking the agency to alleged destabilizing foreign governments, funding activist movements, and involvement in election manipulations around the world.
Assertions include connections to global figures like George Soros and other entities, painting a picture of foreign aid being instrumentalized for political interference and illicit financial flows.
Further delving into this complex nexus, the video directly implicates U.S. taxpayer dollars, channeled through USAID and associated agencies, in supporting highly contentious gain-of-function research at Wuhan and funding various election infrastructure projects.
This connection raises serious questions about funding transparency, research oversight, and the integrity of election security protocols, demanding a reassessment of the ethical and strategic consequences of foreign aid policies.
The narrative then takes a fascinating turn into technological and historical realms, crafting a compelling storyline that links Nikola Tesla’s legacy to modern innovation under Elon Musk. The video explores the strategic government interests, particularly from wartime agencies like the OSS/CIA, that may have suppressed Tesla’s revolutionary inventions.
This segment suggests that groundbreaking technologies have long been shrouded in secrecy, directed towards strategic advantage, and hints at a hidden past that profoundly influences present-day breakthroughs in energy, space, and communications technology. It’s a framework that merges history, technology, and geopolitics, pointing to ongoing clandestine advancements.
The most profound and overarching theme introduced by the video is the concept of “quantum timelines” and Project Looking Glass. This introduces a metaphysical and philosophical dimension, asserting a deterministic view of events culminating in an inevitable mass awakening.
This perspective portrays the current global struggles as part of a preordained cosmic order, where truth, faith, and justice are destined to triumph. This provides a message of hope amid turmoil, underscoring that the challenges we face are elements within a larger narrative of destiny and spiritual victory.
The comprehensive update from And We Know Official concludes with powerful patriotic and spiritual affirmations. It reinforces the critical need for vigilance in understanding the true nature of global events and encourages active community engagement.
By illuminating these diverse, yet interconnected, issues—from national security and economic fairness to the alleged manipulation of foreign aid and the suppressed histories of innovation—the presentation inspires a deeper commitment to transparency and truth.
For a deeper dive into these insights and further examination of the evidence presented, consider exploring the full video from And We Know Official. Engaging with such detailed perspectives is crucial for anyone committed to understanding the unseen forces at play in our world and contributing to a future founded on truth and justice.
==========
Bessent Confirms, The US Economy Is Moving Away From The Rest Of The World
Streamed on: Jun 24, 5:30 pm EDT
Trump is now setting up so the data centers and manufactures will be able to produce their own electric, plus trump is now expanding the grid to make cheaper electricity. Oil prices are dropping and Trump wants to know why the Oil companies aren’t dropping prices like they raise prices. Bessent says the US economy is heading away from all other countries.
DEM’s Go Full Communists, Trump Is Making Tactical Moves, Do You See The Plan? Soon
Streamed on: Jun 24, 6:00 pm EDT
The D’s have gone full communist. This will make it easy for people to see who they truly are, just like when Biden opened the border. Sometimes you need to show the people. Trump is making tactical moves to make sure the [DS] cannot push against the constitution and the rights of the people. This is part of the plan to stop the [DS] in the future. Soon it will all start to come together and people will see what he has done to protect future generations.
============
American was Born through a Declaration that Appealed Above Kings
America was not born as a corporation, commercial venue, or administrative franchise.
America was born through a Declaration that appealed above kings, parliaments, bankers, courts, and institutions to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.”
That means the American covenant rests on a higher moral order: rights are not granted by government; they are recognized by government. Liberty is not licensed by institutions; it is inherent. Law is not legitimate merely because men write it down; law is legitimate only when it conforms to truth, justice, consent, and the unalienable rights of the people.
Any legal system – commercial, administrative, maritime, statutory, or corporate – that trespasses against those higher principles is inferior in moral authority.
So the core issue is this:
No institution may lawfully convert God-given rights into privileges, free people into managed assets, or constitutional citizenship into commercial submission.
Evidence of evil in America is the financed and orchestrated zeal to assassinate assimilation of our Declaration principles and virtues proclaimed in our 1776 founding covenant with God.
The raw, unhinged, vitriolic hatred by so many within, and outside of, America is not organic; it’s an alien virus manufactured in labs of hatred opposed to the spirit of our Declaration of Independence and self-governance under God, in whom we freely acknowledge and recognize as the Originating Source of our inherited liberties, laws, principles and freedoms.
Those secretly or violently opposed to assimilation, possessed with hatred towards America’s founding principles, to include vengeance seeking atheists repulsed by the very idea of acknowledging God even exists, are fully incapable of meeting any moral basis of U.S. citizenship due to their inability to honestly swear to a mutual consenting oath that necessitates moral order as a prerequisite to citizenship.
No honest oath = not capable of declaring oneself worthy of American citizenship.
We must embrace first principles if we aspire to keep America, America.
· Fake rulesFake courtsFake moneyFake NGOsFake moralityFake scarcityFake newsFake medicineFake foodFake patriotsFake elections
Who’s tired of Fake?
========
Trump is Now Pressuring the Senate to Pass the SAVE America Act
Clandestine@WarClandestine
Trump is now pressuring the Senate GOP to pass the SAVE America Act. This tells me that we are getting close.
It’s time for the Senate GOP to put up or shut up. Either they deliver for the American People now, or Trump will be forced to explore the “Executive option”.
It doesn’t really matter to me. I know that one way or the other, the 2026 election will be secure, because it’s a matter of National Security, as we are under assault from within via a corrupt conspiracy/insurrection who wish to overthrow the United States of America, and POTUS confirmed he is willing to handle it himself if has to.
It would be much better optically for the Senate GOP to pass this into law and for Trump to not have to do it the Executive way, but I’m at the point where I don’t give a rat’s a-s.
Trump is going to save this nation, whether anyone likes it or not, and anyone who thinks he does not have the power or authority to do so, is mistaken.
========
THE END
Comments