Search

This is HUGE!

8-29-21 Sunday - thebrookstruth.com


Disclaimer:

The following information is found on the internet and is usually not referenced by the Main-Stream Media [MSM]. It is my intention to present this information so that one has a better knowledgebase from which to make judgements. These are not necessarily my views; however, they need to be considered if one is not to become biased as only one side of a discussion is presented. Much of the content of this BLOG is re-printed Material from the “Restored Republic” report issued by Judy Byington. Consider, do your own research, and make up your own mind.


… according as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness,

through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:

2 Peter 1:3 KJV


The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: But fools despise wisdom and instruction.

Proverbs 1:7 KJV


Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

2 Timothy 2:15 KJV



NOTE:

For your ease in getting to Information that you are interested in… I have divided the following Material into three Groups: It is not necessary that you read every Article… scroll down and pick what interests you! Little to none of these are found in the Main-Stream media {MSM}…

Disclaimer: All articles, videos,and images posted in this BLOG – site, are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed in this BLOG and we do not support, represent, or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted herein.



💥 💥💥💥💥

Thought of the Day!

If doctors with a conscience are forced to recommend patients to those who do abortions and euthanasia,

why can't doctors who approve of Pfizer shots refer you do a doctor who recommends home treatments?

Hunter Biden and Dr. Fauci are still untried traitors.

Don't let them sink into the Democratic memory hole.


Sections divide Material into meaningful Groups



First… PRAISE:

#1. POLITICS

#2. COVID-19

#3. OPINION

#4. SAFETY




PRAISE:



DRAFT Letter to EMPLOYER:

If you are being pressured to follow the MANDATE and get VAXX’d


To [whoever is responsible for the mandate notice or your chief with address of HQ or where they work]

and

To whom it may concern,

I am writing in relation to the recent mandate re: mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations and mandatory testing of COVID-19 for unvaccinated or accommodated person(s). I am not going to disclose my vaccination status to [insert employer] as my medical health is protected by privacy laws. My medical health and choices are private and confidential and I am not required to disclose these to anyone. The [insert employer] does not have the right to ask me about my vaccination status. My privacy is protected under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, 2000 (PIPEDA) as well as the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 (PHIPA) as well as the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1.

I am not going to consent to any COVID-19 testing that the [insert employer] is mandating. I do not give my informed consent. Informed consent means that the person who will administer the medical treatment or procedure, needs to inform you of all the benefits and risks associated with the medical treatment or procedures as well as alternative treatments before you decide if you will consent or not. This is medical freedom. These are our God-given inalienable rights.

Elements of consent: your expressed, informed and explicit consent (voluntary) must be obtained prior to treatment. Without consent it is considered assault under the Criminal Code of Canada. Consent given under fear or duress is not consent. Section 265(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines consent in relation to assault as:

Consent

(3) For the purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of

a. the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant;

b. threats or fear of the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant;

c. fraud; or

d. the exercise of authority.

The Ontario Health Care Consent Act, 1996 defines “consent” as well:

CONSENT TO TREATMENT

No treatment without consent


10 (1) A health practitioner who proposes a treatment for a person shall not administer the treatment, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it is not administered, unless,

(a) he or she is of the opinion that the person is capable with respect to the treatment, and the person has given consent; or

(b) he or she is of the opinion that the person is incapable with respect to the treatment, and the person’s substitute decision-maker has given consent on the person’s behalf in accordance with this Act. 1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 10 (1).

Elements of consent

11 (1) The following are the elements required for consent to treatment:

1. The consent must relate to the treatment.

2. The consent must be informed.

3. The consent must be given voluntarily.

4. The consent must not be obtained through misrepresentation or fraud. 1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 11 (1).

Treatment is also defined in the Ontario Health Care Consent Act, 1996 as follows:

“means anything that is done for a therapeutic, preventive, palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic or other health-related purpose, and includes a course of treatment, plan of treatment or community treatment plan”.

Also, the Nuremberg Code, to which Canada is a signatory, states that is essential before performing a medical procedure on human beings, that there is voluntary informed consent. It also confirms a person involved should have legal capacity to give consent, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an informed decision.

Nuremberg Code: Article 6, Section 1:

Any preventative, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

Nuremberg Code: Article 6: Section 3:

In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

By forcing members to submit to a COVID-19 vaccine or test (including the rapid antigen test), you are in breach of the Nuremberg Code.


Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Canada has well established case law that deals with medical treatment without the informed consent. It is unconstitutional to mandate medical treatment of any kind.

In terms of accessing my health records the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act also speaks to this. Under the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1 under Section 63(2) it states:

Information confidential

Employer access to health records

(2) No employer shall seek to gain access, except by an order of the court or other tribunal or in order to comply with another statute, to a health record concerning a worker without the worker’s written consent. R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1, s. 63 (2).

Also under the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c O.1 it outlines penalties:

PART IX

OFFENCES AND PENALTIES

Penalties

66 (1) Every person who contravenes or fails to comply with,

a. a provision of this Act or the regulations;

b. an order or requirement of an inspector or a Director; or

c. an order of the Minister, is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than twelve months, or to both. R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1, s. 66 (1); 2017, c. 34, Sched. 30, s. 4 (1).

Furthermore, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 2 (a) (freedom of conscience and religion) and Section 7 (everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice), apply to this mandate. Basic human bodily autonomy is as basic as it gets in terms of rights. I have the right to liberty – and this includes my right to refuse medical treatment (including vaccines or any of the available tests for COVID-19).

The PCR test is a form of genetic test. The following legislation applies: Bill S-201, Statues of Canada 2017: “An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination”. I have attached a copy of this statue to this notice. In it, it clearly defines “genetic test”: genetic test means a test that analyzes DNA, RNA or chromosomes for purposes such as the prediction of disease or vertical transmission risks, or monitoring, diagnosis or prognosis. (test génétique)

Furthermore, in this legislation it also outlines Prohibitions:

Prohibitions

Genetic test

3 (1) It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of

a. providing goods or services to that individual;

b. entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or

c. offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.

This legislation also outlines “Offences and Punishment”

Contravention of sections 3 to 5

7 Every person who contravenes any of sections 3 to 5 is guilty of an offence and is liable

a. on conviction on indictment, to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or to both; or

b. on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding $300,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months, or to both.

It is evident that the [insert employer] is in breach of various federal and provincial legislations with the recent COVID 19 vaccination and testing mandates.

In conclusion, I hereby notify you that I will hold you personally liable for any financial injury and/or loss of my personal income and my ability to provide food and shelter for my family if you use coercion or discrimination against me based on my decision to not participate in [insert employer]’s COVID-19 vaccination and testing mandates.

Name: __________________________________

Signature: __________________________________

Date: ___________________________________

Witness Name: ___________________________________

Witness Signature: ___________________________________


💥💥💥Use this TEMPLATE to draft your RESPONSE to your EMPLOYER! 💥💥💥

[Joni Eveleigh]





#1. POLITICS



Fauci World:

Recurring 5-Month Vaccine Schedule Being Discussed with Biden:

https://realpatriotalerts.com/fauci-world-recurring-5-month-vaccine-schedule-being-discussed-with-biden/

President Joe Biden has a lot to say about what former President Donald Trump left for him to deal with when he was sworn in in January, and most of it is far from complimentary.

However, as the current president attempts to blame Trump for his own horrific handling of the Afghanistan crisis this month, he’s spent the better part of this year skirting around the fact that he was able to inherit his predecessor’s quick and successful program to produce a COVID-19 vaccine.

When Biden’s not taking credit for the development of the vaccine, with which he had very little to do, he’s insulting the intelligence of the unvaccinated, many of whom are loyal Trump supporters themselves.

However, the glories promised us by the swift production and delivery of the vaccine — credit whichever president you will for this vision of victory over the pandemic — have failed to come to fruition.

No sooner was the vaccine made widely available by April (something which Trump had indeed promised would be the case), than Biden was setting goals for vaccination rates he’d end up failing to meet a few short months later.






#2. COVID-19



Clapton New Song (4 Min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNt4NIQ7FTA [David Yeo]




💥💥💥CDN Lawyer: 💥💥💥

Why Jab Passports are Illegal (12 Min)

https://www.brighteon.com/07717c27-870a-4fcb-aaf5-ed81b36c55d9 [David Yeo]





💥Action4Canada Interview with Rocco on the recent Lawsuit Against BC (51 Min)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lsdgRFV49LY4/ [David Yeo]




💥In-formed Consent (5 Min)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZAL2dN8jWIe/ [David Yeo]






💥Doc Says, 'getting it defies all Natural Immunity' (12 Min)

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=7OOYH87DOUDH [David Yeo]




New York City Mayor wants the Jab for 5-11 year 0lds! (1 Min)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ETKpzZHRMBw6/ [David Yeo]



Under Hypnosis (1 Min)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3DSdu384pEvT/ [David Yeo]




C*D*C* is a Quasi-Government Agency (9 Min)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MHyLs7FAMMay/ [David Yeo]




💥💥Fate of the Jabbed: 💥💥

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (19 Min)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kFHMd2CgwHOH/ [David Yeo]






#3. OPINION



💥Speechless:

US Navy developing weapon that blasts target's own voice back at them leaving them unable to speak | Daily Mail Online

· A patent for a handheld Acoustic Hailing And Disruption (AHAD) system was approved in June

· The device records a subject’s voice then plays it back at them on a slight delay

· Due to the feedback, 'the target speaker's concentration will be disrupted' the patent reads

· The non-lethal weapon would be making it difficult for a target to continue speaking

By DAN AVERY FOR DAILYMAIL.CO [Patrick Bestall]




#4. SAFETY




Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers:

💥💥💥Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers

Dr Peter McCullough

A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated. This phenomenon may be the source of the shocking post-vaccination surges in heavily vaccinated populations globally.

Let's agree with those who have received the shots to stay away from each other. [Patrick Bestall]




The following list provides links to further explore some of the topics discussed here:

https://rumble.com/vleq43-informed-consent-its-your-right.html


https://www.cmaj.ca/content/184/5/533


CMPA - Consent: A guide for Canadian physicians (cmpa-acpm.ca) Vaccine administration practices: Canadian Immunization Guide - Canada.ca


https://bottomlineresearch.ca/pdf/informed_consent.pdf


https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/so-1996-c-2-sch-a/latest/so-1996-c-2-scha.html#sec11subsec2_smooth


https://pmj.bmj.com/content/80/943/277


https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01897-w


https://www.timesofisrael.com/hmo-those-who-inoculated-early-twice-as-likely-to-catchcovid-as-later-adopters/amp/


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01642-1/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR3CI00yX-YgLsRSXd-0CdBLNm4FDyamzo_Je2wX8GqXwCJPJSnO--2ra7U


Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov


https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-informed-consent-being-shredded-incanada-by-az-vaccine-debacle


https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/


https://www.c19protocols.com/


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/ Vaccin-Status-June25-EN-1241pm (canada.ca)



This publication is for educational purposes only. Nothing in this publication is to be construed as legal advice from the CCCA. Readers should consult a lawyer for advice.

77 views2 comments

Recent Posts

See All