Tuesday BLOG 11-21-23
Verse(s) for today:
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: And I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.
Psalm 23:6 KJV
If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
Galatians 5:25 KJV
This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success.
Joshua 1:8 KJV
Bill Clinton's X account posts erroneous tribute on occasion of Rosalynn Carter's death:
The country was saddened on Sunday at the news that Rosalynn Carter had died at the age of 96, and while dignitaries everywhere began paying tribute to the late former first lady, one particular expression of sympathy struck a rather embarrassing note, as the Daily Mail reports.
In an attempt to convey condolences on behalf of himself and his wife, former President Bill Clinton's X account inadvertently included a tribute posted on the occasion of Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein's death back in September.
As news of Mrs. Carter's death began to spread, Clinton took to social media to declare, “Rosalynn Carter was the embodiment of a life lived with purpose.”
However, that seemingly heartfelt sentiment was followed by a statement paying tribute to Feinstein – the same one used when the Democrat lawmaker passed away earlier this fall.
The Mail noted that initially, the post was edited and then deleted altogether before a corrected, lengthier statement specific to Mrs. Carter was published shortly thereafter. Following the aforementioned corrections, the statement from the Clintons honored Rosalynn Carter as “a compassionate and committed champion of human dignity everywhere.”
Bill and Hillary praised the former first lady and called her “an unwavering voice for the overlooked and underrepresented.”
“Because of her early leadership on childhood immunization, millions of Americans have grown up healthier,” the Clintons added. “And through her decades of work at the Carter Center and with Habitat for Humanity, she spread hope, health, and democracy across the globe.”
Bill Clinton added a personal touch by noting, “Hillary and I are deeply grateful for her extraordinary service to our nation and world, and for more than 40 years of friendship.”
Fortunately, there were plenty of other high-profile figures whose public statements on Mrs. Carter's passing did not encounter technical difficulties such as those that plagued the Clintons, with a long list of prominent Americans giving voice to the esteem in which they held the late wife of former President Jimmy Carter.
Joe and Jill Biden, for their part, heralded the inspiration Mrs. Carter's legacy offers generations of Americans, saying, “She was a champion for equal rights and opportunities for women and girls; and advocate for mental health and wellness for every person; and a supporter of the often unseen and uncompensated caregivers of our children, aging loved ones, and people with disabilities.”
Speaking on behalf of himself and wife Laura Bush, former President George W. Bush characterized Mrs. Carter as a pillar of strength for her husband and observed, “their partnership set a wonderful example of loyalty and fidelity.”
Former President Donald Trump opined that Mrs. Carter “earned the admiration and gratitude” of the entire nation for her “legacy of extraordinary accomplishment and national service,” while former first lady Melania Trump said, “We will always remember her servant's heart and devotion to her husband, family, and country.”
Rosalynn Carter died at her Plains, Georgia home with family by her side, just two days after entering hospice care. In addition to her husband, children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, she is survived by millions of Americans who will continue to honor her decades of service and devotion in both the personal and public spheres.
[The American Digest]
Elise Stefanik plans to go after Judge Arthur Engoron for denying Trump's request for a Mistrial:
Rep. Elise Stefanik believes former President Donald Trump should have been granted a mistrial in the New York civil fraud case against him, The Hill reported. The New York Republican believes Trump was "wrongfully denied" his request given the judge's bias.
Stefanik amended an earlier ethics complaint to include more evidence that the judge presiding over Trump's case has a vendetta against him. "A week ago, I filed an ethics complaint against Manhattan Judge Arthur Engoron for his partisan antics, bias, and railroading of President Trump," the congresswoman posted to X, formerly Twitter.
"Today, I’m supplementing my ethics complaint against Judge Engoron with examples of even more of his egregious misconduct after he just wrongly dismissed President Trump’s motion for a mistrial," she wrote Friday after the judge dismissed his request. Previously, Stefanik accused the judge of being unfit to preside over the case due to his extreme bias against Trump.
"This judge’s bizarre behavior has no place in our judicial system, where Judge Engoron is not honoring the defendant’s rights to due process and a fair trial," Stefanik wrote in her ethics complaint filed last week. Engoron denied Trump's request for a mistrial, claiming it was "utterly without merit."
Trump's attorneys had argued that Engoron was guilty of judicial misconduct and was showing his bias. The judge had made several disparaging remarks about Trump during the legal proceedings that revealed his lack of partiality.
However, Engoron claimed that his words were taken out of context. "Such an argument is disingenuous and made in bad faith, as defendants omitted what I said immediately after that sentence," the judge claimed of one example the attorneys cited.
Despite the ongoing legal woes for Trump, he did have one small victory as an appeals court lifted the gag order on the former president. Stefanik took credit for this development.
"I am pleased to see that after my ethics complaint to the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct against Manhattan Judge Arthur Engoron, an appellate court has lifted the unconstitutional gag order against President Trump," a statement from the congresswoman said following the ruling. Arguably, the gag order was one of the most controversial aspects of the case against him.
After Trump made disparaging remarks about a law clerk on social media, Engoron barred Trump from making any comments about what was happening in the courtroom, the Associated Press reported. The judge fined Trump $15,000 twice for supposed infractions.
Then, on Nov. 3, he placed the order on Trump's lawyers after they complained about the same law clerk, Allison Greenfield, passing notes to the judge. Trump's lawyer said it was akin to "fighting two adversaries" in the courtroom.
Engoron shrugged it off, stating he had "an absolutely unfettered right" to seek her legal advice in the trial. Both the judge and his clerk are Democrats, and Trump is being silenced at a time when he is the favorite to become the GOP presidential nominee.
The trial has had the stench of Democrat-run political theater since its inception. The $250 million lawsuit that threatens Trump's future doing business in New York was brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, a very Democrat who has made no bones about her hatred for Trump.
Trump attorney Alina Habba pointed out that James "campaigned on" the promise to go after Trump, Fox News reported. "That's how she got the attorney general role. She campaigned on Trump, so she had to follow through, and she should really dismiss this case; it's making her look bad, frankly, and the city needs her attention elsewhere.
The case against Trump hinges on the flimsy premise that he was bilking lenders by inflating his assets. This claim is absurd and unproven, but it seems a crooked judge and attorney general are attempting to make hay out of it anyway -- and that's shameful.
[The American Digest]
Cheney, Kinzinger, And "Sham" J6 Committee Under Fire After Friday Footage Dump; GOP Senator Calls For Investigation:
Ever since Friday's release of more than 40,000 hours of Jan. 6 Capitol Police security video, dozens of clips debunking the Jan. 6 committee's 'violent insurrection' narrative have been floating around X.
In response to the exculpatory footage that the Jan. 6 committee never showed the American public, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) has raised significant questions about the handling of security footage.
Lee's statements directly challenge the integrity of the now-disbanded committee, particularly addressing the roles of its former Republican members, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger. He also accuses the committee - particularly those two, of selectively sharing information.
After Cheney attempted to hit back with her 'best hits' Jan. 6 footage, Lee replied: "Liz, we’ve seen footage like that a million times. You made sure we saw that—and nothing else."
[The Durden Dispatch]
Trump just made one Comment that is boiling Biden’s Blood:
Trump is not known for holding back when it comes to his speeches. But still, people were surprised recently.
And Trump just made one comment that is boiling Biden’s blood.
Former President Donald Trump held a fiery rally in Fort Dodge, Iowa, on Saturday as he gears up for his 2024 presidential campaign.
Trump used the event to blast his Democratic and Republican rivals, but he particularly went after Joe Biden.
Trump accused Biden of being “owned by China” and having a “weak” foreign policy. He also criticized Biden’s handling of the economy, immigration, and the war in Ukraine.
In particular, Trump slammed Biden’s plan to revive the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal, which he himself withdrew from in 2017.
Trump said that the TPP would “pulverize” American farmers and manufacturers.
Trump also went after his Republican rival, Ron DeSantis, accusing him of being a “raging opponent” of Iowa Ethanol.
Trump said that DeSantis spent his entire time in Congress “angrily railing against the Renewable Fuel Standard,” which mandates the use of renewable fuels, such as ethanol.
Trump also vowed to repeal Biden’s “ethanol-crushing Electric Vehicle Mandate” and to “stand up for Iowa Ethanol like no president in history.”
Trump also touted his record as president. He said that he achieved the “most secure border in US history,” appointed “nearly 300 federal judges and 3 great Supreme Court justices,” and “kept America safe.”
Trump also said that he would “prevent World War Three” if he were elected president. He said that he is the “only candidate who can make this promise.”
The former president also pledged to “stop the invasion on our southern border” and to “begin the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”
He also said that he would “immediately restore and expand the Trump Travel Ban” and implement “strong ideological screening for all immigrants.”
In terms of the economy, Trump said that he would “deliver tax cuts, regulation cuts, energy price cuts, and interest rate cuts like you’ve never seen before.” He also said that he would “protect Social Security and Medicare for our great seniors.”
Trump concluded his speech by saying that it is “far more than a campaign” and that he and his supporters are “all involved in a great political movement, the greatest in the history of our country.”
Trump’s speech was a clear message to voters that he is the only candidate who can restore America to greatness.
He laid out a clear and concise plan for how he would do this, and he did not shy away from attacking his opponents.
Trump’s supporters were clearly energized by his speech, and they are likely to be even more motivated to support him in the 2024 election.
Trump’s speech was a powerful reminder of why he was elected president in the first place. He is a strong leader who is not afraid to take on tough challenges.
If he is elected president again, he will make America great again which is exactly what this nation needs.
[Prudent Politics Media]
Argentina’s newly elected president, Javier Milei, is taking a wrecking ball to the destructive leftist policies that have destroyed his once-prosperous nation. Ahead of his electoral victory, the libertarian gave some advice to Americans about how to avoid the road Argentina traveled.
Speaking to Tucker Carlson in an interview last month about the dangers of socialism, the politician urged Americans to “never allow yourself to be seduced by the siren song of social justice."
“Don’t get caught up in that terrible concept that where there is a need, there is a right,” he continued, noting that this doesn’t happen on its own and those who desire to oppose socialism must be ready to fight a culture war every day.
Failure to do so results in socialists gaining a foothold in the State and “seducing” the media, culture, and artists, and eventually poisoning educational material.
To prevent this, their funding must be cut off, he argued, and the business sector must be taught that focusing on their bottom line is not enough, that “part of their investment must include investing in those who defend the ideals of freedom so the socialists can make no further advances.” Otherwise, they'll impose a “long term agenda that will destroy everything it touches.”
Socialists are constantly trying to “leech” off others and they’re “tireless in their pursuit" of this, Milei argued.
“Their leitmotif in life is to live off others so they never give up on this mechanism to gain control of other’s wealth, money, or income,” he said. “So, this battle must be waged unceasingly. We cannot take a day off, because when we rest, socialism creeps in.”
Did Blaze Media just catch a J6 ‘Hero’ Cop in a web of Lies?
Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn was heralded as a hero for his bravery and courage on January 6th. Biden even awarded him the Presidential Citizens Medal, and several media outlets invited him on their shows to share his harrowing account of that fateful day.
But as more evidence is unearthed, it’s looking more and more like Dunn’s testimony, which he gave under oath, as well as the recount he gives in his new memoir, are “obviously disprovable” lies, says Glenn Beck.
For example, “Dunn alleged that he was called the N-word numerous times during the riot at the Capitol on January 6th, [and] almost the entirety of the media repeated his claim without any question,” Beck explains.
However, Blaze Media has acquired access to the J6 footage, although the tapes have not been approved for release, and can confirm that there is no evidence that racial slurs were hurled at Dunn on January 6th.
“This is the most video-recorded event in history, [and] not a single piece of evidence, video or audio, has even emerged to confirm that such a racially charged incident ever took place,” explains Glenn.
“In the two and a half years since the events, with tens of thousands of hours of audio taken and analyzed from open-source cell phone video and D.C. Metro Police body-worn cameras, nobody has produced recorded evidence to corroborate Dunn’s story,” he continues.
Further, “the Capitol rotunda closed-circuit TV video” has also been analyzed, and it “does not include any audio” and the “video also appears to lack any visual evidence confirming the event as Dunn described it.”
What the videos do include, however, is footage of Dunn “talking to numerous fellow officers ... sometimes smiling and sharing a cell phone video,” contrary to his claims that he sat down and cried due to the racial abuse he suffered.
One particular individual, a woman in a pink MAGA shirt who, according to Dunn’s story, called him a “f***ing N-word,” cannot be found in any of the J6 footage either.
“Analysts for Blaze Media have spent hours poring over the video recordings, looking for any individual, male or female, wearing a pink MAGA shirt inside the Capitol building, [and] we can report conclusively, based on the many camera sources available, that a woman in a pink MAGA T-shirt is never seen near or in Dunn’s vicinity,” confirms Glenn.
“Blaze Media did not find a single shirt fitting that description worn by anyone inside the building.”
And if that wasn’t convincing enough, the Sedition Hunters, which is a “a group of left-leaning activist researchers” who “assist the U.S., FBI, and Washington, D.C., Capitol Police to find those who committed crimes on January 6 ... has also failed to produce evidence of the N-word being used against Dunn or any other black police officers that day.”
The question now is: will Dunn be forced to contend with the fact that there is no evidence to authenticate his testimony — the same testimony that landed many people behind bars?
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV—the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.
[The BLAZE Media]
House Intelligence Chair Says No Charges for Biden Would Be 'Devastating':
Special counsel Robert Hur's impending decision to forgo charges against President Biden has sparked a furor among Republicans, alleging a double standard in the Justice Department.
The controversy stems from Biden's possession of classified documents as a private citizen, contrasting the charges filed against former President Trump for a similar offense.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner voiced his concerns, stating the absence of charges would have a profound impact on the national security community. He further accused the department of perpetuating a "two-tier system of justice."
Comparisons Drawn Between Biden and Trump Cases
The juxtaposition of the cases involving Biden and Trump has become a focal point in the debate. While Biden is expected to avoid charges, Trump's indictment under the Espionage Act for retaining classified materials post-presidency highlights a stark contrast in how similar situations are handled.
Such comparisons have fueled allegations of a double standard in the enforcement of laws pertaining to classified information. This issue is particularly sensitive given the high-profile nature of both individuals and their roles in American political life.
The unfolding situation raises important questions about the consistency and impartiality of the justice system, especially in cases involving high-ranking political figures. It also reflects the polarized nature of contemporary American politics, where every legal decision is scrutinized for potential partisan bias.
Scrutiny Intensifies on Justice Department's Decisions
The timeline of events further complicates the narrative. Prior to January 2023, Biden had classified documents in his possession from his time in public office. The discovery of these documents in January, followed by the Wall Street Journal's February report about Hur's likely decision, contrasts sharply with the November 2022 charges against Trump for similar offenses.
House Republicans, in particular, have been vocal about their dissatisfaction with the expected outcome. They argue that the lack of charges against Biden could exacerbate public distrust in the Justice Department, potentially harming its credibility and effectiveness.
Trump's response to the news was swift and scathing. On Truth Social, he criticized the Department of Justice and the media, framing the situation as evidence of corruption and bias. His reaction reflects the deepening divide in American politics, where perceptions of justice and fairness are increasingly viewed through a partisan lens.
Turner Criticizes Expected Outcome in Biden's Case
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner's comments capture the essence of the Republican critique. He views the lack of charges against Biden as a failure of justice, undermining the integrity of the Department of Justice and the national security apparatus.
"You can't hoard documents in your home for a decade-long period, concealing them, taking them home as a senator, a vice president, and then suddenly say, 'hey, two weeks while I was president, I cooperated and therefore it doesn't count that I spent 10 years as a serial classified-documents hoarder.'"
Turner's criticism extends beyond the decision itself, delving into the broader implications of how justice is perceived and administered in the United States. His remarks reflect a growing concern among some that the justice system may be influenced by political considerations rather than being purely based on legal merits.
· Special counsel Hur is expected to forgo charges against President Biden for possessing classified documents as a private citizen.
· House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner argues this indicates a "two-tier system of justice."
· Documents dating back to his time as a senator and vice president were found at Biden's home and former office.
· Former President Trump was charged under the Espionage Act for possessing classified materials at Mar-a-Lago.
· Republicans are increasing their scrutiny of the Justice Department.
· The White House dismisses these criticisms as a "baseless fishing expedition."
Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors: Rumors:
This is just ‘Informational’ and YOU
must make up YOUR OWN MIND
There is a lot of INFORMATION here... Things are happening FAST!
Mon. 20 Nov. David Wilcock Update:
· There is also financial warfare taking place against the US Corporation. The Chinese have been dumping US Treasuries in an attempt to collapse the FRB and their Washington DC subsidiary. This prompted the KM to retaliate by hacking Chinese bank computer systems. Reuters reported this attack.
· A ransomware attack on the industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) disrupted some trades in the U.S. Treasury market on Thursday, the Treasury Department said.
· Canadian intelligence agency says what really happened was:
“The Fed put out a $24 TRILLION bond for countries to buy to cover the debt- NO ONE BOUGHT EVEN A PENNY. China bought oil futures from IRAN and paid 33 TRILLION BUT NOT IN US $ – what does that tell you about the USA in world affairs; THEY ARE FINISHED”
· These battles are taking place in the run-up to the summit meeting between “President” Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping on November 15th... [now completed]. Our sources tell us “Biden” (the Rockefellers) will try to appease Xi by offering the State of California to China.
· However, the Chinese have made it clear the US has to “let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.”
· The Chinese foreign ministry notes “the United States has fought or been militarily involved with almost all the 190-odd countries recognized by the United Nations .
· No wonder the so-called King Charles III of England has been deposed, according to MI6 (white hats) after making a speech claiming among other things:
The European Union is seeking to introduce a “German plan” that would result in “the annihilation of the Polish state”, Jarosław Kaczyński, the chairman of Poland’s ruling party, warns.
· “A ‘Defense Union’ is also to be established, which will be able to use Polish armed forces without the consent of the government in Warsaw,” warns Jerzy Kwaśniewski – President of the Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture. “The European treaties do not contain a definition of the rule of law,” he adds.
Back to Natural Law. Goodbye - Maritime Law:
Let’s start with the fact that this proves that you don’t own any stocks. You don’t own any bonds. You don’t own any cash in the system. They own it. They use the legalese against you, the strawman. You are technically speaking, the beneficial owner, subject to the entitlement, but not the direct owner. This problem is very old, maybe even ancient. This is what the English Crown has been trying to do since the Bank of England was created in 1694, to take back what they view as theirs, particularly what was lost during the Revolutionary War. The King dispatches his agents into foreign lands, in an attempt to take whatever, it can back, in any way shape or form (again, think of this going on for hundreds of years). And this invisible force can reprint it (called re-hypothecation), currently done through the NY Fed’s ESF, over and over and over.
So, what happens is the banks and brokerage houses act as intermediaries for the DTCC, literally acting as a “Central Asset Clearing Depository” where they hold all of the actual (real) shares, instead of the fake synthetic shares. “Fichelin’s” (fake Chinese Michelin knockoff stocks and bonds), for example might be sitting in your brokerage or 401(k) at Fidelity, Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, etc. So essentially, all variations of shares of stocks and bonds within all forms such as mutual funds, ETFs, even directly holding stock and bonds within the system are no different than crypto coins sitting at Coinbase; that in legalese, the brokerage or banking deposit is actually a synthetic claim. All shares are synthetic in the system. AMC and GME Apes have found this lesson out the hard way. The scariest and craziest thing is that they can basically push a button to say that the whole financial system is insolvent, and the existing Case Law on Bankruptcy backs the claim that a handful of unknown people (secured senior creditors of the DTCC) could wind up owning all of the assets within the system.
It sounds far-fetched, but we don’t know what they will do. We just have to put the facts together to see what is possible, and then run probability estimates. These are the reasons the elites and most politicians within the system hate Gold, Silver AND Bitcoin – because they can’t get away with their monetary crimes against humanity, because they have no strawman! So, get into hard assets and things that actually have value! The paper unwind is about to begin. Enjoy the show.